Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Global coupled-channel analysis of e+e−→cc¯ processes in s=3.75 to 4.7  GeV

S. X. Nakamura1,2,3,*, X.-H. Li2,3, H.-P. Peng2,3, Z.-T. Sun1, and X.-R. Zhou2,3

  • *Contact author: satoshi@sdu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 054027 – Published 15 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/fch8-xwb8

Abstract

Recent high-precision e+e−→cc¯ data from BESIII and Belle are highly useful to understand vector charmonium (ψ) pole structures and puzzling line shapes due to the exotic hadron candidates Y. We, thus, perform a global coupled-channel analysis of most of the available data (ten two-body, nine three-body, and one four-body final states) in s=3.75 −4.7  GeV. Not only cross sections, but also invariant-mass distributions of subsystems are fitted. The e+e−→μ+μ− cross sections are also predicted. Our model includes dozens of (quasi-)two-body states that nonperturbatively couple with each other through bare ψ excitations, particle-exchange, and short-range mechanisms; approximate three-body unitarity is considered. The amplitudes obtained from the fit are analytically continued to ψ and Zc poles. We find ψ states similar to those in the Particle Data Group listing and Y(4320). Moreover, several ψ states, including new ones, are found close to open-charm thresholds. Trajectories and compositeness of the near-threshold poles suggest dominant hadron-molecule contents in their internal structures. Two Zc poles are found as virtual states ∼40  MeV below the D*D¯(*) thresholds, consistent with lattice QCD results. This work presents the first global analysis to determine ψ and Zc poles, thereby paving the way to extracting detailed properties of the prominent exotic hadron candidates from data.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (118)

  1. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Observation of a broad structure in the π+π−J/ψ mass spectrum around 4.26  GeV/c2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 142001 (2005).
  2. T. E. Coan et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Charmonium decays of Y(4260), ψ(4160), and ψ(4040), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 162003 (2006).
  3. C. Z. Yuan et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the e+e−→π+π−J/ψ cross section via initial-state radiation at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 182004 (2007).
  4. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  5. T. Barnes, S. Godfrey, and E. S. Swanson, Higher charmonia, Phys. Rev. D 72, 054026 (2005).
  6. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Evidence of a broad structure at an invariant mass of 4.32  GeV/c2 in the reaction e+e−→π+π−ψ(2S) measured at BABAR, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 212001 (2007).
  7. X. L. Wang et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of two resonant structures in e+e−→π+π−ψ(2S) via initial-state radiation at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 142002 (2007).
  8. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, The hidden-charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rep. 639, 1 (2016).
  9. A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai, and S. Yasui, Exotic hadrons with heavy flavors: X, Y, Z, and related states, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 062C01 (2016).
  10. R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Heavy-quark QCD exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143 (2017).
  11. A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Multiquark resonances, Phys. Rep. 668, 1 (2017).
  12. A. Ali, J. S. Lange, and S. Stone, Exotics: Heavy pentaquarks and tetraquarks, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 123 (2017).
  13. F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018); arXiv:1705.00141v3.
  14. S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, and D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015003 (2018).
  15. N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, The XYZ states: Experimental and theoretical status and perspectives, Phys. Rep. 873, 1 (2020).
  16. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of the resonance structures in the process e+e−→π+π−J/ψ, Phys. Rev. D 106, 072001 (2022).
  17. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of the process e+e−→π0π0J/ψ and neutral charmoniumlike state Zc(3900)0, Phys. Rev. D 102, 012009 (2020).
  18. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of the Y(4230) and evidence for a new vector charmoniumlike state Y(4710) in e+e−→KS0KS0J/ψ, Phys. Rev. D 107, 092005 (2023).
  19. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of the Y(4230) and a new structure in e+e−→K+K−J/ψ, Chin. Phys. C 46, 111002 (2022).
  20. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Cross section measurement of e+e−→π+π−ψ(3686) from s=4.0076  GeV to 4.6984 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 104, 052012 (2021).
  21. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Evidence of two resonant structures in e+e−→π+π−hc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 092002 (2017).
  22. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Cross section measurements of e+e−→ωχc0 from s=4.178 to 4.278 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 99, 091103(R) (2019).
  23. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Evidence of a resonant structure in the e+e−→π+D0D*− cross section between 4.05 and 4.60 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 102002 (2019).
  24. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Measurement of e+e−→ηJ/ψ cross section from s=3.808 to 4.951 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 109, 092012 (2024).
  25. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Precise measurement of the e+e−→π+π−J/ψ cross section at center-of-mass energies from 3.77 to 4.60 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 092001 (2017).
  26. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Measurement of e+e−→π+π−ψ(3686) from 4.008 to 4.600 GeV and observation of a charged structure in the π±ψ(3686) mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 96, 032004 (2017).
  27. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of a charged charmoniumlike structure in e+e−→π+π−J/ψ at s=4.26  GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252001 (2013).
  28. Z. Q. Liu et al. (Belle Collaboration), Study of e+e−→π+π−J/ψ and observation of a charged charmoniumlike state at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252002 (2013).
  29. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of a charged charmoniumlike structure Zc(4020) and search for the Zc(3900) in e+e−→π+π−hc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 242001 (2013).
  30. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Confirmation of a charged charmoniumlike state Zc(3885)∓ in e+e−→π±(DD¯*)∓ with double D tag, Phys. Rev. D 92, 092006 (2015).
  31. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of a charged charmoniumlike structure in e+e−→(D*D¯*)±π∓ at s=4.26  GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 132001 (2014).
  32. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of e+e−→π+π−π0ηc and evidence for Zc(3900)± decaying into ρ±ηc, Phys. Rev. D 100, 111102(R) (2019).
  33. M. Cleven, Q. Wang, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, and Q. Zhao, Y(4260) as the first S-wave open charm vector molecular state?, Phys. Rev. D 90, 074039 (2014).
  34. L. von Detten, V. Baru, C. Hanhart, Q. Wang, D. Winney, and Q. Zhao, How many vector charmoniumlike states lie in the mass range 4.2–4.35 GeV?, Phys. Rev. D 109, 116002 (2024).
  35. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of three charmoniumlike states with JPC=1−− in e+e−→D*0D*−π+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 121901 (2023).
  36. D.-Y. Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Interference effect as resonance killer of newly observed charmoniumlike states Y(4320) and Y(4390), Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 136 (2018).
  37. Z.-Y. Zhou, C.-Y. Li, and Z. Xiao, A new look at ψ(4160) and ψ(4230), arXiv:2304.07052.
  38. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Precise measurement of born cross sections for e+e−→DD¯ at s=3.80–4.95  GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 081901 (2024).
  39. BESIII Collaboration, Cross section measurements of the e+e−→D*+D*− and e+e−→D*+D− processes at center-of-mass energies from 4.085 to 4.600 GeV, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 155.
  40. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Precise measurement of the e+e−→Ds+Ds− cross sections at center-of-mass energies from threshold to 4.95 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 261902 (2024).
  41. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Precise measurement of the e+e−→Ds*+Ds*− cross sections at center-of-mass energies from threshold to 4.95 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151903 (2023).
  42. BESIII Collaboration, Observation of ψ(3770)→ηJ/ψ, Phys. Rev. D 107, L091101 (2023).
  43. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Cross section measurement of e+e−→η′J/ψ from s=4.178 to 4.600 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 101, 012008 (2020).
  44. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of e+e−→ωχcJ at center of mass energies from 4.21 to 4.42 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 092003 (2015).
  45. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of e+e−→ωχc1,2 near s=4.42 and 4.6 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 93, 011102(R) (2016).
  46. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Determination of the spin and parity of the Zc(3900), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 072001 (2017).
  47. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Precision measurement of the Λc+Λ¯c− cross section near threshold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 132001 (2018).
  48. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Measurement of energy-dependent pair-production cross section and electromagnetic form factors of a charmed baryon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 191901 (2023).
  49. M. Ablikim et al. (BES Collaboration), Determination of the ψ(3770), ψ(4040), ψ(4160) and ψ(4415) resonance parameters, Phys. Lett. B 660, 315 (2008).
  50. G.-J. Ding, Are Y(4260) and Z2+(4250)D1D or D0D* hadronic molecules?, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014001 (2009).
  51. X.-K. Dong, Y.-H. Lin, and B.-S. Zou, Prediction of an exotic state around 4240 MeV with JPC=1−+ as the C-parity partner of Y(4260) in a molecular picture, Phys. Rev. D 101, 076003 (2020).
  52. X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy-antiheavy hadronic molecules, Prog. Phys. 41, 65 (2021).
  53. T. Ji, X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Prediction of a narrow exotic hadronic state with quantum numbers JPC=0−−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 102002 (2022).
  54. F.-Z. Peng, M.-J. Yan, M. S. Sánchez, and M. P. Valderrama, Light- and heavy-quark symmetries and the Y(4230), Y(4360), Y(4500), Y(4620), and X(4630) resonances, Phys. Rev. D 107, 016001 (2023).
  55. S.-L. Zhu, The possible interpretations of Y(4260), Phys. Lett. B 625, 212 (2005).
  56. F. E. Close and P. R. Page, Gluonic charmonium resonances at BABAR and Belle?, Phys. Lett. B 628, 215 (2005).
  57. E. Kou and O. Pene, Suppressed decay into open charm for the Y(4260) being an hybrid, Phys. Lett. B 631, 164 (2005).
  58. S. Dubynskiy and M. B. Voloshin, Hadro-charmonium, Phys. Lett. B 666, 344 (2008).
  59. S. Weinberg, Evidence that the deuteron is not an elementary particle, Phys. Rev. 137, B672 (1965).
  60. T. Sekihara, T. Hyodo, and D. Jido, Comprehensive analysis of the wave function of a hadronic resonance and its compositeness, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2015, 063D04 (2015).
  61. V. Baru, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, Yu. Kalashnikova, and A. Kudryavtsev, Evidence that the a0(980) and f0(980) are not elementary particles, Phys. Lett. B 586, 53 (2004).
  62. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Measurement of cross sections for e+e−→μ+μ− at center-of-mass energies from 3.80 to 4.60 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 102, 112009 (2020).
  63. H. Kamano, S. X. Nakamura, T.-S. H. Lee, and T. Sato, Unitary coupled-channels model for three-mesons decays of heavy mesons, Phys. Rev. D 84, 114019 (2011).
  64. S. X. Nakamura, H. Kamano, T.-S. H. Lee, and T. Sato, Extraction of meson resonances from three-pions photo-production reactions, Phys. Rev. D 86, 114012 (2012).
  65. S. X. Nakamura, Coupled-channel analysis of D+→K−π+π+ decay, Phys. Rev. D 93, 014005 (2016).
  66. S. X. Nakamura, Q. Huang, J.-J. Wu, H.-P. Peng, Y. Zhang, and Y.-C. Zhu, Three-body unitary coupled-channel approach to radiative J/ψ decays and η(1405/1475), Phys. Rev. D 109, 014021 (2024).
  67. H. Kamano, B. Juliá-Díaz, T.-S. H. Lee, A. Matsuyama, and T. Sato, Dynamical coupled-channels study of πN→ππN reactions, Phys. Rev. C 79, 025206 (2009).
  68. A. Sommerfeld, Über die Beugung und Bremsung der Elektronen, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 403, 257 (1931).
  69. A. D. Sakharov, Interaction of the electron and the positron in pair production, Sov. Phys. Usp. 34, 375 (1991).
  70. S. X. Nakamura, Triangle singularity appearing as an X(3872)-like peak in B→(J/ψπ+π−)Kπ, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074004 (2020).
  71. N. Hüsken, R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, E. S. Swanson, Y.-Q. Wang, and C.-Z. Yuan, Poles and poltergeists in e+e−→DD¯ data, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114010 (2024).
  72. V. Zhukova et al. (Belle Collaboration), Angular analysis of the e+e−→D(*)±D*∓ process near the open charm threshold using initial-state radiation, Phys. Rev. D 97, 012002 (2018).
  73. G. Pakhlova et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of e+e−→Ds(*)+Ds(*)− cross sections near threshold using initial-state radiation, Phys. Rev. D 83, 011101(R) (2011).
  74. G. Pakhlova et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of the ψ(4415)→DD¯2*(2460) decay using initial-state radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 062001 (2008).
  75. X. L. Wang et al. (Belle Collaboration), Observation of ψ(4040) and ψ(4160) decay into ηJ/ψ, Phys. Rev. D 87, 051101(R) (2013).
  76. M. Döring, C. Hanhart, F. Huang, S. Krewald, and U.-G. Meißner, The role of the background in the extraction of resonance contributions from meson–baryon scattering, Phys. Lett. B 681, 26 (2009).
  77. D. A. S. Molnar, I. Danilkin, and M. Vanderhaeghen, The role of charged exotic states in e+e−→ψ(2S)π+π−, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134851 (2019).
  78. Q. Huang, D.-Y. Chen, X. Liu, and T. Matsuki, Charged charmoniumlike structures in the e+e−→ψ(3686)π+π− process based on the ISPE mechanism, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 613 (2019).
  79. V. Baru, E. Epelbaum, A. A. Filin, C. Hanhart, and A. V. Nefediev, Emergence of heavy quark spin symmetry breaking in heavy quarkonium decays, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014027 (2023).
  80. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Study of the decay and production properties of Ds1(2536) and Ds2*(2573), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 171903 (2024).
  81. S. Actis et al. (Working Group on Radiative Corrections and Monte Carlo Generators for Low Energies Collaborations), Quest for precision in hadronic cross sections at low energy: Monte Carlo tools vs. experimental data, Eur. Phys. J. C 66, 585 (2010).
  82. G. R. Farrar, Q.-M. Li, and C.-Z. Yuan, New approach to finding invisible states in e+e− annihilation and application to BESIII data, Phys. Rev. D 110, L051901 (2024).
  83. J. Lyon and R. Zwicky, Resonances gone topsy turvy—the charm of QCD or new physics in b→sℓ+ℓ−?, arXiv:1406.0566.
  84. Y. Ikeda and T. Sato, Strange dibaryon resonance in the K¯NN−πYN system, Phys. Rev. C 76, 035203 (2007).
  85. D. Sadasivan, A. Alexandru, H. Akdag, F. Amorim, R. Brett, C. Culver, M. Döring, F. X. Lee, and M. Mai, Pole position of the a1(1260) resonance in a three-body unitary framework, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054020 (2022).
  86. H. Kamano, S. X. Nakamura, T.-S. H. Lee, and T. Sato, Dynamical coupled-channels model of K−p reactions. II. Extraction of Λ* and Σ* hyperon resonances, Phys. Rev. C 92, 025205 (2015).
  87. D. Rönchen, M. Döring, U.-G. Meißner, and C.-W. Shen, Light baryon resonances from a coupled-channel study including KΣ photoproduction, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 229 (2022).
  88. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), R(3780) Resonance interpreted as the 13D1-wave dominant state of charmonium from precise measurements of the cross section of e+e−→ hadrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 241902 (2024).
  89. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), First observation of a three-resonance structure in e+e−→ nonopen charm hadrons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 191902 (2024).
  90. Z.-Y. Lin, J.-Z. Wang, J.-B. Cheng, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, Identification of the G(3900) structure as the P-wave DD¯*/D¯D* resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 241903 (2024).
  91. M.-L. Du, U.-G. Meißner, and Q. Wang, P-wave coupled channel effects in electron-positron annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 94, 096006 (2016).
  92. S. G. Salnikov and A. I. Milstein, Near-threshold resonance in e+e−→ΛcΛ¯c process, Phys. Rev. D 108, L071505 (2023).
  93. N. Suzuki, B. Juliá-Díaz, H. Kamano, T.-S. H. Lee, A. Matsuyama, and T. Sato, Disentangling the dynamical origin of P11 nucleon resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 042302 (2010).
  94. T.-C. Peng, Z.-Y. Bai, J.-Z. Wang, and X. Liu, How higher charmonia shape the puzzling data of the e+e−→ηJ/ψ cross section, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094048 (2024).
  95. Z. Yang, G.-J. Wang, J.-J. Wu, M. Oka, and S.-L. Zhu, Novel coupled channel framework connecting the quark model and lattice QCD for the near-threshold Ds states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 112001 (2022).
  96. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Observation of a near-threshold structure in the K+ recoil-mass spectra in e+e−→K+(Ds−D*0+Ds*−D0), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 102001 (2021).
  97. K. Yu, G.-J. Wang, J.-J. Wu, and Z. Yang, Three-coupled-channel analysis of Zc(3900) involving DD¯*, πJ/ψ, and ρηc, Phys. Rev. D 110, 114029 (2024).
  98. M.-L. Du, M. Albaladejo, F.-K. Guo, and J. Nieves, Combined analysis of the Zc(3900) and the Zcs(3985) exotic states, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074018 (2022).
  99. M. Albaladejo, F.-K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, and J. Nieves, Zc(3900): What has been really seen?, Phys. Lett. B 755, 337 (2016).
  100. J. He and D.-Y. Chen, Zc(3900)/Zc(3885) as a virtual state from πJ/ψ−D¯*D interaction, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 94 (2018).
  101. Q.-R. Gong, Z.-H. Guo, C. Meng, G.-Y. Tang, Y.-F. Wang, and H.-Q. Zheng, Zc(3900) as a DD¯* molecule from the pole counting rule, Phys. Rev. D 94, 114019 (2016).
  102. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, The Zc structures in a coupled-channels model, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 78 (2019).
  103. Y.-H. Chen, M.-L. Du, and F.-K. Guo, Precise determination of the pole position of the exotic Zc(3900), Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 291011 (2024).
  104. A. Pilloni, C. Fernandez-Ramirez, A. Jackura, V. Mathieu, M. Mikhasenko, J. Nys, and A. P. Szczepaniak, Amplitude analysis and the nature of the Zc(3900), Phys. Lett. B 772, 200 (2017).
  105. Y. Ikeda (HAL QCD Collaboration), The tetraquark candidate Zc(3900) from dynamical lattice QCD simulations, J. Phys. G 45, 024002 (2018).
  106. S. Prelovsek and L. Leskovec, Search for Zc+(3900) in the 1+− channel on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 727, 172 (2013).
  107. Y. Chen, M. Gong, Y.-H. Lei, N. Li, J. Liang, C. Liu et al., Low-energy scattering of the (DD¯*)± system and the resonance-like structure Zc(3900), Phys. Rev. D 89, 094506 (2014).
  108. S. Prelovsek, C. B. Lang, L. Leskovec, and D. Mohler, Study of the Zc+ channel using lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91, 014504 (2015).
  109. Y. Ikeda, S. Aoki, T. Doi, S. Gongyo, T. Hatsuda, T. Inoue, T. Iritani, N. Ishii, K. Murano, and K. Sasaki, Fate of the tetraquark candidate Zc(3900) from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 242001 (2016).
  110. G. K. C. Cheung, C. E. Thomas, J. J. Dudek, and R. G. Edwards, Tetraquark operators in lattice QCD and exotic flavour states in the charm sector, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 033.
  111. W. A. Yamada, O. Morimatsu, T. Sato, and K. Yazaki, Near-threshold spectrum from a uniformized Mittag-Leffler expansion: Pole structure of the Z(3900), Phys. Rev. D 105, 014034 (2022).
  112. M. B. Wise, Chiral perturbation theory for hadrons containing a heavy quark, Phys. Rev. D 45, R2188 (1992).
  113. P. del Amo Sanchez et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Observation of new resonances decaying to Dπ and D*π in inclusive e+e− collisions near s=10.58  GeV, Phys. Rev. D 82, 111101(R) (2010).
  114. B. Hyams et al., ππ Phase-shift analysis from 600 to 1900 MeV, Nucl. Phys. B64, 134 (1973).
  115. M. Albaladejo, P. Fernandez-Soler, F.-K. Guo, and J. Nieves, Two-pole structure of the D0*(2400), Phys. Lett. B 767, 465 (2017).
  116. M.-L. Du, M. Albaladejo, P. Fernandez-Soler, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, J. Nieves, and D.-L. Yao, Towards a new paradigm for heavy-light meson spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094018 (2018).
  117. H. Yan, C. Liu, L. Liu, Y. Meng, and H. Xing, Pion mass dependence in Dπ scattering and the D0*(2300) resonance from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014503 (2025).
  118. Q. Wang, M. Cleven, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, X.-G. Wu, and Q. Zhao, Y(4260): Hadronic molecule versus hadro-charmonium interpretation, Phys. Rev. D 89, 034001 (2014).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation