- Open Access
Bessel-Hagen currents for the Fierz-Pauli action
Phys. Rev. D 114, 024033 – Published 14 July, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bkn5-q5tv
Abstract
For electromagnetism in Minkowski spacetime, the Bessel-Hagen method gives a particularly direct Noetherian derivation of the standard gauge-invariant energy-momentum tensor. The key step is to supplement the form variation generated by an infinitesimal coordinate transformation with a compensating electromagnetic gauge transformation. In this paper we ask whether the same idea can be applied to the massless spin-2 field described by the Fierz-Pauli action. We first prove that no nonzero local tensor quadratic in first derivatives of the symmetric field can be strictly invariant under the spin-2 gauge transformation ; the direct electromagnetic analogue of the Bessel-Hagen construction therefore cannot exist. Once the inexact nature of the Fierz-Pauli gauge symmetry is treated correctly, however, the Bessel-Hagen construction does produce a gauge-invariant equivalence class of Noether currents. Changing the compensating spin-2 gauge parameter changes the current only by terms proportional to the Fierz-Pauli field equations; performing an independent spin-2 gauge transformation on changes the current only by a trivial current given by the divergence of an antisymmetric superpotential plus field-equation terms. This provides the natural spin-2 analogue of Bessel-Hagen’s electromagnetic construction, but only in the quotient space of conserved currents, and not as a preferred local gauge-invariant energy-momentum tensor.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (31)
- M. Fierz and W. Pauli, Proc. R. Soc. A 173, 211 (1939).
- E. Bessel-Hagen, Math. Ann. 84, 258 (1921).
- S. Deser and M. Henneaux, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 10, 991 (1995).
- G. Magnano and L. M. Sokolowski, Classical Quantum Gravity 19, 223 (2002).
- T. Padmanabhan, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 17, 367 (2008).
- C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973), Sec. 35.7.
- R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984), Sec. 4.4.
- G. Barnich, F. Brandt, and M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 174, 57 (1995).
- G. Barnich, F. Brandt, and M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 174, 93 (1995).
- G. Barnich, F. Brandt, and M. Henneaux, Phys. Rep. 338, 439 (2000).
- L. B. Taylor and M. R. Baker, Phys. Scr. 99, 035258 (2024).
- D. Hilbert, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, Math.-Phys. Kl. 395 (1915).
- F. J. Belinfante, Physica (Amsterdam) 7, 449 (1940).
- L. Rosenfeld, Mém. Acad. R. Belg. Cl. Sci. 18, 1 (1940).
- L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975).
- M. R. Baker, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 095007 (2021).
- M. R. Baker, N. Kiriushcheva, and S. Kuzmin, Nucl. Phys. B962, 115240 (2021).
- M. R. Baker, N. Linnemann, and C. Smeenk, in The Philosophy and Physics of Noether’s Theorems, edited by J. Read and N. J. Teh (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2022).
- N. Linnemann, C. Smeenk, and M. R. Baker, Philos. Sci. 90, 1363 (2023).
- M. R. Baker and S. Kuzmin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28, 1950092 (2019).
- L. P. S. Singh and C. R. Hagen, Phys. Rev. D 9, 898 (1974).
- L. M. Butcher, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, Phys. Rev. D 82, 104040 (2010).
- L. M. Butcher, A. N. Lasenby, and M. P. Hobson, Phys. Rev. D 86, 084012 (2012).
- L. M. Butcher, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, Phys. Rev. D 86, 084013 (2012).
- W. E. V. Barker, A. N. Lasenby, M. P. Hobson, and W. J. Handley, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 60, 052504 (2019).
- C. Møller, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 12, 118 (1961).
- G. Z. Tóth, Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 075003 (2022).
- M. P. Hobson, A. N. Lasenby, and W. E. V. Barker, Phys. Rev. D 109, 024022 (2024).
- F. Faria, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 217.
- K. Hinterbichler, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 671 (2012).
- C. Fronsdal, Phys. Rev. D 18, 3624 (1978).