Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Portal matter models of kinetic mixing with two light dark gauge bosons

Thomas G. Rizzo*

  • *Contact author: rizzo@slac.stanford.edu

Phys. Rev. D 112, 015029 – Published 31 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/h81b-ydmw

Abstract

The kinetic mixing (KM) portal mandates the existence of at least one new gauge boson, the dark photon (DP) based on the group U(1)D, which mixes with the Standard Model (SM) photon via loops of other new heavy particles carrying both SM and dark charges called portal matter (PM). Arguments exist based on the renormalization group equations running of the U(1)D gauge coupling suggesting that at higher scales U(1)D becomes part of a more complex non-Abelian group, a simple example being just the SM-like GD=SU(2)I×U(1)YI. In our past analyses, it was always assumed that GD broke in a SM-like manner directly to the DP’s U(1)D which then subsequently broke at low energies ≲1  GeV. However, this need not be the case, and GD can instead break to U(1)T3I×U(1)YI, with T3I being the diagonal generator of SU(2)I, now producing two light gauge bosons which obtain masses at the ≲1  GeV scale. In this paper, we explore the phenomenology of a very simple realization of this kind of alternative setup employing non-Abelian KM and having a minimal, leptonlike PM sector, demonstrating its distinctive nature in comparison to the previously examined symmetry breaking path. The effects of interference between these gauge bosons on thermal dark matter annihilation, the production of new heavy gauge, and Higgs and PM states at colliders, as well as the corresponding signatures for the light dark gauge bosons are examined. Collider signatures of this setup are found to be particularly challenging.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (117)

  1. For a recent review, see B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70, 355 (2020).
  2. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  3. M. Kawasaki and K. Nakayama, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 69 (2013).
  4. P. W. Graham, I. G. Irastorza, S. K. Lamoreaux, A. Lindner, and K. A. van Bibber, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 65, 485 (2015).
  5. I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 102, 89 (2018).
  6. G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 203 (2018).
  7. L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo, and S. Trojanowski, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 066201 (2018).
  8. G. Arcadi, D. Cabo-Almeida, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, J. P. Neto, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, arXiv:2403.15860.
  9. K. Pachal, Dark matter searches at ATLAS and CMS, Given at the 8th Edition of the Large Hadron Collider Physics Conference (SISSA, Trieste, 2020).
  10. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018).
  11. A. Albert et al. (Fermi-LAT and DES Collaborations), Astrophys. J. 834, 110 (2017).
  12. C. Amole et al. (PICO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 022001 (2019).
  13. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  14. Z. Bo et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011805 (2025).
  15. M. F. Albakry et al. (SuperCDMS Collaboration), arXiv:2407.08085.
  16. E. Aprile, J. Aalbers, K. Abe, S. Ahmed Maouloud, L. Althueser, B. Andrieu, E. Angelino, D. A. Martin, F. Arneodo, L. Baudis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 161004 (2025).
  17. J. Alexander et al., arXiv:1608.08632.
  18. M. Battaglieri et al., arXiv:1707.04591.
  19. G. Bertone and T. M. P. Tait, Nature (London) 562, 51 (2018).
  20. J. Cooley, T. Lin, W. H. Lippincott, T. R. Slatyer, T. T. Yu, D. S. Akerib, T. Aramaki, D. Baxter, T. Bringmann, R. Bunker et al., arXiv:2209.07426.
  21. A. Boveia, T. Y. Chen, C. Doglioni, A. Drlica-Wagner, S. Gori, W. H. Lippincott, M. E. Monzani, C. Prescod-Weinstein, B. Shakya, T. R. Slatyer et al., arXiv:2210.01770.
  22. P. Schuster, N. Toro, and K. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 105, 035036 (2022).
  23. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, arXiv:2406.01705.
  24. G. Lanfranchi, M. Pospelov, and P. Schuster, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 279 (2021).
  25. G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta, and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 86, 023506 (2012).
  26. G. Steigman, Phys. Rev. D 91, 083538 (2015).
  27. K. Saikawa and S. Shirai, arXiv:2005.03544.
  28. B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 165 (1977).
  29. E. W. Kolb and K. A. Olive, Phys. Rev. D 33, 1202 (1986); 34, 2531(E) (1986).
  30. B. Holdom, Phys. Lett. 166B, 196 (1986); 178B, 65 (1986); K. R. Dienes, C. F. Kolda, and J. March-Russell, Nucl. Phys. B492, 104 (1997); F. Del Aguila, Acta Phys. Pol. B 25, 1317 (1994); K. S. Babu, C. F. Kolda, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D 54, 4635 (1996); T. G. Rizzo, 59, 015020 (1998).
  31. There has been a huge amount of historical work on this subject, see, for example D. Feldman, B. Kors, and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. D 75, 023503 (2007); D. Feldman, Z. Liu, and P. Nath, 75, 115001 (2007); M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, Phys. Lett. B 662, 53 (2008); M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. D 80, 095002 (2009); H. Davoudiasl, H. S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 031802 (2012); Phys. Rev. D 85, 115019 (2012); R. Essig et al., arXiv:1311.0029; E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 251301 (2015); M. Khlopov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1330042 (2013); For a general overview and introduction to this framework, see D. Curtin, R. Essig, S. Gori, and J. Shelton, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 157.
  32. T. Gherghetta, J. Kersten, K. Olive, and M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. D 100, 095001 (2019).
  33. M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi, arXiv:2005.01515.
  34. M. Graham, C. Hearty, and M. Williams, arXiv:2104.10280.
  35. D. Barducci, E. Bertuzzo, G. Grilli di Cortona, and G. M. Salla, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 081.
  36. S. Li, J. M. Yang, M. Zhang, and R. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 111, 035005 (2025).
  37. For a recent review of vector-like fermions, see A. E. Cárcamo Hernández, K. Kowalska, H. Lee, and D. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 109, 035010 (2024).
  38. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), arXiv:2405.17605.
  39. J. M. Alves, G. C. Branco, A. L. Cherchiglia, C. C. Nishi, J. T. Penedo, P. M. F. Pereira, M. N. Rebelo, and J. I. Silva-Marcos, Phys. Rep. 1057, 1 (2024).
  40. A. Banerjee, E. Bergeaas Kuutmann, V. Ellajosyula, R. Enberg, G. Ferretti, and L. Panizzi, arXiv:2406.09193.
  41. G. Guedes and J. Santiago, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 111.
  42. A. Adhikary, M. Olechowski, J. Rosiek, and M. Ryczkowski, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075029 (2024).
  43. R. Benbrik, M. Boukidi, M. Ech-chaouy, S. Moretti, K. Salime, and Q. S. Yan, arXiv:2412.01761.
  44. F. Albergaria, J. F. Bastos, B. Belfatto, G. C. Branco, J. T. Penedo, A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, and J. I. Silva-Marcos, arXiv:2412.21201.
  45. T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 99, 115024 (2019).
  46. T. D. Rueter and T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 101, 015014 (2020).
  47. J. H. Kim, S. D. Lane, H. S. Lee, I. M. Lewis, and M. Sullivan, Phys. Rev. D 101, 035041 (2020).
  48. T. D. Rueter and T. G. Rizzo, arXiv:2011.03529.
  49. G. N. Wojcik and T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 105, 015032 (2022).
  50. T. G. Rizzo, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 035.
  51. T. G. Rizzo, arXiv:2202.02222.
  52. G. N. Wojcik, Phys. Rev. D 108, 035006 (2023).
  53. T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 106, 035024 (2022).
  54. T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 106, 095024 (2022).
  55. A. Carvunis, N. McGinnis, and D. E. Morrissey, arXiv:2209.14305.
  56. S. Verma, S. Biswas, A. Chatterjee, and J. Ganguly, Phys. Rev. D 107, 115024 (2023).
  57. T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 107, 095014 (2023).
  58. G. N. Wojcik, L. L. Everett, S. T. Eu, and R. Ximenes, Phys. Lett. B 841, 137931 (2023).
  59. G. N. Wojcik, L. L. Everett, S. T. Eu, and R. Ximenes, Phys. Rev. D 108, 055033 (2023).
  60. T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 108, 055021 (2023).
  61. T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 109, 055039 (2024).
  62. T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075037 (2024).
  63. M. Ardu, M. H. Rahat, N. Valori, and O. Vives, arXiv:2407.21100.
  64. T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075018 (2025).
  65. T. R. Slatyer, Phys. Rev. D 93, 023527 (2016).
  66. H. Liu, T. R. Slatyer, and J. Zavala, Phys. Rev. D 94, 063507 (2016).
  67. R. K. Leane, T. R. Slatyer, J. F. Beacom, and K. C. Ng, Phys. Rev. D 98, 023016 (2018).
  68. Y. N. Wang, X. C. Duan, T. P. Tang, Z. Wang, and Y. L. S. Tsai, arXiv:2502.18263.
  69. J. Koechler, arXiv:2309.10043.
  70. P. De la Torre Luque, S. Balaji, and J. Silk, arXiv:2312.04907.
  71. G. Wang, B. Y. Su, L. Zu, and L. Feng, arXiv:2503.22148.
  72. G. Bélanger, S. Chakraborti, Y. Génolini, and P. Salati, Phys. Rev. D 110, 023039 (2024).
  73. N. Brahma, S. Heeba, and K. Schutz, Phys. Rev. D 109, 035006 (2024).
  74. S. Balan, C. Balázs, T. Bringmann, C. Cappiello, R. Catena, T. Emken, T. E. Gonzalo, T. R. Gray, W. Handley, Q. Huynh et al., arXiv:2405.17548.
  75. See, for example, G. D. V. Garcia, F. Kahlhoefer, M. Ovchynnikov, and T. Schwetz, arXiv:2405.08081.
  76. G. Mohlabeng, A. Mondol, and T. M. P. Tait, Phys. Rev. D 111, 056003 (2025).
  77. H. Davoudiasl and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 92, 035008 (2015).
  78. A. Reilly and N. Toro, arXiv:2308.01347.
  79. For related work on the possibilities of KM and DM physics employing this same gauge group, see M. Bauer and P. Foldenauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 171801 (2022).
  80. J. L. Hewett and T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rep. 183, 193 (1989).
  81. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 842, 137963 (2023).
  82. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 933 (2023).
  83. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), arXiv:2407.09168.
  84. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), arXiv:2407.20425.
  85. See, for example, T. G. Rizzo, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 079.
  86. C. Giovanetti, M. Lisanti, H. Liu, and J. T. Ruderman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 021302 (2022).
  87. X. Chu, J. L. Kuo, and J. Pradler, Phys. Rev. D 106, 055022 (2022).
  88. N. Sabti, J. Alvey, M. Escudero, M. Fairbairn, and D. Blas, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2021) A01.
  89. N. Sabti, J. Alvey, M. Escudero, M. Fairbairn, and D. Blas, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2020) 004.
  90. T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 86, 055024 (2012).
  91. T. G. Rizzo, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 248.
  92. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 796, 68 (2019).
  93. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 208.
  94. C. Helsens, D. Jamin, M. L. Mangano, T. G. Rizzo, and M. Selvaggi, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 569 (2019).
  95. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  96. K. Tackmann, Lett. High Energy Phys. 2023, 440 (2023).
  97. For a recent update on the Higgs boson couplings, see the talk given by F. Monti (CMS and ATLAS Collaborations), “59th Rencontres de Moriond 2025: QCD and High Energy Interactions,” LaThuile, Italy, 3/30-4/6/25.
  98. Y. Heo, D. W. Jung, and J. S. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 110, 013003 (2024).
  99. Y. Heo, J. S. Lee, and C. B. Park, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075026 (2025).
  100. S. K. Kang and J. Park, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 009.
  101. M. S. Chanowitz and M. K. Gaillard, Nucl. Phys. B261, 379 (1985); B. W. Lee, C. Quigg, and H. B. Thacker, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1519 (1977); J. M. Cornwall, D. N. Levin, and G. Tiktopoulos, 10, 1145 (1974); 11, 972(E) (1975); G. J. Gounaris, R. Kogerler, and H. Neufeld, 34, 3257 (1986).
  102. X. Chu, J. Pradler, and L. Semmelrock, Phys. Rev. D 99, 015040 (2019).
  103. S. Y. Choi, T. Han, J. Kalinowski, K. Rolbiecki, and X. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 92, 095006 (2015).
  104. M. Hirsch, E. Nardi, and D. Restrepo, Phys. Rev. D 67, 033005 (2003).
  105. J. Barranco, O. G. Miranda, C. A. Moura, and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 77, 093014 (2008).
  106. Z. Berezhiani and A. Rossi, Phys. Lett. B 535, 207 (2002).
  107. F. J. Escrihuela, L. J. Flores, and O. G. Miranda, Phys. Lett. B 802, 135241 (2020).
  108. J. Brau et al. (ILC Collaboration), arXiv:0712.1950.
  109. A. Aryshev et al. (ILC International Development Team), arXiv:2203.07622.
  110. M. Aicheler, P. Burrows, M. Draper, T. Garvey, P. Lebrun, K. Peach, N. Phinney, H. Schmickler, D. Schulte, and N. Toge, Report No. CERN-2012-007.
  111. M. Bai, T. Barklow, R. Bartoldus, M. Breidenbach, P. Grenier, Z. Huang, M. Kagan, J. Lewellen, Z. Li, T. W. Markiewicz et al., arXiv:2110.15800.
  112. D. Attié et al. (Linear Collider Vision Collaboration), arXiv:2503.19983.
  113. Y. J. Chae and M. Perelstein, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 138.
  114. J. Kalinowski, W. Kotlarski, K. Mekala, P. Sopicki, and A. F. Zarnecki, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 955 (2021).
  115. S. Khalil, S. Moretti, D. Rojas-Ciofalo, and H. Waltari, Phys. Rev. D 104, 035008 (2021).
  116. K. Black, T. Bose, Y. Chen, S. Dasu, H. Jia, D. Pinna, V. Sharma, N. Venkatasubramanian, and C. Vuosalo, arXiv:2205.10404.
  117. H. Dreiner, M. Huck, M. Krämer, D. Schmeier, and J. Tattersall, Phys. Rev. D 87, 075015 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation