Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Compactification without orientation, or a topological scenario for CP violation

Brian Greene*

Daniel Kabat†

Janna Levin‡

Massimo Porrati§

  • Departments of Physics and Mathematics, Columbia University, 538 West 120th Street, New York, New York 10027, USA

  • Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics, Department of Physics, New York University, 726 Broadway, New York, New York 10003, USA

  • *Contact author: brian.greene@columbia.edu
  • †Contact author: daniel.kabat@lehman.cuny.edu
  • ‡Contact author: janna@astro.columbia.edu
  • §Contact author: massimo.porrati@nyu.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, 065020 – Published 24 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fp2t-9xwj

Abstract

In higher-dimensional theories, we often assume that the extra dimensions form an orientable space, perhaps with singularities. However, many physical theories are well defined on nonorientable spaces, and many spaces are not orientable, so it is reasonable to explore what happens if the assumption of orientability is relaxed. Here we consider the simplest example of free 6D theories compactified on a flat Klein bottle. We focus on a Dirac fermion in 6D, with boundary conditions that define pin+ and pin− structures. Translation invariance is broken by the boundary conditions, which leads to sharp features localized near the parity walls (fixed points of the reflection used to construct the Klein bottle). For a scalar field, there is a position-dependent energy density, peaked near the parity walls. A Dirac fermion can lead to breaking of parity, charge conjugation, and CP in 3+1 dimensions. Order parameters for this breaking are provided by the vacuum expectation values of certain fermion bilinears, again peaked near the parity walls. As one potential application, these results suggest mechanisms for CP violation and baryogenesis, enabled by compactification on a Klein bottle.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (30)

  1. For exceptions in the context of string theory, see for example [2, 3, 4, 5].

  2. D. S. Freed and M. J. Hopkins, Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 72, 603 (2021).
  3. P. Cheng, I. V. Melnikov, and R. Minasian, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 027.
  4. A. Dabholkar and J. Park, Nucl. Phys. B477, 701 (1996).
  5. V. Chakrabhavi, A. Debray, M. Dierigl, and J. J. Heckman, arXiv:2509.03573.
  6. Modern Kaluza-Klein Theories, edited by T. Appelquist, A. Chodos, and P. G. O. Freund (Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1987).
  7. The additional element generating Spin(d) is a 2π rotation, often denoted (−1)F since it changes the sign of all spinor fields.

  8. E. Witten, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035001 (2016).
  9. M. Berg, C. DeWitt-Morette, S. Gwo, and E. Kramer, Rev. Math. Phys. 13, 953 (2001).
  10. D. S. Freed and M. J. Hopkins, Geom. Topol. 25, 1165 (2021).
  11. B. S. DeWitt, C. F. Hart, and C. J. Isham, Physica (Amsterdam) 96A, 197 (1979).
  12. C. DeWitt-Morette and B. S. DeWitt, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1901 (1990).
  13. This makes it impossible to satisfy Ψ=CΨ, and is the reason Majorana (self-conjugate) spinors do not exist in 6D.

  14. In verifying these signs it helps to use explicit spinor indices. See for example [15] page 70.

  15. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995).
  16. The factor of i is included to make iΨ¯Γ¯Ψ real.

  17. In checking the behavior under R5, it is important that, as shown in (29), the spinor is periodic on the covering torus.

  18. J. Polchinski, String Theory. Vol. 1: An Introduction to the Bosonic String, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
  19. J. Polchinski, String Theory. Vol. 2: Superstring Theory and Beyond, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
  20. Y. Hosotani, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 190, 233 (1989).
  21. J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz, Phys. Lett. 82B, 60 (1979).
  22. This is a simple example of building an invariant by averaging over a group of transformations. It is important that ΨK satisfies the Dirac equation and that K2=1. Note that while Ψ+ΨK satisfies the Klein bottle boundary conditions, the other linear combination Ψ−ΨK violates them.

  23. This solves the 6D Dirac equation because γ¯ψ2 satisfies iγμ∂μγ¯ψ2(x)=−mγ¯ψ2(x).

  24. To verify this, note that α changes sign under n4→−n4.

  25. The relation is −ie−iα(−1)ℓ5(Ψ2+Ψ2K)|ℓ4,ℓ5=(Ψ1+Ψ1K)|−ℓ4,ℓ5.

  26. We could make them look completely identical if we had built the pin− structure using −iΓ4Γ¯.

  27. This yields a time-ordered correlator. See for example [28], pages 23 and 76.

  28. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1984).
  29. NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, https://dlmf.nist.gov/, edited by F. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain. See Secs. 20.2 and 20.7.
  30. We have not found boundary conditions that involve charge conjugation and define a pin− structure.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation