Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Probing invisible particles with charm hadron decays

Gudrun Hiller1,2,* and Dominik Suelmann1,†

  • 1Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 4, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany
  • 2Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland

  • *Contact author: gudrun.hiller@cern.ch
  • †Contact author: dominik.suelmann@tu-dortmund.de

Phys. Rev. D 113, 095008 – Published 5 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/h81c-5ss4

Abstract

We point out opportunities to probe invisible particles, left- and right-handed neutrinos, axionlike particles and dark photons (Z′) with rare decays of charm hadrons. We employ and recast existing searches in D→(π,ω)X, D0→X and Λc→pX, where X denotes one of the above invisible final states including dineutrinos. The branching ratios are clean null tests of the standard model yet are essentially unconstrained for some parameters of light new physics, limited only by weak lifetime constraints at the level of O(10−1). On the other hand, if models are probed, branching ratios still reach up to 10−3 (Z′) and 10−4 (axionlike particles). Chirality-preserving operators from heavy new physics in the dimension-six standard model effective theory imply tighter upper limits, up to few ×10−5. Constraints on chirality-flipping heavy new physics, such as lepton number violation from dimension-seven standard model effective theory, or with light sterile neutrinos, are weaker, with branching ratios up to few×10−4. Sensitivities to different couplings arise with Λc→pX and D→ππX decays, in particular in relation with the other modes. Processes can be studied at running and future experiments with high charm luminosities, BESIII, Belle II, a super-tau-charm factory and Z factories, such as the Future Circular Collider and the Circular Electron Positron Collider.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (72)

  1. G. Burdman, E. Golowich, J. L. Hewett, and S. Pakvasa, Phys. Rev. D 66, 014009 (2002).
  2. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  3. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 111, L011103 (2025).
  4. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 105, L071102 (2022).
  5. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 106, 072008 (2022).
  6. Y. T. Lai et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 95, 011102 (2017).
  7. M. Achasov, X. C. Ai, R. Aliberti, L. P. An, Q. An, X. Z. Bai, Y. Bai, O. Bakina, A. Barnyakov, V. Blinov et al., Front. Phys. (Beijing) 19, 14701 (2024).
  8. X. Ai, W. Altmannshofer, P. Athron, X. Bai, L. Calibbi, L. Cao, Y. Che, C. Chen, J. Y. Chen, L. Chen et al., Chin. Phys. 49, 103003 (2025).
  9. M. Benedikt et al. (FCC Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1468 (2025).
  10. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, M. Golz, and G. Hiller, Phys. Rev. D 103, 015033 (2021).
  11. R. Beltrán, G. Cottin, M. Hirsch, A. Titov, and Z. S. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 031.
  12. G. Li and J. Tandean, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 205.
  13. C. Q. Geng and G. Li, Phys. Lett. B 839, 137811 (2023).
  14. A. Carmona, C. Scherb, and P. Schwaller, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 121.
  15. J. F. Eguren, S. Klingel, E. Stamou, M. Tabet, and R. Ziegler, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 111.
  16. G. Faisel, J. Y. Su, and J. Tandean, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 246.
  17. E. Gabrielli, B. Mele, M. Raidal, and E. Venturini, Phys. Rev. D 94, 115013 (2016).
  18. J. Martin Camalich and R. Ziegler, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 75, 223 (2025).
  19. J. Y. Su and J. Tandean, Phys. Rev. D 102, 115029 (2020).
  20. M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel, and A. Thamm, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 056.
  21. Z. G. Berezhiani, M. Y. Khlopov, and R. R. Khomeriki, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 52, 344 (1990), https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/1989/pub/Pub-89-204-A.pdf.
  22. Z. G. Berezhiani and M. Y. Khlopov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51, 739 (1990).
  23. Z. G. Berezhiani and M. Y. Khlopov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51, 935 (1990).
  24. A. Badin and A. A. Petrov, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034005 (2010).
  25. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  26. L. Lehman, Phys. Rev. D 90, 125023 (2014).
  27. Y. Liao and X. D. Ma, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 043.
  28. S. Hamoudou, J. Kumar, and D. London, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 157.
  29. Y. Liao and X. D. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 96, 015012 (2017).
  30. T. Li, X. D. Ma, and M. A. Schmidt, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 152.
  31. T. Felkl, S. L. Li, and M. A. Schmidt, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 118.
  32. A. Di Canto, T. Hacheney, G. Hiller, D. S. Mitzel, S. Monteil, L. Röhrig, and D. Suelmann, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 18 (2026).
  33. Y. Liao, X. D. Ma, and Q. Y. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 162.
  34. E. Witten, Phys. Lett. 149B, 351 (1984).
  35. B. Bellazzini, A. Mariotti, D. Redigolo, F. Sala, and J. Serra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141804 (2017).
  36. G. Ferretti and D. Karateev, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 077.
  37. A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, M. Galanis, L. Lehner, J. O. Thompson, and K. Van Tilburg, Phys. Rev. D 101, 083014 (2020).
  38. M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel, and A. Thamm, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 063.
  39. M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi, The Physics of the Dark Photon (Springer, Cham, 2021), 10.1007/978-3-030-62519-1.
  40. J. Jaeckel and A. Ringwald, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60, 405 (2010).
  41. Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG) Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 869 (2022).
  42. A. Bazavov et al. (Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaborations), Phys. Rev. D 107, 094516 (2023).
  43. V. Lubicz, L. Riggio, G. Salerno, S. Simula, and C. Tarantino (ETM Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 96, 054514 (2017); 99, 099902(E) (2019); 100, 079901(E) (2019).
  44. V. Lubicz et al. (ETM Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 98, 014516 (2018).
  45. L. Gärtner, N. Hartmann, L. Heinrich, M. Horstmann, T. Kuhr, M. Reboud, S. Stefkova, and D. van Dyk, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 693 (2024).
  46. J. Gratrex, M. Hopfer, and R. Zwicky, Phys. Rev. D 93, 054008 (2016).
  47. D. Das, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 230 (2018).
  48. T. Feldmann and M. W. Y. Yip, Phys. Rev. D 85, 014035 (2012); 86, 079901(E) (2012).
  49. S. Meinel, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034511 (2018).
  50. M. Golz, G. Hiller, and T. Magorsch, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 208.
  51. A. Crivellin, C. A. Manzari, W. Altmannshofer, G. Inguglia, P. Feichtinger, and J. Martin Camalich, Phys. Rev. D 106, L031703 (2022).
  52. B. I. Eisenstein et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 78, 052003 (2008).
  53. J. Martin Camalich, M. Pospelov, P. N. H. Vuong, R. Ziegler, and J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015023 (2020).
  54. R. Barlow, Comput. Phys. Commun. 149, 97 (2002).
  55. H. Dembinski, P. Ongmongkolkul et al., Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3949207.
  56. G. Hiller and D. Wendler, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 009.
  57. G. Hiller, L. Nollen, and D. Wendler, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 657 (2025).
  58. Daniel Wendler (private communication).
  59. R. Bause, M. Golz, G. Hiller, and A. Tayduganov, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 65 (2020); 81, 219(E) (2021).
  60. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, G. Hiller, T. Höhne, D. F. Litim, and T. Steudtner, Phys. Rev. D 108, 035005 (2023).
  61. G. Kumar and A. A. Petrov, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055031 (2024).
  62. E. Kou et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019); 2020, 029201(E) (2020).
  63. M. Ablikim et al., Chin. Phys. C 44, 040001 (2020).
  64. A. Abada et al. (FCC Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 474 (2019).
  65. G. Hiller and D. Suelmann, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.19519189.
  66. W. Lin, X. E. Huang, S. Cheng, and D. L. Yao, Phys. Rev. D 111, 113005 (2025).
  67. D. Melikhov and B. Stech, Phys. Rev. D 62, 014006 (2000).
  68. A. Khodjamirian, Hadron Form Factors (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2020), 10.1201/9781315142005.
  69. G. Burdman and G. Hiller, Phys. Rev. D 63, 113008 (2001).
  70. S. Faller, T. Feldmann, A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, and D. van Dyk, Phys. Rev. D 89, 014015 (2014).
  71. S. Descotes-Genon, A. Khodjamirian, and J. Virto, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 083.
  72. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 110, 112018 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation