Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

D0−D¯0 mixing in the Dyson-Schwinger approach

Xiaotong Xie*, Hiroyuki Umeeda†, and Jinglong Zhu‡

  • Center for Theoretical Physics and College of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, China

  • *Contact author: jiext23@mails.jlu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: umeeda@jlu.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: zhujl23@mails.jlu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 034014 – Published 14 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jn43-cv1f

Abstract

In view of difficulty to reproduce observables in the D0−D¯0 mixing via the operator product expansion, we discuss the Dyson-Schwinger approach to this process. Formulated by the parametrization of quark propagators, SU(3) breaking relevant to charm mixing is evaluated in such a way that properly takes account of dynamical chiral symmetry breaking. The D¯0→D0 transition is discussed in the vacuum-insertion approximation with locality of the light valence-quark field, represented by the decay constant of D0 meson as well as relevant momentum integrals. It is found that dimensionless mass-difference observable in this approach leads to |x|=(1.3 – 2.9)×10−3, the order of magnitude comparable to the HFLAV data, and thereby offering a certain improvement as a theoretical framework.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (51)

  1. N. Cabibbo, Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963); M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
  2. J. F. Donoghue, E. Golowich, B. R. Holstein, and J. Trampetic, Dispersive effects in D0−D¯0 mixing, Phys. Rev. D 33, 179 (1986).
  3. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, Long-distance contributions to D0−D¯0 mixing parameters, Phys. Rev. D 81, 114020 (2010).
  4. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, Updated analysis of D→PP,VP, and VV decays: Implications for KS0−KL0 asymmetries and D0−D¯0 mixing, Phys. Rev. D 109, 073008 (2024).
  5. H. Y. Jiang, F. S. Yu, Q. Qin, H. n. Li, and C. D. Lü, D0−D¯0 mixing parameter y in the factorization-assisted topological-amplitude approach, Chin. Phys. C 42, 063101 (2018).
  6. M. Gronau and J. L. Rosner, Revisiting D0−D¯0 mixing using U-spin, Phys. Rev. D 86, 114029 (2012).
  7. J. S. Hagelin, Mass mixing and CP violation in the B0−B¯0 system, Nucl. Phys. B193, 123 (1981).
  8. H. Y. Cheng, CP violating effects in heavy meson systems, Phys. Rev. D 26, 143 (1982).
  9. A. J. Buras, W. Slominski, and H. Steger, B0−B¯0 mixing, CP violation and the B meson decay, Nucl. Phys. B245, 369 (1984).
  10. A. Datta and D. Kumbhakar, D0−D¯0 mixing: A possible test of physics beyond the standard model, Z. Phys. C 27, 515 (1985).
  11. H. Georgi, D−D¯ mixing in heavy quark effective field theory, Phys. Lett. B 297, 353 (1992).
  12. T. Ohl, G. Ricciardi, and E. H. Simmons, D−D¯ mixing in heavy quark effective field theory: The sequel, Nucl. Phys. B403, 605 (1993).
  13. H. N. Li, H. Umeeda, F. Xu, and F. S. Yu, D meson mixing as an inverse problem, Phys. Lett. B 810, 135802 (2020).
  14. H. Li, Dispersive analysis of neutral meson mixing, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054023 (2023).
  15. I. I. Y. Bigi and N. G. Uraltsev, D0−D¯0 oscillations as a probe of quark hadron duality, Nucl. Phys. B592, 92 (2001).
  16. T. Jubb, M. Kirk, A. Lenz, and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, On the ultimate precision of meson mixing observables, Nucl. Phys. B915, 431 (2017).
  17. H. Umeeda, Quark-hadron duality for heavy meson mixings in the ’t Hooft model, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 066.
  18. E. Golowich and A. A. Petrov, Short distance analysis of D0−D¯0 mixing, Phys. Lett. B 625, 53 (2005).
  19. M. Bobrowski, A. Lenz, J. Riedl, and J. Rohrwild, How large can the SM contribution to CP violation in D0−D¯0 mixing be?, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 009.
  20. B. Melić, L. Dulibić, and A. A. Petrov, D0D¯0 mixings from nonlocal condensate contributions, Proc. Sci., ICHEP2024 (2025) 413 [arXiv:2410.14382].
  21. K. G. Wilson, Nonlagrangian models of current algebra, Phys. Rev. 179, 1499 (1969).
  22. S. Banerjee et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV) Collaboration), Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2023, arXiv:2411.18639.
  23. S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani, Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1285 (1970).
  24. R. L. Kingsley, S. B. Treiman, F. Wilczek, and A. Zee, Weak decays of charmed hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 11, 1919 (1975).
  25. A. F. Falk, Y. Grossman, Z. Ligeti, and A. A. Petrov, SU(3) breaking and D0−D¯0 mixing, Phys. Rev. D 65, 054034 (2002).
  26. A. F. Falk, Y. Grossman, Z. Ligeti, Y. Nir, and A. A. Petrov, The D0−D¯0 mass difference from a dispersion relation, Phys. Rev. D 69, 114021 (2004).
  27. C. Greub, T. Hurth, M. Misiak, and D. Wyler, The c→uγ contribution to weak radiative charm decay, Phys. Lett. B 382, 415 (1996).
  28. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  29. C. D. Roberts and A. G. Williams, Dyson-Schwinger equations and their application to hadronic physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 33, 477 (1994).
  30. C. D. Roberts, D. G. Richards, T. Horn, and L. Chang, Insights into the emergence of mass from studies of pion and kaon structure, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103883 (2021).
  31. C. J. Burden, C. D. Roberts, and A. G. Williams, Singularity structure of a model quark propagator, Phys. Lett. B 285, 347 (1992).
  32. C. J. Burden, C. D. Roberts, and M. J. Thomson, Electromagnetic form-factors of charged and neutral kaons, Phys. Lett. B 371, 163 (1996).
  33. Y. Kalinovsky, K. L. Mitchell, and C. D. Roberts, Kl3 and πe3 transition form-factors, Phys. Lett. B 399, 22 (1997).
  34. M. A. Ivanov, Y. L. Kalinovsky, P. Maris, and C. D. Roberts, Semileptonic decays of heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. B 416, 29 (1998).
  35. M. A. Ivanov, Y. L. Kalinovsky, and C. D. Roberts, Survey of heavy meson observables, Phys. Rev. D 60, 034018 (1999).
  36. B. El-Bennich, G. Krein, L. Chang, C. D. Roberts, and D. J. Wilson, Flavor SU(4) breaking between effective couplings, Phys. Rev. D 85, 031502 (2012).
  37. B. El-Bennich, M. A. Paracha, C. D. Roberts, and E. Rojas, Couplings between the ρ and D- and D*-mesons, Phys. Rev. D 95, 034037 (2017).
  38. K. G. Chetyrkin, J. H. Kuhn, and M. Steinhauser, RunDec: A mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses, Comput. Phys. Commun. 133, 43 (2000).
  39. F. Schlumpf, Relativistic constituent quark model of electroweak properties of baryons, Phys. Rev. D 47, 4114 (1993); 49, 6246(E) (1994).
  40. N. Carrasco, P. Dimopoulos, R. Frezzotti, P. Lami, V. Lubicz, F. Nazzaro, E. Picca, L. Riggio, G. C. Rossi, and F. Sanfilippo et al., Leptonic decay constants fK, fD, and fDs with Nf=2+1+1 twisted-mass lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91, 054507 (2015); A. Bazavov, C. Bernard, N. Brown, C. Detar, A. X. El-Khadra, E. Gámiz, S. Gottlieb, U. M. Heller, J. Komijani, and A. S. Kronfeld et al., B- and D-meson leptonic decay constants from four-flavor lattice QCD, 98, 074512 (2018).
  41. Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG) Collaboration), FLAG review 2024, arXiv:2411.04268.
  42. R. Gupta, T. Bhattacharya, and S. R. Sharpe, Matrix elements of four fermion operators with quenched Wilson fermions, Phys. Rev. D 55, 4036 (1997).
  43. N. Carrasco et al., D0−D¯0 mixing in the standard model and beyond from Nf=2 twisted mass QCD, Phys. Rev. D 90, 014502 (2014).
  44. N. Carrasco, P. Dimopoulos, R. Frezzotti, V. Lubicz, G. C. Rossi, S. Simula, and C. Tarantino, (ETM Collaboration), ΔS=2 and ΔC=2 bag parameters in the standard model and beyond from Nf=2+1+1 twisted-mass lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034516 (2015).
  45. A. Bazavov et al., Short-distance matrix elements for D0-meson mixing for Nf=2+1 lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034513 (2018).
  46. A. V. Manohar, Large N QCD, arXiv:hep-ph/9802419.
  47. T. Kugo, M. G. Mitchard, and Y. Yoshida, Isgur-Wise function from Bethe-Salpeter amplitude, Prog. Theor. Phys. 91, 521 (1994).
  48. C. D. Roberts and S. M. Schmidt, Dyson-Schwinger equations: Density, temperature and continuum strong QCD, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 45, S1 (2000).
  49. J. Zhu, H. Umeeda, and X. Xie, D0−D¯0 mixing in the Bethe-Salpeter approach (to be published).
  50. A. J. Buras, S. Jager, and J. Urban, Master formulae for ΔF=2 NLO QCD factors in the standard model and beyond, Nucl. Phys. B605, 600 (2001).
  51. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation