- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Two-loop master integrals for mixed QCD-EW corrections to gg→H through O(ϵ2)

Robin Marzucca1, Andrew J. McLeod2, and Christoph Nega3

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 112, 113007 – Published 26 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/d62t-55k2

Abstract

We consider mixed strong-electroweak corrections to Higgs production via gluon fusion, in which the Higgs boson couples to the top quark. Using the method of differential equations, we compute all of the master integrals that contribute to this process at two loops through O(ϵ2) in the dimensional regularization parameter ϵ=(d−4)/2, keeping full analytic dependence on the top quark, Higgs, W, and Z boson masses. We present the results for these master integrals in terms of iterated integrals whose kernels depend on elliptic curves.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (132)

  1. U. Aglietti, R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi, and A. Vicini, Two loop light fermion contribution to Higgs production and decays, Phys. Lett. B 595, 432 (2004).
  2. G. Degrassi and F. Maltoni, Two-loop electroweak corrections to Higgs production at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 600, 255 (2004).
  3. S. Actis, G. Passarino, C. Sturm, and S. Uccirati, NLO electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 670, 12 (2008).
  4. C. Anastasiou, R. Boughezal, and F. Petriello, Mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to Higgs boson production in gluon fusion, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 003.
  5. P. A. Baikov, K. G. Chetyrkin, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Steinhauser, Quark and gluon form factors to three loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 212002 (2009).
  6. T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, T. Huber, N. Ikizlerli, and C. Studerus, Calculation of the quark and gluon form factors to three loops in QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2010) 094.
  7. C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, E. Furlan, T. Gehrmann, F. Herzog et al., Higgs boson gluon–fusion production at threshold in N3LO QCD, Phys. Lett. B 737, 325 (2014).
  8. C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, F. Herzog, and B. Mistlberger, Higgs boson gluon-fusion production in QCD at three loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 212001 (2015).
  9. C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, E. Furlan, T. Gehrmann, F. Herzog et al., High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 058.
  10. M. Bonetti, K. Melnikov, and L. Tancredi, Three-loop mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to Higgs boson gluon fusion, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034004 (2018).
  11. C. Anastasiou, V. del Duca, E. Furlan, B. Mistlberger, F. Moriello, A. Schweitzer et al., Mixed QCD-electroweak corrections to Higgs production via gluon fusion in the small mass approximation, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 162.
  12. M. Becchetti, R. Bonciani, V. Del Duca, V. Hirschi, F. Moriello, and A. Schweitzer, Next-to-leading order corrections to light-quark mixed QCD-EW contributions to Higgs boson production, Phys. Rev. D 103, 054037 (2021).
  13. M. Czakon, R. V. Harlander, J. Klappert, and M. Niggetiedt, Exact top-quark mass dependence in hadronic Higgs production, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 162002 (2021).
  14. M. Cepeda et al., Report from working group 2: Higgs physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7, 221 (2019).
  15. E. Panzer and O. Schnetz, The Galois coaction on ϕ4 periods, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 11, 657 (2017).
  16. O. Schnetz, The Galois coaction on the electron anomalous magnetic moment, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 12, 335 (2018).
  17. S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod, and G. Papathanasiou, The double pentaladder integral to all orders, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 170.
  18. S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, F. Dulat, M. Von Hippel, A. J. McLeod, and G. Papathanasiou, The cosmic galois group and extended steinmann relations for planar N=4 SYM amplitudes, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2019) 061.
  19. S. Abreu, H. Ita, B. Page, and W. Tschernow, Two-loop hexa-box integrals for non-planar five-point one-mass processes, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 182.
  20. L. J. Dixon, O. Gurdogan, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm, Folding amplitudes into form factors: An antipodal duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 111602 (2022).
  21. L. J. Dixon, O. Gürdoğan, Y.-T. Liu, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm, Antipodal self-duality for a four-particle form factor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 111601 (2023).
  22. K.-T. Chen, Iterated path integrals, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 83, 831 (1977).
  23. A. B. Goncharov, Geometry of configurations, polylogarithms, and motivic cohomology, Adv. Math. 114, 197 (1995).
  24. A. B. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes, Math. Res. Lett. 5, 497 (1998).
  25. E. Remiddi and J. Vermaseren, Harmonic polylogarithms, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 725 (2000).
  26. J. M. Borwein, D. M. Bradley, D. J. Broadhurst, and P. Lisonek, Special values of multiple polylogarithms, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 353, 907 (2001).
  27. S. Moch, P. Uwer, and S. Weinzierl, Nested sums, expansion of transcendental functions and multiscale multiloop integrals, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 43, 3363 (2002).
  28. C. Duhr and F. Brown, A double integral of dlog forms which is not polylogarithmic, Proc. Sci., MA2019 (2022) 005 [arXiv:2006.09413].
  29. A. Sabry, Fourth order spectral functions for the electron propagator, Nucl. Phys. 33, 401 (1962).
  30. R. Huang and Y. Zhang, On genera of curves from high-loop generalized unitarity cuts, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2013) 080.
  31. P. Vanhove, The physics and the mixed Hodge structure of Feynman integrals, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 88, 161 (2014).
  32. J. L. Bourjaily, A. J. McLeod, M. Spradlin, M. von Hippel, and M. Wilhelm, Elliptic double-box integrals: Massless scattering amplitudes beyond polylogarithms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 121603 (2018).
  33. J. L. Bourjaily, A. J. McLeod, M. von Hippel, and M. Wilhelm, Bounded collection of Feynman integral Calabi-Yau geometries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 031601 (2019).
  34. I. Hönemann, K. Tempest, and S. Weinzierl, Electron self-energy in QED at two loops revisited, Phys. Rev. D 98, 113008 (2018).
  35. J. L. Bourjaily, A. J. McLeod, C. Vergu, M. Volk, M. Von Hippel, and M. Wilhelm, Embedding Feynman integral (Calabi-Yau) geometries in weighted projective space, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 078.
  36. H. Jockers, S. Kotlewski, P. Kuusela, A. J. McLeod, S. Pögel, M. Sarve et al., A Calabi-Yau-to-curve correspondence for Feynman integrals, J. High Energy Phys. 25 (2020) 030.
  37. J. L. Bourjaily et al., Functions beyond multiple polylogarithms for precision collider physics, in Snowmass 2021 (2022), arXiv:2203.07088.
  38. C. Duhr, A. Klemm, C. Nega, and L. Tancredi, The ice cone family and iterated integrals for Calabi-Yau varieties, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 228.
  39. C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega, and F. Porkert, Yangian-invariant fishnet integrals in two dimensions as volumes of Calabi-Yau varieties, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 041602 (2023).
  40. R. Marzucca, A. J. McLeod, B. Page, S. Pögel, and S. Weinzierl, Genus drop in hyperelliptic Feynman integrals, Phys. Rev. D 109, L031901 (2024).
  41. F. Forner, C. Nega, and L. Tancredi, On the photon self-energy to three loops in QED, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 148.
  42. C. Duhr, F. Gasparotto, C. Nega, L. Tancredi, and S. Weinzierl, On the electron self-energy to three loops in QED, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 020.
  43. C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega, and F. Porkert, Geometry from integrability: Multi-leg fishnet integrals in two dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 008.
  44. Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon et al., Scattering amplitudes, the tail effect, and conservative binary dynamics at O(G4), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 161103 (2022).
  45. H. Frellesvig, R. Morales, and M. Wilhelm, Calabi-Yau meets gravity: A Calabi-Yau threefold at fifth post-Minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 201602 (2024).
  46. A. Klemm, C. Nega, B. Sauer, and J. Plefka, Calabi-Yau periods for black hole scattering in classical general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 109, 124046 (2024).
  47. M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka et al., Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering, Nature (London) 641, 603 (2025).
  48. S. Laporta and E. Remiddi, Analytic treatment of the two loop equal mass sunrise graph, Nucl. Phys. B704, 349 (2005).
  49. L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, The two-loop sunrise graph with arbitrary masses, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 54, 052303 (2013).
  50. S. Bloch and P. Vanhove, The elliptic dilogarithm for the sunset graph, J. Number Theory 148, 328 (2015).
  51. E. Remiddi and L. Tancredi, Schouten identities for Feynman graph amplitudes; The master integrals for the two-loop massive sunrise graph, Nucl. Phys. B880, 343 (2014).
  52. L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, The two-loop sunrise graph in two space-time dimensions with arbitrary masses in terms of elliptic dilogarithms, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 55, 102301 (2014).
  53. L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, The two-loop sunrise integral around four space-time dimensions and generalisations of the Clausen and Glaisher functions towards the elliptic case, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 56, 072303 (2015).
  54. L. Adams, C. Bogner, and S. Weinzierl, The iterated structure of the all-order result for the two-loop sunrise integral, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 57, 032304 (2016).
  55. S. Bloch, M. Kerr, and P. Vanhove, Local mirror symmetry and the sunset Feynman integral, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 21, 1373 (2017).
  56. J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, and L. Tancredi, Elliptic polylogarithms and iterated integrals on elliptic curves II: An application to the sunrise integral, Phys. Rev. D 97, 116009 (2018).
  57. C. Bogner, A. Schweitzer, and S. Weinzierl, Analytic continuation and numerical evaluation of the kite integral and the equal mass sunrise integral, Nucl. Phys. B922, 528 (2017).
  58. L. Adams and S. Weinzierl, The ϵ-form of the differential equations for Feynman integrals in the elliptic case, Phys. Lett. B 781, 270 (2018).
  59. L. Adams and S. Weinzierl, Feynman integrals and iterated integrals of modular forms, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 12, 193 (2018).
  60. J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, B. Penante, and L. Tancredi, Elliptic symbol calculus: From elliptic polylogarithms to iterated integrals of Eisenstein series, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 014.
  61. J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, B. Penante, and L. Tancredi, Elliptic Feynman integrals and pure functions, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 023.
  62. C. Duhr and L. Tancredi, Algorithms and tools for iterated Eisenstein integrals, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 105.
  63. M. Walden and S. Weinzierl, Numerical evaluation of iterated integrals related to elliptic Feynman integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 265, 108020 (2021).
  64. A. V. Kotikov, Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation, Phys. Lett. B 254, 158 (1991).
  65. A. V. Kotikov, Differential equation method: The Calculation of N point Feynman diagrams, Phys. Lett. B 267, 123 (1991).
  66. E. Remiddi, Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 110A, 1435 (1997).
  67. T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, Differential equations for two loop four point functions, Nucl. Phys. B580, 485 (2000).
  68. J. M. Henn, Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 251601 (2013).
  69. L. Adams, E. Chaubey, and S. Weinzierl, Simplifying differential equations for multiscale Feynman integrals beyond multiple polylogarithms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 141602 (2017).
  70. C. Dlapa, J. Henn, and K. Yan, Deriving canonical differential equations for Feynman integrals from a single uniform weight integral, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 025.
  71. C. Dlapa, J. M. Henn, and F. J. Wagner, An algorithmic approach to finding canonical differential equations for elliptic Feynman integrals, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 120.
  72. X. Jiang, X. Wang, L. L. Yang, and J. Zhao, ϵ-factorized differential equations for two-loop non-planar triangle Feynman integrals with elliptic curves, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 187.
  73. L. Görges, C. Nega, L. Tancredi, and F. J. Wagner, On a procedure to derive ϵ-factorised differential equations beyond polylogarithms, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 206.
  74. V. A. Smirnov, Asymptotic expansions in limits of large momenta and masses, Commun. Math. Phys. 134, 109 (1990).
  75. V. A. Smirnov, Asymptotic expansions in momenta and masses and calculation of Feynman diagrams, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 10, 1485 (1995).
  76. M. Beneke and V. Smirnov, Asymptotic expansion of feynman integrals near threshold, Nucl. Phys. B522, 321 (1998).
  77. V. A. Smirnov and E. R. Rakhmetov, The strategy of regions for asymptotic expansion of two loop vertex Feynman diagrams, Theor. Math. Phys. 120, 870 (1999).
  78. A. Pak and A. Smirnov, Geometric approach to asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1626 (2011).
  79. V. A. Smirnov, Analytic Tools for Feynman Integrals (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012), Vol. 250, 10.1007/978-3-642-34886-0.
  80. G. Heinrich, S. Jahn, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, F. Langer, V. Magerya et al., Expansion by regions with pySecDec, Comput. Phys. Commun. 273, 108267 (2022).
  81. Y. Ma, Identifying regions in wide-angle scattering via graph-theoretical approaches, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 197.
  82. J. Vollinga and S. Weinzierl, Numerical evaluation of multiple polylogarithms, Comput. Phys. Commun. 167, 177 (2005).
  83. C. Duhr and F. Dulat, PolyLogTools—polylogs for the masses, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2019) 135.
  84. F. Brown and A. Levin, Multiple elliptic polylogarithms, arXiv:1110.6917.
  85. J. Broedel, C. R. Mafra, N. Matthes, and O. Schlotterer, Elliptic multiple zeta values and one-loop superstring amplitudes, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2015) 112.
  86. L. Adams, C. Bogner, A. Schweitzer, and S. Weinzierl, The kite integral to all orders in terms of elliptic polylogarithms, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 57, 122302 (2016).
  87. J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, and L. Tancredi, Elliptic polylogarithms and iterated integrals on elliptic curves. Part I: General formalism, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 093.
  88. C. W. Bauer, A. Frink, and R. Kreckel, Introduction to the GiNaC framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language, J. Symb. Comput. 33, 1 (2002).
  89. F. Moriello, Generalised power series expansions for the elliptic planar families of Higgs+jet production at two loops, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 150.
  90. M. Hidding, DiffExp, a Mathematica package for computing Feynman integrals in terms of one-dimensional series expansions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 269, 108125 (2021).
  91. X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma, and C.-Y. Wang, A systematic and efficient method to compute multi-loop master integrals, Phys. Lett. B 779, 353 (2018).
  92. X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma, AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via auxiliary mass flow, Comput. Phys. Commun. 283, 108565 (2023).
  93. R. Marzucca, A. McLeod, and C. Nega, Analytic expressions of master integrals for higgs production through gluon fusion at nlo in the ew coupling, 10.5281/zenodo.14843619 (2025).
  94. P. Nogueira, Automatic Feynman graph generation, J. Comput. Phys. 105, 279 (1993).
  95. J. A. M. Vermaseren, New features of FORM, arXiv:math-ph/0010025.
  96. J. Kuipers, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren, and J. Vollinga, FORM version 4.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1453 (2013).
  97. B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, and J. Vermaseren, FORM version 4.2, arXiv:1707.06453.
  98. W. R. Inc., Mathematica, Version 14.0.
  99. C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer, and T. Reiter, UFO—The universal FeynRules output, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1201 (2012).
  100. M. Gerlach, F. Herren, and M. Lang, tapir: A tool for topologies, amplitudes, partial fraction decomposition and input for reductions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 282, 108544 (2023).
  101. A. von Manteuffel and C. Studerus, Reduze 2—distributed Feynman integral reduction, arXiv:1201.4330.
  102. J. Klappert, F. Lange, P. Maierhöfer, and J. Usovitsch, Integral reduction with Kira 2.0 and finite field methods, Comput. Phys. Commun. 266, 108024 (2021).
  103. M. Prausa, epsilon: A tool to find a canonical basis of master integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 219, 361 (2017).
  104. O. Gituliar and V. Magerya, Fuchsia: A tool for reducing differential equations for Feynman master integrals to epsilon form, Comput. Phys. Commun. 219, 329 (2017).
  105. C. Meyer, Algorithmic transformation of multi-loop master integrals to a canonical basis with CANONICA, Comput. Phys. Commun. 222, 295 (2018).
  106. R. N. Lee, Libra: A package for transformation of differential systems for multiloop integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 267, 108058 (2021).
  107. A. Primo and L. Tancredi, On the maximal cut of Feynman integrals and the solution of their differential equations, Nucl. Phys. B916, 94 (2017).
  108. A. Primo and L. Tancredi, Maximal cuts and differential equations for Feynman integrals. An application to the three-loop massive banana graph, Nucl. Phys. B921, 316 (2017).
  109. A. Davydychev and J. Tausk, Two-loop self-energy diagrams with different masses and the momentum expansion, Nucl. Phys. B397, 123 (1993).
  110. M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz, and P. M. Zerwas, Higgs boson production at the LHC, Nucl. Phys. B453, 17 (1995).
  111. R. Harlander and P. Kant, Higgs production and decay: Analytic results at next-to-leading order QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2005) 015.
  112. C. Anastasiou, S. Beerli, S. Bucherer, A. Daleo, and Z. Kunszt, Two-loop amplitudes and master integrals for the production of a Higgs boson via a massive quark and a scalar-quark loop, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2007) 082.
  113. U. Aglietti, R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi, and A. Vicini, Analytic results for virtual QCD corrections to Higgs production and decay, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2007) 021.
  114. A. Denner, Techniques for calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one loop level and results for W physics at LEP-200, Fortschr. Phys. 41, 307 (1993).
  115. A. Denner and S. Dittmaier, Electroweak radiative corrections for collider physics, Phys. Rep. 864, 1 (2020).
  116. S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, A. McLeod, and M. von Hippel, Bootstrapping a five-loop amplitude using Steinmann relations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 241601 (2016).
  117. J. Drummond, J. Foster, and O. Gürdoğan, Cluster adjacency properties of scattering amplitudes in N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 161601 (2018).
  118. J. L. Bourjaily, H. Hannesdottir, A. J. McLeod, M. D. Schwartz, and C. Vergu, Sequential discontinuities of Feynman integrals and the monodromy group, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 205.
  119. H. S. Hannesdottir, A. J. McLeod, M. D. Schwartz, and C. Vergu, Constraints on sequential discontinuities from the geometry of on-shell spaces, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 236.
  120. C. Fevola, S. Mizera, and S. Telen, Landau singularities revisited: Computational algebraic geometry for Feynman integrals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 101601 (2024).
  121. M. Helmer, G. Papathanasiou, and F. Tellander, Landau singularities from whitney stratifications, arXiv:2402.14787.
  122. S. Caron-Huot, M. Correia, and M. Giroux, Recursive Landau analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 131603 (2025).
  123. M. Correia, M. Giroux, and S. Mizera, SOFIA: Singularities of Feynman integrals automatized, arXiv:2503.16601.
  124. L. Landau, On analytic properties of vertex parts in quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. 13, 181 (1960).
  125. H. S. Hannesdottir, A. J. McLeod, M. D. Schwartz, and C. Vergu, Implications of the Landau equations for iterated integrals, Phys. Rev. D 105, L061701 (2022).
  126. H. Hannesdottir, A. McLeod, M. Schwartz, and C. Vergu, Applications of the Landau bootstrap, Phys. Rev. D 111, 085003 (2025).
  127. H. S. Hannesdottir, A. J. McLeod, M. D. Schwartz, and C. Vergu (to be published).
  128. A. Matijašić and J. Miczajka, Effortless: Efficient generation of odd letters with multiple roots as leading singularities.
  129. H. S. Hannesdottir, L. Lippstreu, A. J. McLeod, and M. Polackova, Minimal cuts and genealogical constraints on Feynman integrals, arXiv:2406.05943.
  130. E. Panzer, Algorithms for the symbolic integration of hyperlogarithms with applications to Feynman integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 188, 148 (2015).
  131. F. C. S. Brown and A. Levin, Multiple elliptic polylogarithms, arXiv:1110.6917.
  132. R. Marzucca, A. J. McLeod, C. Nega, and K. Schönwald (to be published).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 112, 113007– Published 26 December, 2025
  • Received 31 July 2025
  • Accepted 30 October 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation