Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Radiated angular momentum from spinning black hole scattering trajectories

Gustav Mogull1,2,3,*, Jan Plefka1,†, and Kathrin Stoldt1,‡

  • *Contact author: g.mogull@qmul.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: jan.plefka@hu-berlin.de
  • ‡Contact author: kathrin.stoldt.1@hu-berlin.de

Phys. Rev. D 112, 124076 – Published 26 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/my38-14k5

Abstract

Using the worldline quantum field theory approach, we derive solutions to the equations of motion for spinning massive bodies up to quadratic order in spins. At leading post-Minkowskian (PM) order, these trajectories are obtained in the time domain, and at subleading order, they are obtained in the frequency domain. Our approach incorporates diagrammatic techniques and modern Feynman integration technologies and includes a family of loop integrals different to those seen in asymptotic PM calculations. Our results provide a new mechanism for computing the radiated angular momentum involved in gravitational scattering, which we reproduce at 2PM order up to linear spins. We have established a framework for computing higher-order effects to further extend the high-precision frontier in analytical gravitational wave physics and push predictions for the radiated angular momentum to higher perturbative orders.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (110)

  1. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  2. R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific Collaboration), GWTC-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023).
  3. P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA Collaboration), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv:1702.00786.
  4. M. Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 194002 (2010).
  5. S. W. Ballmer et al., Snowmass2021 cosmic frontier white paper: Future gravitational-wave detector facilities, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), p. 3, https://inspirehep.net/literature/2053400.
  6. A. Abac et al., The science of the Einstein Telescope, arXiv:2503.12263.
  7. S. J. Kovacs and K. S. Thorne, The generation of gravitational waves. 4. Bremsstrahlung, Astrophys. J. 224, 62 (1978).
  8. K. Westpfahl and M. Goller, Gravitational scattering of two relativistic particles in postlinear approximation, Lett. Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 26, 573 (1979).
  9. L. Bel, T. Damour, N. Deruelle, J. Ibanez, and J. Martin, Poincaré-invariant gravitational field and equations of motion of two pointlike objects: The postlinear approximation of general relativity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 13, 963 (1981).
  10. T. Damour, High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem, Phys. Rev. D 97, 044038 (2018).
  11. S. Hopper, A. Nagar, and P. Rettegno, Strong-field scattering of two spinning black holes: Numerics versus analytics, Phys. Rev. D 107, 124034 (2023).
  12. G. Kälin and R. A. Porto, Post-Minkowskian effective field theory for conservative binary dynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 106.
  13. G. Kälin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Conservative dynamics of binary systems to third post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 261103 (2020).
  14. G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, Classical black hole scattering from a worldline quantum field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 048.
  15. C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Dynamics of binary systems to fourth post-Minkowskian order from the effective field theory approach, Phys. Lett. B 831, 137203 (2022).
  16. C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Conservative dynamics of binary systems at fourth post-Minkowskian order in the large-eccentricity expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 161104 (2022).
  17. M. M. Riva and F. Vernizzi, Radiated momentum in the post-Minkowskian worldline approach via reverse unitarity, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 228.
  18. C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, J. Neef, and R. A. Porto, Radiation reaction and gravitational waves at fourth post-Minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 101401 (2023).
  19. Z. Liu, R. A. Porto, and Z. Yang, Spin effects in the effective field theory approach to post-Minkowskian conservative dynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 012.
  20. C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Bootstrapping the relativistic two-body problem, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 109.
  21. G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, Classical gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a worldline quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 201103 (2021).
  22. G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, SUSY in the sky with gravitons, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 027.
  23. G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and B. Sauer, All things retarded: Radiation-reaction in worldline quantum field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 128.
  24. A. Luna, I. Nicholson, D. O’Connell, and C. D. White, Inelastic black hole scattering from charged scalar amplitudes, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 044.
  25. D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, Amplitudes, observables, and classical scattering, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 137.
  26. N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, G. Festuccia, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, General relativity from scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 171601 (2018).
  27. Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Scattering amplitudes and the conservative Hamiltonian for binary systems at third post-Minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 201603 (2019).
  28. Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Black hole binary dynamics from the double copy and effective theory, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 206.
  29. A. Cristofoli, P. H. Damgaard, P. Di Vecchia, and C. Heissenberg, Second-order post-Minkowskian scattering in arbitrary dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 122.
  30. N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, Post-Minkowskian radial action from soft limits and velocity cuts, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 071.
  31. C. Cheung and M. P. Solon, Classical gravitational scattering at O(G3) from Feynman diagrams, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 144.
  32. N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, The amplitude for classical gravitational scattering at third post-Minkowskian order, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 172.
  33. P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, Universality of ultra-relativistic gravitational scattering, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135924 (2020).
  34. P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, The eikonal approach to gravitational scattering and radiation at O(G3), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 169.
  35. P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, Radiation reaction from soft theorems, Phys. Lett. B 818, 136379 (2021).
  36. P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, Classical gravitational observables from the Eikonal operator, Phys. Lett. B 843, 138049 (2023).
  37. P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, The gravitational eikonal: From particle, string and brane collisions to black-hole encounters, Phys. Rep. 1083, 1 (2024).
  38. C. Heissenberg, Angular momentum loss due to tidal effects in the post-Minkowskian expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 011603 (2023).
  39. T. Damour, Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order in G, Phys. Rev. D 102, 124008 (2020).
  40. E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, Radiative classical gravitational observables at O(G3) from scattering amplitudes, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 148.
  41. P. H. Damgaard, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, Heavy black hole effective theory, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2019) 070.
  42. P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante, and P. Vanhove, On an exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 213.
  43. P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, The relation between KMOC and worldline formalisms for classical gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 059.
  44. R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, On-shell heavy particle effective theories, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 051.
  45. M. Accettulli Huber, A. Brandhuber, S. De Angelis, and G. Travaglini, From amplitudes to gravitational radiation with cubic interactions and tidal effects, Phys. Rev. D 103, 045015 (2021).
  46. A. Brandhuber, G. Chen, G. Travaglini, and C. Wen, Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 118.
  47. Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon et al., Scattering amplitudes and conservative binary dynamics at O(G4), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 171601 (2021).
  48. Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Scattering amplitudes, the tail effect, and conservative binary dynamics at O(G4), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 161103 (2022).
  49. P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, Classical observables from the exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 183.
  50. M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, Conservative black hole scattering at fifth post-Minkowskian and first self-force order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 241402 (2024).
  51. M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering, Nature (London) 641, 603 (2025).
  52. Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Zeng, Conservative binary dynamics at order α5 in electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 251601 (2024).
  53. Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Zeng, Amplitudes, supersymmetric black hole scattering at O(G5), and loop integration, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 023.
  54. S. Mougiakakos, M. M. Riva, and F. Vernizzi, Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in the post-Minkowskian effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104, 024041 (2021).
  55. G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, Gravitational Bremsstrahlung and hidden supersymmetry of spinning bodies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 011101 (2022).
  56. A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, D. A. Kosower, and D. O’Connell, Waveforms from amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 106, 056007 (2022).
  57. A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De Angelis, J. Gowdy, and G. Travaglini, One-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy-mass effective field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 048.
  58. A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, J. Gowdy, and G. Travaglini, Resummed spinning waveforms from five-point amplitudes, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 026.
  59. S. De Angelis, P. P. Novichkov, and R. Gonzo, Spinning waveforms from the Kosower-Maybee-O’Connell formalism at leading order, Phys. Rev. D 110, L041502 (2024).
  60. A. Herderschee, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, The sub-leading scattering waveform from amplitudes, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 004.
  61. S. Caron-Huot, M. Giroux, H. S. Hannesdottir, and S. Mizera, What can be measured asymptotically?, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 139.
  62. L. Bohnenblust, H. Ita, M. Kraus, and J. Schlenk, Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in black-hole scattering at O(G3): Linear-in-spin effects, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 109.
  63. D. Bini, T. Damour, S. De Angelis, A. Geralico, A. Herderschee, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, Gravitational waveforms: A tale of two formalisms, Phys. Rev. D 109, 125008 (2024).
  64. G. Brunello and S. De Angelis, An improved framework for computing waveforms, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 062.
  65. A. Elkhidir, D. O’Connell, M. Sergola, and I. A. Vazquez-Holm, Radiation and reaction at one loop, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 272.
  66. A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg, and I. Vazquez-Holm, Inelastic exponentiation and classical gravitational scattering at one loop, J. High Energy Phys. 2023 (2023) 126.
  67. L. Bohnenblust, H. Ita, M. Kraus, and J. Schlenk, Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in Black-Hole Scattering at O(G3): Quadratic-in-Spin Effects, arXiv:2505.15724.
  68. J. Vines, Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 084002 (2018).
  69. Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, Binary dynamics through the fifth power of spin at O(G2), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 201402 (2023).
  70. R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, Classical gravitational scattering amplitude at O(G2S1∞S2∞), Phys. Rev. D 108, 024050 (2023).
  71. Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban, T. Scheopner, F. Teng, and J. Vines, Quantum field theory, worldline theory, and spin magnitude change in orbital evolution, Phys. Rev. D 109, 045011 (2024).
  72. F. Febres Cordero, M. Kraus, G. Lin, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, Conservative binary dynamics with a spinning black hole at O(G3) from scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 021601 (2023).
  73. M. Alaverdian, Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban, T. Scheopner, and F. Teng, Conservative spin-magnitude change in orbital evolution in general relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 101602 (2025).
  74. M. Alaverdian, Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban, T. Scheopner et al., Observables and unconstrained spin tensor dynamics in general relativity from scattering amplitudes, arXiv:2503.03739.
  75. L. Bohnenblust, L. Cangemi, H. Johansson, and P. Pichini, Binary Kerr black-hole scattering at 2PM from quantum higher-spin Compton, arXiv:2410.23271.
  76. K. Haddad, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, and J. Plefka, Spinning bodies in general relativity from bosonic worldline oscillators, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 019.
  77. D. Bonocore, A. Kulesza, and J. Pirsch, Higher-spin effects in black hole and neutron star binary dynamics: Worldline supersymmetry beyond minimal coupling, arXiv:2505.11488.
  78. G. U. Jakobsen and G. Mogull, Conservative and radiative dynamics of spinning bodies at third post-Minkowskian order using worldline quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 141102 (2022).
  79. G. U. Jakobsen and G. Mogull, Linear response, Hamiltonian, and radiative spinning two-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044033 (2023).
  80. G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and Y. Xu, Conservative scattering of spinning black holes at fourth post-Minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151401 (2023).
  81. G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and B. Sauer, Dissipative scattering of spinning black holes at fourth post-Minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 241402 (2023).
  82. A. V. Manohar, A. K. Ridgway, and C.-H. Shen, Radiated angular momentum and dissipative effects in classical scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 121601 (2022).
  83. D. Bini and T. Damour, Gravitational radiation reaction along general orbits in the effective one-body formalism, Phys. Rev. D 86, 124012 (2012).
  84. D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Radiative contributions to gravitational scattering, Phys. Rev. D 104, 084031 (2021).
  85. C. Heissenberg, Angular momentum loss due to spin-orbit effects in the post-Minkowskian expansion, Phys. Rev. D 108, 106003 (2023).
  86. C. Heissenberg and R. Russo, Revisiting gravitational angular momentum and mass dipole losses in the eikonal framework, Classical Quantum Gravity 42, 045014 (2025).
  87. C. Heissenberg, Radiation-reaction and angular momentum loss at O(G4), arXiv:2501.02904.
  88. F. Alessio, R. Gonzo, and C. Shi, Dirac brackets for classical radiative observables, arXiv:2506.03249.
  89. K. Westpfahl, On general relativistic dynamics of classical spin particles. (In German), Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 22, 345 (1969), https://inspirehep.net/literature/58821.
  90. K. Westpfahl and H. Hoyler, Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in postlinear fast motion approximation, Lett. Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 27, 581 (1980).
  91. K. Westpfahl, High-speed scattering of charged and uncharged particles in general relativity, Fortschr. Phys. 33, 417 (1985).
  92. D. Bini and T. Damour, Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems at the second post-Minkowskian approximation, Phys. Rev. D 98, 044036 (2018).
  93. D. Bini and T. Damour, Radiation-reaction and angular momentum loss at the second post-Minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. D 106, 124049 (2022).
  94. D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Explicit solution of the gravitational two-body problem at the second post-Minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. D 110, 104051 (2024).
  95. G. U. Jakobsen, Gravitational scattering of compact bodies from Worldline quantum field theory, Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt U., Berlin, 2023, 10.18452/27075.
  96. G. Veneziano and G. A. Vilkovisky, Angular momentum loss in gravitational scattering, radiation reaction, and the Bondi gauge ambiguity, Phys. Lett. B 834, 137419 (2022).
  97. T. Damour and N. Deruelle, Radiation reaction and angular momentum loss in small angle gravitational scattering, Phys. Lett. A 87, 81 (1981).
  98. C. R. Galley, Classical mechanics of nonconservative systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 174301 (2013).
  99. G. Kälin, J. Neef, and R. A. Porto, Radiation-reaction in the effective field theory approach to post-Minkowskian dynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 140.
  100. G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and K. Stoldt, Radiated Angular Momentum from Spinning Black Hole Scattering Trajectories, (2025), 10.5281/zenodo.15740904.
  101. A. Antonelli, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, M. van de Meent, and J. Vines, Energetics of two-body Hamiltonians in post-Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D 99, 104004 (2019).
  102. M. Khalil, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, and J. Vines, Energetics and scattering of gravitational two-body systems at fourth post-Minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. D 106, 024042 (2022).
  103. A. Buonanno, G. U. Jakobsen, and G. Mogull, Post-Minkowskian theory meets the spinning effective-one-body approach for two-body scattering, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044038 (2024).
  104. A. Buonanno, G. Mogull, R. Patil, and L. Pompili, Post-Minkowskian theory meets the spinning effective-one-body approach for bound-orbit waveforms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 211402 (2024).
  105. C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Local in time conservative binary dynamics at fourth post-Minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 221401 (2024).
  106. T. Damour, A. Nagar, A. Placidi, and P. Rettegno, A novel Lagrange-multiplier approach to the effective-one-body dynamics of binary systems in post-Minkowskian gravity, arXiv:2503.05487.
  107. P. Maierhöfer, J. Usovitsch, and P. Uwer, Kira—A Feynman integral reduction program, Comput. Phys. Commun. 230, 99 (2018).
  108. J. Klappert, F. Lange, P. Maierhöfer, and J. Usovitsch, Integral reduction with Kira 2.0 and finite field methods, Comput. Phys. Commun. 266, 108024 (2021).
  109. A. Pak and A. Smirnov, Geometric approach to asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1626 (2011).
  110. B. Jantzen, A. V. Smirnov, and V. A. Smirnov, Expansion by regions: Revealing potential and Glauber regions automatically, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2139 (2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation