Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Scaling properties of net-baryon number fluctuations at the deconfinement critical point

Michał Szymański* and Pok Man Lo

Krzysztof Redlich

Chihiro Sasaki

  • Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław, Plac Maksa Borna 9, PL-50204 Wrocław, Poland and International Institute for Sustainability with Knotted Chiral Meta Matter (WPI-SKCM2), Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8531, Japan

  • *Contact author: michal.szymanski@uwr.edu.pl

Phys. Rev. D 114, 074007 – Published 2 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lcgf-r6vy

Abstract

We investigate the critical behavior of the first four cumulants of the net-baryon number near the deconfinement critical point in QCD in the limit of heavy quarks. By connecting baryon-number fluctuations to Polyakov loop susceptibilities, we analyze their mean-field scaling properties at zero and nonzero baryon chemical potentials. In the mean-field approximation we derive critical exponents via the Landau theory and validate them through explicit numerical calculations in an effective Polyakov loop model. Using a Ginzburg-Landau criterion as a diagnostic of beyond-mean-field effects, we estimate the size of the critical region and find that it shrinks with increasing baryon density. By utilizing the exact scaling function in the 3D Ising model, we estimate critical exponents beyond the mean-field approximation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (61)

  1. P. Braun-Munzinger, V. Koch, T. Schäfer, and J. Stachel, Properties of hot and dense matter from relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rep. 621, 76 (2016).
  2. X. Luo and N. Xu, Search for the QCD critical point with fluctuations of conserved quantities in relativistic heavy-ion collisions at RHIC: An overview, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 112 (2017).
  3. A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy, Nature (London) 561, 321 (2018).
  4. A. Bzdak, S. Esumi, V. Koch, J. Liao, M. Stephanov, and N. Xu, Mapping the phases of quantum chromodynamics with beam energy scan, Phys. Rep. 853, 1 (2020).
  5. K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda, The phase diagram of dense QCD, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 014001 (2011).
  6. K. Fukushima and C. Sasaki, The phase diagram of nuclear and quark matter at high baryon density, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 72, 99 (2013).
  7. J. N. Guenther, Overview of the QCD phase diagram: Recent progress from the lattice, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 136 (2021).
  8. C. Ratti, Equation of state for QCD from lattice simulations, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 129, 104007 (2023).
  9. G. Aarts, J. Aichelin, C. Allton, A. Athenodorou, D. Bachtis, C. Bonanno, N. Brambilla, E. Bratkovskaya, M. Bruno, M. Caselle et al., Phase transitions in particle physics: Results and perspectives from lattice quantum chromo-dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 133, 104070 (2023).
  10. J. O. Andersen, W. R. Naylor, and A. Tranberg, Phase diagram of QCD in a magnetic field: A review, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 025001 (2016).
  11. V. A. Miransky and I. A. Shovkovy, Quantum field theory in a magnetic field: From quantum chromodynamics to graphene and Dirac semimetals, Phys. Rep. 576, 1 (2015).
  12. G. Endrodi, QCD with background electromagnetic fields on the lattice: A review, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 141, 104153 (2025).
  13. P. Adhikari, M. Ammon, S. S. Avancini, A. Ayala, A. Bandyopadhyay, D. Blaschke, F. L. Braghin, P. Buividovich, R. P. Cardoso, C. Cartwright et al., Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 146, 104199 (2026).
  14. G. Boyd, J. Engels, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, C. Legeland, M. Lutgemeier, and B. Petersson, Thermodynamics of SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B469, 419 (1996).
  15. B. Svetitsky and L. G. Yaffe, Critical behavior at finite temperature confinement transitions, Nucl. Phys. B210, 423 (1982).
  16. J. Greensite, The confinement problem in lattice gauge theory, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 1 (2003).
  17. A. M. Polyakov, Thermal properties of gauge fields and quark liberation, Phys. Lett. 72B, 477 (1978).
  18. G. ’t Hooft, On the phase transition towards permanent quark confinement, Nucl. Phys. B138, 1 (1978).
  19. F. Green and F. Karsch, Mean field analysis of SU(N) deconfining transitions in the presence of dynamical quarks, Nucl. Phys. B238, 297 (1984).
  20. S. Ejiri et al. (WHOT-QCD Collaboration), End point of the first-order phase transition of QCD in the heavy quark region by reweighting from quenched QCD, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054505 (2020).
  21. F. Cuteri, O. Philipsen, A. Schön, and A. Sciarra, Deconfinement critical point of lattice QCD with Nf=2 Wilson fermions, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014513 (2021).
  22. R. Ashikawa, M. Kitazawa, S. Ejiri, and K. Kanaya, High-precision analysis of the critical point in heavy-quark QCD at Nt=6, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074508 (2024).
  23. C. S. Fischer, J. Luecker, and J. M. Pawlowski, Phase structure of QCD for heavy quarks, Phys. Rev. D 91, 014024 (2015).
  24. K. Kashiwa, R. D. Pisarski, and V. V. Skokov, Critical endpoint for deconfinement in matrix and other effective models, Phys. Rev. D 85, 114029 (2012).
  25. P. M. Lo, B. Friman, and K. Redlich, Polyakov loop fluctuations and deconfinement in the limit of heavy quarks, Phys. Rev. D 90, 074035 (2014).
  26. P. M. Lo, M. Szymański, C. Sasaki, and K. Redlich, Deconfinement in the presence of a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 102, 034024 (2020).
  27. A. Q. Pham, J. Kim, and O. Philipsen, Deconfinement critical point of heavy quark effective lattice theories, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2022) 113, 10.22323/1.396.0113
  28. V. T. Mari Surkau and U. Reinosa, Heavy-quark corner of the Columbia plot from the center-symmetric Curci-Ferrari model, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014002 (2025).
  29. C. Konrad and O. Philipsen, From deconfinement to nuclear matter: Mean-field approaches for effective Polyakov loop theories of lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2026) 189.
  30. A. Bazavov, N. Brambilla, H. T. Ding, P. Petreczky, H. P. Schadler, A. Vairo, and J. H. Weber, Polyakov loop in 2+1 flavor QCD from low to high temperatures, Phys. Rev. D 93, 114502 (2016).
  31. J. H. Weber (TUMQCD Collaboration), Lattice calculation of the Polyakov loop and Polyakov loop correlators, Eur. Phys. J. Web Conf. 137, 07028 (2017).
  32. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, Freeze-out parameters: Lattice meets experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 062005 (2013).
  33. A. Bazavov, H. T. Ding, P. Hegde, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, Y. Maezawa, S. Mukherjee, H. Ohno, P. Petreczky et al., Strangeness at high temperatures: From hadrons to quarks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 082301 (2013).
  34. A. Bazavov, D. Bollweg, H. T. Ding, P. Enns, J. Goswami, P. Hegde, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, R. Larsen, S. Mukherjee et al., Skewness, kurtosis, and the fifth and sixth order cumulants of net baryon-number distributions from lattice QCD confront high-statistics STAR data, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074502 (2020).
  35. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, S. D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, D. Pesznyak, K. K. Szabo, and C. H. Wong, Continuum-extrapolated high-order baryon fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 110, L011501 (2024).
  36. M. Asakawa and M. Kitazawa, Fluctuations of conserved charges in relativistic heavy ion collisions: An introduction, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 90, 299 (2016).
  37. K. Tohme, T. M. Doi, M. Kitazawa, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Thermodynamics of fermionic excitations in heavy-quark QCD, Phys. Rev. D 112, 094515 (2025).
  38. M. A. Stephanov, Non-Gaussian fluctuations near the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 032301 (2009).
  39. B. J. Schaefer and J. Wambach, Susceptibilities near the QCD (tri)critical point, Phys. Rev. D 75, 085015 (2007).
  40. B. J. Schaefer and M. Wagner, QCD critical region and higher moments for three flavor models, Phys. Rev. D 85, 034027 (2012).
  41. N. Goldenfeld, Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018), 10.1201/9780429493492.
  42. P. Kopietz, L. Bartosch, and F. Schütz, Introduction to the functional renormalization group, Lect. Notes Phys. 798, 1 (2010).
  43. Y. Hatta and T. Ikeda, Universality, the QCD critical/tricritical point and the quark number susceptibility, Phys. Rev. D 67, 014028 (2003).
  44. P. M. Lo, Beyond mean field: Fluctuation diagnostics and fixed-point behavior, J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol. 5, 100379 (2026).
  45. L. D. McLerran and B. Svetitsky, Quark liberation at high temperature: A Monte Carlo study of SU(2) gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 24, 450 (1981).
  46. P. M. Lo, B. Friman, O. Kaczmarek, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Polyakov loop fluctuations in SU(3) lattice gauge theory and an effective gluon potential, Phys. Rev. D 88, 074502 (2013).
  47. K. Fukushima and V. Skokov, Polyakov loop modeling for hot QCD, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 96, 154 (2017).
  48. C. Sasaki, B. Friman, and K. Redlich, Susceptibilities and the phase structure of a chiral model with Polyakov loops, Phys. Rev. D 75, 074013 (2007).
  49. M. Szymański, Deconfinement of heavy quarks at finite density and strong magnetic field, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 229, 3387 (2020).
  50. S. Ejiri, F. Karsch, and K. Redlich, Hadronic fluctuations at the QCD phase transition, Phys. Lett. B 633, 275 (2006).
  51. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with superconductivity. 1, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961).
  52. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with superconductivity. II, Phys. Rev. 124, 246 (1961).
  53. S. P. Klevansky, The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 649 (1992).
  54. M. Buballa, NJL model analysis of quark matter at large density, Phys. Rep. 407, 205 (2005).
  55. G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, A. Schafer, and K. K. Szabo, The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2012) 044.
  56. K. Fukushima, Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop, Phys. Lett. B 591, 277 (2004).
  57. F. Karsch, M. Neumann, and M. Sarkar, Scaling functions of the three-dimensional Z(2), O(2), and O(4) models and their finite-size dependence in an external field, Phys. Rev. D 108, 014505 (2023).
  58. C. H. Chang, V. Dommes, R. S. Erramilli, A. Homrich, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, M. S. Mitchell, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bootstrapping the 3d Ising stress tensor, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 136.
  59. M. A. Stephanov, On the sign of kurtosis near the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 052301 (2011).
  60. A. Dumitru and R. D. Pisarski, Event-by-event fluctuations from decay of a Polyakov loop condensate, Phys. Lett. B 504, 282 (2001).
  61. B. Hua and J. Zhu, Confinement and chiral phase transitions: The role of Polyakov loop kinetics terms, arXiv:2601.19270.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation