Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Lazarides-Shafi axion models as Dijkgraaf-Witten theories

Motoo Suzuki1,2,3 and Ryo Yokokura4

Phys. Rev. D 113, L091902 – Published 15 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hl5s-73lj

Abstract

Axion models often face the domain wall problem, which threatens the standard big bang cosmology. The Lazarides-Shafi mechanism attempts to resolve this by identifying degenerate vacua through a continuous gauge symmetry. We formulate a topological quantum field theory to isolate the essential structure of the mechanism and analyze its generalized symmetry structure, including higher-form symmetries and higher-group. This framework yields a master formula for computing the domain wall number and clarifies the higher-form symmetry conditions required for complete vacuum identification in a model-independent way. Moreover, while a domain-wall-number-one scenario eliminates all higher-form global symmetries, the theory nevertheless exhibits a nontrivial four-group structure and realizes a symmetry-protected topological phase.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (53)

  1. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977).
  2. R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977).
  3. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978).
  4. F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978).
  5. P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1156 (1982).
  6. G. Lazarides and Q. Shafi, Phys. Lett. 115B, 21 (1982).
  7. T. W. B. Kibble, G. Lazarides, and Q. Shafi, Phys. Rev. D 26, 435 (1982).
  8. T. W. B. Kibble, G. Lazarides, and Q. Shafi, Phys. Lett. 113B, 237 (1982).
  9. T. Hiramatsu, M. Ibe, and M. Suzuki, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 058.
  10. T. Hiramatsu, M. Ibe, and M. Suzuki, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2020) 054.
  11. Q. Lu, M. Reece, and Z. Sun, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 227.
  12. A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 001.
  13. D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 172.
  14. C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator, and S.-H. Shao, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2205.09545.
  15. J. McGreevy, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 57 (2023).
  16. P. R. S. Gomes, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 74, 1 (2023).
  17. S. Schafer-Nameki, Phys. Rep. 1063, 1 (2024).
  18. T. D. Brennan and S. Hong, arXiv:2306.00912.
  19. R. Luo, Q.-R. Wang, and Y.-N. Wang, Phys. Rep. 1065, 1 (2024).
  20. S.-H. Shao, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics 2023: Aspects of Symmetry (2023), arXiv:2308.00747.
  21. D. Costa et al., arXiv:2411.09082.
  22. N. Iqbal, arXiv:2407.20815.
  23. J. Davighi, Proc. Sci. DISCRETE2024 (2025) 076 [arXiv:2504.05960].
  24. R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 129, 393 (1990).
  25. H. M. Georgi, L. J. Hall, and M. B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B192, 409 (1981).
  26. M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell, Phys. Lett. B 282, 137 (1992).
  27. R. Holman, S. D. H. Hsu, T. W. Kephart, E. W. Kolb, R. Watkins, and L. M. Widrow, Phys. Lett. B 282, 132 (1992).
  28. R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, D. A. Linde, and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 52, 912 (1995).
  29. S. M. Barr and D. Seckel, Phys. Rev. D 46, 539 (1992).
  30. S. Ghigna, M. Lusignoli, and M. Roncadelli, Phys. Lett. B 283, 278 (1992).
  31. M. Dine, in Conference on Topics in Quantum Gravity (1992), arXiv:hep-th/9207045.
  32. Y. Hidaka, M. Nitta, and R. Yokokura, Phys. Lett. B 823, 136762 (2021).
  33. Y. Hidaka, M. Nitta, and R. Yokokura, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 04A109 (2022).
  34. Y. Hidaka, M. Nitta, and R. Yokokura, Phys. Lett. B 808, 135672 (2020).
  35. Y. Hidaka, M. Nitta, and R. Yokokura, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 173.
  36. T. D. Brennan and C. Cordova, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 145.
  37. R. Sato, F. Takahashi, and M. Yamada, Phys. Rev. D 98, 043535 (2018).
  38. C. Chatterjee, T. Higaki, and M. Nitta, Phys. Rev. D 101, 075026 (2020).
  39. A. S. Schwarz, Nucl. Phys. B208, 141 (1982).
  40. J. T. Mäkinen, V. V. Dmitriev, J. Nissinen, J. Rysti, G. E. Volovik, A. N. Yudin, K. Zhang, and V. B. Eltsov, Nat. Commun. 10, 237 (2019).
  41. G. E. Volovik and K. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023263 (2020).
  42. G. E. Volovik, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 131, 11 (2020).
  43. A. Aurilia, Y. Takahashi, and P. K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. 95B, 265 (1980).
  44. P. Di Vecchia and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B171, 253 (1980).
  45. G. Dvali, arXiv:hep-th/0507215.
  46. Y. Hidaka, M. Nitta, and R. Yokokura, Phys. Lett. B 803, 135290 (2020).
  47. A. Azatov, M. Mahdi Khalil, and M. Suzuki, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2026) 143.
  48. M. Ardu, L. Di Luzio, G. Landini, A. Strumia, D. Teresi, and J.-W. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 090.
  49. H. Fukuda, M. Ibe, M. Suzuki, and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 771, 327 (2017).
  50. J. E. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 103 (1979).
  51. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B166, 493 (1980).
  52. Z. Arvasi, T. S. Kuzpinari, and E. O. Uslu, Homol. Homotopy Appl. 11, 161 (2009).
  53. M. Fukuda and T. Shu, arXiv:2512.22797.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation