Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Inclusive quasielastic neutrino and antineutrino scattering off nuclei within the Standard Model and beyond

E. Hernández1, J. Nieves2, and J. E. Sobczyk3,4

Phys. Rev. D 112, 053006 – Published 22 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ll9y-1v4z

Abstract

We derive fully general expressions for the inclusive (anti-)neutrino-induced nuclear quasielastic production of a strange or charmed baryon Y, considering all dimension-six new-physics operators relevant to the semileptonic q→q′ℓνℓ transition with both left- and right-handed neutrino fields. We illustrate the formalism by applying it to the Λc production in neutrino-nucleus scattering. The nuclear response is computed using a state-of-the-art ab initio spectral function, based on realistic nuclear many-body wave functions obtained via the coupled-cluster method and a nuclear Hamiltonian derived from chiral effective field theory. We also highlight the role played by the final state interactions between the produced Y hyperon and the residual nuclear system, which can obscure potential new physics signals in this (anti-)neutrino–nucleus reaction. Our results improve upon previous studies that neglected nuclear corrections and uncertainties—effects we show to be comparable to, or even larger than, those expected from new physics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (53)

  1. P. Langacker, The Standard Model and Beyond (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 2017).
  2. S. Banerjee et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV) Collaboration), Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2023, arXiv:2411.18639.
  3. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions B(Bc+→J/ψτ+ντ)/B(Bc+→J/ψμ+νμ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 121801 (2018).
  4. A. Y. Anisimov, I. M. Narodetsky, C. Semay, and B. Silvestre-Brac, The Bc meson lifetime in the light front constituent quark model, Phys. Lett. B 452, 129 (1999).
  5. M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Korner, and P. Santorelli, Exclusive semileptonic and nonleptonic decays of the Bc meson, Phys. Rev. D 73, 054024 (2006).
  6. E. Hernández, J. Nieves, and J. Verde-Velasco, Study of exclusive semileptonic and non-leptonic decays of Bc— in a nonrelativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D 74, 074008 (2006).
  7. T. Huang and F. Zuo, Semileptonic Bc decays and charmonium distribution amplitude, Eur. Phys. J. C 51, 833 (2007).
  8. W. Wang, Y.-L. Shen, and C.-D. Lu, Covariant light-front approach for B(c) transition form factors, Phys. Rev. D 79, 054012 (2009).
  9. W.-F. Wang, Y.-Y. Fan, and Z.-J. Xiao, Semileptonic decays Bc→(ηc,J/Ψ)lν in the perturbative QCD approach, Chin. Phys. C 37, 093102 (2013).
  10. R. Watanabe, New physics effect on Bc→J/ψτν¯ in relation to the RD(*) anomaly, Phys. Lett. B 776, 5 (2018).
  11. A. Issadykov and M. A. Ivanov, The decays Bc→J/ψ+ℓ¯νℓ and Bc→J/ψ+π(K) in covariant confined quark model, Phys. Lett. B 783, 178 (2018).
  12. C.-T. Tran, M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Körner, and P. Santorelli, Implications of new physics in the decays Bc→(J/ψ,ηc)τν, Phys. Rev. D 97, 054014 (2018).
  13. X.-Q. Hu, S.-P. Jin, and Z.-J. Xiao, Semileptonic decays Bc→(ηc,J/ψ)lν¯l in the “PQCD + Lattice” approach, Chin. Phys. C 44, 023104 (2020).
  14. D. Leljak, B. Melic, and M. Patra, On lepton flavour universality in semileptonic Bc→ηc,J/ψ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2019) 094.
  15. K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Lepton flavor universality violation in semileptonic tree level weak transitions, Phys. Rev. D 99, 113004 (2019).
  16. W. Wang and R. Zhu, Model independent investigation of the RJ/ψ,ηc and ratios of decay widths of semileptonic Bc decays into a P-wave charmonium, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34, 1950195 (2019).
  17. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of the decay Λb0→Λc+τ−ν¯τ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 191803 (2022).
  18. F. U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti, D. J. Robinson, and W. L. Sutcliffe, Precise predictions for Λb→Λc semileptonic decays, Phys. Rev. D 99, 055008 (2019).
  19. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), First measurement of R(Xτ/ℓ) as an inclusive test of the b→cτν anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 211804 (2024).
  20. Z. Ligeti, M. Luke, and F. J. Tackmann, Theoretical predictions for inclusive B→Xuτν− decay, Phys. Rev. D 105, 073009 (2022).
  21. M. Rahimi and K. K. Vos, Standard Model predictions for lepton flavour universality ratios of inclusive semileptonic B decays, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 007.
  22. S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and I. Nisandzic, On the B→D*τν¯τ sensitivity to new physics, Phys. Rev. D 85, 094025 (2012).
  23. P. Rubin et al. (CLEO Collaboration), An investigation of D+→ tau+nu, Phys. Rev. D 73, 112005 (2006).
  24. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of the leptonic decay D+→τ+ντ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 211802 (2019).
  25. R. Fleischer, R. Jaarsma, and G. Koole, Testing lepton flavour universality with (semi)-leptonic D(s) decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 153 (2020).
  26. D. Bečirević, F. Jaffredo, A. Peñuelas, and O. Sumensari, New physics effects in leptonic and semileptonic decays, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 175.
  27. X. Leng, X.-L. Mu, Z.-T. Zou, and Y. Li, Investigation on effects of new physics in c→(s,d)ℓ+νℓ transitions, Chin. Phys. C 45, 063107 (2021).
  28. J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Greljo, J. Martin Camalich, and J. D. Ruiz-Alvarez, Charm physics confronts limx→∞ high-pT lepton tails, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 080.
  29. Y.-R. Kong, L.-F. Lai, X.-Q. Li, X.-S. Yan, Y.-D. Yang, and D.-H. Zheng, Probing new physics with polarized τ and Λc in quasielastic ντ+n→τ−+Λc scattering process, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095036 (2023).
  30. J. E. Sobczyk and S. Bacca, O16 spectral function from coupled-cluster theory: Applications to lepton-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. C 109, 044314 (2024).
  31. N. Penalva, E. Hernández, and J. Nieves, The role of right-handed neutrinos in b→ ct (πνt, ρνt, μν¯μνt)ν¯t from visible final-state kinematics, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 122.
  32. F. Alvarado, L. Alvarez-Ruso, E. Hernandez, J. Nieves, and N. Penalva, The Λc→Λℓ+νℓ weak decay including new physics, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 137.
  33. N. Penalva, E. Hernández, and J. Nieves, B¯c→ηc, B¯c→J/ψ and B¯→D(*) semileptonic decays including new physics, Phys. Rev. D 102, 096016 (2020).
  34. N. Penalva, E. Hernández, and J. Nieves, Hadron and lepton tensors in semileptonic decays including new physics, Phys. Rev. D 101, 113004 (2020).
  35. M.-L. Du, N. Penalva, E. Hernández, and J. Nieves, New physics effects on Λb→Λc*τν−τ decays, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055039 (2022).
  36. S. Meinel, Λc→N form factors from lattice QCD and phenomenology of Λc→nℓ+νℓ and Λc→pμ+μ− decays, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034511 (2018).
  37. X.-S. Yan, L.-H. Zhang, Q. Chang, and Y.-D. Yang, Probing new physics with polarization components of the tau lepton in quasielastic e−p→Λcτ− scattering process, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075025 (2024).
  38. X.-S. Yan (private communication).
  39. J. Nieves, J. E. Amaro, and M. Valverde, Inclusive quasi-elastic neutrino reactions, Phys. Rev. C 70, 055503 (2004); 72, 019902(E) (2005).
  40. M. Valverde, J. E. Amaro, J. Nieves, and C. Maieron, Nuclear effects on lepton polarization in charged-current quasielastic neutrino scattering, Phys. Lett. B 642, 218 (2006).
  41. J. E. Sobczyk, N. Rocco, A. Lovato, and J. Nieves, Weak production of strange and charmed ground-state baryons in nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 99, 065503 (2019).
  42. E. Hernández, J. Nieves, F. Sánchez, and J. E. Sobczyk, Tau longitudinal and transverse polarizations from visible kinematics in (anti-)neutrino nucleus scattering, Phys. Lett. B 829, 137046 (2022); 836, 137612(E) (2023).
  43. O. Benhar, A. Fabrocini, S. Fantoni, and I. Sick, Spectral function of finite nuclei and scattering of GeV electrons, Nucl. Phys. A579, 493 (1994).
  44. N. Rocco and C. Barbieri, Inclusive electron-nucleus cross section within the self consistent Green’s function approach, Phys. Rev. C 98, 025501 (2018).
  45. J. Nieves and J. E. Sobczyk, In medium dispersion relation effects in nuclear inclusive reactions at intermediate and low energies, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 383, 455 (2017).
  46. G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and D. J. Dean, Coupled-cluster computations of atomic nuclei, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 096302 (2014).
  47. J. E. Sobczyk, S. Bacca, G. Hagen, and T. Papenbrock, Spectral function for He4 using the Chebyshev expansion in coupled-cluster theory, Phys. Rev. C 106, 034310 (2022).
  48. J. E. Sobczyk and A. Roggero, Spectral density reconstruction with Chebyshev polynomials, Phys. Rev. E 105, 055310 (2022).
  49. J. F. Stanton and R. J. Bartlett, The equation of motion coupled-cluster method. A systematic biorthogonal approach to molecular excitation energies, transition probabilities, and excited state properties, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 7029 (1993).
  50. A. Ekström, G. R. Jansen, K. A. Wendt, G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, B. D. Carlsson, C. Forssén, M. Hjorth-Jensen, P. Navrátil, and W. Nazarewicz, Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral interaction, Phys. Rev. C 91, 051301 (2015); 109, 059901(E) (2024).
  51. M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018).
  52. N. Penalva, E. Hernández, and J. Nieves, Visible energy and angular distributions of the charged particle from the τ− decay in b→cτ(μν¯μντ,πντ,ρντ)ν¯τ reactions, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 026.
  53. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation