Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Localized chiral magnetic effect in equilibrium QCD

Bastian B. Brandt, Gergely Endrődi, Eduardo Garnacho-Velasco, Gergely Markó, and A. Dean M. Valois

Phys. Rev. D 112, 034508 – Published 25 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dwx4-5rmy

Abstract

We study the impact of a nonuniform magnetic background field on the chiral magnetic effect (CME) in equilibrium QCD using lattice simulations with 2+1 flavors of dynamical staggered quarks at the physical point. We show that in the presence of a nonuniform magnetic field the CME manifests itself via a localized electromagnetic current density along the direction of the field, which integrates to zero over the full volume. Our primary observable is the leading-order coefficient of the current in a chiral chemical potential expansion, which we compute for various lattice spacings and extrapolate to the continuum limit. Our findings demonstrate that, even though the global spatial average of the CME conductivity vanishes in equilibrium, steady currents still exist locally. Thus, spatially modulated magnetic fields provide a possible way of generating a nontrivial CME signal in equilibrium.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (37)

  1. D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, and P. Tribedy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33, 2430007 (2024).
  2. K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H. J. Warringa, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074033 (2008).
  3. Q. Li, D. E. Kharzeev, C. Zhang, Y. Huang, I. Pletikosic, A. V. Fedorov, R. D. Zhong, J. A. Schneeloch, G. D. Gu, and T. Valla, Nat. Phys. 12, 550 (2016).
  4. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 88, 064911 (2013).
  5. L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 052302 (2014).
  6. M. Abdallah et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 105, 014901 (2022).
  7. N. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. D 92, 085011 (2015).
  8. D. Hou, H. Liu, and H.-c. Ren, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2011) 046.
  9. P. V. Buividovich, Nucl. Phys. A925, 218 (2014).
  10. M. A. Zubkov, Phys. Rev. D 93, 105036 (2016).
  11. P. V. Buividovich, Phys. Rev. D 110, 094508 (2024).
  12. M. Horváth, D. Hou, J. Liao, and H.-c. Ren, Phys. Rev. D 101, 076026 (2020).
  13. B. B. Brandt, G. Endrődi, E. Garnacho-Velasco, and G. Markó, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 092.
  14. W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044907 (2012).
  15. B. B. Brandt, F. Cuteri, G. Endrődi, G. Markó, L. Sandbote, and A. D. M. Valois, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 229.
  16. P. V. Buividovich, M. N. Chernodub, E. V. Luschevskaya, and M. I. Polikarpov, Phys. Rev. D 80, 054503 (2009).
  17. A. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 031601 (2011).
  18. A. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. D 84, 114504 (2011).
  19. P. V. Buividovich, D. Smith, and L. von Smekal, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014511 (2021).
  20. M. Puhr and P. V. Buividovich, EPJ Web Conf. 175, 04003 (2018).
  21. B. B. Brandt, G. Endrődi, E. Garnacho-Velasco, and G. Markó, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 142.
  22. B. B. Brandt, G. Endrődi, G. Markó, and A. D. M. Valois, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 027.
  23. G. Endrődi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 141, 104153 (2025).
  24. C. Banerjee, M. Lewkowicz, and M. A. Zubkov, Phys. Lett. B 819, 136457 (2021).
  25. G. V. Dunne, Heisenberg-Euler effective Lagrangians: Basics and extensions, in From Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics. Ian Kogan Memorial Collection (3 Volume Set), edited by M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, and J. Wheater (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004), pp. 445–522.
  26. G. Cao, Phys. Rev. D 97, 054021 (2018).
  27. S. Borsányi, G. Endrődi, Z. Fodor, A. Jakovác, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabó, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2010) 077.
  28. S. Dürr, Phys. Rev. D 87, 114501 (2013).
  29. G. Endrődi, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2013) 023.
  30. P. Adhikari and B. C. Tiburzi, Phys. Rev. D 107, 094504 (2023).
  31. B. B. Brandt, G. Endrődi, E. Garnacho-Velasco, G. Markó, and A. D. M. Valois, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2024 (2025) 196 [arXiv:2502.01155].
  32. C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, International Series In Pure and Applied Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).
  33. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  34. G. Endrődi, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 1307 (2011).
  35. B. B. Brandt, F. Cuteri, and G. Endrődi, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 055.
  36. B. B. Brandt and G. Endrődi, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2016 (2016) 039 [arXiv:1611.06758].
  37. H. Akaike, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19, 716 (1974).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation