Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantum thermal machines in BTZ black hole spacetime

Dimitris Moustos* and Obinna Abah†

  • School of Mathematics, Statistics, and Physics, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom

  • *Contact author: dimitris.moustos@newcastle.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: obinna.abah@newcastle.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 111, 105030 – Published 30 May, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lm63-71rd

Abstract

We investigate an Otto thermodynamic cycle with a qubit Unruh-DeWitt detector as the working medium, coupled to a massless, conformally coupled scalar quantum field in the Hartle-Hawking vacuum in a (2+1)-dimensional BTZ black hole spacetime. We employ the thermal properties of the field to model heat and cold reservoirs between which the thermal machine operates. Treating the detector as an open quantum system, we employ a master equation to study its finite-time dynamics during each cycle stroke. We evaluate the output performance of the Otto heat engine and refrigerator by computing, respectively, the total work output and the cooling power for each of the Neumann, transparent, and Dirichlet boundary condition cases satisfied by the field at spatial infinity. Furthermore, we evaluate the optimal performance of the thermal machine by analyzing its efficiency at maximum power output and ecological impact. Our study presents a general framework for understanding the finite-time operation of relativistic quantum thermal machines, focusing on their energy optimization.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (69)

  1. S. Vinjanampathy and J. Anders, Quantum thermodynamics, Contemp. Phys. 57, 545 (2016).
  2. F. Binder, L. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso, Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Fundamental Aspects and New Directions, Fundamental Theories of Physics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2018).
  3. S. Deffner and S. Campbell, Quantum Thermodynamics, 2053-2571 (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, 2019).
  4. P. P. Potts, Quantum thermodynamics, arXiv:2406.19206.
  5. N. M. Myers, O. Abah, and S. Deffner, Quantum thermodynamic devices: From theoretical proposals to experimental reality, AVS Quantum Sci. 4, 027101 (2022).
  6. O. Abah, J. Roßnagel, G. Jacob, S. Deffner, F. Schmidt-Kaler, K. Singer, and E. Lutz, Single-ion heat engine at maximum power, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203006 (2012).
  7. O. Abah and E. Lutz, Optimal performance of a quantum Otto refrigerator, Europhys. Lett. 113, 60002 (2016).
  8. R. Kosloff and Y. Rezek, The quantum harmonic Otto cycle, Entropy 19, 136 (2017).
  9. H. B. Callen, Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics (Wiley, New York, NY, 1985).
  10. F. L. Curzon and B. Ahlborn, Efficiency of a Carnot engine at maximum power output, Am. J. Phys. 43, 22 (1975).
  11. S. Deffner, Efficiency of harmonic quantum Otto engines at maximal power, Entropy 20, 875 (2018).
  12. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982).
  13. S. W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).
  14. W. G. Unruh, Notes on black-hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).
  15. B. S. DeWitt, Quantum gravity: The new synthesis, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, edited by S. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1979).
  16. B. L. Hu, S.-Y. Lin, and J. Louko, Relativistic quantum information in detectors–field interactions, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 224005 (2012).
  17. R. B. Mann and T. C. Ralph, Relativistic quantum information, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 220301 (2012).
  18. E. Arias, T. R. de Oliveira, and M. Sarandy, The Unruh quantum Otto engine, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 168.
  19. F. Gray and R. B. Mann, Scalar and fermionic Unruh Otto engines, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 174.
  20. H. Xu and M.-H. Yung, Unruh quantum Otto heat engine with level degeneracy, Phys. Lett. B 801, 135201 (2020).
  21. G. R. Kane and B. R. Majhi, Entangled quantum Unruh Otto engine is more efficient, Phys. Rev. D 104, L041701 (2021).
  22. D. Barman and B. R. Majhi, Constructing an entangled Unruh Otto engine and its efficiency, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 046.
  23. A. Mukherjee, S. Gangopadhyay, and A. S. Majumdar, Unruh quantum Otto engine in the presence of a reflecting boundary, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 105.
  24. K. Gallock-Yoshimura, V. Thakur, and R. B. Mann, Quantum Otto engine driven by quantum fields, Front. Phys. 11, 1287860 (2023).
  25. N. Papadatos, The quantum Otto heat engine with a relativistically moving thermal bath, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 60, 4210 (2021).
  26. N. K. Kollas and D. Moustos, An exactly solvable relativistic quantum Otto engine, Phys. Rev. D 109, 065025 (2024).
  27. K. Gallock-Yoshimura, Relativistic quantum Otto engine: Instant work extraction from a quantum field, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 198.
  28. M. Bañados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, Black hole in three-dimensional spacetime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1849 (1992).
  29. M. Bañados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, Geometry of the 2+1 black hole, Phys. Rev. D 48, 1506 (1993).
  30. G. Lifschytz and M. Ortiz, Scalar field quantization on the (2+1)-dimensional black hole background, Phys. Rev. D 49, 1929 (1994).
  31. S. Carlip, The (2+1)-dimensional black hole, Classical Quantum Gravity 12, 2853 (1995).
  32. L. Hodgkinson and J. Louko, Static, stationary, and inertial Unruh-Dewitt detectors on the BTZ black hole, Phys. Rev. D 86, 064031 (2012).
  33. M. R. Preciado-Rivas, M. Naeem, R. B. Mann, and J. Louko, More excitement across the horizon, Phys. Rev. D 110, 025002 (2024).
  34. M. Spadafora, M. Naeem, M. R. Preciado-Rivas, R. B. Mann, and J. Louko, Deep in the knotted black hole, Phys. Rev. D 111, 065013 (2025).
  35. J. Foo, C. S. Arabaci, M. Zych, and R. B. Mann, Quantum signatures of black hole mass superpositions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 181301 (2022).
  36. L. J. Henderson, R. A. Hennigar, R. B. Mann, A. R. Smith, and J. Zhang, Harvesting entanglement from the black hole vacuum, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 21LT02 (2018).
  37. K. Bueley, L. Huang, K. Gallock-Yoshimura, and R. B. Mann, Harvesting mutual information from BTZ black hole spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 106, 025010 (2022).
  38. Z. Tian, X. Liu, J. Wang, and J. Jing, Dissipative dynamics of an open quantum battery in the BTZ spacetime, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 188.
  39. E. E. Ferketic and S. Deffner, Boosting thermodynamic performance by bending space-time, Europhys. Lett. 141, 19001 (2023).
  40. A. Misra, P. Chattopadhyay, A. Svidzinsky, M. O. Scully, and G. Kurizki, Black-hole powered quantum coherent amplifier, npj Quantum Inf. 10, 34 (2024).
  41. H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, New York, 2007).
  42. F. Angulo-Brown, An ecological optimization criterion for finite-time heat engines, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 7465 (1991).
  43. F. Benatti and R. Floreanini, Entanglement generation in uniformly accelerating atoms: Reexamination of the Unruh effect, Phys. Rev. A 70, 012112 (2004).
  44. D. Moustos and C. Anastopoulos, Non-Markovian time evolution of an accelerated qubit, Phys. Rev. D 95, 025020 (2017).
  45. B. A. Juárez-Aubry and D. Moustos, Asymptotic states for stationary Unruh-Dewitt detectors, Phys. Rev. D 100, 025018 (2019).
  46. H. Yu and J. Zhang, Understanding Hawking radiation in the framework of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. D 77, 024031 (2008).
  47. G. Kaplanek and C. P. Burgess, Hot accelerated qubits: Decoherence, thermalization, secular growth and reliable late-time predictions, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 008.
  48. G. Kaplanek and E. Tjoa, Effective master equations for two accelerated qubits, Phys. Rev. A 107, 012208 (2023).
  49. J. R. Letaw, Stationary world lines and the vacuum excitation of noninertial detectors, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1709 (1981).
  50. S. J. Avis, C. J. Isham, and D. Storey, Quantum field theory in anti-de Sitter space-time, Phys. Rev. D 18, 3565 (1978).
  51. R. Kubo, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. General theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570 (1957).
  52. P. C. Martin and J. Schwinger, Theory of many-particle systems. I, Phys. Rev. 115, 1342 (1959).
  53. R. Tolman, Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology, International Series of Monographs on Physics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1934).
  54. J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, Path-integral derivation of black-hole radiance, Phys. Rev. D 13, 2188 (1976).
  55. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic Press, USA, 2014).
  56. L. J. Henderson, R. A. Hennigar, R. B. Mann, A. R. Smith, and J. Zhang, Anti-Hawking phenomena, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135732 (2020).
  57. Y. Yu, J. Zhang, and H. Yu, The Lamb shift in the BTZ spacetime, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 209.
  58. R. Alicki, The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine, J. Phys. A 12, L103 (1979).
  59. S. Singh and O. Abah, Energy optimization of two-level quantum Otto machines, arXiv:2008.05002.
  60. J. J. Fernández, Optimization of energy production in two-qubit heat engines using the ecological function, Quantum Sci. Technol. 7, 035002 (2022).
  61. Z. Yan and J. Chen, A class of irreversible Carnot refrigeration cycles with a general heat transfer law, J. Phys. D 23, 136 (1990).
  62. P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, Gibbons-Hawking effect in the sonic de Sitter space-time of an expanding Bose-Einstein-condensed gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 240407 (2003).
  63. P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, Observer dependence for the phonon content of the sound field living on the effective curved space-time background of a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. D 69, 064021 (2004).
  64. J. Drori, Y. Rosenberg, D. Bermudez, Y. Silberberg, and U. Leonhardt, Observation of stimulated Hawking radiation in an optical analogue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 010404 (2019).
  65. J. R. Muñoz de Nova, K. Golubkov, V. I. Kolobov, and J. Steinhauer, Observation of thermal Hawking radiation and its temperature in an analogue black hole, Nature (London) 569, 688 (2019).
  66. C. R. Almeida and M. J. Jacquet, Analogue gravity and the Hawking effect: Historical perspective and literature review, Eur. Phys. J. H 48, 15 (2023).
  67. B. Kandemir, Hairy BTZ black hole and its analogue model in graphene, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 413, 168064 (2020).
  68. L. Chen, H. Zhang, and B. Zhang, An optical analogue for rotating BTZ black holes, Commun. Theor. Phys. 75, 035302 (2023).
  69. S. Wu, L. Chen, B. Yi, L. Li, and B. Zhang, Measurement of the inner horizon in the analog of rotating Bañado-teitelboim-Zanelli black holes by an improved photon fluid, Phys. Rev. A 111, 043525 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation