- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Extremal black hole with a unique ground state

Swapnamay Mondal

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 026010 – Published 13 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/n2p6-1ksm

Abstract

Recent computations in gravity suggest that nonsupersymmetric extremal black holes lack any sizeable ground state degeneracy. We confirm this for a D-brane description of nonsupersymmetric four-charge extremal black holes in N=8 string theory. The microscopic description comprises four stacks of D-branes wrapping various cycles of the internal six torus and intersecting at a point. The orientations of the stacks are such that supersymmetry is broken completely. We construct the low energy worldline Lagrangian for the brane system, which is seen to have 32 Goldstinos and 28 Goldstones. The Hamiltonian has a unique ground state, which carries a nonzero energy implying the absence of any truly extremal state. Our arguments rely on symmetry and hence should hold in the supergravity regime as well.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (42)

  1. D. N. Page, arXiv:hep-th/0012020.
  2. J. Preskill, P. Schwarz, A. D. Shapere, S. Trivedi, and F. Wilczek, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 06, 2353 (1991).
  3. J. M. Maldacena, J. Michelson, and A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (1999) 011.
  4. L. V. Iliesiu and G. J. Turiaci, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 145.
  5. A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 379, 99 (1996).
  6. J. M. Maldacena, A. Strominger, and E. Witten, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (1997) 002.
  7. J. C. Breckenridge, D. A. Lowe, R. C. Myers, A. W. Peet, A. Strominger, and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 381, 423 (1996).
  8. J. M. Maldacena, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7645 (1997).
  9. G. T. Horowitz, J. M. Maldacena, and A. Strominger, Phys. Lett. B 383, 151 (1996).
  10. K. Sfetsos and K. Skenderis, Nucl. Phys. B517, 179 (1998).
  11. J. M. Maldacena, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3736 (1998).
  12. J. M. Maldacena, Nucl. Phys. B477, 168 (1996).
  13. G. T. Horowitz, D. A. Lowe, and J. M. Maldacena, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 430 (1996).
  14. A. Dabholkar, Phys. Lett. B 402, 53 (1997).
  15. U. H. Danielsson, A. Guijosa, and M. Kruczenski, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2001) 011.
  16. M. Cvetic and D. Youm, Nucl. Phys. B477, 449 (1996).
  17. M. Cvetic and A. A. Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B537, 381 (1999).
  18. M. Cvetic, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, Nucl. Phys. B549, 194 (1999).
  19. S. R. Das, Phys. Rev. D 56, 3582 (1997).
  20. J.-G. Zhou, H. J. W. Muller-Kirsten, J. Q. Liang, and F. Zimmerschied, Nucl. Phys. B487, 155 (1997).

  21. We thank Roberto Emparan for drawing our attention to this issue.

  22. R. Minasian, G. W. Moore, and D. Tsimpis, Commun. Math. Phys. 209, 325 (2000).
  23. R. Emparan and G. T. Horowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 141601 (2006).
  24. A. Chowdhury, R. S. Garavuso, S. Mondal, and A. Sen, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 186.
  25. A. Chowdhury, R. S. Garavuso, S. Mondal, and A. Sen, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2016) 082.
  26. T. Ortin, Phys. Lett. B 422, 93 (1998).
  27. E. G. Gimon, F. Larsen, and J. Simon, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2008) 040.
  28. E. G. Gimon, F. Larsen, and J. Simon, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2009) 052.
  29. D. Shih, A. Strominger, and X. Yin, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2006) 037.
  30. T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5112 (1997).
  31. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B460, 335 (1996).

  32. E.g. for the D2 brane wrapping the 45 directions, ϕ1 will be the Wilson line along 45, whereas ϕ2,ϕ3 will be the transverse coordinates along 67,89. For the D6 branes all three scalars describe Wilson lines.

  33. P. Fayet and J. Iliopoulos, Phys. Lett. 51B, 461 (1974).
  34. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/n2p6-1ksm for F-term equations.
  35. J. Manschot and S. Mondal, Phys. Rev. D 107, L121903 (2023).
  36. F. Denef, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2002) 023.
  37. I. Bena, M. Berkooz, J. de Boer, S. El-Showk, and D. Van den Bleeken, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2012) 171.
  38. A. Sen, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2009) 068.
  39. A. Dabholkar, J. Gomes, S. Murthy, and A. Sen, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2011) 034.
  40. A. Sen, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43, 2171 (2011).
  41. K. Bringmann and S. Murthy, Commun. Num. Theor Phys. 7, 15 (2013).
  42. S. Mondal, SciPost Phys. 18, 103 (2025).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 026010– Published 13 January, 2026
  • Received 17 June 2025
  • Accepted 12 December 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation