Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Nonfactorizing interface in the two-dimensional long-range Ising model

Dongsheng Ge*

Yu Nakayama†

  • *Contact author: dge@het.phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp
  • †Contact author: yu.nakayama@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 113, 065028 – Published 26 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/blrz-phyn

Abstract

The factorization proposal claims that the codimension one “pinning defect,” on which a local relevant operator is integrated, factorizes the space into two halves in general conformal field theories in the infrared limit. In this paper, we study a two-dimensional long-range Ising model at criticality with a line defect or an interface, which physically corresponds to changing the local temperature on it. We show that in the perturbative regime, it is not factorizing even in the infrared limit. An intuitive explanation of the nonfactorization is that the long-range Ising model is equivalent to a local conformal field theory in higher dimensions. In this picture, the space is still connected through the “extra dimension” across the defect line.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (70)

  1. M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Defect lines in the Ising model and boundary states on orbifolds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2604 (1996).
  2. M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck, Boundary conformal field theory approach to the critical two-dimensional Ising model with a defect line, Nucl. Phys. B495, 533 (1997).
  3. T. Quella, I. Runkel, and G. M. T. Watts, Reflection and transmission for conformal defects, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2007) 095.
  4. M. Hasenbusch, Restoring isotropy in a three-dimensional lattice model: The Ising universality class, Phys. Rev. B 104, 014426 (2021).
  5. S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Solving the 3D Ising model with the conformal bootstrap, Phys. Rev. D 86, 025022 (2012).
  6. S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Solving the 3d Ising model with the conformal bootstrap II. C-Minimization and precise critical exponents, J. Stat. Phys. 157, 869 (2014).
  7. Y. Nakayama, Bootstrapping critical Ising model on three-dimensional real projective space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 141602 (2016).
  8. F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Precision islands in the Ising and O(N) models, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 036.
  9. C.-H. Chang, V. Dommes, R. S. Erramilli, A. Homrich, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, M. S. Mitchell, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bootstrapping the 3d Ising stress tensor, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 136.
  10. W. Zhu, C. Han, E. Huffman, J. S. Hofmann, and Y.-C. He, Uncovering conformal symmetry in the 3D Ising transition: State-operator correspondence from a quantum fuzzy sphere regularization, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021009 (2023).
  11. L. Hu, Y.-C. He, and W. Zhu, Operator product expansion coefficients of the 3D Ising criticality via quantum fuzzy spheres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 031601 (2023).
  12. F. Gliozzi, P. Liendo, M. Meineri, and A. Rago, Boundary and interface CFTs from the conformal bootstrap, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2015) 036; 12 (2021) 093(E).
  13. Z. Zhou and Y. Zou, Studying the 3d Ising surface CFTs on the fuzzy sphere, SciPost Phys. 18, 031 (2025).
  14. M. Dedushenko, Ising BCFT from fuzzy hemisphere, arXiv:2407.15948.
  15. A. Krishnan and M. A. Metlitski, A plane defect in the 3d O(N) model, SciPost Phys. 15, 090 (2023).
  16. F. P. Toldin, A. Krishnan, and M. A. Metlitski, Universal finite-size scaling in the extraordinary-log boundary phase of three-dimensional O(N) model, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023052 (2025).
  17. F. K. Popov and Y. Wang, Factorizing defects from generalized pinning fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 201601 (2025).
  18. F. Parisen Toldin, F. F. Assaad, and S. Wessel, Critical behavior in the presence of an order-parameter pinning field, Phys. Rev. B 95, 014401 (2017).
  19. G. Cuomo, Z. Komargodski, and M. Mezei, Localized magnetic field in the O(N) model, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 134.
  20. D. Rodriguez-Gomez, A scaling limit for line and surface defects, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 071.
  21. A. Gimenez-Grau, E. Lauria, P. Liendo, and P. van Vliet, Bootstrapping line defects with O(2) global symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 018.
  22. S. Giombi, E. Helfenberger, and H. Khanchandani, Line defects in fermionic CFTs, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 224.
  23. J. Barrat, P. Liendo, and P. van Vliet, Line defect correlators in fermionic CFTs, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 146.
  24. T. Nishioka, Y. Okuyama, and S. Shimamori, The epsilon expansion of the O(N) model with line defect from conformal field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 203.
  25. W. H. Pannell and A. Stergiou, Line defect RG flows in the ϵ expansion, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 186.
  26. W. H. Pannell, A note on defect stability in d=4−ϵ, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 187.
  27. Z. Zhou, D. Gaiotto, Y.-C. He, and Y. Zou, The g-function and defect changing operators from wavefunction overlap on a fuzzy sphere, SciPost Phys. 17, 021 (2024).
  28. A. Söderberg Rousu, Fusion of conformal defects in interacting theories, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 183.
  29. O. Diatlyk, H. Khanchandani, F. K. Popov, and Y. Wang, Defect fusion and Casimir energy in higher dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 006.
  30. B. Gabai, A. Sever, and D.-l. Zhong, Universal constraints for conformal line defects, Phys. Rev. D 112, 065004 (2025).
  31. T. Shachar, R. Sinha, and M. Smolkin, RG flows on two-dimensional spherical defects, SciPost Phys. 15, 240 (2023).
  32. M. Trépanier, Surface defects in the O(N) model, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 074.
  33. S. Giombi and B. Liu, Notes on a surface defect in the O(N) model, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 004.
  34. A. Raviv-Moshe and S. Zhong, Phases of surface defects in scalar field theories, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 143.
  35. O. Diatlyk, Z. Sun, and Y. Wang, Surprises in the ordinary: O(N) invariant surface defect in the ε-expansion, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 131.
  36. E. de Sabbata, N. Drukker, and A. Stergiou, Transdimensional defects, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 187.
  37. P. Brax and S. Fichet, Casimir forces in CFT with defects and boundaries, Physics 6, 544 (2024).
  38. S. Harribey, I. R. Klebanov, and Z. Sun, Boundaries and interfaces with localized cubic interactions in the O(N) model, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 017.
  39. S. Harribey, W. H. Pannell, and A. Stergiou, Multiscalar critical models with localised cubic interactions, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 092.
  40. S. Giombi, E. Himwich, A. Katsevich, I. Klebanov, and Z. Sun, Sphere free energy of scalar field theories with cubic interactions, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 133.
  41. L. Bianchi, L. S. Cardinale, and E. de Sabbata, Defects in the long-range O(N) model, J. Phys. A 58, 335401 (2025).
  42. E. Wong and I. Affleck, Tunneling in quantum wires: A boundary conformal field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B417, 403 (1994).
  43. J. L. Cardy, Boundary conditions, Fusion rules and the Verlinde formula, Nucl. Phys. B324, 581 (1989).
  44. D. M. McAvity and H. Osborn, Conformal field theories near a boundary in general dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B455, 522 (1995).
  45. C. Bachas, J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf, and H. Ooguri, Permeable conformal walls and holography, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2002) 027.
  46. J. Polchinski, Scale and conformal invariance in quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. B303, 226 (1988).
  47. Y. Nakayama, Scale invariance vs conformal invariance, Phys. Rep. 569, 1 (2015).
  48. Y. Nakayama, Conformal equations that are not Virasoro or Weyl invariant, Lett. Math. Phys. 109, 2255 (2019).
  49. M. F. Paulos, S. Rychkov, B. C. van Rees, and B. Zan, Conformal invariance in the long-range Ising model, Nucl. Phys. B902, 246 (2016).
  50. M. E. Fisher, S.-k. Ma, and B. G. Nickel, Critical exponents for long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 917 (1972).
  51. J. Sak, Recursion relations and fixed points for ferromagnets with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. B 8, 281 (1973).
  52. C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, Long-range critical exponents near the short-range crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 241601 (2017).
  53. C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov, and B. Zan, A scaling theory for the long-range to short-range crossover and an infrared duality, J. Phys. A 50, 354002 (2017).
  54. L. Caffarelli and L. Silvestre, An extension problem related to the fractional Laplacian, Commun. Partial Differ. Equations 32, 1245 (2007).
  55. D. Ge, T. Nishioka, and S. Shimamori, Localized RG flows on composite defects and C-theorem, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 012.
  56. M. Lohmann, G. Slade, and B. C. Wallace, Critical two-point function for long-range O(N) models below the upper critical dimension, J. Stat. Phys. 169, 1132 (2017).
  57. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/blrz-phyn for details of free bulk correlators in the parallel momentum space, perturbative calculations of the bulk-bulk correlation, a fractional quantum mechanical model and derivations of the broken Ward-Takahashi identities. The Supplemental Materials includes Refs. [59–62].
  58. R. Gorenflo, A. A. Kilbas, F. Mainardi, and S. V. Rogosin, Mittag-Leffler Functions, Related Topics and Applications (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014).
  59. L. S. Brown, Dimensional regularization of composite operators in scalar field theory, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 126, 135 (1980).
  60. G. R. Dvali and G. Gabadadze, Gravity on a brane in infinite volume extra space, Phys. Rev. D 63, 065007 (2001).
  61. J. Dong and M. Xu, Some solutions to the space fractional Schrödinger equation using momentum representation method, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 48, 072105 (2007).
  62. E. C. de Oliveira, F. S. Costa, and J. Vaz, Jayme, The fractional Schrödinger equation for delta potentials, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 51, 123517 (2010).
  63. D. M. McAvity and H. Osborn, Energy momentum tensor in conformal field theories near a boundary, Nucl. Phys. B406, 655 (1993).
  64. C. P. Herzog and K.-W. Huang, Boundary conformal field theory and a boundary central charge, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 189.
  65. M. Billò, V. Gonçalves, E. Lauria, and M. Meineri, Defects in conformal field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2016) 091.
  66. A. Gadde, Conformal constraints on defects, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 038.
  67. P. Dey and A. Söderberg, On analytic bootstrap for interface and boundary CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 013.
  68. Y. Okuyama, Aspects of critical O(N) model with boundary and defect, Ph.D. thesis, Tokyo University, 2023.
  69. S. Shimamori, Conformal field theory with composite defect, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 131.
  70. M. Meineri, J. Penedones, and A. Rousset, Colliders and conformal interfaces, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 138.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation