Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Investigation of the photoproduction of bottom-charmed baryons within NRQCD

Juan-Juan Niu1,* and Hong-Hao Ma2,1,†

  • *Contact author: niujj@gxnu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: honghao.ma@unesp.br

Phys. Rev. D 114, 054057 – Published 29 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k7ym-ynsf

Abstract

We present a further theoretical study of the orbital P-wave bottom-charmed baryon within the framework of nonrelativistic QCD, considering both the direct photoproduction channel γ+γ→Ξbc+c¯+b¯ and the resolved photoproduction channel γ+g→Ξbc+c¯+b¯. At future linear colliders, ILC and CLIC, the initial photons can be emitted from the laser backscattering and then the parton gluon can be emitted from the photon. The formation of Ξbc can be modeled in two steps: a compact diquark state ⟨bc⟩[n] is formed first and subsequently captures a light quark from the vacuum to hadronize into the baryon Ξbc. The color and spin quantum number [n] of the ⟨bc⟩ diquark can be [S31]3¯/6, [S10]3¯/6, [P11]3¯/6, or [P3J]3¯/6 with J=0, 1, 2. Using three benchmark collision energies and an illustrative integrated luminosity, we analyze the cross sections, differential distributions, and the estimated produced events of the Ξbc baryon. For the conservative h6=0 baseline, the combined P-wave contribution amounts to approximately 8% of the combined S-wave rate at three considered collision energies and is therefore non-negligible.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (79)

  1. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of the doubly charmed baryon Ξcc++, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 112001 (2017).
  2. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), First observation of the doubly charmed baryon decay Ξcc++→Ξc+π+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 162002 (2018).
  3. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the lifetime of the doubly charmed baryon Ξcc++, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 052002 (2018).
  4. M. Gell-Mann, A schematic model of baryons and mesons, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964).
  5. G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking, Version 1, Report No. CERN-TH-401.
  6. G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symmetry and its breaking, Version 2, Report No. CERN-TH-412.
  7. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Search for the doubly heavy baryon Ξbc+ decaying to J/ψΞc+, Chin. Phys. C 47, 093001 (2023).
  8. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Search for the doubly heavy Ξbc0 baryon via decays to D0pK−, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 095.
  9. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Search for the doubly heavy baryons Ωbc0 and Ξbc0 decaying to Λc+π− and Ξc+π−, Chin. Phys. C 45, 093002 (2021).
  10. S. S. Gershtein, V. V. Kiselev, A. K. Likhoded, and A. I. Onishchenko, Spectroscopy of doubly heavy baryons, Phys. Rev. D 62, 054021 (2000).
  11. J. Oudichhya, K. Gandhi, and A. Kumar Rai, Mass spectra of Ξcc, Ξbc, Ωcc, and Ωbc baryons in Regge phenomenology, Phys. Scr. 97, 054001 (2022).
  12. Q. Qin, Y. J. Shi, W. Wang, G. H. Yang, F. S. Yu, and R. Zhu, Inclusive approach to hunt for the beauty-charmed baryons Ξbc, Phys. Rev. D 105, L031902 (2022).
  13. Y. J. Shi, W. Wang, and Z. X. Zhao, QCD sum rules analysis of weak decays of doubly-heavy baryons, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 568 (2020).
  14. Z. Ghalenovi, C. P. Shen, and M. Moazzen Sorkhi, Mass spectra and semileptonic decays of doubly heavy Ξ and Ω baryons, Phys. Lett. B 834, 137405 (2022).
  15. N. Mathur, M. Padmanath, and S. Mondal, Precise predictions of charmed-bottom hadrons from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 202002 (2018).
  16. N. Mohajery, N. Salehi, and H. Hassanabadi, A new model for calculating the ground and excited states masses spectra of doubly heavy Ξ baryons, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018, 1326438 (2018).
  17. Y. Song, D. Jia, W. Zhang, and A. Hosaka, Low-lying doubly heavy baryons: Regge relation and mass scaling, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1 (2023).
  18. G. H. Yang, E. P. Liang, Q. Qin, and K. K. Shao, Inclusive weak-annihilation decays and lifetimes of beauty-charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 106, 093013 (2022).
  19. Q. F. Song, Q. F. Lü, and A. Hosaka, Bottom-charmed baryons in a nonrelativistic quark model, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 89 (2024).
  20. S. P. Baranov, Production of doubly flavored baryons in pp, ep, and γγ collisions, Phys. Rev. D 54, 3228 (1996).
  21. G. Chen, X. G. Wu, J. W. Zhang, H. Y. Han, and H. B. Fu, Hadronic production of Ξcc at a fixed-target experiment at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074020 (2014).
  22. G. Chen, X. G. Wu, and S. Xu, Impacts of the intrinsic charm content of the proton on the Ξcc hadroproduction at a fixed target experiment at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 100, 054022 (2019).
  23. A. P. Martynenko and A. M. Trunin, Pair double heavy diquark production in high energy proton–proton collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 138 (2015).
  24. S. Koshkarev, Production of the doubly heavy baryons, Bc meson and the all-charm tetraquark at AFTER@LHC with double intrinsic heavy mechanism, Acta Phys. Pol. B 48, 163 (2017).
  25. S. Koshkarev and V. Anikeev, Production of the doubly charmed baryons at the SELEX experiment—The double intrinsic charm approach, Phys. Lett. B 765, 171 (2017).
  26. S. Groote and S. Koshkarev, Production of doubly charmed baryons nearly at rest, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 509 (2017).
  27. A. V. Berezhnoy, A. K. Likhoded, and A. V. Luchinsky, Doubly heavy baryons at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 98, 113004 (2018).
  28. S. J. Brodsky, S. Groote, and S. Koshkarev, Resolving the SELEX–LHCb double-charm baryon conflict: The impact of intrinsic heavy-quark hadroproduction and supersymmetric light-front holographic QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 483 (2018).
  29. X. G. Wu, A new search for the doubly charmed baryon Ξcc+ at the LHC, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 63, 221063 (2020).
  30. C. H. Chang, J. X. Wang, and X. G. Wu, GENXICC: A generator for hadronic production of the double heavy baryons Xi(cc), Xi(bc) and Xi(bb), Comput. Phys. Commun. 177, 467 (2007).
  31. C. H. Chang, J. X. Wang, and X. G. Wu, GENXICC2.0: An upgraded version of the generator for hadronic production of double heavy baryons Xi(cc), Xi(bc) and Xi(bb), Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1144 (2010).
  32. Z. J. Yang, P. F. Zhang, and Y. J. Zheng, Doubly heavy baryon production in e+e− annihilation, Chin. Phys. Lett. 31, 051301 (2014).
  33. J. Jiang, X. G. Wu, Q. L. Liao, X. C. Zheng, and Z. Y. Fang, Doubly heavy baryon production at a high luminosity e+e− collider, Phys. Rev. D 86, 054021 (2012).
  34. J. Jiang, X. G. Wu, S. M. Wang, J. W. Zhang, and Z. Y. Fang, Further study on the doubly heavy baryon production around the Z0 peak at a high luminosity e+e− collider, Phys. Rev. D 87, 054027 (2013).
  35. X. C. Zheng, C. H. Chang, and Z. Pan, Production of doubly heavy-flavored hadrons at e+e− colliders, Phys. Rev. D 93, 034019 (2016).
  36. Z. J. Yang and X. X. Zhao, The production of Ξbb at photon collider, Chin. Phys. Lett. 31, 091301 (2014).
  37. G. Chen, X. G. Wu, Z. Sun, Y. Ma, and H. B. Fu, Photoproduction of doubly heavy baryon at the ILC, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 018.
  38. X. J. Zhan, X. G. Wu, and X. C. Zheng, Photoproduction of doubly heavy baryons at future e+e- colliders, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074030 (2023).
  39. H. Y. Bi, R. Y. Zhang, X. G. Wu, W. G. Ma, X. Z. Li, and S. Owusu, Photoproduction of doubly heavy baryon at the LHeC, Phys. Rev. D 95, 074020 (2017).
  40. Z. Sun and X. G. Wu, The production of the doubly charmed baryon in deeply inelastic ep scattering at the Large Hadron Electron Collider, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 034.
  41. G. Chen, C. H. Chang, and X. G. Wu, Hadronic production of the doubly charmed baryon via the proton–nucleus and the nucleus–nucleus collisions at the RHIC and LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 801 (2018).
  42. J. J. Niu, L. Guo, H. H. Ma, X. G. Wu, and X. C. Zheng, Production of semi-inclusive doubly heavy baryons via top-quark decays, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094021 (2018).
  43. J. J. Niu, L. Guo, H. H. Ma, and X. G. Wu, Production of doubly heavy baryons via Higgs boson decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 339 (2019).
  44. P. H. Zhang, L. Guo, X. C. Zheng, and Q. W. Ke, Excited doubly heavy baryon production via W+ boson decays, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034016 (2022).
  45. X. Luo, H. B. Fu, and H. J. Tian, Investigation of Z-boson decay into and baryons within the NRQCD factorization approach*, Chin. Phys. C 47, 053102 (2023).
  46. A. V. Berezhnoy, I. N. Belov, and A. K. Likhoded, Production of doubly charmed baryons with the excited heavy diquark at LHC, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34, 1950038 (2019).
  47. H. H. Ma, J. J. Niu, and X. C. Zheng, Excited doubly heavy baryons production via top-quark decays, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014006 (2023).
  48. X. J. Zhan, X. G. Wu, and X. C. Zheng, Photoproduction of P-wave doubly charmed baryon at future e+e− collider, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 029.
  49. A. V. Berezhnoy, V. V. Kiselev, and A. K. Likhoded, Photonic production of S- and P wave b/c states and doubly heavy baryons, Z. Phys. A 356, 89 (1996).
  50. M. Klasen, B. A. Kniehl, L. N. Mihaila, and M. Steinhauser, Evidence for color octet mechanism from CERN LEP-2γγ→J/ψ+X data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 032001 (2002).
  51. S. Frixione, M. L. Mangano, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi, Improving the Weizsacker-Williams approximation in electron-proton collisions, Phys. Lett. B 319, 339 (1993).
  52. A. Djouadi et al. (ILC Collaboration), International linear collider reference design report volume 2: Physics at the ILC, arXiv:0709.1893.
  53. P. N. Burrows et al. (CLICdp and CLIC Collaborations), The compact linear collider (CLIC)—2018 summary report, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 2, 1 (2018).
  54. J. Jiang, S. Y. Li, X. Liang, Y. R. Liu, Z. G. Si, and Z. J. Yang, Production of doubly charmed tetraquark tcc via photon-photon fusion at electron-positron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 866, 139543 (2025).
  55. A. Abada et al. (FCC Collaboration), FCC-ee: The lepton collider: Future circular collider conceptual design report volume 2, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 228, 261 (2019).
  56. CEPC Study Group Collaboration, CEPC conceptual design report: Volume 1-accelerator, arXiv:1809.00285.
  57. J. B. Guimarães da Costa et al. (CEPC Study Group Collaboration), CEPC conceptual design report: Volume 2—physics & detector, arXiv:1811.10545.
  58. J. Erler, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, G. Weiglein, and P. M. Zerwas, Physics impact of GigaZ, Phys. Lett. B 486, 125 (2000).
  59. H. H. Ma, J. J. Niu, and L. Guo, Further study on excited ΞQQ′ via photoproduction at CEPC and FCC-ee, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 197.
  60. J. J. Niu and H. H. Ma, Photoproduction of doubly charmed tetraquark tcc via photon-gluon fusion at ILC and CLIC, Phys. Rev. D 112, 054002 (2025).
  61. R. Li and K. T. Chao, Photoproduction of J/psi in association with a cc¯ pair, Phys. Rev. D 79, 114020 (2009).
  62. X. J. Zhan, X. G. Wu, and X. C. Zheng, Inclusive J/ψ photoproduction at the ILC within the framework of non-relativistic QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 050.
  63. X. J. Zhan, X. G. Wu, and X. C. Zheng, Photoproduction of the bc meson at future e+e- colliders, Phys. Rev. D 106, 094036 (2022).
  64. G. T. Bodwin, E. Braaten, and G. P. Lepage, Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium, Phys. Rev. D 51, 1125 (1995); 55, 5853(E) (1997).
  65. J. P. Ma and Z. G. Si, Factorization approach for inclusive production of doubly heavy baryon, Phys. Lett. B 568, 135 (2003).
  66. I. F. Ginzburg, G. L. Kotkin, V. G. Serbo, and V. I. Telnov, Colliding γe and γγ beams based on the single-pass e+e− colliders (VLEPP type), Nucl. Instrum. Methods 205, 47 (1983).
  67. V. I. Telnov, Problems of obtaining γγ and γε colliding beams at linear colliders, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 294, 72 (1990).
  68. M. Glück, E. Reya, and I. Schienbein, Radiatively generated parton distributions of real and virtual photons, Phys. Rev. D 60, 054019 (1999); 62, 019902(E) (2000).
  69. P. Aurenche, M. Fontannaz, and J. P. Guillet, New NLO parametrizations of the parton distributions in real photons, Eur. Phys. J. C 44, 395 (2005).
  70. W. Slominski, H. Abramowicz, and A. Levy, NLO photon parton parametrization using ee and ep data, Eur. Phys. J. C 45, 633 (2006).
  71. A. Petrelli, M. Cacciari, M. Greco, F. Maltoni, and M. L. Mangano, NLO production and decay of quarkonium, Nucl. Phys. B514, 245 (1998).
  72. A. F. Falk, M. E. Luke, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, Heavy quark fragmentation to baryons containing two heavy quarks, Phys. Rev. D 49, 555 (1994).
  73. V. V. Kiselev, A. K. Likhoded, and M. V. Shevlyagin, Double charmed baryon production at B factory, Phys. Lett. B 332, 411 (1994).
  74. E. Bagan, H. G. Dosch, P. Gosdzinsky, S. Narison, and J. M. Richard, Hadrons with charm and beauty, Z. Phys. C 64, 57 (1994).
  75. A. V. Berezhnoy, V. V. Kiselev, A. K. Likhoded, and A. I. Onishchenko, Doubly charmed baryon production in hadronic experiments, Phys. Rev. D 57, 4385 (1998).
  76. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  77. V. V. Kiselev, A. K. Likhoded, O. N. Pakhomova, and V. A. Saleev, Mass spectra of doubly heavy Omega QQ′ baryons, Phys. Rev. D 66, 034030 (2002).
  78. N. Brambilla et al. (Quarkonium Working Group Collaboration), Heavy quarkonium physics, CERN Yellow Report, CERN-2005-005, CERN, Geneva, 2005, arXiv:hep-ph/0412158.
  79. N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, B. K. Heltsley, R. Vogt, G. T. Bodwin, E. Eichten, A. D. Frawley, A. B. Meyer, R. E. Mitchell, V. Papadimitriou et al., Heavy quarkonium: Progress, puzzles, and opportunities, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1534 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation