Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Renormalization group running of the parity operator in Lorentz-violating quantum field theory

Brett Altschul*

  • *Contact author: altschul@mailbox.sc.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, 015002 – Published 5 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hb36-j93h

Abstract

In conventional relativistic quantum field theory, the discrete operators C, P, and T are matrix operators with no renormalization scale dependence. However, in a Lorentz-violating theory with a fermion fμ term in the action, these operators may acquire nontrivial renormalization group behavior. Because the fμ term may actually be exchanged in the action for an equivalent cνμ term, the scale dependence depends explicitly on the renormalization scheme, even at one-loop order. The scheme dependence means it is always possible to set the scale dependence parameter 1−X to zero, but for analyses of some high-energy electron-photon processes, using a scheme with X=0—and thus definite scale dependences for C, P, and T—may nonetheless be more convenient.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (22)

  1. D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997).
  2. D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. D 58, 116002 (1998).
  3. O. W. Greenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 231602 (2002).
  4. V. A. Kostelecký, C. D. Lane, and A. G. M. Pickering, Phys. Rev. D 65, 056006 (2002).
  5. G. de Berredo-Peixoto and I. L. Shapiro, Phys. Lett. B 642, 153 (2006).
  6. D. Colladay and P. McDonald, Phys. Rev. D 75, 105002 (2007).
  7. D. Colladay and P. McDonald, Phys. Rev. D 77, 085006 (2008).
  8. D. Colladay and P. McDonald, Phys. Rev. D 79, 125019 (2009).
  9. M. Gomes, J. R. Nascimento, A. Yu. Petrov, and A. J. da Silva, Phys. Rev. D 81, 045018 (2010).
  10. M. M. Anber and J. F. Donoghue, Phys. Rev. D 83, 105027 (2011).
  11. A. Ferrero and B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D 84, 065030 (2011).
  12. L. C. T. Brito, J. C. C. Felipe, J. R. Nascimento, A. Yu. Petrov, and A. P. Baêta Scarpelli, Phys. Rev. D 102, 075017 (2020).
  13. B. Altschul, J. Phys. A 39, 13757 (2006).
  14. S. Karki and B. Altschul, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 676 (2022).
  15. S. Karki and B. Altschul, Symmetry 14, 2326 (2022).
  16. S. D. Bass, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1257 (2005).
  17. F. Myhrer and A. W. Thomas, J. Phys. G 37, 023101 (2010).
  18. B. Altschul and D. Colladay, Phys. Rev. D 71, 125015 (2005).
  19. B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D 83, 056012 (2011).
  20. B. Altschul, Phys. Rev. D 74, 083003 (2006).
  21. F. W. Stecker and S. L. Glashow, Astropart. Phys. 16, 97 (2001).
  22. B. Altschul, Astropart. Phys. 28, 380 (2007).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation