Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Topological production of charmonia with event-shape engineering in pp collisions at s=13  TeV using pythia8

Aswathy Menon Kavumpadikkal Radhakrishnan1, Suraj Prasad1, Neelkamal Mallick1,2, and Raghunath Sahoo1,*

  • *Contact author: Raghunath.Sahoo@cern.ch

Phys. Rev. D 113, 054032 – Published 23 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dtgx-hrbp

Abstract

The production of heavy quarks (charm and beauty) in high-energy hadronic and nuclear collisions provides an excellent testing ground for the theory of strong interactions and validates models based on quantum chromodynamics (QCD). In this work, prompt and nonprompt production of J/ψ in pp collisions at s=13  TeV are studied as a function of the transverse spherocity using pythia8. J/ψ is reconstructed via its electromagnetic decay to dielectrons and dimuons, in mid- and forward rapidity, respectively. Transverse spherocity, an event-shape observable, is used to distinguish hard-QCD events from the softer, isotropic ones. In pythia8, the production of J/ψ can be influenced by the average number of multiple parton interactions (⟨Nmpi⟩), owing to the underlying events, which have a dominant contribution to particle production at lower transverse momentum. Since transverse spherocity is correlated to ⟨Nmpi⟩, this can serve as an experimentally accessible tool for event selection to study the underlying QCD processes influencing the prompt and nonprompt J/ψ production. This study reveals the correlation between heavy-flavor production dynamics and topological event selection in pp collisions using pythia8, whose relevance awaits experimental validation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (55)

  1. S. A. Bass, M. Gyulassy, H. Stoecker, and W. Greiner, J. Phys. G 25, R1 (1999).
  2. J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman, Adv. Ser. Dir. High Energy Phys. 5, 1 (1989).
  3. N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, B. K. Heltsley et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1534 (2011).
  4. J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2015) 051.
  5. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 466 (2018).
  6. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 269 (2017).
  7. D. Acosta et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 71, 032001 (2005).
  8. S. Prasad, N. Mallick, and R. Sahoo, Phys. Rev. D 109, 014005 (2024).
  9. B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 712, 165 (2012).
  10. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 810, 135758 (2020).
  11. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 015.
  12. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 238.
  13. S. G. Weber, A. Dubla, A. Andronic, and A. Morsch, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 36 (2019).
  14. S. Prasad, S. Tripathy, B. Sahoo, and R. Sahoo, arXiv:2506.03782.
  15. S. Prasad, B. Sahoo, S. Tripathy, N. Mallick, and R. Sahoo, Phys. Rev. C 111, 044902 (2025).
  16. K. Goswami, S. Prasad, N. Mallick, R. Sahoo, and G. B. Mohanty, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034017 (2024).
  17. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 184.
  18. J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 148.
  19. D. Thakur, S. De, R. Sahoo, and S. Dansana, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094002 (2018).
  20. S. Deb, D. Thakur, S. De, and R. Sahoo, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 134 (2020).
  21. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 630 (2021).
  22. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 857 (2019).
  23. S. Prasad, N. Mallick, D. Behera, R. Sahoo, and S. Tripathy, Sci. Rep. 12, 3917 (2022).
  24. S. Prasad, N. Mallick, S. Tripathy, and R. Sahoo, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074011 (2023).
  25. S. Tripathy, S. Prasad, and R. Sahoo, Phys. Rev. D 112, 114012 (2025).
  26. S. Prasad, A. M. Kavumpadikkal Radhakrishnan, R. Sahoo, and N. Mallick, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139753 (2025).
  27. N. Mallick, R. Sahoo, S. Tripathy, and A. Ortiz, J. Phys. G 48, 045104 (2021).
  28. N. Mallick, S. Tripathy, and R. Sahoo, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 524 (2022).
  29. A. Menon Kavumpadikkal Radhakrishnan, S. Prasad, S. Tripathy, N. Mallick, and R. Sahoo, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 140, 110 (2025).
  30. Available online at https://pythia.org/.
  31. C. Bierlich, S. Chakraborty, N. Desai, L. Gellersen, I. Helenius et al., SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 8 (2022).
  32. T. Sjostrand and P. Z. Skands, Eur. Phys. J. C 39, 129 (2005).
  33. R. Corke and T. Sjostrand, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2011) 032.
  34. T. Sjostrand and M. van Zijl, Phys. Rev. D 36, 2019 (1987).
  35. T. Sjostrand and P. Z. Skands, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2004) 053.
  36. B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, G. Ingelman, and T. Sjostrand, Phys. Rep. 97, 31 (1983).
  37. T. Sjostrand, Nucl. Phys. B248, 469 (1984).
  38. M. M. Aggarwal et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 84, 034909 (2011).
  39. J. R. Christiansen and P. Z. Skands, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2015) 003.
  40. P. Schwaller, D. Stolarski, and A. Weiler, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2015) 059.
  41. E. Norrbin and T. Sjostrand, Phys. Lett. B 442, 407 (1998).
  42. A. Banfi, G. P. Salam, and G. Zanderighi, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2010) 038.
  43. B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2012) 065.
  44. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 190.
  45. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 762 (2018).
  46. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1575 (2011).
  47. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 167 (2020).
  48. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 843, 137649 (2023).
  49. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 229.
  50. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 101, 044907 (2020).
  51. A. Ortiz, A. Paz, J. D. Romo, S. Tripathy, E. A. Zepeda, and I. Bautista, Phys. Rev. D 102, 076014 (2020).
  52. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 001.
  53. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1121 (2021).
  54. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2015) 172.
  55. S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 092.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation