Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Twist-3 contributions to γγ→π0π0,KS0KS0 in kT factorization

Jun-Kang He* and Cong Wang†

  • *Contact author: hejk@hbnu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: wangj@hbnu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 054016 – Published 9 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dtpq-cskf

Abstract

We compute the cross sections for the two-photon processes γγ→π0π0 and γγ→KS0KS0 in kT factorization, including the chirally enhanced two-parton twist-3 light cone distribution amplitudes. For these charge-suppressed neutral channels the twist-3 cross sections exceed the twist-2 ones by close to an order of magnitude in the intermediate-energy region, bringing the predictions much closer to the Belle data, the residual underestimate being plausibly attributable to higher-order QCD corrections. The calculation reproduces the measured angular distributions and the energy dependence of the charged channels and the neutral pion, though not the steeper fall of the neutral kaon. The neutral-to-charged ratios are the most discriminating observables. They depend strongly on energy in the data, whereas our calculation, like other approaches in the literature, yields a nearly flat ratio. Finally, in a phenomenological discussion, we combine our contribution with the soft handbag contribution and largely reproduce the observed energy dependence, suggesting that the hard and soft contributions are comparably important in the few-GeV region.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (69)

  1. S. J. Brodsky and G. P. Lepage, Large-angle two-photon exclusive channels in quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1808 (1981).
  2. G. P. Lepage and S. J. Brodsky, Exclusive processes in perturbative quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2157 (1980).
  3. V. L. Chernyak, γγ→ππ,KK: Leading term QCD versus handbag model, Phys. Lett. B 640, 246 (2006).
  4. W.-T. Chen et al. (Belle Collaboration), A study of γγ→KS0KS0 production at energies of 2.4–4.0 GeV at Belle, Phys. Lett. B 651, 15 (2007).
  5. V. L. Chernyak and S. I. Eidelman, Hard exclusive two-photon processes in QCD, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 80, 1 (2015).
  6. S. Uehara et al. (Belle Collaboration), High-statistics study of neutral-pion pair production in two-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D 79, 052009 (2009).
  7. H. Aihara et al. (TPC/Two Gamma Collaborations), Pion and kaon pair production in photon-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 404 (1986).
  8. A. Heister et al. (ALEPH Collaboration), Exclusive production of pion and kaon meson pairs in two photon collisions at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 569, 140 (2003).
  9. H. Nakazawa et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the γγ→π+π− and γγ→K+K− processes at energies of 2.4–4.1 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 615, 39 (2005).
  10. T. Mori et al. (Belle Collaboration), High statistics measurement of the cross sections of γγ→π+π− production, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 074102 (2007).
  11. S. Uehara et al. (Belle Collaboration), High-statistics measurement of neutral-pion pair production in two-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D 78, 052004 (2008).
  12. S. Uehara et al. (Belle Collaboration), High-statistics study of ηπ0 production in two-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D 80, 032001 (2009).
  13. S. Uehara et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of ηη production in two-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D 82, 114031 (2010).
  14. S. Uehara et al. (Belle Collaboration), High-statistics study of KS0 pair production in two-photon collisions, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2013, 123C01 (2013).
  15. M. Masuda et al. (Belle Collaboration), Study of π0 pair production in single-tag two-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D 93, 032003 (2016).
  16. M. Masuda et al. (Belle Collaboration), Study of KS0 pair production in single-tag two-photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D 97, 052003 (2018).
  17. C. Corianò, H.-n. Li, and C. Savkli, Exclusive processes at intermediate energy, quark–hadron duality and the transition to perturbative QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (1998) 008.
  18. R.-C. Hsieh and H.-n. Li, Transition to perturbative QCD in two photon collisions, Phys. Rev. D 70, 056002 (2004).
  19. C. Wang, M.-Z. Zhou, and H. Chen, γγ→M+M−(M=π,K) processes with twist-3 corrections in QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 219 (2017).
  20. G. Duplančić and B. Nižić, NLO perturbative QCD predictions for γγ→M+M−(M=π,K), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 142003 (2006).
  21. M. Diehl, P. Kroll, and C. Vogt, The handbag contribution to γγ→ππ and KK, Phys. Lett. B 532, 99 (2002).
  22. M. Diehl and P. Kroll, Two-photon annihilation into octet meson pairs: Symmetry relations in the handbag approach, Phys. Lett. B 683, 165 (2010).
  23. P. Kroll, Hard exclusive wide-angle processes, Eur. Phys. J. Web Conf. 37, 01019 (2012).
  24. M. Hoferichter, D. R. Phillips, and C. Schat, Roy–Steiner equations for γγ→ππ, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1743 (2011).
  25. R. García-Martín and B. Moussallam, MO analysis of the high statistics Belle results on γγ→π+π−,π0π0 with chiral constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 155 (2010).
  26. L.-Y. Dai and M. R. Pennington, Comprehensive amplitude analysis of γγ→π+π−,π0π0 and K¯K below 1.5 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 90, 036004 (2014).
  27. I. Danilkin and M. Vanderhaeghen, Dispersive analysis of the γγ*→ππ process, Phys. Lett. B 789, 366 (2019).
  28. Y. S. Surovtsev, P. Bydžovský, T. Gutsche, R. Kamiński, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and M. Nagy, Coupled-channel analysis of the process γγ→π0π0, Particles 5, 210 (2022).
  29. S. P. Klevansky, R. H. Lemmer, and A. Beygi, Amplitude determination for MM→MM,M=π, K and cross-sections for γγ→π+π−,π0π0,π0η in a chiral model, Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 49 (2025).
  30. J. Botts and G. F. Sterman, Hard elastic scattering in QCD: Leading behavior, Nucl. Phys. B325, 62 (1989).
  31. H.-n. Li and G. F. Sterman, The perturbative pion form factor with Sudakov suppression, Nucl. Phys. B381, 129 (1992).
  32. R. Jakob and P. Kroll, The pion form factor: Sudakov suppressions and intrinsic transverse momentum, Phys. Lett. B 315, 463 (1993).
  33. C. Wang, J.-K. He, and M.-Z. Zhou, Twist-3 contributions to γγ→π+π−,K+K− processes in perturbative QCD approach, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 765 (2019).
  34. H.-n. Li, Unification of the kT and threshold resummations, Phys. Lett. B 454, 328 (1999).
  35. T. Kurimoto, H.-n. Li, and A. I. Sanda, Leading-power contributions to B→π,ρ transition form factors, Phys. Rev. D 65, 014007 (2001).
  36. H.-n. Li, Threshold resummation for exclusive B meson decays, Phys. Rev. D 66, 094010 (2002).
  37. M. Gell-Mann, R. J. Oakes, and B. Renner, Behavior of current divergences under SU(3)×SU(3), Phys. Rev. 175, 2195 (1968).
  38. H. Leutwyler, The ratios of the light quark masses, Phys. Lett. B 378, 313 (1996).
  39. P. Ball, Theoretical update of pseudoscalar meson distribution amplitudes of higher twist: The nonsinglet case, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (1999) 010.
  40. P. Ball, V. M. Braun, and A. Lenz, Higher-twist distribution amplitudes of the K meson in QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 004.
  41. M. Beneke and T. Feldmann, Symmetry-breaking corrections to heavy-to-light B meson form factors at large recoil, Nucl. Phys. B592, 3 (2001).
  42. S. Cheng, Y.-Y. Fan, and Z.-J. Xiao, NLO twist-3 contribution to the pion electromagnetic form factors in kT factorization, Phys. Rev. D 89, 054015 (2014).
  43. S. Cheng and Z.-J. Xiao, Timelike pion electromagnetic form factors in kT factorization with the next-to-leading-order twist-3 contribution, Phys. Lett. B 749, 1 (2015).
  44. S. Cheng, Pion and kaon form factors in the perturbative QCD approach, Phys. Rev. D 100, 013007 (2019).
  45. J. Chai and S. Cheng, Shedding light on the intrinsic transversal momentum distributions of pions and kaons, Phys. Rev. D 111, L071902 (2025).
  46. J. Chai and S. Cheng, Form factors of light pseudoscalar mesons from the perturbative QCD approach, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 229.
  47. V. M. Braun and I. E. Filyanov, QCD sum rules in exclusive kinematics and pion wave function, Z. Phys. C 44, 157 (1989).
  48. V. M. Braun and I. E. Filyanov, Conformal invariance and pion wave functions of nonleading twist, Z. Phys. C 48, 239 (1990).
  49. Z.-T. Wei and M.-Z. Yang, Systematic study of B→π form factors in the pQCD approach and its reliability, Nucl. Phys. B642, 263 (2002).
  50. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  51. A. V. Efremov and A. V. Radyushkin, Factorization and asymptotic behaviour of pion form factor in QCD, Phys. Lett. B94, 245 (1980).
  52. V. M. Braun, A. N. Manashov, and J. Rohrwild, Baryon operators of higher twist in QCD and nucleon distribution amplitudes, Nucl. Phys. B807, 89 (2009).
  53. P. Kroll and K. Passek-Kumerički, Twist-3 contributions to wide-angle photoproduction of pions, Phys. Rev. D 97, 074023 (2018).
  54. S. J. Brodsky, T. Huang, and G. P. Lepage, Hadronic wave functions and high momentum transfer interactions in quantum chromodynamics, in Particles and Fields 2, Banff Summer Institute (Plenum, New York, 1981), p. 143.
  55. G. P. Lepage, S. J. Brodsky, T. Huang, and P. B. Mackenzie, Hadronic wave functions in QCD, in Particles and Fields 2, Proceedings of the Banff Summer Institute (Plenum, New York, 1982), p. 83.
  56. J. Bolz, P. Kroll, and G. A. Schuler, Color octet contributions to exclusive charmonium decays, Phys. Lett. B 392, 198 (1997).
  57. M. Nagashima and H.-n. Li, kT factorization of exclusive processes, Phys. Rev. D 67, 034001 (2003).
  58. H.-n. Li and S. Mishima, Pion transition form factor in kT factorization, Phys. Rev. D 80, 074024 (2009).
  59. H.-n. Li, Y.-L. Shen, Y.-M. Wang, and H. Zou, Next-to-leading-order correction to pion form factor in kT factorization, Phys. Rev. D 83, 054029 (2011).
  60. H.-C. Hu and H.-n. Li, Next-to-leading-order timelike pion form factors in kT factorization, Phys. Lett. B 718, 1351 (2013).
  61. A. S. Gorsky, The power correction to the asymptotics of the cross section for the process γγ→π+π− in QCD, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 50, 708 (1989).
  62. D. Faiman, H. J. Lipkin, and H. R. Rubinstein, Resonance physics with γγ events, Phys. Lett. 59B, 269 (1975).
  63. N. N. Achasov and G. N. Shestakov, Lightest scalar and tensor resonances in γγ→ππ after the Belle experiment, Phys. Rev. D 77, 074020 (2008).
  64. C. N. Yang, Selection rules for the dematerialization of a particle into two photons, Phys. Rev. 77, 242 (1950).
  65. G. S. Bali, V. M. Braun, S. Bürger, M. Göckeler, M. Gruber, F. Hutzler, P. Korcyl, A. Schäfer, A. Sternbeck, and P. Wein (RQCD Collaboration), Light-cone distribution amplitudes of pseudoscalar mesons from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 065; 11 (2020) 037(A).
  66. A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A. A. Pivovarov, and Y.-M. Wang, Charm-loop effect in B→K(*)ℓ+ℓ− and B→K*γ, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2009) 089.
  67. A. Khodjamirian and A. V. Rusov, Bs→Kℓνℓ and B(s)→π(K)ℓ+ℓ− decays at large recoil and CKM matrix elements, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 112.
  68. S. Cheng, A. Khodjamirian, and A. V. Rusov, Pion light-cone distribution amplitude from the pion electromagnetic form factor, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074022 (2020).
  69. Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG) Collaboration), FLAG review 2024, Phys. Rev. D 113, 014508 (2026).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation