Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Nonrenormalization of coupling constants from categorical symmetries in two dimensions

Guillermo Arias-Tamargo*, Chris Hull†, and Maxwell L. Velásquez Cotini Hutt‡

  • Abdus Salam Centre for Theoretical Physics, The Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

  • *Contact author: g.arias-tamargo@imperial.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: c.hull@imperial.ac.uk
  • ‡Contact author: m.hutt22@imperial.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 113, L061701 – Published 6 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/h56x-zgg8

Abstract

We study the role of categorical symmetries in constraining the renormalization of couplings in two-dimensional nonlinear sigma models with a Wess-Zumino term. A large class of these theories admits self-duality symmetries associated with discrete gauging and T-duality. They are generically nonconformal, but we argue that a particular coupling is protected from quantum corrections by the categorical symmetry. We give strong evidence for this claim by showing that the β-function for this coupling vanishes to 2-loop order if and only if this symmetry is present. Furthermore, in cases where the target space is a group manifold, the nonrenormalization result can be proven to hold nonperturbatively.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (61)

  1. D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized global symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 172.
  2. See, e.g. [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] for reviews.

  3. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, and H. Tillim, Lectures on generalized symmetries, Phys. Rep. 1051, 1 (2024).
  4. S. Schafer-Nameki, ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries, Phys. Rep. 1063, 1 (2024).
  5. J. McGreevy, Generalized symmetries in condensed matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 57 (2023).
  6. T. D. Brennan and S. Hong, Introduction to generalized global symmetries in QFT and particle physics, arXiv:2306.00912.
  7. D. Costa, C. Córdova, M. D. Zotto, D. Freed, J. Gödicke, A. Hofer, D. Jordan, D. Morgante, R. Moscrop, K. Ohmori et al., Simons lectures on categorical symmetries, arXiv:2411.09082.
  8. S.-H. Shao, What’s done cannot be undone: TASI lectures on non-invertible symmetries, arXiv:2308.00747.
  9. C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang, and X. Yin, Topological defect lines and renormalization group flows in two dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 026.
  10. R. Thorngren and Y. Wang, Fusion category symmetry. Part II. Categoriosities at c=1 and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 051.
  11. Z. Komargodski, K. Ohmori, K. Roumpedakis, and S. Seifnashri, Symmetries and strings of adjoint QCD2, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 103.
  12. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schäfer-Nameki, Gapped phases with non-invertible symmetries: (1+1)d, SciPost Phys. 18, 032 (2025).
  13. L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, D. Pajer, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Categorical Landau paradigm for gapped phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 161601 (2024).
  14. J. A. Damia, G. Galati, and L. Tizzano, Symmetries, universes and phases of QCD2 with an adjoint Dirac fermion, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 230.
  15. C. Copetti, L. Cordova, and S. Komatsu, Noninvertible symmetries, anomalies, and scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 181601 (2024).
  16. C. Copetti, L. Cordova, and S. Komatsu, S-matrix bootstrap and non-invertible symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 204.
  17. S. D. Pace, H. T. Lam, and Ö. M. Aksoy, (SPT-)LSM theorems from projective non-invertible symmetries, SciPost Phys. 18, 028 (2025).
  18. C. Cordova, D. García-Sepúlveda, and N. Holfester, Particle-Soliton degeneracy in 2D quantum chromodynamics, arXiv:2412.21153.
  19. C. Cordova and D. García-Sepúlveda, Topological Cosets via Anyon condensation and applications to gapped QCD2, arXiv:2412.01877.
  20. Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 105, 125016 (2022).
  21. M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Defect lines in the Ising model and boundary states on orbifolds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2604 (1996).
  22. M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Boundary conformal field theory approach to the critical two-dimensional Ising model with a defect line, Nucl. Phys. B495, 533 (1997).
  23. V. B. Petkova and J. B. Zuber, Generalized twisted partition functions, Phys. Lett. B 504, 157 (2001).
  24. J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, TFT construction of RCFT correlators 1. Partition functions, Nucl. Phys. B646, 353 (2002).
  25. J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, TFT construction of RCFT correlators. 2. Unoriented world sheets, Nucl. Phys. B678, 511 (2004).
  26. J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, TFT construction of RCFT correlators. 3. Simple currents, Nucl. Phys. B694, 277 (2004).
  27. J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, TFT construction of RCFT correlators IV: Structure constants and correlation functions, Nucl. Phys. B715, 539 (2005).
  28. J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, Kramers-Wannier duality from conformal defects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 070601 (2004).
  29. J. Frohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, Duality and defects in rational conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B763, 354 (2007).
  30. J. Fuchs, M. R. Gaberdiel, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, Topological defects for the free boson CFT, J. Phys. A 40, 11403 (2007).
  31. C. Bachas, I. Brunner, and D. Roggenkamp, A worldsheet extension of O(d,d:Z), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2012) 039.
  32. C. Bachas, I. Brunner, and D. Roggenkamp, Fusion of critical defect lines in the 2D Ising model, J. Stat. Mech. (2013) P08008.
  33. P. Niro, K. Roumpedakis, and O. Sela, Exploring non-invertible symmetries in free theories, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 005.
  34. S. Bharadwaj, P. Niro, and K. Roumpedakis, Non-invertible defects on the worldsheet, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 164.
  35. J. A. Damia, G. Galati, O. Hulik, and S. Mancani, Exploring duality symmetries, multicriticality and RG flows at c=2, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 028.
  36. R. Argurio, A. Collinucci, G. Galati, O. Hulik, and E. Paznokas, Non-invertible T-duality at any radius via non-compact SymTFT, SciPost Phys. 18, 089 (2025).
  37. G. Arias-Tamargo, C. Hull, and M. L. Velásquez Cotini Hutt, Non-invertible symmetries of two-dimensional non-linear sigma models, SciPost Phys. 19, 126 (2025).
  38. G. Arias-Tamargo and M. L. Velásquez Cotini Hutt, Symmetries, anomalies, and dualities of two-dimensional non-linear sigma models, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 013.
  39. C. M. Hull, Global aspects of T-duality, gauged sigma models and T-folds, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2007) 057.
  40. More precisely, p and q specify a Zp×Zq subgroup of the global symmetry of the NLSM to be gauged in half-space. These symmetries and their ’t Hooft anomalies are determined by the topology of the NLSM. The condition gcd(p,q)=1 is the requirement that these discrete subgroups do not have a mixed ’t Hooft anomaly. There are cases where the two individual factors can have pure ’t Hooft anomalies, leading to further restrictions on p and q [38].

  41. D. Friedan, Nonlinear models in 2+ε dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1057 (1980).
  42. T. L. Curtright and C. K. Zachos, Geometry, topology and supersymmetry in nonlinear models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1799 (1984).
  43. D. Friedan, Nonlinear models in 2+ε dimensions, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 163, 318 (1985).
  44. It is not strictly necessary for the β function to vanish, as the target space geometry would be invariant under RG if βijg=2∇(iVj) for some vector V [41, 45]. In the present case, we will see that βNNg vanishes and this technicality is not required.

  45. C. M. Hull and P. K. Townsend, Finiteness and conformal invariance in nonlinear σ models, Nucl. Phys. B274, 349 (1986).
  46. R. R. Metsaev and A. A. Tseytlin, Two loop beta function for the generalized bosonic sigma model, Phys. Lett. B 191, 354 (1987).
  47. C. M. Hull and P. K. Townsend, The two loop beta function for σ models with torsion, Phys. Lett. B 191, 115 (1987).
  48. D. Zanon, Two loop beta functions and low-energy string effective action for the two-dimensional bosonic nonlinear σ model with a Wess-Zumino-witten term, Phys. Lett. B 191, 363 (1987).
  49. The β-function is scheme dependent and here we use Eq. (32) of [46] in the f1=−1 scheme.

  50. This is the curvature tensor of the connection with torsion Γ^ijk=Γijk−12Hijk, where Γijk are the Christoffel connection coefficients associated with g.

  51. E. Witten, Nonabelian bosonization in two-dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 92, 455 (1984).
  52. D. Schubring and M. Shifman, Sigma model on a squashed sphere with a Wess-Zumino term, Phys. Rev. D 103, 025016 (2021).
  53. N. Levine and A. A. Tseytlin, Integrability vs. RG flow in G×G and G×G/H sigma models, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 076.
  54. L. J. Romans, New compactifications of chiral N=2, d=10 supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 153, 392 (1985).
  55. Tp,q manifolds are S1 bundles over S2×S2, with p, q specifying the Chern class. There is a particular limit of the NLSM on T1,q with WZ term where the target space factorises into a squashed S3 and a round S2 [53]. The former is the example studied in detail above.

  56. S. Frolov, D. Polvara, and A. Sfondrini, Exchange relations and crossing, J. Phys. A 58, 415402 (2025).
  57. S. Shimamori and S. Yamaguchi, Boundary scattering and non-invertible symmetries in 1+1 dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 088.
  58. J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, Kramers-Wannier-like duality defects in (3+1)D gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 111601 (2022).
  59. V. Bashmakov, M. Del Zotto, A. Hasan, and J. Kaidi, Non-invertible symmetries of class S theories, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 225.
  60. A. Antinucci, C. Copetti, G. Galati, and G. Rizi, “Zoology” of non-invertible duality defects: The view from class S, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 036.
  61. F. Carta, S. Giacomelli, N. Mekareeya, and A. Mininno, Comments on non-invertible symmetries in Argyres-Douglas theories, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 135.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation