Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Gravitational form factors of the pion in the self-consistent light-front quark model

Yongwoo Choi* and Hyeon-Dong Son†

Ho-Meoyng Choi‡

  • *Contact author: sunctchoi@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: hdson@inha.ac.kr
  • ‡Contact author: homyoung@knu.ac.kr

Phys. Rev. D 112, 014043 – Published 28 July, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/h7gf-f7p4

Abstract

We present a self-consistent light-front quark model (LFQM) analysis of the pion’s gravitational form factors (GFFs), incorporating the Bakamjian-Thomas (BT) construction consistently throughout the framework. By uniformly applying the BT formalism to both hadronic matrix elements and their associated Lorentz structures, we achieve a current-component-independent extraction of the pion GFFs Aπ(t) and Dπ(t), thereby eliminating the light-front zero-mode ambiguities that typically hinder conventional LFQM approaches. By tuning the model parameters, we identify an optimal set that successfully reproduces the decay constant and electromagnetic form factor of the pion, while yielding a D-term value Dπ(0)≈−1, consistent with predictions from chiral perturbation theory. The D-term emerges as a sensitive probe of the pion’s internal dynamics, governing its mechanical radius—the largest among the charge, mass, and mechanical radii. We further examine the pion’s spatial structure via its associated two-dimensional light-front densities, including the momentum density, transverse pressure, and shear stress, all of which satisfy the required normalization and von Laue stability conditions. Our results reveal a detailed mechanical landscape: a centrally peaked momentum density that decreases monotonically; a repulsive pressure near the center (up to x⊥=0.33  fm) that transitions to attraction in the outer region; and a shear stress profile peaking at an intermediate distance (x⊥≈0.2  fm).

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

See Also

Article Text

References (69)

  1. I. Y. Kobzarev and L. B. Okun, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 43, 1904 (1962).
  2. H. Pagels, Phys. Rev. 144, 1250 (1966).
  3. M. V. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 555, 57 (2003).
  4. C. Lorcé, H. Moutarde, and A. P. Trawiński, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 89 (2019).
  5. J. Y. Panteleeva and M. V. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135707 (2020).
  6. J.-Y. Kim, H.-C. Kim, M. V. Polyakov, and H.-D. Son, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014015 (2021).
  7. M. V. Polyakov and P. Schweitzer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1830025 (2018).
  8. C. Lorcé and P. Schweitzer, Acta Phys. Pol. B 56, 3 (2025).
  9. D. Müller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, F. M. Dittes, and J. Hořejši, Fortschr. Phys. 42, 101 (1994).
  10. V. D. Burkert, L. Elouadrhiri, and F. X. Girod, Nature (London) 557, 396 (2018).
  11. B. Duran et al., Nature (London) 615, 813 (2023).
  12. S. Adhikari et al. (GlueX Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 108, 025201 (2023).
  13. Y. Guo, X. Ji, Y. Liu, and J. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034003 (2023).
  14. H.-D. Son and H.-C. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 90, 111901 (2014).
  15. S. Kumano, Q.-T. Song, and O. V. Teryaev, Phys. Rev. D 97, 014020 (2018).
  16. M. Masuda et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 032003 (2016).
  17. D. Amrath, M. Diehl, and J.-P. Lansberg, Eur. Phys. J. C 58, 179 (2008).
  18. J. M. M. Chávez, V. Bertone, F. De Soto Borrero, M. Defurne, C. Mezrag, H. Moutarde, J. Rodríguez-Quintero, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 202501 (2022).
  19. Y. Hatta and J. Schoenleber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 251901 (2025).
  20. D. Brommel, Pion structure from the lattice, Ph. D. thesis, Regensburg U., 2007.
  21. D. Brömmel et al. (QCDSF, UKQCD Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 122001 (2008).
  22. P. E. Shanahan and W. Detmold, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014511 (2019).
  23. D. A. Pefkou, D. C. Hackett, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054509 (2022).
  24. D. C. Hackett, P. R. Oare, D. A. Pefkou, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 108, 114504 (2023).
  25. J. F. Donoghue and H. Leutwyler, Z. Phys. C 52, 343 (1991).
  26. W. Broniowski and E. R. Arriola, Phys. Rev. D 78, 094011 (2008).
  27. A. Freese and I. C. Cloët, Phys. Rev. C 100, 015201 (2019).
  28. A. F. Krutov and V. E. Troitsky, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014029 (2021).
  29. Z. Xing, M. Ding, and L. Chang, Phys. Rev. D 107, L031502 (2023).
  30. Y. Z. Xu, M. Ding, K. Raya, C. D. Roberts, J. Rodríguez-Quintero, and S. M. Schmidt, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 191 (2024).
  31. Y. Li and J. P. Vary, Phys. Rev. D 109, L051501 (2024).
  32. W.-Y. Liu, E. Shuryak, C. Weiss, and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054021 (2024).
  33. W.-Y. Liu, E. Shuryak, and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054022 (2024).
  34. W. Broniowski and E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Lett. B 859, 139138 (2024).
  35. S. J. Brodsky, D. S. Hwang, B.-Q. Ma, and I. Schmidt, Nucl. Phys. B593, 311 (2001).
  36. H.-M. Choi and C.-R. Ji, Phys. Rev. D 89, 033011 (2014).
  37. H.-M. Choi and C.-R. Ji, Phys. Rev. D 91, 014018 (2015).
  38. H.-M. Choi and C.-R. Ji, Phys. Rev. D 95, 056002 (2017).
  39. A. J. Arifi, H.-M. Choi, C.-R. Ji, and Y. Oh, Phys. Rev. D 107, 053003 (2023).
  40. A. J. Arifi, H.-M. Choi, and C.-R. Ji, Phys. Rev. D 108, 013006 (2023).
  41. H.-M. Choi, Phys. Rev. D 103, 073004 (2021).
  42. H.-M. Choi, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2021, 4277321 (2021).
  43. H.-M. Choi and C.-R. Ji, Phys. Rev. D 110, 014006 (2024).
  44. B. Bakamjian and L. H. Thomas, Phys. Rev. 92, 1300 (1953).
  45. W. N. Polyzou, Phys. Rev. C 82, 064001 (2010).
  46. P. L. Chung, F. Coester, B. D. Keister, and W. N. Polyzou, Phys. Rev. C 37, 2000 (1988).
  47. H.-M. Choi and C.-R. Ji, Phys. Rev. D 59, 074015 (1999).
  48. H.-M. Choi and C.-R. Ji, Phys. Lett. B 460, 461 (1999).
  49. H.-M. Choi, C.-R. Ji, Z. Li, and H.-Y. Ryu, Phys. Rev. C 92, 055203 (2015).
  50. A. J. Arifi, H.-M. Choi, C.-R. Ji, and Y. Oh, Phys. Rev. D 106, 014009 (2022).
  51. W. Jaus, Phys. Rev. D 44, 2851 (1991).
  52. W. Jaus, Phys. Rev. D 41, 3394 (1990).
  53. H.-Y. Cheng, C.-Y. Cheung, and C.-W. Hwang, Phys. Rev. D 55, 1559 (1997).
  54. F. Coester and W. N. Polyzou, Phys. Rev. C 71, 028202 (2005).
  55. H.-M. Choi and C.-R. Ji, Phys. Rev. D 75, 034019 (2007).
  56. H. J. Melosh, Phys. Rev. D 9, 1095 (1974).
  57. H.-M. Choi and C.-R. Ji, Phys. Rev. D 80, 054016 (2009).
  58. N. Dhiman, H. Dahiya, C.-R. Ji, and H.-M. Choi, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014026 (2019).
  59. G. P. Lepage and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2157 (1980).
  60. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  61. J. Volmer et al. (The Jefferson Lab Fπ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1713 (2001).
  62. S. R. Amendolia et al., Nucl. Phys. B277, 168 (1986).
  63. V. Tadevosyan et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 055205 (2007).
  64. T. Horn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 192001 (2006).
  65. M. Burkardt, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 173–207 (2003).
  66. A. Freese and G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094023 (2021).
  67. A. Freese and G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 105, 014003 (2022).
  68. A. Freese and G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034008 (2023).
  69. J. Y. Panteleeva and M. V. Polyakov, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014008 (2021).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation