Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Modeling the differential rate for signal interactions in coincidence with noise fluctuations or large rate backgrounds

Xinran Li*

Matt Pyle

Bernard Sadoulet

  • *Contact author: xinranli@lbl.gov

Phys. Rev. D 112, 092007 – Published 12 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dn11-wvr4

Abstract

The characteristic energy of a relic dark matter interaction with a detector scales strongly with the putative dark matter mass. Consequently, experimental search sensitivity at the lightest masses will always come from interactions whose size is similar to noise fluctuations and low energy backgrounds in the detector. In this paper, we correctly calculate the net change in measured differential event rate due to low rate signal interactions that overlap in time with noise and backgrounds, accounting for both periods of time when the signal is coincident with noise/backgrounds and for the decreased amount of time in which only noise/backgrounds occur and we show that the introduction of random simulated signal events into the continuous raw data stream (a form of “salting”) provides a correct and practical implementation to estimate this net linear signal sensitivity. Unfortunately this does not apply to the situation with non negligible pileups as we show through explicit examples. Consequently, this exclusion technique should be complemented by less sensitive techniques that can separately exclude large rate, high pileup signal parameter space. An analysis threshold above the Gaussian-like noise component of the measured differential rate spectrum should also likely produce conservative limits. Though previous light mass dark matter searches did not correctly account for decreased background only live time effects in their signal sensitivity, conservative analysis choices likely protected their published limits from being nonconservative.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (21)

  1. Z. Liu, L. Yang, Q. Yue, C. Yeh, K. Kang, Y. Li, M. Agartioglu, H. An, J. Chang, J. Chen et al., Studies of the earth shielding effect to direct dark matter searches at the China Jinping Underground Laboratory, Phys. Rev. D 105, 052005 (2022).
  2. A. H. Abdelhameed, G. Angloher, P. Bauer, A. Bento, E. Bertoldo, C. Bucci, L. Canonica, A. D’Addabbo, X. Defay, S. Di Lorenzo et al., First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program, Phys. Rev. D 100, 102002 (2019).
  3. I. Alkhatib, D. Amaral, T. Aralis, T. Aramaki, I. J. Arnquist, I. A. Langroudy, E. Azadbakht, S. Banik, D. Barker, C. Bathurst et al., Light dark matter search with a high-resolution athermal phonon detector operated above ground, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 061801 (2021).
  4. G. Angloher et al., First observation of single photons in a CRESST detector and new dark matter exclusion limits, Phys. Rev. D 110, 083038 (2024).
  5. E. Armengaud, C. Augier, A. Benoît, A. Benoit, L. Bergé, J. Billard, A. Broniatowski, P. Camus, A. Cazes, M. Chapellier et al., Searching for low-mass dark matter particles with a massive Ge bolometer operated above ground, Phys. Rev. D 99, 082003 (2019).
  6. J. Aalbers, D. Akerib, C. Akerlof, A. Al Musalhi, F. Alder, A. Alqahtani, S. Alsum, C. Amarasinghe, A. Ames, T. Anderson et al., First dark matter search results from the Lux-Zeplin (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  7. R. Agnese, Z. Ahmed, A. Anderson, S. Arrenberg, D. Balakishiyeva, R. Basu Thakur, D. Bauer, J. Billard, A. Borgland, D. Brandt et al., Silicon detector dark matter results from the final exposure of CDMS II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 251301 (2013).
  8. R. Agnese, T. Aralis, T. Aramaki, I. Arnquist, E. Azadbakht, W. Baker, S. Banik, D. Barker, D. Bauer, T. Binder et al., First dark matter constraints from a superCDMS single-charge sensitive detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 051301 (2018).
  9. L. Hehn et al., Improved EDELWEISS-III sensitivity for low-mass WIMPs using a profile likelihood approach, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 548 (2016).
  10. P. Adari, A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo, D. Amidei, G. Angloher, E. Armengaud, C. Augier, L. Balogh, S. Banik, D. Baxter, C. Beaufort et al., Excess workshop: Descriptions of rising low-energy spectra, SciPost Phys. Proc. 9, 001 (2022).
  11. M. Kendall and A. Stuart, The Advances Theory of Satistics, 2nd ed. (Charles Griffin and Company Limited, London, 1967), Vol. 2.
  12. S. Yellin, Finding an upper limit in the presence of an unknown background, Phys. Rev. D 66, 032005 (2002).
  13. A. Aguilar-Arevalo, I. Arnquist, N. Avalos, L. Barak, D. Baxter, X. Bertou, I. Bloch, A. Botti, M. Cababie, G. Cancelo et al., Confirmation of the spectral excess in DAMIC at SNOLAB with skipper CCDS, Phys. Rev. D 109, 062007 (2024).
  14. M. Albakry, I. Alkhatib, D. Amaral, T. Aralis, T. Aramaki, I. Arnquist, I. Ataee Langroudy, E. Azadbakht, S. Banik, C. Bathurst et al., Investigating the sources of low-energy events in a superCDMS-HVEV detector, Phys. Rev. D 105, 112006 (2022).
  15. P. Agnes, I. F. d. M. Albuquerque, T. Alexander, A. Alton, G. Araujo, D. M. Asner, M. Ave, H. O. Back, B. Baldin, G. Batignani et al., Low-mass dark matter search with the DarkSide-50 experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 081307 (2018).
  16. D. Akerib, S. Alsum, H. Araújo, X. Bai, J. Balajthy, A. Baxter, E. Bernard, A. Bernstein, T. Biesiadzinski, E. Boulton et al., Investigation of background electron emission in the LUX detector, Phys. Rev. D 102, 092004 (2020).
  17. R. Anthony-Petersen, A. Biekert, R. Bunker, C. L. Chang, Y.-Y. Chang, L. Chaplinsky, E. Fascione, C. W. Fink, M. Garcia-Sciveres, R. Germond et al., A stress-induced source of phonon bursts and quasiparticle poisoning, Nat. Commun. 15, 6444 (2024).
  18. A. Das, N. Kurinsky, and R. K. Leane, Dark matter induced power in quantum devices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 121801 (2024).
  19. X. Li and M. Pyle, Constrain dark matter interactions with noise power.
  20. L. A. Zadeh and J. R. Ragazzini, Optimum filters for the detection of signals in noise, Proc. IRE 40, 1223 (1952).
  21. X. Li, 2025, https://github.com/xinranli1993/DifferentialRateWithNoiseFluctuations.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation