- Open Access
Compactification without orientation, or a topological scenario for violation
Phys. Rev. D 113, 065020 – Published 24 March, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fp2t-9xwj
Abstract
In higher-dimensional theories, we often assume that the extra dimensions form an orientable space, perhaps with singularities. However, many physical theories are well defined on nonorientable spaces, and many spaces are not orientable, so it is reasonable to explore what happens if the assumption of orientability is relaxed. Here we consider the simplest example of free 6D theories compactified on a flat Klein bottle. We focus on a Dirac fermion in 6D, with boundary conditions that define and structures. Translation invariance is broken by the boundary conditions, which leads to sharp features localized near the parity walls (fixed points of the reflection used to construct the Klein bottle). For a scalar field, there is a position-dependent energy density, peaked near the parity walls. A Dirac fermion can lead to breaking of parity, charge conjugation, and in dimensions. Order parameters for this breaking are provided by the vacuum expectation values of certain fermion bilinears, again peaked near the parity walls. As one potential application, these results suggest mechanisms for violation and baryogenesis, enabled by compactification on a Klein bottle.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (30)
For exceptions in the context of string theory, see for example [2, 3, 4, 5].
- D. S. Freed and M. J. Hopkins, Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 72, 603 (2021).
- P. Cheng, I. V. Melnikov, and R. Minasian, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2023) 027.
- A. Dabholkar and J. Park, Nucl. Phys. B477, 701 (1996).
- V. Chakrabhavi, A. Debray, M. Dierigl, and J. J. Heckman, arXiv:2509.03573.
- Modern Kaluza-Klein Theories, edited by T. Appelquist, A. Chodos, and P. G. O. Freund (Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1987).
The additional element generating is a rotation, often denoted since it changes the sign of all spinor fields.
- E. Witten, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035001 (2016).
- M. Berg, C. DeWitt-Morette, S. Gwo, and E. Kramer, Rev. Math. Phys. 13, 953 (2001).
- D. S. Freed and M. J. Hopkins, Geom. Topol. 25, 1165 (2021).
- B. S. DeWitt, C. F. Hart, and C. J. Isham, Physica (Amsterdam) 96A, 197 (1979).
- C. DeWitt-Morette and B. S. DeWitt, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1901 (1990).
This makes it impossible to satisfy , and is the reason Majorana (self-conjugate) spinors do not exist in 6D.
In verifying these signs it helps to use explicit spinor indices. See for example [15] page 70.
- M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995).
The factor of is included to make real.
In checking the behavior under , it is important that, as shown in (29), the spinor is periodic on the covering torus.
- J. Polchinski, String Theory. Vol. 1: An Introduction to the Bosonic String, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
- J. Polchinski, String Theory. Vol. 2: Superstring Theory and Beyond, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007).
- Y. Hosotani, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 190, 233 (1989).
- J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz, Phys. Lett. 82B, 60 (1979).
This is a simple example of building an invariant by averaging over a group of transformations. It is important that satisfies the Dirac equation and that . Note that while satisfies the Klein bottle boundary conditions, the other linear combination violates them.
This solves the 6D Dirac equation because satisfies .
To verify this, note that changes sign under .
The relation is .
We could make them look completely identical if we had built the structure using .
This yields a time-ordered correlator. See for example [28], pages 23 and 76.
- N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1984).
- NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, https://dlmf.nist.gov/, edited by F. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain. See Secs. 20.2 and 20.7.
We have not found boundary conditions that involve charge conjugation and define a structure.