Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Dirac states from the ’t Hooft model

Paul Hoyer*

  • *Contact author: paul.hoyer@helsinki.fi

Phys. Rev. D 113, 016023 – Published 28 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/g13x-2913

Abstract

The dynamics of a light fermion bound to a heavy one is expected to be described by the Dirac equation with an external potential. The potential breaks translation invariance, whereas the bound state momentum is well defined. Boosting the bound state determines the frame dependence of the light fermion dynamics. I study the Dirac limit of QCD2 in the limit of Nc→∞. The light quark wave function turns out to be independent of the frame of the bound state, up to an irrelevant Lorentz contraction. The discrete bound state spectrum determines corresponding discrete energies of the Dirac equation, which for a linear potential allows a continuous spectrum.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (12)

  1. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. A A117, 610 (1928); A118, 351 (1928).
  2. S. J. Brodsky, Atomic physics and astrophysics. Vol. 1. Brandeis University Summer Institute in Theoretical Physics, Report No. SLAC-PUB-1010, 1971, https://inspirehep.net/literature/67494.
  3. F. Gross, Phys. Rev. C 26, 2203 (1982).
  4. A. Neghabian and W. Gloeckle, Can. J. Phys. 61, 85 (1983).
  5. M. Järvinen, Phys. Rev. D 71, 085006 (2005).
  6. G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B75, 461 (1974).
  7. I. Bars and M. B. Green, Phys. Rev. D 17, 537 (1978).
  8. P. Hoyer, Phys. Rev. D 111, 074021 (2025).
  9. Y. S. Kalashnikova and A. V. Nefediev, Phys. At. Nucl. 62, 323 (1999), https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9711347.
  10. M. S. Plesset, Phys. Rev. 41, 278 (1932).
  11. P. Hoyer, Journey to the Bound States, SpringerBriefs in Physics (Springer, New York, 2021), 10.1007/978-3-030-79489-7.
  12. D. D. Dietrich, P. Hoyer, and M. Järvinen, Phys. Rev. D 87, 065021 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation