We make several comments on the recent work in Rogers et al. [Phys. Rev. D 111, 056001 (2025)] while also reaffirming and adding to the work in Pitonyak et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 011902 (2024)]. We show that the factorization formula for $e^{+}{e}^{-}\to (h_1\cdots h_n)X$ in Rogers et al. is equivalent to a version one can derive using the definition of a $n$-hadron fragmentation function (FF) introduced in Pitonyak et al.. In addition, we scrutinize how to generalize the number density definition of a single-hadron FF to a $n$-hadron FF, arguing that the definition given in Pitonyak et al. should be considered the standard one while the definition in Rogers et al. has no clear interpretation. We also emphasize that the evolution equations for dihadron FFs (DiFFs) in Pitonyak et al. have the same splitting functions as those for single-hadron FFs. Therefore, the DiFF (and $n$-hadron FF) definitions in Pitonyak et al. have a natural number density interpretation and, contrary to what is stated in Rogers et al., are consistent with collinear factorization using the standard hard factors and evolution kernels.

Close

PrevNext

Reuse & PermissionsView figure in article

• Fragmentation functions
• Nonperturbative effects in field theory
• Perturbation theory
• Quantum chromodynamics
• Quark & gluon jets