Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Effective-metric formulation of Casimir energies in nonlinear scalar and electromagnetic theories

C. A. Escobar*

  • Departamento de Física, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, San Rafael Atlixco 186, Ciudad de México 09340, Mexico

  • *Contact author: carlos.escobar@xanum.uam.mx

Phys. Rev. D 114, 025010 – Published 13 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hg8s-pxzc

Abstract

We study the Casimir effect in nonlinear field theories through the effective geometries that govern their linearized fluctuations. Previous analyses of Lorentz-violating scalar fields showed that a constant kinetic background modifies the parallel-plate Casimir energy by a rescaling of the plate separation and an overall determinant factor. We show that this structure is not merely a consequence of diagonalizing the reduced Green function. It follows from a common Schur-complement structure; after Fourier reduction parallel to the plates, the same reduced quadratic form controls the spectral denominator of the reduced Green function and the numerator generated by the energy-density insertion. This observation allows the Lorentz-violating scalar result to be used as an effective-metric prescription for regular fluctuation sectors arising from the linearization of nonlinear theories around constant backgrounds. In nonlinear scalar theories, the effective tensor is the Hessian of the Lagrangian evaluated on a constant-gradient background. In nonlinear electrodynamics L(F), a constant magnetic background splits the fluctuations into an ordinary Maxwell branch and an extraordinary optical branch. For this electromagnetic sector, we compute the parallel-plate Casimir energy both by direct mode summation and by applying the effective-metric formula branch by branch, finding exact agreement. The resulting energy depends on the orientation of the magnetic background relative to the plates, providing a concrete anisotropic Casimir response in a regular nonlinear electromagnetic sector.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. H. B. G. Casimir, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. 51, 793 (1948).
  2. G. Plunien, B. Müller, and W. Greiner, Phys. Rep. 134, 87 (1986).
  3. K. A. Milton, The Casimir Effect: Physical Manifestations of Zero-Point Energy (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001).
  4. M. Bordag, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepanenko, Advances in the Casimir Effect (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009).
  5. L. S. Brown and G. J. Maclay, Phys. Rev. 184, 1272 (1969).
  6. M. Frank and I. Turan, Phys. Rev. D 74, 033016 (2006).
  7. M. B. Cruz, E. R. Bezerra de Mello, and A. Y. Petrov, Phys. Rev. D 96, 045019 (2017).
  8. M. B. Cruz, E. R. Bezerra de Mello, and A. Y. Petrov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33, 1850115 (2018).
  9. A. Martín-Ruiz and C. A. Escobar, Phys. Rev. D 95, 036011 (2017).
  10. C. A. Escobar, L. Medel, and A. Martín-Ruiz, Phys. Rev. D 101, 095011 (2020).
  11. C. A. Escobar, A. Martín-Ruiz, O. J. Franca, and M. A. G. Garcia, Phys. Lett. B 807, 135567 (2020).
  12. A. Martín-Ruiz, C. A. Escobar, A. M. Escobar-Ruiz, and O. J. Franca, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015027 (2020).
  13. A. M. Escobar-Ruiz, A. Martín-Ruiz, C. A. Escobar, and R. Linares, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, 2150168 (2021).
  14. R. A. Dantas, H. F. S. Mota, and E. R. Bezerra de Mello, Universe 9, 241 (2023).
  15. E. R. Bezerra de Mello and M. B. Cruz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38, 2350062 (2023).
  16. M. B. Cruz, E. R. Bezerra de Mello, and A. Y. Petrov, Phys. Rev. D 99, 085012 (2019).
  17. M. Born and L. Infeld, Proc. R. Soc. A 144, 425 (1934).
  18. W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Z. Phys. 98, 714 (1936).
  19. J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951).
  20. Z. Bialynicka-Birula and I. Bialynicki-Birula, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2341 (1970).
  21. G. Boillat, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, A 5, 217 (1966).
  22. G. Boillat, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 11, 941 (1970).
  23. M. Novello, V. A. De Lorenci, J. M. Salim, and R. Klippert, Phys. Rev. D 61, 045001 (2000).
  24. M. Novello and S. E. Perez Bergliaffa, AIP Conf. Proc. 668, 288 (2003).
  25. Y. N. Obukhov and G. F. Rubilar, Phys. Rev. D 66, 024042 (2002).
  26. C. A. M. de Melo, L. G. Medeiros, and P. J. Pompeia, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30, 1550025 (2015).
  27. J. G. Russo and P. K. Townsend, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 039.
  28. C. A. Escobar and R. Potting, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2050174 (2020).
  29. C. A. Escobar, R. Linares, and A. Martín-Ruiz, arXiv:2606.00361.
  30. E. Plácido-Flores, R. Linares, V. López, and C. A. Escobar, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 619 (2026).
  31. E. Goulart and S. E. Perez Bergliaffa, Phys. Rev. D 84, 105027 (2011).
  32. I. T. Drummond, Phys. Rev. D 95, 025006 (2017).
  33. M. Cambiaso, R. Lehnert, and R. Potting, Phys. Rev. D 90, 065003 (2014).
  34. G. Betschart, E. Kant, and F. R. Klinkhamer, Nucl. Phys. B815, 198 (2009).
  35. F. R. Klinkhamer and M. Schreck, Nucl. Phys. B848, 90 (2011).
  36. F. W. Hehl, Y. N. Obukhov, and G. F. Rubilar, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17, 2695 (2002).
  37. G. O. Schellstede, V. Perlick, and C. Lämmerzahl, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 528, 738 (2016).
  38. J. G. Russo and P. K. Townsend, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 191.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation