- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Direct detection of fast-moving low-mass dark matter

Haider Alhazmi1,*, Doojin Kim2,3,†, Kyoungchul Kong4,‡, Gopolang Mohlabeng5,6,7,§, Jong-Chul Park8,9,∥, and Seodong Shin10,11,¶

  • *Contact author: hmalhazmi@jazanu.edu.sa
  • †Contact author: doojin.kim@usd.edu
  • ‡Contact author: kckong@ku.edu
  • §Contact author: gmohlabe@sfu.ca
  • ∥Contact author: jcpark@cnu.ac.kr
  • Contact author: sshin@jbnu.ac.kr
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 112, 095029 – Published 20 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kqsz-27nj

Abstract

We examine the signals produced by dark-matter interactions with electrons, which play a crucial role in direct detection experiments employing heavy target materials, particularly in many well-motivated sub-GeV dark-matter scenarios. When the momentum transfer to target electrons is comparable to or exceeds their binding energy, atomic effects related to electron ionization become essential for accurately determining signal rates—especially in the case of fast-moving dark matter. In this paper, we revisit and extend the atomic ionization formalism, systematically comparing different approaches used to formulate the ionization form factor and identifying their respective domains of validity. As practical applications, we explore detection prospects in xenon target experiments. To illustrate our findings, we consider a specific scenario involving boosted dark matter, which often leads to high-momentum electron recoils. Our analysis demonstrates that the choice of formalism can significantly influence the interpretation of experimental data, depending on the regions of parameter space.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (98)

  1. Gerard Jungman, Marc Kamionkowski, and Kim Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rep. 267, 195 (1996).
  2. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Design and performance of the XENON10 dark matter experiment, Astropart. Phys. 34, 679 (2011).
  3. Rouven Essig, Jeremy Mardon, and Tomer Volansky, Direct detection of sub-GeV dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 85, 076007 (2012).
  4. Kaustubh Agashe, Yanou Cui, Lina Necib, and Jesse Thaler, (In)direct detection of boosted dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2014) 062.
  5. Atri Bhattacharya, Raj Gandhi, and Aritra Gupta, The direct detection of boosted dark matter at high energies and PeV events at IceCube, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2015) 027.
  6. Kyoungchul Kong, Gopolang Mohlabeng, and Jong-Chul Park, Boosted dark matter signals uplifted with self-interaction, Phys. Lett. B 743, 256 (2015).
  7. John F. Cherry, Mads T. Frandsen, and Ian M. Shoemaker, Direct detection phenomenology in models where the products of dark matter annihilation interact with nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 231303 (2015).
  8. Lina Necib, Jarrett Moon, Taritree Wongjirad, and Janet M. Conrad, Boosted dark matter at neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. D 95, 075018 (2017).
  9. Haider Alhazmi, Kyoungchul Kong, Gopolang Mohlabeng, and Jong-Chul Park, Boosted dark matter at the deep underground neutrino experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2017) 158.
  10. Doojin Kim, Jong-Chul Park, and Seodong Shin, Dark matter “collider” from inelastic boosted dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161801 (2017).
  11. Haipeng An, Maxim Pospelov, Josef Pradler, and Adam Ritz, Directly detecting MeV-scale dark matter via solar reflection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 141801 (2018); 121, 259903(E) (2018).
  12. Gian F. Giudice, Doojin Kim, Jong-Chul Park, and Seodong Shin, Inelastic boosted dark matter at direct detection experiments, Phys. Lett. B 780, 543 (2018).
  13. Animesh Chatterjee, Albert De Roeck, Doojin Kim, Zahra Gh. Moghaddam, Jong-Chul Park, Seodong Shin, Leigh H. Whitehead, and Jaehoon Yu, Searching for boosted dark matter at ProtoDUNE, Phys. Rev. D 98, 075027 (2018).
  14. Doojin Kim, Kyoungchul Kong, Jong-Chul Park, and Seodong Shin, Boosted dark matter quarrying at surface neutrino detectors, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 155.
  15. Wen Yin, Highly-boosted dark matter and cutoff for cosmic-ray neutrinos through neutrino portal, EPJ Web Conf. 208, 04003 (2019).
  16. Christopher V. Cappiello, Kenny C. Y. Ng, and John F. Beacom, Reverse direct detection: Cosmic ray scattering with light dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 99, 063004 (2019).
  17. Torsten Bringmann and Maxim Pospelov, Novel direct detection constraints on light dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 171801 (2019).
  18. Yohei Ema, Filippo Sala, and Ryosuke Sato, Light dark matter at neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 181802 (2019).
  19. Doojin Kim, Jong-Chul Park, and Seodong Shin, Searching for boosted dark matter via dark-photon bremsstrahlung, Phys. Rev. D 100, 035033 (2019).
  20. William DeRocco, Peter W. Graham, Daniel Kasen, Gustavo Marques-Tavares, and Surjeet Rajendran, Supernova signals of light dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 100, 075018 (2019).
  21. Lucien Heurtier, Doojin Kim, Jong-Chul Park, and Seodong Shin, Explaining the ANITA anomaly with inelastic boosted dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 100, 055004 (2019).
  22. James B. Dent, Bhaskar Dutta, Jayden L. Newstead, and Ian M. Shoemaker, Bounds on cosmic ray-boosted dark matter in simplified models and its corresponding neutrino-floor, Phys. Rev. D 101, 116007 (2020).
  23. Joshua Berger, Yanou Cui, Mathew Graham, Lina Necib, Gianluca Petrillo, Dane Stocks, Yun-Tse Tsai, and Yue Zhao, Prospects for detecting boosted dark matter in DUNE through hadronic interactions, Phys. Rev. D 103, 095012 (2021).
  24. Wenyu Wang, Lei Wu, Jin Min Yang, Hang Zhou, and Bin Zhu, Cosmic ray boosted sub-GeV gravitationally interacting dark matter in direct detection, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 072; 02 (2021) 052(E).
  25. Doojin Kim, Pedro A. N. Machado, Jong-Chul Park, and Seodong Shin, Optimizing energetic light dark matter searches in dark matter and neutrino experiments, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 057.
  26. Bartosz Fornal, Pearl Sandick, Jing Shu, Meng Su, and Yue Zhao, Boosted dark matter interpretation of the XENON1T excess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 161804 (2020).
  27. Qing-Hong Cao, Ran Ding, and Qian-Fei Xiang, Searching for sub-MeV boosted dark matter from xenon electron direct detection, Chin. Phys. C 45, 045002 (2021).
  28. Yongsoo Jho, Jong-Chul Park, Seong Chan Park, and Po-Yan Tseng, Leptonic new force and cosmic-ray boosted dark matter for the XENON1T excess, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135863 (2020).
  29. Haider Alhazmi, Doojin Kim, Kyoungchul Kong, Gopolang Mohlabeng, Jong-Chul Park, and Seodong Shin, Implications of the XENON1T excess on the dark matter interpretation, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 055.
  30. Gang Guo, Yue-Lin Sming Tsai, Meng-Ru Wu, and Qiang Yuan, Elastic and inelastic scattering of cosmic-rays on sub-GeV dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 102, 103004 (2020).
  31. James B. Dent, Bhaskar Dutta, Jayden L. Newstead, Ian M. Shoemaker, and Natalia Tapia Arellano, Present and future status of light dark matter models from cosmic-ray electron upscattering, Phys. Rev. D 103, 095015 (2021).
  32. Lian-Bao Jia and Tong Li, Interpretation of XENON1T excess with MeV boosted dark matter *, Chin. Phys. C 46, 083111 (2022).
  33. Yongsoo Jho, Jong-Chul Park, Seong Chan Park, and Po-Yan Tseng, Cosmic-neutrino-boosted dark matter (νBDM), arXiv:2101.11262.
  34. Anirban Das and Manibrata Sen, Boosted dark matter from diffuse supernova neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075029 (2021).
  35. Debasish Borah, Manoranjan Dutta, Satyabrata Mahapatra, and Narendra Sahu, Boosted self-interacting dark matter and XENON1T excess, Nucl. Phys. B979, 115787 (2022).
  36. Nicole F. Bell, James B. Dent, Bhaskar Dutta, Sumit Ghosh, Jason Kumar, Jayden L. Newstead, and Ian M. Shoemaker, Cosmic-ray upscattered inelastic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 104, 076020 (2021).
  37. Haipeng An, Haoming Nie, Maxim Pospelov, Josef Pradler, and Adam Ritz, Solar reflection of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 104, 103026 (2021).
  38. Debjyoti Bardhan, Supritha Bhowmick, Diptimoy Ghosh, Atanu Guha, and Divya Sachdeva, Bounds on boosted dark matter from direct detection: The role of energy-dependent cross sections, Phys. Rev. D 107, 015010 (2023).
  39. Tarak Nath Maity and Ranjan Laha, Cosmic-ray boosted dark matter in Xe-based direct detection experiments, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 117 (2024).
  40. Nicole F. Bell, Jayden L. Newstead, and Iman Shaukat-Ali, Cosmic-ray boosted dark matter confronted by constraints on new light mediators, Phys. Rev. D 109, 063034 (2024).
  41. Atanu Guha and Jong-Chul Park, Constraints on cosmic-ray boosted dark matter with realistic cross section, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 074.
  42. Bhaskar Dutta, Wei-Chih Huang, Doojin Kim, Jayden L. Newstead, Jong-Chul Park, and Iman Shaukat Ali, Prospects for light dark matter searches at large-volume neutrino detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 161801 (2024).
  43. Christopher V. Cappiello, Qinrui Liu, Gopolang Mohlabeng, and Aaron C. Vincent, Cosmic ray-boosted dark matter at IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 110, 095031 (2024).
  44. Koun Choi and Jong-Chul Park, New search for dark matter with neutrons at neutrino detectors, arXiv:2409.05646.
  45. Atanu Guha and Jong-Chul Park, A congruous approach with realistic cross section towards limiting sub-GeV dark matter from LUX-ZEPLIN, arXiv:2509.02301.
  46. Rouven Essig, Aaron Manalaysay, Jeremy Mardon, Peter Sorensen, and Tomer Volansky, First direct detection limits on sub-GeV dark matter from XENON10, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 021301 (2012).
  47. B. M. Roberts, V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, M. Pospelov, and Y. V. Stadnik, Dark matter scattering on electrons: Accurate calculations of atomic excitations and implications for the DAMA signal, Phys. Rev. D 93, 115037 (2016).
  48. Rouven Essig, Tomer Volansky, and Tien-Tien Yu, New constraints and prospects for sub-GeV dark matter scattering off electrons in xenon, Phys. Rev. D 96, 043017 (2017).
  49. Riccardo Catena, Timon Emken, Nicola A. Spaldin, and Walter Tarantino, Atomic responses to general dark matter-electron interactions, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033195 (2020).
  50. Itay M. Bloch, Andrea Caputo, Rouven Essig, Diego Redigolo, Mukul Sholapurkar, and Tomer Volansky, Exploring new physics with O(keV) electron recoils in direct detection experiments, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 178.
  51. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Excess electronic recoil events in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. D 102, 072004 (2020).
  52. Samuel K. Lee, Mariangela Lisanti, Siddharth Mishra-Sharma, and Benjamin R. Safdi, Modulation effects in dark matter-electron scattering experiments, Phys. Rev. D 92, 083517 (2015).
  53. B. M. Roberts, V. V. Flambaum, and G. F. Gribakin, Ionization of atoms by slow heavy particles, including dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 023201 (2016).
  54. C. Kachulis et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Search for boosted dark matter interacting with electrons in Super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 221301 (2018).
  55. C. Ha et al. (COSINE-100 Collaboration), First direct search for inelastic boosted dark matter with COSINE-100, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 131802 (2019).
  56. Xiangyi Cui et al. (PandaX-II Collaboration), Search for cosmic-ray boosted sub-GeV dark matter at the PandaX-II experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 171801 (2022).
  57. R. Xu et al. (CDEX Collaboration), Constraints on sub-GeV dark matter boosted by cosmic rays from the CDEX-10 experiment at the china jinping underground laboratory, Phys. Rev. D 106, 052008 (2022).
  58. K. Abe et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Search for cosmic-ray boosted sub-GeV dark matter using recoil protons at Super-Kamiokande, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 031802 (2023); 131, 159903(E) (2023).
  59. Z. H. Zhang et al. (CDEX Collaboration), Search for boosted keV-MeV light dark matter particles from evaporating primordial black holes at the CDEX-10 experiment, Phys. Rev. D 108, 052006 (2023).
  60. N. Y. Agafonova et al. (NEWSdm Collaboration), Directional sensitivity of the NEWSdm experiment to cosmic ray boosted dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2023) 067.
  61. G. Adhikari et al. (COSINE-100 Collaboration), Search for boosted dark matter in COSINE-100, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 201802 (2023).
  62. Xiaofeng Shang et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Search for cosmic-ray boosted sub-MeV dark-matter–electron scattering in PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 101805 (2024).
  63. H. Carranza et al. (ICARUS Collaboration), Search for inelastic boosted dark matter with the ICARUS detector at the Gran Sasso Underground National Laboratory, Phys. Rev. D 111, 092003 (2025).
  64. Genevieve Belanger and Jong-Chul Park, Assisted freeze-out, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2012) 038.
  65. Ayuki Kamada, Hee Jung Kim, Jong-Chul Park, and Seodong Shin, Manifesting hidden dynamics of a sub-component dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2022) 052.
  66. Jeong Han Kim, Kyoungchul Kong, Se Hwan Lim, and Jong-Chul Park, Warm surprises from cold duets: N-body simulations with two-component dark matter, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024, 123B03 (2024).
  67. Jeong Han Kim, Kyoungchul Kong, Se Hwan Lim, and Jong-Chul Park, Astrophysical and cosmological probes of boosted dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2025) 016.
  68. C. F. Bunge, J. A. Barrientos, and A. V. Bunge, Roothaan-Hartree-Fock ground-state atomic wave functions: Slater-type orbital expansions and expectation values for Z=2–54, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 53, 113 (1993).
  69. Rouven Essig, Marivi Fernandez-Serra, Jeremy Mardon, Adrian Soto, Tomer Volansky, and Tien-Tien Yu, Direct detection of sub-GeV dark matter with semiconductor targets, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 046.
  70. Louis Hamaide and Christopher McCabe, Fueling the search for light dark matter-electron scattering with spherical proportional counters, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063002 (2023).
  71. Timon Emken, Rouven Essig, and Hailin Xu, Solar reflection of dark matter with dark-photon mediators, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 023.
  72. F. J. Gálvez, E. Buendía, P. Maldonado, and A. J. Sarsa, Optimized effective potential energies and ionization potentials for the atoms Li to Ra, Eur. Phys. J. D 50, 229 (2008).
  73. Dimitri N. Laikov and Ksenia R. Briling, Atomic effective potentials for starting molecular electronic structure calculations, Theor. Chem. Acc. 139, 17 (2020).
  74. Francesc Salvat and José M. Fernández-Varea, radial: A Fortran subroutine package for the solution of the radial Schrödinger and Dirac wave equations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 240, 165 (2019).
  75. Haider Alhazmi, Charting the Unknown: The Hunt for Dark Matter Continues (University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 2021).
  76. A. R. Caddell, V. V. Flambaum, and B. M. Roberts, Accurate electron-recoil ionization factors for dark matter direct detection in xenon, krypton, and argon, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083030 (2023).
  77. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), The XENONnT dark matter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 784 (2024).
  78. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Search for new physics in electronic recoil data from XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 161805 (2022).
  79. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), The XENON1T dark matter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 881 (2017).
  80. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Dark matter search results from a one ton-year exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018).
  81. E. Aprile et al. (XENON100 Collaboration), The XENON100 dark matter experiment, Astropart. Phys. 35, 573 (2012).
  82. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Low-mass dark matter search using ionization signals in XENON100, Phys. Rev. D 94, 092001 (2016); 95, 059901(E) (2017).
  83. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Emission of single and few electrons in XENON1T and limits on light dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 106, 022001 (2022).
  84. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Light dark matter search with ionization signals in XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 251801 (2019).
  85. XENON1T, XENON1T S2-only data release, https://github.com/XENON1T/s2only_data_release (2020).
  86. Timon Emken, Rouven Essig, Chris Kouvaris, and Mukul Sholapurkar, Direct detection of strongly interacting sub-GeV dark matter via electron recoils, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2019) 070.
  87. Liron Barak et al. (SENSEI Collaboration), SENSEI: Direct-detection results on sub-GeV dark matter from a new skipper-CCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 171802 (2020).
  88. Q. Arnaud et al. (EDELWEISS Collaboration), First germanium-based constraints on sub-MeV dark matter with the EDELWEISS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 141301 (2020).
  89. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Search for light dark matter in low-energy ionization signals from XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 161004 (2025).
  90. D. W. Amaral et al. (SuperCDMS Collaboration), Constraints on low-mass, relic dark matter candidates from a surface-operated SuperCDMS single-charge sensitive detector, Phys. Rev. D 102, 091101 (2020).
  91. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (DAMIC Collaboration), Constraints on light dark matter particles interacting with electrons from DAMIC at SNOLAB, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 181802 (2019).
  92. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide Collaboration), Constraints on sub-GeV dark-matter–electron scattering from the DarkSide-50 experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111303 (2018).
  93. Heechan Yi, Kayoung Ban, Myeonghun Park, and Kyoungchul Kong, Quantum integration networks for efficient Monte Carlo in high-energy physics, arXiv:2510.10501.
  94. Leonardo Badurina, Diego Blas, John Ellis, and Sebastian A. R. Ellis, Ultralight dark matter detection with trapped-ion interferometry, arXiv:2507.17825.
  95. K. Nakazono et al., Search for dark photon dark matter with a mass around 36.1  μeV using a frequency-tunable cavity controlled through a coupled superconducting qubit, arXiv:2505.15619.
  96. Jing Shu, Bin Xu, and Yuan Xu, Eliminating incoherent noise: A Coherent quantum approach in multi-sensor dark matter detection, arXiv:2410.22413.
  97. Shion Chen, Hajime Fukuda, Toshiaki Inada, Takeo Moroi, Tatsumi Nitta, and Thanaporn Sichanugrist, Quantum enhancement in dark matter detection with quantum computation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 021801 (2024).
  98. Shion Chen, Hajime Fukuda, Toshiaki Inada, Takeo Moroi, Tatsumi Nitta, and Thanaporn Sichanugrist, Detecting hidden photon dark matter using the direct excitation of transmon qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 211001 (2023).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 112, 095029– Published 20 November, 2025
  • Received 31 March 2025
  • Accepted 6 November 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation