Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Lee-Yang edge singularities in a nonlocal Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model

Zong-shuai Zhang1,*, Yi Lu1,†, and Yu-xin Liu1,2,3,‡

  • *Contact author: zhangzongshuai@stu.pku.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: qwertylou@pku.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: yxliu@pku.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 113, 074021 – Published 16 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/h1gk-tzjn

Abstract

We investigate the QCD phase diagram and the associated Lee–Yang edge singularities using the two-flavor nonlocal Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model extended to complex chemical potential. We show explicitly there exists a strong correlation between the chiral phase transition and the patterns in the effective potential in the complex plane of order parameter, serving as a criterion to differentiate crossover from first-order transitions. Typically, the Lee–Yang edge singularities can be understood as a generalization of the critical end point (CEP) separating the crossover and the first-order transition, where the positive Nambu phase and the Wigner phase coalesce. We further analyze the scaling behavior near the CEP by extracting the critical exponent associated with the Lee–Yang singularities. Additionally, we confirm that the extrapolation of the Lee–Yang edge singularity trajectories provides an efficient method of determining the CEP location, even at a small real chemical potential. This provides a viable method for exploring regions of the QCD phase diagram that remain inaccessible to lattice QCD.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (66)

  1. T. Ablyazimov et al. (CBM Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 60 (2017).
  2. G. Aarts et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 133, 104070 (2023).
  3. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, V. Vovchenko, and C. H. Wong, Phys. Rev. D 112, L111505 (2025).
  4. F. Gao and J. M. Pawlowski, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136584 (2021).
  5. P. J. Gunkel and C. S. Fischer, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054022 (2021).
  6. W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054032 (2020).
  7. M. Hippert, J. Grefa, T. A. Manning, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo Vazquez, C. Ratti, R. Rougemont, and M. Trujillo, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094006 (2024).
  8. Y. Lu, F. Gao, Y.-X. Liu, and J. M. Pawlowski, Phys. Rev. D 110, 014036 (2024).
  9. P. Costa, M. C. Ruivo, C. A. de Sousa, and H. Hansen, Symmetry 2, 1338 (2010).
  10. W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, R. D. Pisarski, F. Rennecke, R. Wen, and S. Yin, Phys. Rev. D 111, 094026 (2025).
  11. T. F. Motta, J. Bernhardt, M. Buballa, and C. S. Fischer, Phys. Rev. D 108, 114019 (2023).
  12. M. G. Alford, K. Pangeni, and A. Windisch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 082701 (2018).
  13. A. Pandav, EPJ Web Conf. 296, 01016 (2024).
  14. K. Agarwal (CBM Collaboration), Phys. Scr. 98, 034006 (2023).
  15. A. Pandav, D. Mallick, and B. Mohanty, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103960 (2022).
  16. J. Adamczewski-Musch et al. (HADES Collaboration), Nat. Phys. 15, 1040 (2019).
  17. X. Luo and N. Xu, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 112 (2017).
  18. M. M. Aggarwal et al. (STAR Collaboration), arXiv:1007.2613.
  19. Y. Lu, F. Gao, X. Luo, L. Chang, and Y. Liu, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 251012 (2025).
  20. L. Jiang, F. Gao, and Y. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 807 (2025).
  21. C. N. Yang and T. D. Lee, Phys. Rev. 87, 404 (1952).
  22. T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 87, 410 (1952).
  23. P. Dimopoulos, L. Dini, F. Di Renzo, J. Goswami, G. Nicotra, C. Schmidt, S. Singh, K. Zambello, and F. Ziesché, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034513 (2022).
  24. Z.-Y. Wan, Y. Lu, F. Gao, and Y.-X. Liu, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 899 (2024).
  25. G. Basar, Phys. Rev. C 110, 015203 (2024).
  26. C. Schmidt, J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol. 3, 100057 (2025).
  27. K. Zambello, D. A. Clarke, P. Dimopoulos, F. Di Renzo, J. Goswami, G. Nicotra, C. Schmidt, and S. Singh, Proc. Sci., LATTICE2022 (2023) 164 [arXiv:2301.03952].
  28. D. A. Clarke, P. Dimopoulos, F. Di Renzo, J. Goswami, C. Schmidt, S. Singh, and K. Zambello, Phys. Rev. D 112, L091504 (2025).
  29. S. Mitra, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014511 (2025).
  30. M. Kitazawa, T. Wada, and K. Kanaya, in 16th Conference on Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum (2025).
  31. X. An, D. Mesterházy, and M. A. Stephanov, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 041.
  32. G. Johnson, F. Rennecke, and V. V. Skokov, Phys. Rev. D 107, 116013 (2023).
  33. G. Basar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 171603 (2021).
  34. S. Mukherjee, F. Rennecke, and V. V. Skokov, Phys. Rev. D 105, 014026 (2022).
  35. A. Connelly, G. Johnson, F. Rennecke, and V. Skokov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 191602 (2020).
  36. Z.-y. Wan, Y. Lu, F. Gao, and Y.-x. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 112, 094007 (2025).
  37. A. Bazavov et al. (MILC Collaboration), Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1349 (2010).
  38. C. E. DeTar and U. M. Heller, Eur. Phys. J. A 41, 405 (2009).
  39. G. Aarts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 131601 (2009).
  40. P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, Nucl. Phys. B642, 290 (2002).
  41. C. S. Fischer, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 105, 1 (2019).
  42. A. Bashir, L. Chang, I. C. Cloet, B. El-Bennich, Y.-X. Liu, C. D. Roberts, and P. C. Tandy, Commun. Theor. Phys. 58, 79 (2012).
  43. C. D. Roberts and A. G. Williams, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 33, 477 (1994).
  44. N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rep. 910, 1 (2021).
  45. R. Rougemont, J. Grefa, M. Hippert, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo, and C. Ratti, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135, 104093 (2024).
  46. Y. Chen, D. Li, and M. Huang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 74, 097201 (2022).
  47. S. J. Brodsky, G. F. de Teramond, H. G. Dosch, and J. Erlich, Phys. Rep. 584, 1 (2015).
  48. S. P. Klevansky, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 649 (1992).
  49. T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247, 221 (1994).
  50. M. Buballa, Phys. Rep. 407, 205 (2005).
  51. R. Bowler and M. Birse, Nucl. Phys. A582, 655 (1995).
  52. M. B. Parappilly, P. O. Bowman, U. M. Heller, D. B. Leinweber, A. G. Williams, and J. B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 73, 054504 (2006).
  53. T. Schäfer and E. V. Shuryak, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 323 (1998).
  54. D. Gomez Dumm and N. N. Scoccola, Phys. Rev. D 65, 074021 (2002).
  55. T. Hell, S. Roessner, M. Cristoforetti, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014022 (2009).
  56. D. G. Dumm, J. P. Carlomagno, and N. N. Scoccola, Symmetry 13, 121 (2021).
  57. D. G. Dumm, A. G. Grunfeld, and N. N. Scoccola, Phys. Rev. D 74, 054026 (2006).
  58. J. M. Karthein, V. Koch, and C. Ratti, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034013 (2025).
  59. W.-y. Ke and Y.-x. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074041 (2014).
  60. F. Gao and Y.-x. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 94, 094030 (2016).
  61. J. M. Pawlowski and F. Rennecke, Phys. Rev. D 90, 076002 (2014).
  62. M. D’Elia, Nucl. Phys. A982, 99 (2019).
  63. S. Mondal, S. Mukherjee, and P. Hegde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 022001 (2022).
  64. D. Blaschke, A. Höll, C. D. Roberts, and S. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. C 58, 1758 (1998).
  65. D. Gomez Dumm and N. N. Scoccola, Phys. Rev. C 72, 014909 (2005).
  66. https://github.com/zzsxqbh/nNJL-LYEs.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation