- Open Access
Constraining glueball couplings
Phys. Rev. D 112, 094023 – Published 12 November, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/f46t-xp36
Abstract
We set up a numerical S-matrix bootstrap problem to rigorously constrain bound-state couplings given by the residues of poles in elastic amplitudes. We extract upper bounds on these couplings that follow purely from unitarity, crossing symmetry, and the Roy equations within their proven domain of validity. First we consider amplitudes with a single spin-0 or spin-2 bound state, both with or without a self-coupling. Subsequently we investigate amplitudes with the spectrum of bound states corresponding to the estimated glueball masses of pure Yang-Mills. In the latter case the “glue-hedron,” the space of allowed couplings, provides a first-principles constraint for future lattice estimates.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (35)
- V. Crede and C. A. Meyer, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 63, 74 (2009).
- A. Athenodorou and M. Teper, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 172.
- A. Athenodorou and M. Teper, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 082.
- P. De Forcrand, G. Schierholz, H. Schneider, and M. Teper, Phys. Lett. 152B, 107 (1985).
- N. Yamanaka, H. Iida, A. Nakamura, and M. Wakayama, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054507 (2020).
- F. Giacosa, A. Pilloni, and E. Trotti, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 487 (2022).
- C. Lopez and G. Mennessier, Nucl. Phys. B118, 426 (1977).
- A. Guerrieri and A. Sever, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 251601 (2021).
- M. F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees, and P. Vieira, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 143.
- M. F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees, and P. Vieira, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 040.
- C. Lopez, Nucl. Phys. 88B, 358 (1975).
- C. Lopez, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 13, 69 (1975).
- C. Lopez and G. Mennessier, Phys. Lett. 58B, 437 (1975).
- B. Bonnier, C. Lopez, and G. Mennessier, Phys. Lett. 60B, 63 (1975).
- J. E. Miro, A. Guerrieri, and M. A. Gumus, Phys. Rev. D 110, 016007 (2024).
- S. Caron-Huot and V. Van Duong, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 280.
- A. J. Tolley, Z.-Y. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhou, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 255.
- B. Bellazzini, J. Elias Miró, R. Rattazzi, M. Riembau, and F. Riva, Phys. Rev. D 104, 036006 (2021).
- N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-T. Huang, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 259.
- C. de Rham, S. Kundu, M. Reece, A. J. Tolley, and S.-Y. Zhou, in Snowmass 2021 (2022).
- J. Albert and L. Rastelli, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 151.
- J. Albert and L. Rastelli, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 039.
- M. Froissart, Phys. Rev. 123, 1053 (1961).
- Y. S. Jin and A. Martin, Phys. Rev. 135, B1375 (1964).
- A. Martin, Nuovo Cimento A 42, 930 (1965).
- S. M. Roy, Phys. Lett. 36B, 353 (1971).
- D. Simmons-Duffin, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 174.
- W. Landry and D. Simmons-Duffin, arXiv:1909.09745.
- A. Homrich, J. a. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees, and P. Vieira, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2019) 076.
- M. Correia, Phys. Rev. D 110, 025012 (2024).
- A. Hebbar, D. Karateev, and J. Penedones, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 060.
- A. L. Guerrieri, A. Homrich, and P. Vieira, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 084.
- M. Correia, A. Sever, and A. Zhiboedov, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 013.
- J. Elias Miro, A. Guerrieri, and M. A. Gumus, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 001.
- G. Auberson and G. Mennessier, Nucl. Phys. B162, 440 (1980).