Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Renormalizing a three-flavor lattice calculation of the two-photon contribution to KL→μ+μ−

En-Hung Chao1, Norman Christ2, and Ceran Hu2

Phys. Rev. D 114, 074512 – Published 20 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bsqc-6q3t

Abstract

The Standard Model prediction for the rare KL→μ+μ− decay depends critically on the long-distance contribution coming from the exchange of two photons. Such a contribution can be computed using lattice QCD and an effective three-flavor theory including only the u, d and s quarks, provided terms falling as the inverse square of the omitted charm quark mass, 1/mc2, are neglected. Because of the missing Glashow-Iliopoulos-Maiani cancellation, this three-flavor theory contains additional low-energy constants that depend on mc. Here we show how these constants can be determined from a practical four-flavor lattice QCD calculation performed on a small volume with u and d quark masses that are heavier than physical.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (19)

  1. D. Ambrose et al. (E871 Collaboration), Improved branching ratio measurement for the decay KL0→μ+μ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1389 (2000).
  2. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
  3. M. Gorbahn and U. Haisch, Charm quark contribution to KL→μ+μ− at next-to-next-to-leading, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 122002 (2006).
  4. N. H. Christ, X. Feng, L. Jin, C. Tu, and Y. Zhao, Lattice QCD calculation of the two-photon contributions to KL→μ+μ− and π0→e+e− decays, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2019 (2020) 128.
  5. E.-H. Chao and N. Christ, Calculating the two-photon exchange contribution to KL→μ+μ− decay, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054514 (2024).
  6. P. Boyle, E.-H. Chao, N. Christ, C. Hu, L. Jin, and Y. Zhao, Exploratory calculation of KL→μ+μ− decay from lattice QCD at physical pion mass, Phys. Rev. D 113, 074523 (2026).
  7. M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018).
  8. T. Blum, P. A. Boyle, D. Hoying, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, C. Kelly, C. Lehner, A. Soni, and M. Tomii (RBC and UKQCD Collaborations), ΔI=3/2 and ΔI=1/2 channels of K→ππ decay at the physical point with periodic boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094517 (2023).
  9. S. L. Adler, Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177, 2426 (1969).
  10. G. D’Ambrosio, D. Greynat, and M. Knecht, On the amplitudes for the CP-conserving K±(KS)→π±(π0)ℓ+ℓ− rare decay modes, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 049.
  11. G. Martinelli, C. Pittori, C. T. Sachrajda, M. Testa, and A. Vladikas, A general method for non-perturbative renormalization of lattice operators, Nucl. Phys. B445, 81 (1995).
  12. T. Blum et al. (RBC and UKQCD Collaborations), Domain wall QCD with physical quark masses, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074505 (2016).
  13. R. F. Dashen and D. J. Gross, The relationship between lattice and continuum definitions of the gauge theory coupling, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2340 (1981).
  14. J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, A PCAC puzzle: π0→γγ in the σ model, Nuovo Cimento A 60, 47 (1969).
  15. P. A. Boyle (UKQCD Collaboration), Conserved currents for mobius domain wall fermions, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2014 (2015) 087.
  16. S. L. Adler and W. A. Bardeen, Absence of higher order corrections in the anomalous axial vector divergence equation, Phys. Rev. 182, 1517 (1969).
  17. G. Costa, J. Julve, T. Marinucci, and M. Tonin, Nonabelian gauge theories and triangle anomalies, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 38A, 373 (1977).
  18. R. C. Brower, H. Neff, and K. Orginos, The Möbius domain wall fermion algorithm, Comput. Phys. Commun. 220, 1 (2017).
  19. H. Yin and R. D. Mawhinney, Improving DWF simulations: The force gradient integrator and the Möbius accelerated DWF solver, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2011 (2011) 051.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation