Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

J/ψ polarization and pT distribution in cc¯ associated hadroproduction at O(αs5)

Qi-Ming Feng1 and Cong-Feng Qiao1,2,*

  • *Contact author: qiaocf@ucas.ac.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, L071501 – Published 2 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/htrt-26ws

Abstract

The quarkonium production in association with a heavy-quark pair of the same flavor was found to play an important role in various production schemes and provide a distinctive signature that could be studied in experiment. Within the nonrelativistic QCD framework, we perform the first complete calculation of the hadroproduction process gg→J/ψ+cc¯ at the next-to-leading order (NLO) in the expansion of strong coupling constant αs. The result tells us that the NLO corrections substantially enhance the color-singlet yield and alter the predicted polarization patterns and, hence, lead to a better agreement with experimental data across the pT spectrum. In contrast to charm-quark fragmentation, the fixed-order J/ψ and cc¯ associated production channel displays a markedly different kinematic behavior. While the inclusion of this process greatly reduces the discrepancy between color-singlet theoretical prediction and experimental measurement, a residual gap of approximately 1 order of magnitude still remains.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (40)

  1. G. T. Bodwin, E. Braaten, and G. P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. D 51, 1125 (1995); 55, 5853(E) (1997).
  2. G. T. Bodwin, arXiv:1208.5506.
  3. C. H. Chang, R. Li, and J. X. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 80, 034020 (2009).
  4. P. Artoisenet, J. M. Campbell, F. Maltoni, and F. Tramontano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 142001 (2009).
  5. J. M. Campbell, F. Maltoni, and F. Tramontano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 252002 (2007).
  6. J. P. Lansberg, Phys. Lett. B 695, 149 (2011).
  7. P. Artoisenet, J. P. Lansberg, and F. Maltoni, Phys. Lett. B 653, 60 (2007).
  8. B. Gong and J. X. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 232001 (2008).
  9. M. Kramer, J. Zunft, J. Steegborn, and P. M. Zerwas, Phys. Lett. B 348, 657 (1995).
  10. M. Krämer, Nucl. Phys. B459, 3 (1996).
  11. M. Butenschoen and B. A. Kniehl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 072001 (2010).
  12. M. Butenschoen and B. A. Kniehl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 172002 (2012).
  13. M. Butenschoen and B. A. Kniehl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 232001 (2011).
  14. K. T. Chao, Y. Q. Ma, H. S. Shao, K. Wang, and Y. J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 242004 (2012).
  15. Y. Q. Ma, K. Wang, and K. T. Chao, Phys. Rev. D 84, 114001 (2011).
  16. Y. Q. Ma, K. Wang, and K. T. Chao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 042002 (2011).
  17. Y. J. Zhang, Y. Q. Ma, K. Wang, and K. T. Chao, Phys. Rev. D 81, 034015 (2010).
  18. B. Gong, L. P. Wan, J. X. Wang, and H. F. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 042002 (2013).
  19. N. Brambilla, M. Butenschoen, and X. P. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 112, L011902 (2025).
  20. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 727, 381 (2013).
  21. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 858, 139044 (2024).
  22. C. F. Qiao and J. X. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 69, 014015 (2004).
  23. Y. J. Zhang and K. T. Chao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 092003 (2007).
  24. Z. Q. Chen, L. B. Chen, and C. F. Qiao, Phys. Rev. D 95, 036001 (2017).
  25. Q. M. Feng and C. F. Qiao, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094047 (2024).
  26. E. Braaten and J. Russ, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 64, 221 (2014).
  27. P. Faccioli, C. Lourenco, J. Seixas, and H. K. Wohri, Eur. Phys. J. C 69, 657 (2010).
  28. P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, and T. Peraro, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2012) 095; 11 (2012) 128(E).
  29. T. Peraro, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2771 (2014).
  30. Z. Wu, J. Boehm, R. Ma, H. Xu, and Y. Zhang, Comput. Phys. Commun. 295, 108999 (2024).
  31. B. W. Harris and J. F. Owens, Phys. Rev. D 65, 094032 (2002).
  32. S. Dittmaier, Nucl. Phys. B675, 447 (2003).
  33. J. Pumplin, D. R. Stump, J. Huston, H. L. Lai, P. M. Nadolsky, and W. K. Tung, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2002) 012.
  34. P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  35. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 169 (2024).
  36. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 154.
  37. Y. J. Zhang, Y. Q. Ma, and K. T. Chao, Phys. Rev. D 78, 054006 (2008).
  38. E. Braaten, K. m. Cheung, and T. C. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4230 (1993).
  39. X. C. Zheng, C. H. Chang, and X. G. Wu, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014005 (2019).
  40. B. Gong, R. Li, and J. X. Wang, arXiv:1102.0118.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation