Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Superluminal modes in a quantum field simulator for cosmology from analog trans-Planckian physics

Christian F. Schmidt* and Stefan Floerchinger†

  • *Contact author: christian.schmidt@uni-jena.de
  • †Contact author: stefan.floerchinger@uni-jena.de

Phys. Rev. D 113, 105014 – Published 18 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hjfy-52jt

Abstract

The quantum-field-theoretic description for the U(1)-Goldstone boson of a scalar Bose-Einstein condensate with time-dependent contact interactions is developed beyond the acoustic approximation in accordance with Bogoliubov theory. The resulting effective action is mapped to a relativistic quantum field theory on a dispersive (or rainbow) cosmological spacetime which has a superluminal Corley-Jacobson dispersion relation. Time-dependent changes of the s-wave scattering length to quantum-simulate cosmological particle production are accompanied by a time-dependent healing length that can be interpreted as an analog Planck length in the comoving frame. Nonadiabatic transitions acquire a dispersive character, which is thoroughly discussed. The framework is applied to exponentially expanding or power-law contracting (2+1)-dimensional spacetimes which are known to produce scale-invariant cosmological power spectra. The sensitivity of these scenarios to the time dependence of the Bogoliubov dispersion is investigated: We find a violation of scale invariance via analytically trackable trans-Planckian damping effects if the cutoff scale is not well separated from the horizon-crossing scale. In case of the exponential expansion, these damping effects remarkably settle and converge to another scale-invariant plateau in the far ultraviolet regime where nonadiabatic transitions are suppressed by the high dispersion. The developed framework enables quantitative access to more drastic analog cosmological scenarios with improved predictability in the ultraviolet regime that ultimately may lead to the observation of a scale-invariant cosmological power spectrum in the laboratory.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (121)

  1. S. W. Hawking, Nature (London) 248, 30 (1974).
  2. S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).
  3. L. Parker, Phys. Rev. 183, 1057 (1969).
  4. Y. B. Zel’Dovich, JETP Lett. 14, 180 (1971), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971JETPL..14..180Z.
  5. W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 10, 3194 (1974).
  6. G. T. Moore, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 11, 2679 (1970).
  7. S. A. Fulling and P. C. W. DaviesProc. R. Soc. A 348, 393 (1976).
  8. M. J. Jacquet, T. Boulier, F. Claude, A. Maître, E. Cancellieri, C. Adrados, A. Amo, S. Pigeon, Q. Glorieux, A. Bramati, and E. Giacobino, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 378, 20190225 (2020).
  9. C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, arXiv:gr-qc/0505065v4.
  10. R. Schützhold, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 145, 104198 (2025).
  11. T. Grass, D. Bercioux, U. Bhattacharya, M. Lewenstein, H. S. Nguyen, and C. Weitenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 011001 (2025).
  12. A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett. (USSR) 30, 682 (1979), https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5336557.
  13. V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, JETP Lett. 33, 532 (1981), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981JETPL..33..532M.
  14. V. Mukhanov, H. Feldman, and R. Brandenberger, Phys. Rep. 215, 203 (1992).
  15. D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 60, 023507 (1999).
  16. F. Finelli and R. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D 65, 103522 (2002).
  17. R. H. Brandenberger, arXiv:1206.4196.
  18. T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. D 44, 1731 (1991).
  19. R. H. Brandenberger, Inflationary cosmology: Progress and problems (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2000), pp. 169–211.
  20. Y. Akrami et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A10 (2020).
  21. R. H. Brandenberger and J. Martin, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 113001 (2013).
  22. P. Hořava, Phys. Rev. D 79, 084008 (2009).
  23. M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D 80, 025011 (2009).
  24. T. P. Sotiriou, M. Visser, and S. Weinfurtner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 251601 (2009).
  25. G. E. Volovik, JETP Lett. 89, 525 (2009).
  26. T. P. Sotiriou, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 283, 012034 (2011).
  27. T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, Phys. Rev. D 64, 024028 (2001).
  28. B. Cropp, S. Liberati, A. Mohd, and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D 89, 064061 (2014).
  29. S. Liberati, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 133001 (2013).
  30. W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 1351 (1981).
  31. W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 51, 2827 (1995).
  32. R. Brout, S. Massar, R. Parentani, and P. Spindel, Phys. Rev. D 52, 4559 (1995).
  33. S. Corley and T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. D 54, 1568 (1996).
  34. S. Corley, Phys. Rev. D 57, 6280 (1998).
  35. T. Jacobson, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 136, 1 (1999).
  36. J. Martin and R. H. Brandenberger, in 9th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Gravitation and Relativistic Field Theories (MG 9) (2000), pp. 2001–2002, arXiv:astro-ph/0012031.
  37. J. Martin and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D 63, 123501 (2001).
  38. R. H. Brandenberger and J. Martin, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 16, 999 (2001).
  39. J. Martin and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D 65, 103514 (2002).
  40. R. H. Brandenberger, S. E. Jorás, and J. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 66, 083514 (2002).
  41. J. C. Niemeyer, Phys. Rev. D 63, 123502 (2001).
  42. J. C. Niemeyer and R. Parentani, Phys. Rev. D 64, 101301 (2001).
  43. R. Parentani, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17, 2721 (2002).
  44. J. Macher and R. Parentani, Phys. Rev. D 78, 043522 (2008).
  45. A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett. 73, 371 (2001).
  46. W. G. Unruh and R. Schützhold, Phys. Rev. D 71, 024028 (2005).
  47. J. Macher and R. Parentani, Phys. Rev. D 79, 124008 (2009).
  48. A. Coutant and R. Parentani, Phys. Rev. D 90, 121501 (2014).
  49. R. H. Brandenberger and J. Martin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17, 3663 (2002).
  50. F. Belgiorno, S. L. Cacciatori, M. Clerici, V. Gorini, G. Ortenzi, L. Rizzi, E. Rubino, V. G. Sala, and D. Faccio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 203901 (2010).
  51. S. Weinfurtner, E. W. Tedford, M. C. J. Penrice, W. G. Unruh, and G. A. Lawrence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 021302 (2011).
  52. J.-C. Jaskula, G. B. Partridge, M. Bonneau, R. Lopes, J. Ruaudel, D. Boiron, and C. I. Westbrook, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 220401 (2012).
  53. C.-L. Hung, V. Gurarie, and C. Chin, Science 341, 1213 (2013).
  54. J. Steinhauer, Nat. Phys. 12, 959 (2016).
  55. T. Torres, S. Patrick, A. Coutant, M. Richartz, E. W. Tedford, and S. Weinfurtner, Nat. Phys. 13, 833 (2017).
  56. S. Eckel, A. Kumar, T. Jacobson, I. B. Spielman, and G. K. Campbell, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021021 (2018).
  57. M. Wittemer, F. Hakelberg, P. Kiefer, J.-P. Schröder, C. Fey, R. Schützhold, U. Warring, and T. Schaetz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 180502 (2019).
  58. C.-A. Chen, S. Khlebnikov, and C.-L. Hung, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 060404 (2021).
  59. M. C. Braidotti, R. Prizia, C. Maitland, F. Marino, A. Prain, I. Starshynov, N. Westerberg, E. M. Wright, and D. Faccio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 013901 (2022).
  60. J. Steinhauer, M. Abuzarli, T. Aladjidi, T. Bienaimé, C. Piekarski, W. Liu, E. Giacobino, A. Bramati, and Q. Glorieux, Nat. Commun. 13, 2890 (2022).
  61. C. Viermann, M. Sparn, N. Liebster, M. Hans, E. Kath, Á. Parra-López, M. Tolosa-Simeón, N. Sánchez-Kuntz, T. Haas, H. Strobel, S. Floerchinger, and M. K. Oberthaler, Nature (London) 611, 260 (2022).
  62. M. Sparn, E. Kath, N. Liebster, J. Duchene, C. F. Schmidt, M. Tolosa-Simeón, A. Parra-López, S. Floerchinger, H. Strobel, and M. K. Oberthaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 260201 (2024).
  63. V. Gondret, R. Dias, C. Lamirault, L. Camier, A. Micheli, C. Leprince, Q. Marolleau, S. Robertson, D. Boiron, and C. I. Westbrook, C.R. Phys., 25, 1 (2024), online first.
  64. P. Švančara, P. Smaniotto, L. Solidoro, J. F. MacDonald, S. Patrick, R. Gregory, C. F. Barenghi, and S. Weinfurtner, Nature (London) 628, 66 (2024).
  65. S. Weinfurtner, A. White, and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D 76, 124008 (2007).
  66. S. Weinfurtner, P. Jain, M. Visser, and C. W. Gardiner, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 065012 (2009).
  67. J. Macher and R. Parentani, Phys. Rev. A 80, 043601 (2009).
  68. J. Macher and R. Parentani, Phys. Rev. D 79, 124008 (2009).
  69. C. Barceló, L. J. Garay, and G. Jannes, Phys. Rev. D 79, 024016 (2009).
  70. S. Finazzi and R. Parentani, Phys. Rev. D 85, 124027 (2012).
  71. S. Finazzi and R. Parentani, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 314, 012030 (2011).
  72. A. Coutant, R. Parentani, and S. Finazzi, Phys. Rev. D 85, 024021 (2012).
  73. A. Coutant and S. E. C. Weinfurtner, Phys. Rev. D 97, 025006 (2017).
  74. S.-Y. Chä and U. R. Fischer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 130404 (2017).
  75. C. C. Holanda Ribeiro and U. R. Fischer, Phys. Rev. D 107, L121502 (2023).
  76. F. Del Porro, M. Herrero-Valea, S. Liberati, and M. Schneider, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 094.
  77. F. Del Porro, S. Liberati, and M. Schneider, C.R. Phys. 25, 1 (2025).
  78. S. M. Chandran and U. R. Fischer, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1476 (2025).
  79. T. Jacobson, S. Liberati, and D. Mattingly, Quantum gravity phenomenology and lorentz violation, in Particle Physics and the Universe (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005), pp. 83–98.
  80. S. Liberati, M. Visser, and S. Weinfurtner, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 3129 (2006).
  81. S. Weinfurtner, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, J. Phys. A 39, 6807 (2006).
  82. G. Amelino-Camelia, Living Rev. Relativity 16, 5 (2013).
  83. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 1725 (2004).
  84. Y. Ling, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2007) 017.
  85. I. P. Lobo, N. Loret, and F. Nettel, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 451 (2017).
  86. F. Girelli, S. Liberati, and L. Sindoni, Phys. Rev. D 75, 064015 (2007).
  87. A. Kempf, G. Mangano, and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1108 (1995).
  88. L. J. GARAY, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 10, 145 (1995).
  89. R. Brout, C. Gabriel, M. Lubo, and P. Spindel, Phys. Rev. D 59, 044005 (1999).
  90. A. Kempf, Phys. Rev. D 63, 083514 (2001).
  91. A. Kempf and J. C. Niemeyer, Phys. Rev. D 64, 103501 (2001).
  92. S. Hassan and M. S. Sloth, Nucl. Phys. B674, 434 (2003).
  93. M. Tolosa-Simeón, A. Parra-López, N. Sánchez-Kuntz, T. Haas, C. Viermann, M. Sparn, N. Liebster, M. Hans, E. Kath, H. Strobel, M. K. Oberthaler, and S. Floerchinger, Phys. Rev. A 106, 033313 (2022).
  94. C. F. Schmidt, A. Parra-López, M. Tolosa-Simeón, M. Sparn, E. Kath, N. Liebster, J. Duchene, H. Strobel, M. K. Oberthaler, and S. Floerchinger, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123523 (2024).
  95. S. Floerchinger and C. Wetterich, Phys. Rev. A 77, 053603 (2008).
  96. E. M. Lifshitz and L. Pitaevskii, Statistical Physics Part 2 (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980).
  97. E. Madelung, Z. Phys. 40, 322 (1927).
  98. G. E. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Oxford University Press, New York, 2009).
  99. S. Massar and R. Parentani, Nucl. Phys. 513, 375 (1997).
  100. Note that the additional factor of a converts the effective physical wavenumber F(k/a) into an effective comoving wavenumber a(η)F(k/a) (i.e. the wavennumber in the rest-frame of the cosmological background evolution).

  101. This choice corresponds to the ground state in the interacting BEC. In particular, the unique existence of that state places the initial superhorizon modes in a vacuum state. Note that in the cosmological target system, the nature of the vacuum on initial superhorizon scales is generally unknown [103].

  102. Where the pre-factor accounts for momentum space isotropy and that the conformal factor in (2+1) dimensions is given by a.

  103. V. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki, Introduction to Quantum Effects in Gravity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
  104. We neglect the term involving J1 in Eq. (63) and approximate Y1(x)≈−2/πx for x≪1.

  105. T. M. Dunster, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 21, 995 (1990).
  106. T. M. Dunster, arXiv:2412.12595.
  107. J. C. Niemeyer, R. Parentani, and D. Campo, Phys. Rev. D 66, 083510 (2002).
  108. S. Robertson, F. Michel, and R. Parentani, Phys. Rev. D 96, 045012 (2017).
  109. C. Duval and N. Cherroret, Phys. Rev. A 107, 043305 (2023).
  110. E. Lifshitz and L. Pitaevskii, Statistical Physics: Theory of the Condensed State, Course of Theoretical Physics No. Bd. 9 (Butterworth-Heinemann, London, 2013).
  111. Note that Eq. (102) corrects a typo in equation (S2) of the supplementary material of [62].

  112. J. Esteve, J.-B. Trebbia, T. Schumm, A. Aspect, C. I. Westbrook, and I. Bouchoule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 130403 (2006).
  113. N. Sánchez-Kuntz, A. Parra-López, M. Tolosa-Simeón, T. Haas, and S. Floerchinger, Phys. Rev. D 105, 105020 (2022).
  114. F. Crameri, Scientific colour maps (2021).
  115. P. Jain, S. Weinfurtner, M. Visser, and C. W. Gardiner, Phys. Rev. A 76, 033616 (2007).
  116. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982).
  117. L. H. Ford, Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 116901 (2021).
  118. L. D. Landau and E. Lifshitz, in Statistical Physics (Third Edition), 3rd ed., edited by L. D. Landau and E. Lifshitz (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1980), pp. 333–400.
  119. R. M. Ziff, G. E. Uhlenbeck, and M. Kac, Phys. Rep. 32, 169 (1977).
  120. M. Naraschewski and R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. A 59, 4595 (1999).
  121. L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation