Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Bessel-Hagen currents for the Fierz-Pauli action

Michael Hobson1,*, Will Barker2,†, and Anthony Lasenby1,3,‡

  • 1Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, J.J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom
  • 2Central European Institute for Cosmology and Fundamental Physics, Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 1999/2, 182 00 Prague 8, Czechia
  • 3Kavli Institute for Cosmology, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, United Kingdom

  • *Contact author: mph@mrao.cam.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: barker@fzu.cz
  • ‡Contact author: a.n.lasenby@mrao.cam.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 114, 024033 – Published 14 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bkn5-q5tv

Abstract

For electromagnetism in Minkowski spacetime, the Bessel-Hagen method gives a particularly direct Noetherian derivation of the standard gauge-invariant energy-momentum tensor. The key step is to supplement the form variation generated by an infinitesimal coordinate transformation with a compensating electromagnetic gauge transformation. In this paper we ask whether the same idea can be applied to the massless spin-2 field described by the Fierz-Pauli action. We first prove that no nonzero local tensor quadratic in first derivatives of the symmetric field hμν can be strictly invariant under the spin-2 gauge transformation hμν↦hμν+∂μξν+∂νξμ; the direct electromagnetic analogue of the Bessel-Hagen construction therefore cannot exist. Once the inexact nature of the Fierz-Pauli gauge symmetry is treated correctly, however, the Bessel-Hagen construction does produce a gauge-invariant equivalence class of Noether currents. Changing the compensating spin-2 gauge parameter changes the current only by terms proportional to the Fierz-Pauli field equations; performing an independent spin-2 gauge transformation on hμν changes the current only by a trivial current given by the divergence of an antisymmetric superpotential plus field-equation terms. This provides the natural spin-2 analogue of Bessel-Hagen’s electromagnetic construction, but only in the quotient space of conserved currents, and not as a preferred local gauge-invariant energy-momentum tensor.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (31)

  1. M. Fierz and W. Pauli, Proc. R. Soc. A 173, 211 (1939).
  2. E. Bessel-Hagen, Math. Ann. 84, 258 (1921).
  3. S. Deser and M. Henneaux, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 10, 991 (1995).
  4. G. Magnano and L. M. Sokolowski, Classical Quantum Gravity 19, 223 (2002).
  5. T. Padmanabhan, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 17, 367 (2008).
  6. C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973), Sec. 35.7.
  7. R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984), Sec. 4.4.
  8. G. Barnich, F. Brandt, and M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 174, 57 (1995).
  9. G. Barnich, F. Brandt, and M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 174, 93 (1995).
  10. G. Barnich, F. Brandt, and M. Henneaux, Phys. Rep. 338, 439 (2000).
  11. L. B. Taylor and M. R. Baker, Phys. Scr. 99, 035258 (2024).
  12. D. Hilbert, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, Math.-Phys. Kl. 395 (1915).
  13. F. J. Belinfante, Physica (Amsterdam) 7, 449 (1940).
  14. L. Rosenfeld, Mém. Acad. R. Belg. Cl. Sci. 18, 1 (1940).
  15. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975).
  16. M. R. Baker, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 095007 (2021).
  17. M. R. Baker, N. Kiriushcheva, and S. Kuzmin, Nucl. Phys. B962, 115240 (2021).
  18. M. R. Baker, N. Linnemann, and C. Smeenk, in The Philosophy and Physics of Noether’s Theorems, edited by J. Read and N. J. Teh (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2022).
  19. N. Linnemann, C. Smeenk, and M. R. Baker, Philos. Sci. 90, 1363 (2023).
  20. M. R. Baker and S. Kuzmin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28, 1950092 (2019).
  21. L. P. S. Singh and C. R. Hagen, Phys. Rev. D 9, 898 (1974).
  22. L. M. Butcher, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, Phys. Rev. D 82, 104040 (2010).
  23. L. M. Butcher, A. N. Lasenby, and M. P. Hobson, Phys. Rev. D 86, 084012 (2012).
  24. L. M. Butcher, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, Phys. Rev. D 86, 084013 (2012).
  25. W. E. V. Barker, A. N. Lasenby, M. P. Hobson, and W. J. Handley, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 60, 052504 (2019).
  26. C. Møller, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 12, 118 (1961).
  27. G. Z. Tóth, Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 075003 (2022).
  28. M. P. Hobson, A. N. Lasenby, and W. E. V. Barker, Phys. Rev. D 109, 024022 (2024).
  29. F. Faria, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 217.
  30. K. Hinterbichler, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 671 (2012).
  31. C. Fronsdal, Phys. Rev. D 18, 3624 (1978).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation