Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Implications of a portal vectorlike lepton on associated Higgs boson production at a multi-TeV muon collider

Krishna Tewary1,*, Sanjoy Biswas1,†, and Shivam Verma2,‡

  • *Contact author: krishna.tewary.phy22@gm.rkmvu.ac.in, krishnatewary3@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: sanjoy.phy@gm.rkmvu.ac.in, sanjoyhri@gmail.com
  • ‡Contact author: shivamverma@prl.res.in, shivam.59910103@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 114, 035029 – Published 21 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kpdt-4zm2

Abstract

We explore a portal vectorlike lepton (pVLL) extension of the Standard Model (SM) and study its implications for Higgs and vector-boson associated production (hV, with V=Z-boson or dark photon) at a future muon collider facility. We show that while the μ+μ−→hZ production rate remains close to its SM prediction in a wide range of parameter space, the rate for μ+μ−→hγd can be substantially enhanced owing to the nondecoupling nature of the interaction involving the heavy lepton, the muon and the dark photon. We demonstrate that the hγd production rate can exceed the corresponding hZ rate by a factor of 1–100 within the perturbative unitarity limit, making it a promising channel for probing Higgs interactions and potential new physics effects. We also examine the role of the pVLL state in the context of dark matter (DM) phenomenology and identify regions of parameter space consistent with the observed relic abundance by extending the simplified setup with a viable DM candidate. The hγd production can also be used to constrain the dark photon mass (mγd) and/or the dark gauge coupling (gd) consistent with various constraints including the current muon g−2 measurements within the pVLL framework. We perform a detailed collider analysis of the hγd process in the bb¯+ missing energy final state. A 2σ exclusion limit for mγd up to 80 GeV is obtained assuming gd=0.05, sinθL=4×10−5, sinθs=0.05, for a heavy lepton mass ∼3  TeV at a 3 TeV muon collider with an integrated luminosity of 1  ab−1.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (103)

  1. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  2. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  3. W. Kilian, M. Kramer, and P. M. Zerwas, Higgsstrahlung and W W fusion in e+ e- collisions, Phys. Lett. B 373, 135 (1996).
  4. Z. Liu, L.-T. Wang, and H. Zhang, Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson at future e+e− lepton colliders, Chin. Phys. C 41, 063102 (2017).
  5. A. G. Akeroyd, A. Arhrib, and M. Capdequi Peyranere, CP odd Higgs boson production in association with neutral gauge boson in high-energy e+ e- collisions, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14, 2093 (1999).
  6. S. Kanemura, Possible enhancement of the e+ e-—> H+- W-+ cross-section in the two Higgs doublet model, Eur. Phys. J. C 17, 473 (2000).
  7. B. A. Ouazghour, A. Arhrib, K. Cheung, E.-s. Ghourmin, and L. Rahili, Associated charged Higgs boson production within the 2HDM: e-e+ versus μ−μ+ colliders, Phys. Rev. D 110, 095026 (2024).
  8. R. Barate et al. (LEP Working Group for Higgs boson searches Collaboration, ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, and OPAL Collaboration), Search for the standard model Higgs boson at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 565, 61 (2003).
  9. G. Abbiendi et al. (OPAL Collaboration), Search for the standard model Higgs boson with the OPAL detector at LEP, Eur. Phys. J. C 26, 479 (2003).
  10. A. Abada et al. (FCC Collaboration), FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future circular collider conceptual design report volume 2, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 228, 261 (2019).
  11. H. Abramowicz et al., Higgs physics at the CLIC electron-positron linear collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 475 (2017).
  12. R. Franceschini and M. Greco, Higgs and BSM physics at the future muon collider, Symmetry 13, 851 (2021).
  13. Y. Hamada, R. Kitano, R. Matsudo, S. Okawa, R. Takai, H. Takaura, and L. Treuer, Higgs boson production at μ+μ+ colliders, Phys. Rev. D 110, 113011 (2024).
  14. E. J. Chun and T. Mondal, Explaining g−2 anomalies in two Higgs doublet model with vector-like leptons, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 077.
  15. P. Asadi, S. Homiller, A. Radick, and T.-T. Yu, Fermion-portal dark matter at a high-energy muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 112, 055038 (2025).
  16. A. Crivellin, F. Kirk, C. A. Manzari, and M. Montull, Global electroweak fit and vector-like leptons in light of the Cabibbo angle anomaly, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 166.
  17. M. Kirk, Cabibbo anomaly versus electroweak precision tests: An exploration of extensions of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 103, 035004 (2021).
  18. G. N. Wojcik, L. L. Everett, S. T. Eu, and R. Ximenes, Lepton flavor portal matter, Phys. Rev. D 108, 055033 (2023).
  19. Z. Poh and S. Raby, Vectorlike leptons: Muon g-2 anomaly, lepton flavor violation, Higgs boson decays, and lepton nonuniversality, Phys. Rev. D 96, 015032 (2017).
  20. R. Dermisek, K. Hermanek, and N. McGinnis, Muon g-2 in two-Higgs-doublet models with vectorlike leptons, Phys. Rev. D 104, 055033 (2021).
  21. H. M. Lee, J. Song, and K. Yamashita, Seesaw lepton masses and muon g−2 from heavy vector-like leptons, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 79, 1121 (2021).
  22. J. Kawamura, S. Raby, and A. Trautner, Complete vectorlike fourth family with U(1)’: A global analysis, Phys. Rev. D 101, 035026 (2020).
  23. M. Endo and S. Mishima, Muon g−2 and CKM unitarity in extra lepton models, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 004.
  24. C. A. Manzari, Vector-like leptons in light of the cabibbo-angle anomaly, arXiv:2105.03399.
  25. B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, C. A. Manzari, and M. Montull, Explaining b→sℓ+ℓ− and the Cabibbo angle anomaly with a vector triplet, Phys. Rev. D 103, 015032 (2021).
  26. W. Abdallah, M. Ashry, J. Kawamura, and A. Moursy, Semivisible dark photon in a model with vectorlike leptons for the (g-2)e, μ and W-boson mass anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 109, 015031 (2024).
  27. H. M. Lee and K. Yamashita, A model of vector-like leptons for the muon g−2 and the W boson mass, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 661 (2022).
  28. C.-H. Lee and R. N. Mohapatra, Vector-like quarks and leptons, SU(5) ⊗SU (5) grand unification, and proton decay, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2017) 080.
  29. F. Gursey, P. Ramond, and P. Sikivie, A universal gauge theory model based on E6, Phys. Lett. B 60, 177 (1976).
  30. B. Kyae and C. S. Shin, Vector-like leptons and extra gauge symmetry for the natural Higgs boson, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2013) 102.
  31. M. Cvetic, G. Shiu, and A. M. Uranga, Three family supersymmetric standard—like models from intersecting brane worlds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 201801 (2001).
  32. G. B. Cleaver, A. E. Faraggi, D. V. Nanopoulos, and J. W. Walker, Phenomenological study of a minimal superstring standard model, Nucl. Phys. B593, 471 (2001).
  33. F. Marchesano, D. Regalado, and L. Vazquez-Mercado, Discrete flavor symmetries in D-brane models, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2013) 028.
  34. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for vector-like leptons coupling to first- and second-generation Standard Model leptons in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 075.
  35. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for pair-produced vector-like leptons in final states with third-generation leptons and at least three b quark jets in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 846, 137713 (2023).
  36. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for vector-like leptons in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Rev. D 100, 052003 (2019).
  37. C.-X. Yue, Y.-Q. Wang, H. Wang, Y.-H. Wang, and S. Li, Searching for singlet vector-like leptons via pair production at ILC, Nucl. Phys. B1000, 116482 (2024).
  38. L. Shang, M. Wang, Z. Heng, and B. Yang, Search for the singlet vector-like lepton at future e+e− colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 415 (2021).
  39. Q. Guo, L. Gao, Y. Mao, and Q. Li, Vector-like lepton searches at a muon collider in the context of the 4321 model, Chin. Phys. C 47, 103106 (2023).
  40. N. Ghosh, S. K. Rai, and T. Samui, Search for a leptoquark and vector-like lepton in a muon collider, Nucl. Phys. B1004, 116564 (2024).
  41. P. N. Bhattiprolu and S. P. Martin, Prospects for vectorlike leptons at future proton-proton colliders, Phys. Rev. D 100, 015033 (2019).
  42. T. G. Rizzo, Portal matter and dark sector phenomenology at colliders, Report No. SLAC-PUB-17633, 2022.
  43. T. D. Rueter and T. G. Rizzo, Towards a UV-model of kinetic mixing and portal matter, Phys. Rev. D 101, 015014 (2020).
  44. T. G. Rizzo, Kinetic mixing and portal matter phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 99, 115024 (2019).
  45. A. Belyaev, L. Panizzi, N. Thongyoi, and F. Wilhelm, The muonic portal to vector dark matter: Connecting precision muon physics, cosmology, and colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2026) 240.
  46. J. Lahiri, D. Pradhan, and A. Sarkar, The influence of lepton portal on the WIMP-pFIMP framework, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 019.
  47. J. P. Delahaye, M. Diemoz, K. Long, B. Mansoulié, N. Pastrone, L. Rivkin et al., Muon Colliders, arXiv:1901.06150.
  48. D. Schulte (International Muon Collider Collaboration), The muon collider, JACoW IPAC2022 (2022) 821, 10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2022-TUIZSP2.
  49. K. M. Black et al., Muon Collider Forum report, J. Instrum. 19, T02015 (2024).
  50. C. Accettura et al. (International Muon Collider Collaboration), Interim report for the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC), CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 2/2024, 176 (2024).
  51. B. Holdom, Searching for ε charges and a new U(1), Phys. Lett. B 178, 65 (1986).
  52. P. Fayet, Extra U(1)’s and new forces, Nucl. Phys. B347, 743 (1990).
  53. M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi, The Dark Photon (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2021).
  54. J. Alexander et al., Dark sectors 2016 workshop: Community report, tech. rep., Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States), 2016.
  55. K. S. Babu, C. F. Kolda, and J. March-Russell, Implications of generalized Z-Z-prime mixing, Phys. Rev. D 57, 6788 (1998).
  56. J. H. Kim, S. D. Lane, H.-S. Lee, I. M. Lewis, and M. Sullivan, Searching for dark photons with maverick top partners, Phys. Rev. D 101, 035041 (2020).
  57. M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer, and J. Jaeckel, Hunting all the hidden Photons, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 094.
  58. D. He et al. (APEX Collaboration), Dark photon constraints from a 7.139 GHz cavity haloscope experiment, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) L021101.
  59. T. Robens and T. Stefaniak, Status of the Higgs singlet extension of the Standard Model after LHC run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 104 (2015).
  60. T. Robens, Investigating extended scalar sectors at current and future colliders, Proc. Sci. LHCP2019 138 (2019).
  61. T. Robens, More Doublets and Singlets, Report No. RBI-ThPhys-2022-16, 2022.
  62. S. Adhikari, S. D. Lane, I. M. Lewis, and M. Sullivan, Complex scalar singlet model benchmarks for Snowmass, arXiv:2203.07455.
  63. S. D. Lane, I. M. Lewis, and M. Sullivan, Resonant multiscalar production in the generic complex singlet model in the multi-TeV region, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055017 (2024).
  64. T. Robens, Constraining extended scalar sectors at current and future colliders—an update, Springer Proc. Phys. 292, 141 (2023).
  65. T. Robens and R. Santos, BSM: Extended scalar sectors, tech. rep., Boskovic Inst., Zagreb, CERN, 2025.
  66. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139  fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Lett. B 842, 137963 (2023).
  67. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), A search for decays of the Higgs boson to invisible particles in events with a top-antitop quark pair or a vector boson in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 933 (2023).
  68. A. Papaefstathiou, T. Robens, and G. White, Signal strength and W-boson mass measurements as a probe of the electro-weak phase transition at colliders—Snowmass White Paper, arXiv:2205.14379.
  69. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Combination of searches for nonresonant Higgs boson pair production in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, arXiv:2510.07527.
  70. A. Cheng (ATLAS Collaboration), Combination of searches for resonant Higgs boson pair production using pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Proc. Sci. LHCP2024 (2025) 248.
  71. D. Buttazzo, F. Sala, and A. Tesi, Singlet-like Higgs bosons at present and future colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2015) 158.
  72. A. Sopczak, Search for new particles at LEP, Acta Phys. Pol. B 30, 3229 (1999).
  73. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Inclusive nonresonant multilepton probes of new phenomena at s=13  TeV, Phys. Rev. D 105, 112007 (2022).
  74. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for third-generation vector-like leptons in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 118.
  75. V. Chekhovsky et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for vector-like leptons with long-lived particle decays in the CMS muon system in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 156.
  76. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Combination of searches for resonant Higgs boson pair production using pp collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 231801 (2024).
  77. S. Schael et al. (ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OPAL Collaboration, SLD Collaboration, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, and SLD Heavy Flavour Group), Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rep. 427, 257 (2006).
  78. C.-Y. Chen, S. Dawson, and E. Furlan, Vectorlike fermions and Higgs effective field theory revisited, Phys. Rev. D 96, 015006 (2017).
  79. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  80. D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 127 ppb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 101802 (2025).
  81. G. W. Bennett et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Final report of the muon E821 anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006).
  82. R. Aliberti et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: An update, Phys. Rep. 1143, 1 (2025).
  83. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  84. S. Mahapatra, P. K. Paul, and N. Sahu, Forbidden dark matter assisted by first-order phase transition and associated gravitational waves, arXiv:2601.12319.
  85. P. Huang, A. D. Medina, and C. E. M. Wagner, Rescuing overabundant dark matter with a strongly first order phase transition in the dark sector, arXiv:2602.16822.
  86. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, Feynrules 2.0—a complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  87. G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml, A. Mjallal, and A. Pukhov, micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter, Comput. Phys. Commun. 299, 109133 (2024).
  88. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Dark matter search results from a one Ton-Year exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018).
  89. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), WIMP dark matter search using a 3.1 Tonne-Year exposure of the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 221003 (2025).
  90. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Dark matter search results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  91. C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer, and T. Reiter, UFO-The universal FeynRules output, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1201 (2012).
  92. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H.-S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  93. C. Bierlich et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of pythia8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 8 (2022).
  94. T. H. Park, Jet energy resolution measurement of the atlas detector using momentum balance, 2018.
  95. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV, J. Instrum. 12, P02014 (2017).
  96. I. Pezzotti et al., Dual-readout calorimetry for future experiments probing fundamental physics, arXiv:2203.04312.
  97. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2008) 063.
  98. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012).
  99. J. M. Butterworth, A. R. Davison, M. Rubin, and G. P. Salam, Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 242001 (2008).
  100. S. Bentvelsen and I. Meyer, The Cambridge jet algorithm: Features and applications, Eur. Phys. J. C 4, 623 (1998).
  101. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011).
  102. N. Kumar and S. P. Martin, Vectorlike leptons at the large hadron collider, Phys. Rev. D 92, 115018 (2015).
  103. P. N. Bhattiprolu, S. P. Martin, and J. D. Wells, Criteria for projected discovery and exclusion sensitivities of counting experiments, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 123 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation