Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Coupling light waves to gravitational waves

Stefanos Fr. Koufidis* and Martin W. McCall

  • Blackett Laboratory, Department of Physics, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

  • *Contact author: steven.koufidis20@imperial.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 112, 104033 – Published 12 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/g96h-6dg6

Abstract

We demonstrate analytically that gravitational waves, upon interacting with copropagating electromagnetic radiation in a plasma, induce distinctive sidebands on the modulated light, thereby providing a detectable signature of their presence. Employing a fully covariant coupled-wave framework, we envision gravitational waves as phase-insensitive luminal moving gratings and derive explicit phase-matching conditions that articulate such an interaction while conserving both energy and momentum. Beyond preserving the directional signature of gravitational waves, the coupling mechanism imposes no coherence requirements on the photon-by-graviton scattering, hence enabling possibilities for exploiting cosmic microwave background radiation. Although detection at low frequencies is constrained by the requirement of long interaction lengths, advances in laser technology are poised to enable high-frequency gravitational wave detection, potentially unveiling insights into the primordial spacetime ripples that have been traversing the cosmos since the inflationary epoch.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (37)

  1. O. Heaviside, Electrician 31, 281 (1893).
  2. A. Einstein, Sitzungsber. Königl. Preuß. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 1, 688 (1916).
  3. J. Weber, Phys. Rev. 117, 306 (1960).
  4. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  5. T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 64, 064008 (2001).
  6. A. M. Cruise, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 095003 (2012).
  7. V. Domcke, C. Garcia-Cely, and N. L. Rodd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 041101 (2022).
  8. M. E. Gertsenshtein, Sov. Phys. JETP 14, 84 (1962).
  9. Y. B. Zel’dovich, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 65, 1311 (1973).
  10. N. Herman, A. F Huzfa, L. Lehoucq, and S. Clesse, Phys. Rev. D 104, 023524 (2021).
  11. J. B. Pendry, E. Galiffi, and P. A. Huidobro, Optica 8, 636 (2021).
  12. T. Z. Esirkepov and S. V. Bulanov, Phys. Rev. E 109, L023202 (2024).
  13. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/g96h-6dg6 which includes Refs. [14,15].
  14. E. J. Post, Formal Structure of Electromagnetics: General Covariance and Electromagnetics (Dover Publications, New York, 1997).
  15. B. F. Schutz, A First Course in General Relativity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1985).
  16. C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1970), pp. 388–389.
  17. The TT gauge for weak GWs simplifies the Lorenz gauge to Aμ,μ=0, ensuring compatibility: the former fixes the coordinates for hμν, the latter is metric independent.

  18. B. T. Draine, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2011).
  19. S. M. Mahajan and F. A. Asenjo, Phys. Rev. E 107, 035205 (2023).
  20. F. A. Asenjo and S. M. Mahajan, arXiv:2406.18831.
  21. In a plasma, introducing a constitutive tensor χαβμν, the mode condition χαβμνkμkβ=0 of Eq. (6.35) in Ref. [14] eliminates the rightmost term in Aα,μ,μ.

  22. E. Falcón-Gómez, V. De Falco, K. Atia Abdalmalak, A. Amor-Martín, V. De La Rubia, G. Santamaría-Botello, and L. E. García Muñoz, Phys. Rev. D 107, 124042 (2023), cf. the insets of Fig. 2. Although properly treated there, Plebanski’s method requires caution [23].
  23. M. W. McCall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 091102 (2007).
  24. D. Carney, V. Domcke, and N. L. Rodd, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044009 (2024).
  25. Above the plasma frequency ωp, EMWs in a plasma are regarded as subluminal because their group velocity, vg=(1−ωp2/ω(0)2)1/2, falls below unity, even though their phase velocity, vph=(1−ωp2/ω(0)2)−1/2, exceeds it.

  26. S. F. Koufidis and M. W. McCall, Phys. Rev. A 106, 062213 (2022).
  27. S. F. Koufidis, T. T. Koutserimpas, and M. W. McCall, Opt. Lett. 48, 4500 (2023).
  28. S. A. R. Horsley and J. B. Pendry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 156903 (2024).
  29. J. Zhang, W. Donaldson, and G. P. Agrawal, Phys. Rev. A 110, 043526 (2024).
  30. Nonzero components per tensor follow. Tensor Cανμ: C011, C012, C021, C022, C101, C110, C102, C120, C113, C131, C123, C132, C201, C210, C202, C220, C213, C231, C223, C232, C311, C312, C321, C322. Tensor Mαν: M11, M12, M21, M22. Tensor Qαν: Q11, Q12, Q21, Q22. Tensor Pαν: P11, P12, P21, P22. Tensor Nαν: ∅. For analytic expressions see Sec. VII of Supplemental Material [13].

  31. A. Yariv, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 9, 919 (1973).
  32. G. Vacalis, G. Marocco, J. Bamber, R. Bingham, and G. Gregori, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 155006 (2023).
  33. T. D. Shoji, W. Xie, K. L. Silverman, A. Feldman, T. Harvey, R. P. Mirin, and T. R. Schibli, Optica 3, 995 (2016), see the RF spectrum plotted in Fig. 3(b).
  34. A. C. Harwood, S. Vezzoli, T. V. Raziman, C. Hooper, R. Tirole, F. Wu, S. A. Maier, J. B. Pendry, S. A. R. Horsley, and R. Sapienza, Nat. Commun. 16, 5147 (2025).
  35. S. F. Koufidis and M. W. McCall, Opt. Lett. 50, 5901 (2025).
  36. U. Seljak and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2054 (1997).
  37. G. Mentasti, C. R. Contaldi, and M. Peloso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 221403 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation