- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Orbifold origin of higher form symmetries in geometric engineering

Darius Dramburg1,*, Shani Nadir Meynet5,†, and Andrea Sangiovanni2,3,4,‡

  • *Contact author: darius.dramburg@ipmu.jp
  • †Contact author: smeynet@sas.upenn.edu
  • ‡Contact author: andrea.sangiovanni@math.uu.se
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 066007 – Published 9 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lkn5-fstq

Abstract

In this work we explore the relation between orbifold singularities and higher form symmetries. Using the geometric engineering dictionary, we argue that the discrete higher symmetries of 5D SCFTs constructed from M theory on a noncompact Calabi-Yau threefold can be related to a quantum symmetry of the associated BPS quiver. Through unorbifolding the quantum symmetry we obtain a new theory without higher form symmetry, providing a notion of “minimality” for a theory. This procedure is carried out via algebraic manipulations of the BPS/McKay quiver describing the crepant resolution of the singular geometry. This technique can also be reverted and thus, starting from any “minimal” theory, one can orbifold it and generate new theories with the desired higher form symmetries. We test our technology on classes of 5D SCFTs that arise from M-theory geometric engineering on Calabi-Yau threefolds that are nontoric noncomplete intersections, which have historically been challenging to tackle.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (100)

  1. D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized global symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 172.
  2. E. Sharpe, Notes on generalized global symmetries in QFT, Fortschr. Phys. 63, 659 (2015).
  3. J. McGreevy, Generalized symmetries in condensed matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 57 (2023).
  4. D. S. Freed, Introduction to topological symmetry in QFT, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 107, 93 (2024).
  5. P. R. S. Gomes, An introduction to higher-form symmetries, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 74, 1 (2023).
  6. S. Schafer-Nameki, ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries, Phys. Rep. 1063, 1 (2024).
  7. T. D. Brennan and S. Hong, Introduction to generalized global symmetries in QFT and particle physics, arXiv:2306.00912.
  8. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre et al., Lectures on generalized symmetries, Phys. Rep. 1051, 1 (2024).
  9. S.-H. Shao, What’s done cannot be undone: TASI lectures on Non-Invertible symmetry, arXiv:2308.00747.
  10. N. Carqueville, M. Del Zotto, and I. Runkel, Topological defects, Encycl. Math. Phys. 5, 621 (2025).
  11. D. Costa et al., Simons lectures on categorical symmetries, arXiv:2411.09082.
  12. S. H. Katz, A. Klemm, and C. Vafa, Geometric engineering of quantum field theories, Nucl. Phys. B497, 173 (1997).
  13. S. H. Katz and C. Vafa, Geometric engineering of N=1 quantum field theories, Nucl. Phys. B497, 196 (1997).
  14. E. Witten, Phase transitions in M theory and F theory, Nucl. Phys. B471, 195 (1996).
  15. D. R. Morrison and N. Seiberg, Extremal transitions and five-dimensional supersymmetric field theories, Nucl. Phys. B483, 229 (1997).
  16. K. A. Intriligator, D. R. Morrison, and N. Seiberg, Five-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories and degenerations of Calabi-Yau spaces, Nucl. Phys. B497, 56 (1997).
  17. O. Aharony, A. Hanany, and B. Kol, Webs of (p,q) five-branes, five-dimensional field theories and grid diagrams, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (1998) 002.
  18. M. Atiyah, J. M. Maldacena, and C. Vafa, An M theory flop as a large N duality, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 42, 3209 (2001).
  19. B. S. Acharya, On Realizing N=1 super-Yang-Mills in M theory, arXiv:hep-th/0011089.
  20. J. J. Heckman, D. R. Morrison, and C. Vafa, On the classification of 6D SCFTs and generalized ADE orbifolds, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2014) 028.
  21. P. Jefferson, S. Katz, H.-C. Kim, and C. Vafa, On geometric classification of 5d SCFTs, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2018) 103.
  22. C. Closset, M. Del Zotto, and V. Saxena, Five-dimensional SCFTs and gauge theory phases: An M-theory/type IIA perspective, SciPost Phys. 6, 052 (2019).
  23. C. Closset, S. Schafer-Nameki, and Y.-N. Wang, Coulomb and Higgs branches from canonical singularities: Part 0, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 003.
  24. F. Apruzzi, M. Dierigl, and L. Lin, The fate of discrete 1-form symmetries in 6d, SciPost Phys. 12, 047 (2022).
  25. C. Closset, S. Giacomelli, S. Schafer-Nameki, and Y.-N. Wang, 5d and 4d SCFTs: Canonical singularities, trinions and S-dualities, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 274.
  26. B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius, and I. Valenzuela, Chern-Weil global symmetries and how quantum gravity avoids them, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 053.
  27. I. Bah, F. Bonetti, and R. Minasian, Discrete and higher-form symmetries in SCFTs from wrapped M5-branes, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 196.
  28. F. Apruzzi, M. van Beest, D. S. W. Gould, and S. Schäfer-Nameki, Holography, 1-form symmetries, and confinement, Phys. Rev. D 104, 066005 (2021).
  29. S. S. Hosseini and R. Moscrop, Maruyoshi-Song flows and defect groups of Dpb(G) theories, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 119.
  30. F. Apruzzi, S. Schafer-Nameki, L. Bhardwaj, and J. Oh, The global form of flavor symmetries and 2-group symmetries in 5d SCFTs, SciPost Phys. 13, 024 (2022).
  31. L. Bhardwaj, 2-group symmetries in class S, SciPost Phys. 12, 152 (2022).
  32. L. Bhardwaj, M. Hubner, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Liberating confinement from Lagrangians: 1-form symmetries and lines in 4d N=1 from 6d N=(2,0), SciPost Phys. 12, 040 (2022).
  33. C. Closset, S. Schäfer-Nameki, and Y.-N. Wang, Coulomb and Higgs branches from canonical singularities. Part I. Hypersurfaces with smooth Calabi-Yau resolutions, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 061.
  34. B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius, and I. Valenzuela, Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spectrum, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 203.
  35. M. Cvetič, J. J. Heckman, E. Torres, and G. Zoccarato, Reflections on the matter of 3D N=1 vacua and local spin(7) compactifications, Phys. Rev. D 105, 026008 (2022).
  36. A. Debray, M. Dierigl, J. J. Heckman, and M. Montero, The anomaly that was not meant IIB, Fortschr. Phys. 70, 2100168 (2022).
  37. J. Tian and Y.-N. Wang, 5D and 6D SCFTs from C3 orbifolds, SciPost Phys. 12, 127 (2022).
  38. A. P. Braun, M. Larfors, and P.-K. Oehlmann, Gauged 2-form symmetries in 6D SCFTs coupled to gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 132.
  39. I. Bah, F. Bonetti, E. Leung, and P. Weck, M5-branes probing flux backgrounds, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 122.
  40. M. Cvetic, M. Dierigl, L. Lin, and H. Y. Zhang, Higher-form symmetries and their anomalies in M-/F-theory duality, Phys. Rev. D 104, 126019 (2021).
  41. M. Del Zotto, J. J. Heckman, S. N. Meynet, R. Moscrop, and H. Y. Zhang, Higher symmetries of 5D orbifold SCFTs, Phys. Rev. D 106, 046010 (2022).
  42. M. Cvetič, J. J. Heckman, M. Hübner, and E. Torres, 0-form, 1-form, and 2-group symmetries via cutting and gluing of orbifolds, Phys. Rev. D 106, 106003 (2022).
  43. A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).
  44. M. Del Zotto, J. J. Heckman, D. S. Park, and T. Rudelius, On the defect group of a 6D SCFT, Lett. Math. Phys. 106, 765 (2016).
  45. F. Albertini, M. Del Zotto, I. García Etxebarria, and S. S. Hosseini, Higher form symmetries and M-theory, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 203.
  46. D. R. Morrison, S. Schafer-Nameki, and B. Willett, Higher-form symmetries in 5d, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 024.
  47. F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. n. García Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Symmetry TFTs from string theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 402, 895 (2023).
  48. F. Baume, J. J. Heckman, M. Hübner, E. Torres, A. P. Turner, and X. Yu, SymTrees and Multi-Sector QFTs, Phys. Rev. D 109, 106013 (2024).
  49. J. J. Heckman, M. Hübner, E. Torres, and H. Y. Zhang, The branes behind generalized symmetry operators, Fortschr. Phys. 71, 2200180 (2023).
  50. F. Apruzzi, I. Bah, F. Bonetti, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Noninvertible symmetries from holography and branes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 121601 (2023).
  51. M. Del Zotto, S. N. Meynet, and R. Moscrop, Remarks on geometric engineering, symmetry TFTs and anomalies, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 220.
  52. I. n. García Etxebarria and S. S. Hosseini, Some aspects of symmetry descent, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 223.
  53. Y. Ito and M. Reid, The McKay correspondence for finite subgroups of SL(3,C), in Higher Dimensional Complex Varieties: Proceedings of the International Conference Held in Trento, Italy, 1994 (De Gruyter, 2011), pp. 221–240, arXiv:alg-geom/9411010.
  54. M. Alim, S. Cecotti, C. Cordova, S. Espahbodi, A. Rastogi, and C. Vafa, N=2 quantum field theories and their BPS quivers, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 18, 27 (2014).
  55. C. Closset and M. Del Zotto, On 5D SCFTs and their BPS quivers. Part I: B-branes and brane tilings, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 26, 37 (2022).
  56. N. Braeger, V. Chakrabhavi, J. J. Heckman, and M. Hübner, Generalized symmetries of nonsupersymmetric orbifolds, Phys. Rev. D 111, 066015 (2025).
  57. N. Braeger, V. Chakrabhavi, J. J. Heckman, and M. Hübner, Generalized symmetries of non-SUSY and discrete torsion string backgrounds, SciPost Phys. 19, 160 (2025).
  58. L. Demonet, Skew group algebras of path algebras and preprojective algebras, J. Algebra 323, 1052 (2010).
  59. I. Reiten and C. Riedtmann, Skew group algebras in the representation theory of artin algebras, J. Algebra 92, 224 (1985).
  60. B. Feng, A. Hanany, Y.-H. He, and N. Prezas, Stepwise projection: Toward brane setups for generic orbifold singularities, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2002) 040.
  61. D. Berenstein, V. Jejjala, and R. G. Leigh, D-branes on singularities: New quivers from old, Phys. Rev. D 64, 046011 (2001).
  62. E. Garć𝚤a-Valdecasas, A. Mininno, and A. M. Uranga, Discrete symmetries in Dimer diagrams, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 091.
  63. A. Collinucci, F. Del Monte, M. De Marco, M. Moleti, and R. Valandro, Non-toric 5d SCFTs from Reid’s pagoda, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2026) 128.
  64. I. Garcia Etxebarria, B. Heidenreich, and D. Regalado, IIB flux non-commutativity and the global structure of field theories, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 169.
  65. Y. Ito and H. Nakajima, Mckay correspondence and Hilbert schemes in dimension three, Topology 39, 1155 (1998).
  66. D. Xie and S.-T. Yau, Three dimensional canonical singularity and five dimensional N=1 SCFT, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 134.
  67. A. Bourget, A. Collinucci, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Generalized toric polygons, T-branes, and 5d SCFTs, SciPost Phys. 18, 079 (2025).
  68. J. Mu, Y.-N. Wang, and H. N. Zhang, 5d SCFTs from isolated complete intersection singularities, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 155.
  69. M. De Marco, M. Del Zotto, M. Graffeo, and A. Sangiovanni, 5d conformal matter, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 306.
  70. A. Collinucci, A. Sangiovanni, and R. Valandro, Genus zero Gopakumar-Vafa invariants from open strings, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 059.
  71. A. Collinucci, M. De Marco, A. Sangiovanni, and R. Valandro, Higgs branches of 5d rank-zero theories from geometry, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 018.
  72. M. De Marco, A. Sangiovanni, and R. Valandro, 5d Higgs branches from M-theory on quasi-homogeneous cDV threefold singularities, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 124.
  73. N. Seiberg, Five-dimensional SUSY field theories, nontrivial fixed points and string dynamics, Phys. Lett. B 388, 753 (1996).
  74. M. Alim, S. Cecotti, C. Cordova, S. Espahbodi, A. Rastogi, and C. Vafa, BPS quivers and spectra of complete N=2 quantum field theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 323, 1185 (2013).
  75. J. McKay, Graphs, singularities, and finite groups, in The Santa Cruz Conference on Finite Groups (Univ. California, Santa Cruz, Calif., 1979), Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics Vol. 37 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1980), pp. 183–186.
  76. G. Gonzalez-Sprinberg and J.-L. Verdier, Construction géométrique de la correspondance de mckay, Ann. Sci. de l’École Norm. Supé Rieure 16, 409 (1983).
  77. Peter B. Kronheimer, The construction of ALE spaces as hyper-Kähler quotients, J. Diff. Geom. 29, 665 (1989).
  78. M. Del Zotto and I. n. García Etxebarria, Global structures from the infrared, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 058.
  79. M. Cvetič, R. Donagi, J. J. Heckman, M. Hübner, and E. Torres, Cornering relative symmetry theories, Phys. Rev. D 111, 085026 (2025).
  80. M. Cohen and S. Montgomery, Group-graded rings, smash products, and group actions, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 282, 237 (1984).
  81. T. Bridgeland, F. Del Monte, and L. Giovenzana, Invariant stability conditions on certain Calabi-Yau threefolds, arXiv:2412.08531.
  82. M. A. Armstrong, The fundamental group of the orbit space of a discontinuous group, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 64, 299 (1968).
  83. P. S. Aspinwall, T. Bridgeland, A. Craw, M. R. Douglas, A. Kapustin, G. W. Moore et al., Dirichlet Branes and Mirror Symmetry, Clay Mathematics Monographs Vol. 4 (AMS, Providence, RI, 2009).
  84. A. Hanany and K. D. Kennaway, Dimer models and toric diagrams, arXiv:hep-th/0503149.
  85. S. Franco, A. Hanany, K. D. Kennaway, D. Vegh, and B. Wecht, Brane dimers and quiver gauge theories, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2006) 096.
  86. M. Del Zotto, I. García Etxebarria, and S. Schafer-Nameki, 2-group symmetries and M-theory, SciPost Phys. 13, 105 (2022).
  87. K. Oh and R. Tatar, Branes at orbifolded conifold singularities and supersymmetric gauge field theories, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (1999) 031.
  88. B. S. Acharya, Confinement in five dimensions, arXiv:2407.03171.
  89. P. S. Aspinwall and D. R. Morrison, Quivers from matrix factorizations, Commun. Math. Phys. 313, 607 (2012).
  90. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/lkn5-fstq for more details.
  91. S. Pinansky, Quantum deformations from toric geometry, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2006) 055.
  92. M. Reid, Young person guide to canonical singularities, 1987.
  93. M. De Marco, M. Del Zotto, M. Graffeo, and A. Sangiovanni, 5d trinions and tetraons, arXiv:2605.16497.
  94. M. Cvetič, R. Donagi, J. J. Heckman, and M. Hübner, Extra-dimensional η-invariants and anomaly theories, arXiv:2512.17906.
  95. V. Chakrabhavi, M. Cvetič, J. J. Heckman, and S. Meynet, Quiver approach to symmetry theories, arXiv:2605.30354.
  96. M. Dierigl, J. J. Heckman, M. Montero, and E. Torres, R7-branes as charge conjugation operators, Phys. Rev. D 109, 046004 (2024).
  97. M. De Marco and S. N. Meynet, Symmetries beyond branes: Geometric engineering and isometries, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 082.
  98. V. Chakrabhavi, A. Debray, M. Dierigl, and J. J. Heckman, Exploring pintopia: Reflection branes, bordisms, and U-dualities, Phys. Rev. D 113, 066015 (2026).
  99. B. S. Acharya and E. Torres, QCD string axions and M-theory, arXiv:2511.08566.
  100. D. A. Cox, J. B. Little, and H. K. Schenck, Toric Varieties (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2024), Vol. 124.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 066007– Published 9 September, 2026
  • Received 24 March 2026
  • Accepted 7 August 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation