- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Triply heavy tetraquarks b¯cq¯c and c¯bq¯b in a constituent quark model

Gang Yang1,*, Jialun Ping2,†, and Jorge Segovia3,‡

  • *Contact author: yanggang@zjnu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: jlping@njnu.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: jsegovia@upo.es
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 034014 – Published 12 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k8dy-yhbr

Abstract

A systematic investigation of S-wave triply heavy tetraquark systems with quark content b¯cq¯c and c¯bq¯b (q=u, d, s), spin-parity quantum numbers JP=0+, 1+, 2+, and isospin I=0,12 is carried out within the constituent quark model framework. The four-body bound and resonance states are determined by solving the Schrödinger equation employing the high-precision and efficient Gaussian expansion method in conjunction with the powerful complex scaling method. Besides, a comprehensive coupled-channel analysis of the S-wave tetraquark systems is performed, taking into account meson-meson, diquark-antidiquark, and K-type configurations, as well as all allowed color structures. Several narrow resonant states are identified in each I(JP) channel. In particular, resonances for the b¯cq¯c system are found in the mass range of 8.87–9.36 GeV, while those for the c¯bq¯b system lie between 12.13–12.45 GeV. Most of the predicted resonances are compact tetraquark states with sizes smaller than 1.0 fm, although four states exhibit more extended structures with sizes around 1.3 fm, suggesting a more loosely bound nature. Magnetic moments and dominant wave function components of these exotic states are also analyzed. The results indicate that K-type configurations play a major role in the structure of the observed resonances. Finally, possible strong decay channels (golden modes) for these states are theoretically proposed.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (84)

  1. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 112003 (2020).
  2. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 242001 (2020).
  3. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041902 (2023).
  4. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 012017 (2023).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Phys. 18, 751 (2022).
  6. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Commun. 13, 3351 (2022).
  7. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Sci. Bull. 65, 1983 (2020).
  8. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 111901 (2024).
  9. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151902 (2023).
  10. X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 152001 (2021).
  11. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 639, 1 (2016).
  12. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076201 (2017).
  13. F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018).
  14. Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237 (2019).
  15. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Symmetry 12, 1869 (2020).
  16. X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73, 125201 (2021).
  17. H.-X. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094003 (2022).
  18. X. Cao, Front. Phys. 18, 44600 (2023).
  19. M. Mai, U.-G. Meißner, and C. Urbach, Phys. Rep. 1001, 1 (2023).
  20. L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 1019, 1 (2023).
  21. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023).
  22. F.-K. Guo, H. Peng, J.-J. Xie, and X. Zhou, arXiv:2203.07141.
  23. P. G. Ortega and D. R. Entem, Symmetry 13, 279 (2021).
  24. H. Huang, C. Deng, X. Liu, Y. Tan, and J. Ping, Symmetry 15, 1298 (2023).
  25. R. F. Lebed, Proc. Sci. FPCP2023 (2023) 028 [arXiv:2308.00781].
  26. B.-S. Zou,Sci. Bull. 66, 1258 (2021).
  27. M.-L. Du, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, J. A. Oller, and Q. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 157.
  28. M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Phys. Rep. 1108, 1 (2025).
  29. D. Johnson, I. Polyakov, T. Skwarnicki, and M. Wang, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 74, 583 (2024).
  30. D. R. Entem, F. Fernández, P. G. Ortega, and J. Segovia, arXiv:2504.07897.
  31. C. Hanhart, arXiv:2504.06043.
  32. X. Wang, X. Liu, and Y. Gao, arXiv:2502.15117.
  33. Z.-G. Wang, Front. Phys. (Beijing)21, 016300 (2026).
  34. A. Francis, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 140, 104143 (2025).
  35. J.-H. Chen, J. Chen, F.-K. Guo, Y.-G. Ma, C.-P. Shen, Q.-Y. Shou, Q. Shou, Q. Wang, J.-J. Wu, and B.-S. Zou, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 55 (2025).
  36. N. Hüsken, E. S. Norella, and I. Polyakov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 40, 2530002 (2025).
  37. Y. Liu, M. A. Nowak, and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 100, 126023 (2019).
  38. N. Li, Y. Xing, and J.-R. Shi, arXiv:2503.03555.
  39. J.-F. Jiang, W. Chen, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094022 (2017).
  40. Y.-J. Xu, L.-G. Tian, Y. Li, J.-Y. Wu, Y.-L. Liu, and M.-Q. Huang, arXiv:2506.14527.
  41. W.-S. Zhang and L. Tang, Nucl. Phys. A1064, 123227 (2025).
  42. Z.-H. Zhu, W.-X. Zhang, and D. Jia, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 344 (2024).
  43. X.-Z. Weng, W.-Z. Deng, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034026 (2022).
  44. Q.-F. Lü, D.-Y. Chen, Y.-B. Dong, and E. Santopinto, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054026 (2021).
  45. S.-Y. Li, Y.-R. Liu, Z.-L. Man, C.-R. Shu, Z.-G. Si, and J. Wu, Symmetry 17, 170 (2025).
  46. H.-M. Yang, Y. Ma, W.-L. Wu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 111, 074040 (2025).
  47. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054036 (2024).
  48. X. Liu, Y. Tan, D. Chen, H. Huang, and J. Ping, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054019 (2023).
  49. H. Mutuk, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 358 (2023).
  50. Y. Xing, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 57 (2020).
  51. K. Chen, X. Liu, J. Wu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 5 (2017).
  52. G. Yang, J. L. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014001 (2020).
  53. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054023 (2020).
  54. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014006 (2021).
  55. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 772 (2023).
  56. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094035 (2021).
  57. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 106, 014021 (2022).
  58. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074011 (2021).
  59. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Chin. Phys. C 48, 073106 (2024).
  60. G. Yang, J. Ping, and F. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 95, 014010 (2017).
  61. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014035 (2019).
  62. G. Yang, J. L. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074030 (2020).
  63. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 106, 014005 (2022).
  64. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Symmetry 16, 354 (2024).
  65. G. S. Bali, H. Neff, T. Duessel, T. Lippert, and K. Schilling (SESAM Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 71, 114513 (2005).
  66. J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, F. Fernandez, and E. Hernandez, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 22, 1330026 (2013).
  67. J. Vijande, F. Fernandez, and A. Valcarce, J. Phys. G 31, 481 (2005).
  68. A. Valcarce, F. Fernandez, P. Gonzalez, and V. Vento, Phys. Lett. B 367, 35 (1996).
  69. J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Lett. B 662, 33 (2008).
  70. J. Segovia, A. M. Yasser, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. D 78, 114033 (2008).
  71. J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. D 83, 114018 (2011).
  72. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, Phys. Rev. D 94, 114018 (2016).
  73. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Few-Body Syst. 59, 113 (2018).
  74. F. Fernandez, A. Valcarce, U. Straub, and A. Faessler, J. Phys. G 19, 2013 (1993).
  75. A. Valcarce, F. Fernandez, A. Buchmann, and A. Faessler, Phys. Rev. C 50, 2246 (1994).
  76. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. D 81, 054023 (2010).
  77. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. D 94, 074037 (2016).
  78. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, Phys. Rev. D 95, 034010 (2017).
  79. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 78 (2019).
  80. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 223 (2020).
  81. J. Vijande, A. Valcarce, and K. Tsushima, Phys. Rev. D 74, 054018 (2006).
  82. G. Yang and J. Ping, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034023 (2018).
  83. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  84. E. Hiyama, Y. Kino, and M. Kamimura, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 223 (2003).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 034014– Published 12 February, 2026
  • Received 21 July 2025
  • Accepted 2 January 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation