- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Gravitational black hole shadow spectroscopy

Reggie C. Pantig1,* and Ali Övgün2,†

  • 1Physics Department, School of Foundational Studies and Education, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla Street, Intramuros, Manila 1002, Philippines
  • 2Physics Department, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, 99628 North Cyprus via Mersin 10, Turkiye

  • *Contact author: rcpantig@mapua.edu.ph
  • †Contact author: ali.ovgun@emu.edu.tr
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 112, 124072 – Published 24 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jmpd-8tn8

Abstract

In this work, we develop a generalized perturbative framework for gravitational shadows in static, spherically symmetric spacetimes. Building upon the recent two-parameter perturbative framework of K. Kobialko et al. [Perturbation theory for gravitational shadows in static spherically symmetric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044071 (2025).], this work extends the expansion in particle energy and metric deviation to encompass arbitrary, simultaneous deformations of all metric functions. By relaxing the common restriction of a fixed area radius (β(r)=r2), our formalism applies to a significantly broader class of alternative gravity theories and exotic compact objects. We derive analytical formulas for the massive shadow radius up to the second order in the deformation parameter, explicitly revealing the phenomenological signatures that arise from the coupling between temporal and spatial metric perturbations. The key result is that the distinct energy dependence of the massive shadow provides a powerful method to disentangle these different types of geometric deformations, breaking observational degeneracies inherent in the photon shadow alone. We demonstrate this principle with applications to traversable wormholes and canonical scalar-tensor solutions, showing how each produces a unique, distinguishable energy-dependent fingerprint. This generalized framework provides a robust, theory-agnostic tool for testing strong-field gravity. It offers a clear methodology for reconstructing metric parameters from potential multimessenger observations of massive particle shadows.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (78)

  1. K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L1 (2019).
  2. K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole in the center of the milky way, Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L12 (2022).
  3. J. L. Synge, The escape of photons from gravitationally intense stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 131, 463 (1966).
  4. C. T. Cunningham and J. M. Bardeen, The optical appearance of a star orbiting an extreme Kerr black hole, Astrophys. J. 173, L137 (1972).
  5. J. M. Bardeen, Timelike and null geodesics in the Kerr metric, Proceedings, Ecole d’Eté de Physique Théorique: Les Astres Occlus: Les Houches, France, August, 1972 (1973), pp. 215–240.
  6. J. P. Luminet, Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk, Astron. Astrophys. 75, 228 (1979).
  7. S. Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes (Oxford University Press, New York, 1985).
  8. H. Falcke, F. Melia, and E. Agol, Viewing the shadow of the black hole at the galactic center, Astrophys. J. Lett. 528, L13 (2000).
  9. C. Bambi, Testing black hole candidates with electromagnetic radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 025001 (2017).
  10. D. Psaltis, Testing general relativity with the Event Horizon Telescope, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 51, 137 (2019).
  11. V. Perlick and O. Y. Tsupko, Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies, Phys. Rep. 947, 1 (2022).
  12. S. Vagnozzi et al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 165007 (2023).
  13. S. Vagnozzi, C. Bambi, and L. Visinelli, Concerns regarding the use of black hole shadows as standard rulers, Classical Quantum Gravity 37, 087001 (2020).
  14. D. Ayzenberg et al., Fundamental physics opportunities with future ground-based mm/sub-mm VLBI arrays, Living Rev. Relativity 28, 4 (2025).
  15. P. Tiede, M. D. Johnson, D. W. Pesce, D. C. M. Palumbo, D. O. Chang, and P. Galison, Measuring photon rings with the ngEHT, Galaxies 10, 111 (2022).
  16. F. Aratore, O. Y. Tsupko, and V. Perlick, Constraining spherically symmetric metrics by the gap between photon rings, Phys. Rev. D 109, 124057 (2024).
  17. V. Perlick, O. Y. Tsupko, and G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically symmetric black hole, Phys. Rev. D 92, 104031 (2015).
  18. C.-M. Claudel, K. S. Virbhadra, and G. F. R. Ellis, The geometry of photon surfaces, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 42, 818 (2001).
  19. Y. Decanini, A. Folacci, and B. Raffaelli, Unstable circular null geodesics of static spherically symmetric black holes, Regge poles and quasinormal frequencies, Phys. Rev. D 81, 104039 (2010).
  20. A. A. Shoom, Metamorphoses of a photon sphere, Phys. Rev. D 96, 084056 (2017).
  21. S. Hod, Lower bound on the radii of black-hole photonspheres, Phys. Rev. D 101, 084033 (2020).
  22. S. Hod, Lower bound on the radii of light rings in traceless black-hole spacetimes, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 178.
  23. E. Teo, Spherical photon orbits around a Kerr black hole, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 35, 1909 (2003).
  24. S. Hod, Spherical null geodesics of rotating Kerr black holes, Phys. Lett. B 718, 1552 (2013).
  25. S. Hod, Marginally bound (critical) geodesics of rapidly rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 88, 087502 (2013).
  26. N. Tsukamoto, Z. Li, and C. Bambi, Constraining the spin and the deformation parameters from the black hole shadow, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2014) 043.
  27. N. Tsukamoto, Black hole shadow in an asymptotically-flat, stationary, and axisymmetric spacetime: The Kerr-Newman and rotating regular black holes, Phys. Rev. D 97, 064021 (2018).
  28. P. V. P. Cunha and C. A. R. Herdeiro, Shadows and strong gravitational lensing: A brief review, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 50, 42 (2018).
  29. P. V. P. Cunha, C. A. R. Herdeiro, and M. J. Rodriguez, Does the black hole shadow probe the event horizon geometry?, Phys. Rev. D 97, 084020 (2018).
  30. H. C. D. Lima, Junior., L. C. B. Crispino, P. V. P. Cunha, and C. A. R. Herdeiro, Can different black holes cast the same shadow?, Phys. Rev. D 103, 084040 (2021).
  31. A. A. Abdujabbarov, L. Rezzolla, and B. J. Ahmedov, A coordinate-independent characterization of a black hole shadow, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 2423 (2015).
  32. R. Konoplya, L. Rezzolla, and A. Zhidenko, General parametrization of axisymmetric black holes in metric theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 93, 064015 (2016).
  33. V. Cardoso, P. Pani, and J. Rico, On generic parametrizations of spinning black-hole geometries, Phys. Rev. D 89, 064007 (2014).
  34. T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, A metric for rapidly spinning black holes suitable for strong-field tests of the no-hair theorem, Phys. Rev. D 83, 124015 (2011).
  35. Z. Younsi, A. Zhidenko, L. Rezzolla, R. Konoplya, and Y. Mizuno, New method for shadow calculations: Application to parametrized axisymmetric black holes, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084025 (2016).
  36. K. A. Bronnikov, R. A. Konoplya, and T. D. Pappas, General parametrization of wormhole spacetimes and its application to shadows and quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D 103, 124062 (2021).
  37. R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Shadows of parametrized axially symmetric black holes allowing for separation of variables, Phys. Rev. D 103, 104033 (2021).
  38. K. Kobialko, D. Gal’tsov, and A. Molchanov, Gravitational shadow and emission spectrum of thin accretion disks in a plasma medium, Phys. Rev. D 112, 044039 (2025).
  39. Y. Koga, N. Asaka, M. Kimura, and K. Okabayashi, Dynamical photon sphere and time evolving shadow around black holes with temporal accretion, Phys. Rev. D 105, 104040 (2022).
  40. J. Solanki and V. Perlick, Photon sphere and shadow of a time-dependent black hole described by a Vaidya metric, Phys. Rev. D 105, 064056 (2022).
  41. O. Y. Tsupko and G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, First analytical calculation of black hole shadow in McVittie metric, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29, 2050062 (2020).
  42. M. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Shadows of Bonnor black dihole by chaotic lensing, Phys. Rev. D 97, 064029 (2018).
  43. T. Johannsen, Photon rings around Kerr and Kerr-like black holes, Astrophys. J. 777, 170 (2013).
  44. F. Feleppa, V. Bozza, and O. Y. Tsupko, Strong deflection limit analysis of black hole lensing in inhomogeneous plasma, Phys. Rev. D 110, 064031 (2024).
  45. F. Feleppa, F. Aratore, and V. Bozza, Interferometric signature of higher-order images in a parametrized framework, Phys. Rev. D 112, 044007 (2025).
  46. F. Feleppa, V. Bozza, and O. Y. Tsupko, Strong deflection of massive particles in spherically symmetric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044018 (2025).
  47. C.-K. Qiao, Curvatures, photon spheres, and black hole shadows, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084060 (2022).
  48. K. Paithankar and S. Kolekar, Black hole shadow and acceleration bounds for spherically symmetric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104042 (2023).
  49. H. Lu and H.-D. Lyu, Schwarzschild black holes have the largest size, Phys. Rev. D 101, 044059 (2020).
  50. V. Vertogradov and A. Övgün, Analyzing the influence of geometrical deformation on photon sphere and shadow radius: A new analytical approach—Spherically symmetric spacetimes, Phys. Dark Universe 45, 101541 (2024).
  51. V. Vertogradov and A. Övgün, General approach on shadow radius and photon spheres in asymptotically flat spacetimes and the impact of mass-dependent variations, Phys. Lett. B 854, 138758 (2024).
  52. V. Vertogradov, A. Övgün, and R. C. Pantig, Analyzing the influence of geometrical deformation on photon sphere and shadow radius: A new analytical approach-stationary, and axisymmetric spacetime, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 22, 2540001 (2025).
  53. R. C. Pantig, On the analytic generalization of particle deflection in the weak field regime and shadow size in light of EHT constraints for Schwarzschild-like black hole solutions, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 52 (2025).
  54. K. Kobialko and D. Gal’tsov, Perturbation theory for gravitational shadows in static spherically symmetric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044071 (2025).
  55. A. Simpson and M. Visser, Black-bounce to traversable wormhole, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2019) 042.
  56. S. Sau, I. Banerjee, and S. SenGupta, Imprints of the Janis-Newman-Winicour spacetime on observations related to shadow and accretion, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064027 (2020).
  57. P. V. P. Cunha, E. Berti, and C. A. R. Herdeiro, Light-ring stability for ultracompact objects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251102 (2017).
  58. M. S. Churilova, Analytical quasinormal modes of spherically symmetric black holes in the eikonal regime, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 629 (2019).
  59. R. A. Hennigar, M. B. J. Poshteh, and R. B. Mann, Shadows, signals, and stability in Einsteinian cubic gravity, Phys. Rev. D 97, 064041 (2018).
  60. R. A. Konoplya, A. F. Zinhailo, and Z. Stuchlik, Quasinormal modes and Hawking radiation of black holes in cubic gravity, Phys. Rev. D 102, 044023 (2020).
  61. A. Allahyari, M. Khodadi, S. Vagnozzi, and D. F. Mota, Magnetically charged black holes from non-linear electrodynamics and the Event Horizon Telescope, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2020) 003.
  62. X.-M. Kuang and A. Övgün, Strong gravitational lensing and shadow constraint from M87* of slowly rotating Kerr-like black hole, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 447, 169147 (2022).
  63. M. Okyay and A. Övgün, Nonlinear electrodynamics effects on the black hole shadow, deflection angle, quasinormal modes and greybody factors, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2021) 009.
  64. R. C. Pantig, L. Mastrototaro, G. Lambiase, and A. Övgün, Shadow, lensing, quasinormal modes, greybody bounds and neutrino propagation by dyonic ModMax black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1155 (2022).
  65. R. C. Pantig and A. Övgün, Black hole in quantum wave dark matter, Fortschr. Phys. 71, 2200164 (2023).
  66. R. C. Pantig, A. Övgün, and D. Demir, Testing symmergent gravity through the shadow image and weak field photon deflection by a rotating black hole using the M87* and Sgr. A* results, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 250 (2023).
  67. A. Övgün, R. C. Pantig, and A. Rincón, Shadow and greybody bounding of a regular scale-dependent black hole solution, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 463, 169625 (2024).
  68. K. Karshiboev, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, A. Övgün, and A. Reyimberganov, Exploring the shadow of a rotating charged ModMax black hole, Commun. Theor. Phys. 76, 025401 (2024).
  69. M. Alloqulov, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, B. Ahmedov, and V. Khamidov, Shadow and weak gravitational lensing for Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole, Chin. Phys. C 48, 025104 (2024).
  70. A. Abdujabbarov, M. Amir, B. Ahmedov, and S. G. Ghosh, Shadow of rotating regular black holes, Phys. Rev. D 93, 104004 (2016).
  71. G. Mustafa, F. Atamurotov, I. Hussain, S. Shaymatov, and A. Övgün, Shadows and gravitational weak lensing by the Schwarzschild black hole in the string cloud background with quintessential field*, Chin. Phys. C 46, 125107 (2022).
  72. J. Rayimbaev, R. C. Pantig, A. Övgün, A. Abdujabbarov, and D. Demir, Quasiperiodic oscillations, weak field lensing and shadow cast around black holes in Symmergent gravity, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 454, 169335 (2023).
  73. Y. Yang, D. Liu, A. Övgün, G. Lambiase, and Z.-W. Long, Black hole surrounded by the pseudo-isothermal dark matter halo, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 63 (2024).
  74. S. L. Adler and K. S. Virbhadra, Cosmological constant corrections to the photon sphere and black hole shadow radii, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 54, 93 (2022).
  75. K. S. Virbhadra and G. F. R. Ellis, Schwarzschild black hole lensing, Phys. Rev. D 62, 084003 (2000).
  76. K. S. Virbhadra and C. R. Keeton, Time delay and magnification centroid due to gravitational lensing by black holes and naked singularities, Phys. Rev. D 77, 124014 (2008).
  77. K. S. Virbhadra, Distortions of images of Schwarzschild lensing, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064038 (2022).
  78. N. Heidari, A. A. Araújo Filho, R. C. Pantig, and A. Övgün, Absorption, scattering, geodesics, shadows and lensing phenomena of black holes in effective quantum gravity, Phys. Dark Universe 47, 101815 (2025).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 112, 124072– Published 24 December, 2025
  • Received 10 September 2025
  • Accepted 9 December 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation