Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Tripartite entanglement in e+e−→tt¯Z

Dorival Gonçalves1,*, Alberto Navarro2,†, and Kazuki Sakurai3,‡

  • *Contact author: dorival@okstate.edu
  • †Contact author: alberto.navarro1001@seoultech.ac.kr
  • ‡Contact author: kazuki.sakurai@fuw.edu.pl

Phys. Rev. D 114, 073004 – Published 23 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/l88d-nfqp

Abstract

Multipartite entanglement is a uniquely quantum form of correlation that captures collective properties of a composite quantum state beyond those encoded in its bipartite subsystems. We investigate this phenomenon in the process e+e−→tt¯Z at a future lepton collider, where the final-state spins span the tripartite Hilbert space H=C2⊗C2⊗C3. Starting from the standard model helicity amplitudes, we reconstruct the full 12×12 spin density matrix and characterize its entanglement structure through one-to-one negativities, one-to-other negativities, and the genuine multipartite negativity, evaluated at three increasingly inclusive levels of phase-space integration. Pairwise entanglement is generally suppressed relative to the collective (one-to-other) and the genuine multipartite entanglement, and all measures decrease as more kinematic information is integrated out. Assuming quantum tomography in the fully leptonic decay channel at s=1  TeV, we find that collective entanglement should be accessible at a realistic high-luminosity polarized lepton collider. By contrast, certifying genuine multipartite entanglement is more challenging, with only limited sensitivity projected for a specific polarization benchmark within the luminosity expected at the International Linear Collider. The study establishes e+e−→tt¯Z as an attractive laboratory for probing multipartite entanglement in high-energy collisions and provides a general mixed state framework that applies to any tripartite spin system.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (119)

  1. Y. Afik and J. R. M. n. de Nova, Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 907 (2021).
  2. M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, and G. Panizzo, Testing bell inequalities at the LHC with top-quark pairs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 161801 (2021).
  3. C. Severi, C. D. E. Boschi, F. Maltoni, and M. Sioli, Quantum tops at the LHC: from entanglement to Bell inequalities, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 285 (2022).
  4. Y. Afik and J. R. M. n. de Nova, Quantum discord and steering in top quarks at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 221801 (2023).
  5. R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni, and L. Mantani, Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055007 (2022).
  6. Y. Afik and J. R. M. de Nova, Quantum information with top quarks in QCD, Quantum 6, 820 (2022).
  7. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. A. Casas, Improved tests of entanglement and Bell inequalities with LHC tops, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 666 (2022).
  8. M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, and E. Gabrielli, Constraining new physics in entangled two-qubit systems: Top-quark, tau-lepton and photon pairs, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 162 (2023).
  9. C. Severi and E. Vryonidou, Quantum entanglement and top spin correlations in SMEFT at higher orders, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 148.
  10. Z. Dong, D. Gonçalves, K. Kong, and A. Navarro, Entanglement and Bell inequalities with boosted tt¯, Phys. Rev. D 109, 115023 (2024).
  11. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Postdecay quantum entanglement in top pair production, Phys. Rev. D 108, 076025 (2023).
  12. T. Han, M. Low, and T. A. Wu, Quantum entanglement and bell inequality Violation in Semi-Leptonic Top Decays, arXiv:2310.17696.
  13. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of quantum entanglement with top quarks at the ATLAS detector, Nature (London) 633, 542 (2024).
  14. K. Cheng, T. Han, and M. Low, Optimizing fictitious states for Bell inequality violation in bipartite qubit systems with applications to the tt¯ system, Phys. Rev. D 109, 116005 (2024).
  15. F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori, and E. Vryonidou, Quantum detection of new physics in top-quark pair production at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 099.
  16. A. J. Barr, M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Marzola, Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation at colliders, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 139, 104134 (2024).
  17. F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori, and E. Vryonidou, Quantum tops at circular lepton colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 001.
  18. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of quantum entanglement in top quark pair production in proton–proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 117801 (2024).
  19. C. D. White and M. J. White, Magic states of top quarks, Phys. Rev. D 110, 116016 (2024).
  20. Z. Dong, D. Gonçalves, K. Kong, A. J. Larkoski, and A. Navarro, Hadronic top quark polarimetry with ParticleNet, Phys. Lett. B 862, 139314 (2025).
  21. K. Cheng, T. Han, and M. Low, Optimizing entanglement and Bell inequality violation in top antitop events, Phys. Rev. D 111, 033004 (2025).
  22. Z. Dong, D. Gonçalves, K. Kong, A. J. Larkoski, and A. Navarro, Analytical insights on hadronic top quark polarimetry, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 117.
  23. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Measurements of polarization and spin correlation and observation of entanglement in top quark pairs using lepton+jets events from proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Rev. D 110, 112016 (2024).
  24. T. Han, M. Low, N. McGinnis, and S. Su, Measuring quantum discord at the LHC, arXiv:2412.21158.
  25. C. Altomonte, A. J. Barr, M. Eckstein, P. Horodecki, and K. Sakurai, Prospects for quantum process tomography at high energies, arXiv:2412.01892.
  26. K. Cheng and B. Yan, Bell inequality violation of light quarks in back-to-back Dihadron pair production at lepton colliders, arXiv:2501.03321.
  27. Y. Afik et al., Quantum information meets high-energy physics: Input to the update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics, arXiv:2504.00086.
  28. Y. Afik, Y. Kats, J. R. M. de Nova, A. Soffer, and D. Uzan, Entanglement and Bell nonlocality with bottom-quark pairs at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 111, L111902 (2025).
  29. R. Aoude, A. J. Barr, F. Maltoni, and L. Satrioni, Decoherence effects in entangled fermion pairs at colliders, Phys. Rev. D 113, 076007 (2026).
  30. P. Nason, E. Re, and L. Rottoli, Spin correlations in tt¯ production and decay at the LHC in QCD perturbation theory, arXiv:2505.00096.
  31. M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, and L. Marzola, Local vs nonlocal entanglement in top-quark pairs at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2025) 005.
  32. S.-J. Lin, M.-J. Liu, D. Y. Shao, and S.-Y. Wei, Spin correlations and Bell nonlocality in ΛΛ¯ pair production from e+e− collisions with a thrust cut, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2025) 082.
  33. M. Low, Addressing local realism through Bell tests at colliders, Phys. Rev. D 112, 096008 (2025).
  34. V. Durupt, F. Maltoni, and O. Mattelaer, Automated computation of spin-density matrices and quantum observables for collider physics, arXiv:2510.17730.
  35. J. Gu, S.-J. Lin, D. Y. Shao, L.-T. Wang, and S.-X. Yang, Decoherence in high energy collisions as renormalization group flow, arXiv:2510.13951.
  36. E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola, Quantum entanglement and bell nonlocality at future lepton colliders, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 141, 331 (2026).
  37. Y.-C. Guo, T. Han, M. Low, and Y. Su, Quantum tomography of fermion pairs in e+e− collisions: Longitudinal beam polarization effects, arXiv:2602.02719.
  38. Y.-J. Fang, A. Bhoonah, K. Cheng, T. Han, Y. Liu, and H. Zhang, Spin correlation and quantum entanglement of fermion pairs in transversely polarized e−e+ collisions, arXiv:2604.11887.
  39. S. Y. Choi, D. W. Kang, J. S. Lee, and C. B. Park, Quantum entanglement and Bell nonlocality in top-quark pair production at a photon linear collider, arXiv:2603.12830.
  40. M. M. Altakach, P. Lamba, F. Maltoni, and K. Sakurai, Quantum properties of heavy-fermion pairs at a lepton collider with polarised beams, arXiv:2601.09558.
  41. R. Aoude, J. M. Camacho, V. Durupt, G. García-Mir, F. Maltoni, M. Moreno Llácer, L. Satrioni, and M. Vos, Radiation effects on the entanglement of fermion pairs at colliders, arXiv:2604.16268.
  42. M. M. Altakach, P. Lamba, F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari, and K. Sakurai, Quantum information and CP measurement in H→τ+τ− at future lepton colliders, Phys. Rev. D 107, 093002 (2023).
  43. K. Ma and T. Li, Testing Bell inequality through h→ττ at CEPC*, Chin. Phys. C 48, 103105 (2024).
  44. K. Ehatäht, M. Fabbrichesi, L. Marzola, and C. Veelken, Probing entanglement and testing Bell inequality violation with e+e−→τ+τ− at Belle II, Phys. Rev. D 109, 032005 (2024).
  45. M. Fabbrichesi and L. Marzola, Quantum tomography with τ leptons at the FCC-ee: Entanglement, Bell inequality violation, sinθW, and anomalous couplings, Phys. Rev. D 110, 076004 (2024).
  46. M. Fabbrichesi, M. Low, and L. Marzola, Trace distance between density matrices: A nifty tool in new-physics searches, Phys. Rev. D 112, 013003 (2025).
  47. T. Han, M. Low, and Y. Su, Entanglement and Bell nonlocality in τ+τ− at the BEPC, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 217.
  48. Y. Zhang, B.-H. Zhou, Q.-B. Liu, T. A. Wu, S. Li, T. Han, S.-C. Hsu, and M. Low, Entanglement and Bell nonlocality in τ+τ− at the LHC using machine learning for neutrino reconstruction, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2026) 190.
  49. D. Jeans, Experimental aspects of the quantum tomography of tau lepton pairs at a Higgs factory collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 549 (2026).
  50. L. Lee, J. Lawless, and C. Riggall, Higgs boson spookiness: Probing quantum nonlocality with spacetime-resolved H→τ+τ− decays, arXiv:2603.28868.
  51. A. J. Barr, Testing Bell inequalities in Higgs boson decays, Phys. Lett. B 825, 136866 (2022).
  52. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, A. Bernal, J. A. Casas, and J. M. Moreno, Testing entanglement and Bell inequalities in H→ZZ, Phys. Rev. D 107, 016012 (2023).
  53. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Laboratory-frame tests of quantum entanglement in H→WW, Phys. Rev. D 107, 076016 (2023).
  54. R. Ashby-Pickering, A. J. Barr, and A. Wierzchucka, Quantum state tomography, entanglement detection and Bell violation prospects in weak decays of massive particles, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 020.
  55. M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Marzola, Bell inequalities and quantum entanglement in weak gauge boson production at the LHC and future colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 823 (2023).
  56. M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Marzola, Stringent bounds on HWW and HZZ anomalous couplings with quantum tomography at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 195.
  57. R. A. Morales, Exploring Bell inequalities and quantum entanglement in vector boson scattering, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 1157 (2023).
  58. R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni, and L. Mantani, Probing new physics through entanglement in diboson production, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 017.
  59. F. Fabbri, J. Howarth, and T. Maurin, Isolating semi-leptonic H→WW* decays for Bell inequality tests, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 20 (2024).
  60. A. Bernal, P. Caban, and J. Rembieliński, Entanglement and Bell inequalities violation in H→ZZ with anomalous coupling, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1050 (2023).
  61. Q. Bi, Q.-H. Cao, K. Cheng, and H. Zhang, New observables for testing Bell inequalities in W boson pair production, Phys. Rev. D 109, 036022 (2024).
  62. A. Bernal, P. Caban, and J. Rembieliński, Entanglement and Bell inequality violation in vector diboson systems produced in decays of spin-0 particles, arXiv:2405.16525.
  63. A. Ruzi, Y. Wu, R. Ding, S. Qian, A. M. Levin, and Q. Li, Testing Bell inequalities and probing quantum entanglement at a muon collider, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 211.
  64. M. Grossi, G. Pelliccioli, and A. Vicini, From angular coefficients to quantum observables: A phenomenological appraisal in di-boson systems, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 120.
  65. Y. Wu, R. Jiang, A. Ruzi, Y. Ban, X. Yan, and Q. Li, Testing Bell inequalities and probing quantum entanglement at CEPC, Phys. Rev. D 111, 036008 (2025).
  66. M. Sullivan, Constraining new physics with h→VV tomography, arXiv:2410.10980.
  67. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, H→ZZ as a double-slit experiment, arXiv:2411.13464.
  68. R. Ding, A. Ruzi, S. Qian, A. Levin, Y. Wu, and Q. Li, Quantum entanglement between gauge boson pairs at a Muon Collider, arXiv:2504.09832.
  69. M. Del Gratta, F. Fabbri, P. Lamba, F. Maltoni, and D. Pagani, Quantum properties of H→VV*: Precise predictions in the SM and sensitivity to new physics, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 013.
  70. D. Gonçalves, A. Kaladharan, F. Krauss, and A. Navarro, Quantum entanglement is quantum: ZZ production at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 122.
  71. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Quantum tomography beyond the leading order, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 969 (2025).
  72. D. Gonçalves, A. Kaladharan, and A. Navarro, Higher-order corrections to quantum observables in h→WW*, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2025) 158.
  73. A. Ruzi, Y. Wu, R. Ding, and Q. Li, Searching quantum entanglement in pp→ZZ process, arXiv:2506.16077.
  74. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Momentum entanglement at colliders: The H→WW,ZZ case, arXiv:2512.02104.
  75. S. De, A. Dey, and T. Samui, Unfolding quantum entanglement from h→ZZ*→jjℓℓ at a muon collider, arXiv:2512.09121.
  76. CMS Collaboration, Study of spin correlations in Higgs boson decays to four leptons at CMS, tech. rep., CERN, Geneva, 2025 https://cds.cern.ch/record/2949823.
  77. G. Pelliccioli and E. Re, SMEFT effects on spin correlations and entanglement at NLO QCD in di-boson production at hadron colliders, arXiv:2601.09540.
  78. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Measurements of Z-boson pair entanglement in decays of Higgs bosons at the ATLAS experiment, arXiv:2603.26463.
  79. D. Gonçalves, A. Kaladharan, and A. Navarro, Quantum tomography and entanglement in semi-leptonic h→VV* decays at higher orders, arXiv:2604.16218.
  80. K. Sakurai and M. Spannowsky, Three-body entanglement in particle decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 151602 (2024).
  81. P. Horodecki, K. Sakurai, A. S. Shaleena, and M. Spannowsky, Three-body non-locality in particle decays, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 160.
  82. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Tripartite entanglement in H→ZZ,WW decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 113004 (2024).
  83. R. A. Morales, Tripartite entanglement and Bell non-locality in loop-induced Higgs boson decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 581 (2024).
  84. A. Subba and R. Rahaman, On bipartite and tripartite entanglement at present and future particle colliders, arXiv:2404.03292.
  85. M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Marzola, Quantum-entangled pions, Phys. Rev. D 112, L091301 (2025).
  86. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
  87. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002).
  88. B. Jungnitsch, T. Moroder, and O. Gühne, Taming Multiparticle Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 190502 (2011).
  89. A. Bernal, J. A. Casas, and J. M. Moreno, Entanglement and entropy in multipartite systems: A useful approach, Quantum Inf. Process. 23, 56 (2024).
  90. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Measurement of the angular coefficients in Z-boson events using electron and muon pairs from data taken at s=8  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 159.
  91. ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the effective leptonic weak mixing angle using electron and muon pairs from Z-boson decay in the ATLAS experiment at s=8  TeV, July, 2018 https://cds.cern.ch/record/2630340.
  92. D. Goncalves and J. Nakamura, Role of the Z polarization in the H→bb¯ measurement, Phys. Rev. D 98, 093005 (2018).
  93. D. Goncalves and J. Nakamura, Boosting the H→invisibles searches with Z boson polarization, Phys. Rev. D 99, 055021 (2019).
  94. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Measurements of top-quark pair spin correlations in the eμ channel at s=13  TeV using pp collisions in the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 754 (2020).
  95. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Measurement of the top quark polarization and tt¯ spin correlations using dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Rev. D 100, 072002 (2019).
  96. D. Gonçalves, T. Han, S. Ching Iris Leung, and H. Qin, Off-shell Higgs couplings in H*→ZZ→ℓℓνν, Phys. Lett. B 817, 136329 (2021).
  97. R. Mammen Abraham and D. Gonçalves, Boosting new physics searches in tt¯Z and tZj production with angular moments, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 965 (2023).
  98. A. Bhardwaj, C. Englert, D. Gonçalves, and A. Navarro, Nonlinear CP violation in the top-Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115006 (2023).
  99. J. Ackerschott, R. K. Barman, D. Gonçalves, T. Heimel, and T. Plehn, Returning CP-observables to the frames they belong, SciPost Phys. 17, 001 (2024).
  100. A. Denner, C. Haitz, and G. Pelliccioli, NLO EW corrections to polarised W+W− production and decay at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 850, 138539 (2024).
  101. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Measurement of the Drell–Yan forward-backward asymmetry and of the effective leptonic weak mixing angle in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, arXiv:2408.07622.
  102. A. Denner, C. Haitz, and G. Pelliccioli, NLO EW and QCD corrections to polarised same-sign WW scattering at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 115.
  103. C. Carrivale et al., Precise Standard-Model predictions for polarised Z-boson pair production and decay at the LHC, arXiv:2505.09686.
  104. ILC Collaboration, The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report—Volume 2: Physics, arXiv:1306.6352.
  105. T. K. Charles et al. (CLICdp Collaboration and CLIC Collaboration), The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC)—2018 Summary Report, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 2, 1 (2018).
  106. C. Accettura et al. (International Muon Collider Collaboration), The Muon Collider, arXiv:2504.21417.
  107. K. Hagiwara and D. Zeppenfeld, Helicity amplitudes for heavy lepton production in e+e− annihilation, Nucl. Phys. B274, 1 (1986).
  108. K. Hagiwara and D. Zeppenfeld, Amplitudes for multiparton processes involving a current at e+e−, e±p, and hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B313, 560 (1989).
  109. H. Murayama, I. Watanabe, and K. Hagiwara, HELAS: HELicity amplitude subroutines for Feynman diagram evaluations, KEK Report No. KEK-91-11, 1992.
  110. O. Gühne and G. Tóth, Entanglement detection, Phys. Rep. 474, 1 (2009).
  111. A. Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
  112. P. Horodecki, Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition, Phys. Lett. A 232, 333 (1997).
  113. M. Hofmann, T. Moroder, and O. Gühne, Analytical characterization of the genuine multiparticle negativity, J. Phys. A 47, 155301 (2014).
  114. H. Abramowicz et al. (Linear Collider Vision Collaboration), A linear collider vision for the future of particle physics, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 235, 1641 (2026).
  115. E. Leader, Spin in Particle Physics, Vol. 15 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2001).
  116. A. Bernal, Quantum tomography of helicity states for general scattering processes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 116007 (2024).
  117. R. Rahaman, On two-body and three-body spin correlations in leptonic tt¯Z production and anomalous couplings at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 077.
  118. F. Boudjema and R. K. Singh, A Model independent spin analysis of fundamental particles using azimuthal asymmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2009) 028.
  119. M. Jezabek, Top quark physics, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 37, 197 (1994).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation