Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Existence of a supersymmetric extension of the gauged nonlinear Σ model and the transition from integrability to chaos

Fabrizio Canfora*

Nicolás Grandi†

Marcelo Oyarzo‡

  • *Contact author: fabrizio.canfora@uss.cl
  • †Contact author: grandi@fisica.unlp.edu.ar
  • ‡Contact author: moyarzo2016@udec.cl

Phys. Rev. D 111, 114026 – Published 23 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mqc2-rzwb

Abstract

The nonlinear Σ model minimally coupled with Maxwell theory in 3+1 dimensions possesses a topologically nontrivial sector characterized by lasagnalike configurations. We demonstrate that, when a specific quantization condition is met, the associated second-order field equations admit a first-order Bogomol’nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield system. This discloses the existence of a (1+1)-dimensional supersymmetric extension with N=2 supercharges. We examine its imprint on the time-dependent regime, with particular emphasis on the transition from integrability to chaos.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (76)

  1. N. Manton and P. Sutcliffe, Topological Solitons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).
  2. A. Balachandran, G. Marmo, B. Skagerstam, and A. Stern, Classical Topology and Quantum States (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).
  3. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B250, 465 (1985).
  4. V. P. Nair, Quantum Field Theory: A Modern Perspective (Springer, New York, 2005).
  5. S. Scherer and M. R. Schindler, A Primer for Chiral Perturbation Theory, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012), ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat].
  6. J. Donoghue, E. Golowich, and B. Holstein, Dynamics of the Standard Model (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1994).
  7. R. Machleidt and D. R. Entem, Phys. Rep. 503, 1 (2011).
  8. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 158, 142 (1984).
  9. H. Leutwyler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 235, 165 (1994).
  10. G. Ecker, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 35, 1 (1995).
  11. S. Scherer, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 27, 277 (2003).
  12. S. Carignano, A. Mammarella, and M. Mannarelli, Phys. Rev. D 93, 051503 (2016).
  13. D. G. Ravenhall, C. J. Pethick, and J. R. Wilson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 2066 (1983).
  14. M. Hashimoto, H. Seki, and M. Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 71, 320 (1984).
  15. C. J. Horowitz, D. K. Berry, C. M. Briggs, M. E. Caplan, A. Cumming, and A. S. Schneider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 031102 (2015).
  16. D. K. Berry, M. E. Caplan, C. J. Horowitz, G. Huber, and A. S. Schneider, Phys. Rev. C 94, 055801 (2016).
  17. J. A. Lopez, C. O. Dorso, and G. A. Frank, Nucl. Phys. A978, 35 (2018); A1002, 122004 (2020); Front. Phys. (Beijing) 16, 24301 (2021); M. R. Pelicer, M. Antonelli, D. P. Menezes, and F. Gulminelli, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 521, 743 (2023); R. Nandi and S. Schramm, Astrophys. J. 852, 135 (2018); D. G. Yakovlev, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 453, 581 (2015).
  18. G. V. Dunne and M. Thies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 121602 (2013); G. Basar, G. V. Dunne, and M. Thies, Phys. Rev. D 79, 105012 (2009); O. Schnetz, M. Thies, and K. Urlichs, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 321, 2604 (2006); M. Thies, Phys. Rev. D 98, 096019 (2018); 101, 014010 (2020); 101, 074013 (2020); 102, 096006 (2020); 107, 076024 (2023); P. Adhikari, J. O. Andersen, and P. Kneschke, 96, 016013 (2017); 98, 099902(E) (2018).
  19. F. Canfora and H. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 87, 084049 (2013).
  20. F. Canfora, Phys. Rev. D 88, 065028 (2013); Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 929 (2018).
  21. S. Chen, Y. Li, and Y. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 89, 025007 (2014).
  22. F. Canfora, F. Correa, and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. D 90, 085002 (2014).
  23. F. Canfora, M. Di Mauro, M. A. Kurkov, and A. Naddeo, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 443 (2015).
  24. E. Ayon-Beato, F. Canfora, and J. Zanelli, Phys. Lett. B 752, 201 (2016).
  25. F. Canfora and G. Tallarita, Nucl. Phys. B21, 394 (2017).
  26. F. Canfora, S. Carignano, M. Lagos, M. Mannarelli, and A. Vera, Phys. Rev. D 103, 076003 (2021).
  27. P. D. Alvarez, F. Canfora, N. Dimakis, and A. Paliathanasis, Phys. Lett. B 773, 401 (2017).
  28. L. Aviles, F. Canfora, N. Dimakis, and D. Hidalgo, Phys. Rev. D 96, 125005 (2017).
  29. F. Canfora, M. Lagos, S. H. Oh, J. Oliva, and A. Vera, Phys. Rev. D 98, 085003 (2018).
  30. F. Canfora, N. Dimakis, and A. Paliathanasis, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 139 (2019).
  31. S. L. Cacciatori, F. Canfora, M. Lagos, F. Muscolino, and A. Vera, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 150; Nucl. Phys. B76, 115693 (2022).
  32. G. Baym, B. L. Friman, and G. Grinstein, Nucl. Phys. B10, 193 (1982).
  33. Y. Hidaka, K. Kamikado, T. Kanazawa, and T. Noumi, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034003 (2015).
  34. M. Buballa and S. Carignano, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 81, 39 (2015).
  35. P. de Forcrand and U. Wenger, Proc. Sci. LAT2006 (2006) 152 [arXiv:hep-lat/0610117].
  36. T. Brauner and N. Yamamoto, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 132.
  37. X.-G. Huang, K. Nishimura, and N. Yamamoto, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 069.
  38. A. I. Larkin and Yu. N. Ovchinnikov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1136 (1964) [Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 762 (1965)].
  39. P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Phys. Rev. 135, A550 (1964).
  40. P. de Forcrand, Proc. Sci. LAT2009 (2009) 010 [arXiv:1005.0539].
  41. J. B. Kogut and M. A. Stephanov, The Phases of Quantum Chromodynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2004).
  42. N. Brambilla et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2981 (2014).
  43. A. Bzdak, S. Esumi, V. Koch, J. Liao, M. Stephanov et al., Phys. Rep. 853, 1 (2020).
  44. K. Nagata, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 127, 103991 (2022).
  45. N. Yu. Astrakhantsev, V. V. Braguta, N. V. Kolomoyets, A. Yu. Kotov, D. D. Kuznedelev, A. A. Nikolaev, and A. Roenko, Phys. Part. Nucl. 52, 536 (2021); N. Astrakhantsev, V. Braguta, M. Cardinali, M. D. Elia, L. Maio et al., Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2022) 119; B. B. Brandt, F. Cuteri, G. Endrődi, G. Mark, L. Sandbote, and A. D. M. Valois, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 229.
  46. M. F. Sohnius, Phys. Rep. 128, 39 (1985).
  47. S. B. Gudnason, M. Nitta, and S. Sasaki, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 074; 01 (2017) 014(E).
  48. T. H. R. Skyrme, Proc. R. Soc. A 260, 127 (1961); 262, 237 (1961); Nucl. Phys. 31, 556 (1962).
  49. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. A223, 433 (1983).
  50. A. P. Balachandran, V. P. Nair, N. Panchapakesan, and S. G. Rajeev, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2830 (1983).
  51. G. S. Adkins, C. R. Nappi, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B228, 552 (1983).
  52. B. J. Schroers, Phys. Lett. B 356, 291 (1995).
  53. K. Arthur and D. H. Tchrakian, Phys. Lett. B 378, 187 (1996).
  54. J. Gladikowski, B. M. A. G. Piette, and B. J. Schroers, Phys. Rev. D 53, 844 (1996).
  55. Y. M. Cho and K. Kimm, Phys. Rev. D 52, 7325 (1995).
  56. Y. Brihaye and D. H. Tchrakian, Nonlinearity 11, 891 (1998).
  57. A. Yu. Loginov and V. V. Gauzshtein, Phys. Lett. B 784, 112 (2018).
  58. C. Adam, C. Naya, T. Romanczukiewicz, J. Sanchez-Guillena, and A. Wereszczynski, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2015) 155.
  59. C. Adam, T. Romanczukiewicz, J. Sanchez-Guillen, and A. Wereszczynski, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2014) 095.
  60. A. Alonso-Izquierdo, W. Garc𝚤a Fuertes, and J. Mateos Guilarte, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 139.
  61. S. Chimento, T. Ortin, and A. Ruiperez, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 107.
  62. F. Canfora, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 007.
  63. F. Canfora, M. Lagos, and A. Vera, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 224.
  64. T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5112 (1997); J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 106.
  65. P. V. Buividovich, Phys. Rev. D 106, 046001 (2022); T. McLoughlin, R. Pereira, and A. Spiering, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 124; as well as SciPost Phys. 14, 049 (2023); T. Akutagawa, K. Hashimoto, T. Sasaki, and R. Watanabe, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 013.
  66. G. Z. Baseian, S. G. Matinyan, and G. K. Savvidy, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 29, 641 (1979); G. K. Savvidy, Phys. Lett. 159B, 325 (1985); S. G. Matinyan, G. K. Savvidy, and N. G. Ter-Arutunian Savvidy, Sov. Phys. JETP 53, 421 (1981).
  67. M. Luscher, Nucl. Phys. B219, 233 (1983); G. K. Savvidy, B246, 302 (1984).
  68. F. Canfora, N. Grandi, M. Oyarzo, and J. Oliva, Nucl. Phys. B1004, 116553 (2024).
  69. C. G. Callan, Jr. and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B239, 161 (1984).
  70. Sergei Ketov, Scholarpedia 4, 8508 (2009).
  71. M. Gell-Mann and M. Lévy, Nuovo Cimento (1955–1965) 16, 705 (1960).
  72. F. Gürsey, Nuovo Cimento (1955–1965) 16, 230 (1960).
  73. S. Bertini, S. L. Cacciatori, and B. L. Cerchiai, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 47, 043510 (2006).
  74. S. L. Cacciatori, F. Dalla Piazza, and A. Scotti, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 369, 4709 (2017).
  75. T. E. Tilma and G. Sudarshan, J. Geom. Phys. 52, 263 (2004).
  76. E. Witten and D. I. Olive, Phys. Lett. 78B, 97 (1978).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation