Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Entropy bounds from quantum thermodynamics

Massimo Giovannini*

  • Department of Physics, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland and INFN, Section of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy

  • *Contact author: massimo.giovannini@cern.ch

Phys. Rev. D 111, 123548 – Published 23 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bpzp-kzwh

Abstract

Within an inherently classical perspective, there is always an unavoidable energy cost associated with the information deletion and this common lore is at the heart of the Landauer conjecture that does not impose, per se, any relevant limit on the information acquisition. Although such a mindset should generally apply to systems of any size, its quantum mechanical implications are particularly intriguing and, for this reason, we examine here a minimal physical structure where the system and the environment are described, respectively, by a pair of quantum oscillators coupled by an appropriate Hermitian interaction able to amplify the entropy of the initial state. Since at the onset of the dynamical evolution the system is originally in a pure state, its entropy variation is always positive semidefinite and the Landauer conjecture should not impose any constraint. Nonetheless, provided the quantum amplification is effective, it turns out that the entropy variation of the system always undershoots the heat transferred to the environment. When the initial thermal state of the environment is characterized by a chemical potential, the entropy growth is bounded both by the particles and by the heat flowing to the environment. The limits deduced in the quantum thermodynamical framework are also scrutinized from a field theory standpoint where species of different spins are copiously produced (especially in a cosmological context) thanks to the rapid variation of the space-time curvature.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (53)

  1. R. P. Feynman, Feynman Lectures on Computation (Addison-Wesley, Boston 1996).
  2. R. Penrose, The Emperor’s New Mind (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989).
  3. R. Landauer, IBM J. Res. Dev. 5, 183 (1961).
  4. C. H. Bennett, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 905 (1982).
  5. K. Shizume, Phys. Rev. E 52, 3495 (1995).
  6. R. Landauer, Phys. Lett. A 217, 188 (1996).
  7. B. Piechocinska, Phys. Rev. A 61, 062314 (2000).
  8. K. Maruyama, F. Nori, and V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1 (2009).
  9. M. Giovannini, Phys. Rev. D 111, L061301 (2025).
  10. W. Louisell, A. Yariv, and A. Siegman, Phys. Rev. 124, 1646 (1961).
  11. B. L. Mollow and R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 160, 1076 (1967).
  12. B. L. Mollow and R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 160, 1097 (1967).
  13. R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983).
  14. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
  15. N. D. Birrel and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum fields in curved spaces (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982).
  16. L. Parker and D. Toms, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2009).
  17. L. Parker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 562 (1968).
  18. L. Parker, Phys. Rev. 183, 1057 (1969).
  19. L. P. Grishchuk, Sov. Phys. JETP 40, 409 (1975) [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 67, 825 (1974)].
  20. L. P. Grishchuk, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 302, 439 (1977).
  21. L. H. Ford and L. Parker, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1601 (1977).
  22. B. L. Hu and L. Parker, Phys. Lett. 63A, 217 (1977).
  23. A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett. 30, 682 (1979) [Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 30, 719 (1979)].
  24. L. Abbott and M. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B244, 541 (1984).
  25. S. W. Hawking, Phys. Lett. 150B, 339 (1985).
  26. M. Giovannini, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112, 103774 (2020).
  27. M. Giovannini, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2023) 056.
  28. C. E. Shannon, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379 (1948).
  29. C. E. Shannon and W. W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1949).
  30. F. M. Reza, An Introduction to Information Theory (Dover publications, New York, 1961).
  31. P. Riechers and M. Gu, Phys. Rev. A 104, 012214 (2021).
  32. R. Dillenschneider and E. Lutz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 210601 (2009).
  33. Y. Jun, M. Gavrilov, and J. Bechhoefer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 190601 (2014).
  34. T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 250602 (2009).
  35. B. d’Espagnat, Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Perseus Books, Reading Massachusetts, 1999).
  36. C. Caves and B. L. Schumaker, Phys. Rev. A 31, 3068 (1985); 31, 3093 (1985).
  37. B. L. Schumaker, Phys. Rep. 135, 317 (1986).
  38. A. Perelomov, Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986).
  39. V. Bargmann, Ann. Math. 48, 568 (1947).
  40. J. R. Klauder and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Fundamentals of Quantum Optics (W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1968).
  41. R. Gilmore, Lie groups, Lie Algebras, and Some of Their Applications (Wiley, New York, 1974).
  42. R. A. Fisher, M. M. Neto, and Y. D. Sandberg, Phys. Rev. D 29, 1107 (1984).
  43. D. R. Truax, Phys. Rev. D 31, 1988 (1985).
  44. M. M. Nieto and D. R. Truax, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2843 (1993).
  45. D. Stoler, Phys. Rev. D 1, 3217 (1970).
  46. D. Stoler, Phys. Rev. D 4, 1925 (1971); 11, 3033 (1975).
  47. H. P. Yuen, Phys. Rev. A 13, 2226 (1976).
  48. R. E. Slusher, L. W. Hollberg, B. Yurke, J. C. Mertz, and J. F. Valley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2409 (1985).
  49. R. M. Shelby, M. D. Levenson, S. H. Perlmutter, R. G. DeVoe, and D. F. Walls, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 691 (1986).
  50. L. A. Wu, H. J. Kimble, J. L. Hall, and H. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2520 (1986).
  51. U. L. Andersen, T. Gehring, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuchs, Phys. Scr. 91, 053001 (2016).
  52. S. Weinberg, Cosmology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2008).
  53. M. Giovannini, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123520 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation