- Letter
- Open Access
Extracting edge modes: Reduction of 3D and 2D gravities
Phys. Rev. D 113, L021901 – Published 2 January, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/bgjv-m11w
Abstract
We investigate the boundary reduction of 3D Einstein gravity and Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity into their respective edge mode theories—namely, the Liouville and Alekseev-Shatashvili, and Schwarzian models. By examining the roles of boundary conditions, canonical transformations, and differing formulations—metric versus Chern-Simons—we clarify how physical degrees of freedom become localized at the boundary and resolve several longstanding ambiguities in the reduction procedure.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (52)
- R. Floreanini and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1873 (1987).
- E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 121, 351 (1989).
- S. Elitzur, G. W. Moore, A. Schwimmer, and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B326, 108 (1989).
These edge modes have played a key role in understanding various condensed-matter properties, such as the quantum Hall effect [5, 6].
- X. G. Wen, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 05, 39 (1991).
- X.-G. Wen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 06, 1711 (1992).
- G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B 220, 422 (1989).
- A. S. Arvanitakis, L. T. Cole, O. Hulik, A. Sevrin, and D. C. Thompson, Phys. Rev. D 107, 126024 (2023).
- C. Y.-R. Chen, E. Joung, K. Mkrtchyan, and J. Yoon, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 186.
Our list of references is not complete; this is partly due to our limited knowledge and partly due to space constraints.
- A. P. Balachandran, L. Chandar, and A. Momen, Nucl. Phys. B461, 581 (1996).
See also [13, 14, 15] for the attempts of explaining the entropy of BTZ black hole in terms of the would-be gauge mode.
- S. Carlip, Phys. Rev. D 51, 632 (1995).
- S. Carlip, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 57, 8 (1997).
- S. Carlip, Phys. Rev. D 55, 878 (1997).
- J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 104, 207 (1986).
- O. Coussaert, M. Henneaux, and P. v. Driel, Classical Quantum Gravity 12, 2961 (1995).
- M. Henneaux, L. Maoz, and A. Schwimmer, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 282, 31 (2000).
- M. Rooman and P. Spindel, Nucl. Phys. B594, 329 (2001).
- K. Nguyen, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 218.
- L. Benizri and J. Troost, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 093.
- M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (1998) 023.
- C. Imbimbo, A. Schwimmer, S. Theisen, and S. Yankielowicz, Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 1129 (2000).
- S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin, and K. Skenderis, Commun. Math. Phys. 217, 595 (2001).
- J. Navarro-Salas and P. Navarro, Phys. Lett. B 439, 262 (1998).
- K. Skenderis and S. N. Solodukhin, Phys. Lett. B 472, 316 (2000).
- K. Bautier, F. Englert, M. Rooman, and P. Spindel, Phys. Lett. B 479, 291 (2000).
- T. Nakatsu, H. Umetsu, and N. Yokoi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 102, 867 (1999).
- M. Rooman and P. Spindel, Classical Quantum Gravity 18, 2117 (2001).
- K. Krasnov, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4, 929 (2000).
- K. Krasnov, Classical Quantum Gravity 20, 4015 (2003).
- R. Manvelyan, R. Mkrtchian, and H. J. W. Muller-Kirsten, Phys. Lett. B 509, 143 (2001).
- S. Carlip, Classical Quantum Gravity 22, 3055 (2005).
- J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016).
- A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography 1; 2 (2015), Talks at KITP, April 7, 2015 and May 27, 2015.
- A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 183.
- J. Maldacena, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 12C104 (2016).
- P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, arXiv:1903.11115.
- J. Cotler and K. Jensen, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 079.
- A. Alekseev and S. L. Shatashvili, Nucl. Phys. B323, 719 (1989).
- F. Valach and D. R. Youmans, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 189.
- J. de Boer, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2000) 003.
- I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2004) 075.
- M. Cvetič and I. Papadimitriou, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 008; 01 (2017) 120(E).
- P. Chaturvedi, I. Papadimitriou, W. Song, and B. Yu, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 142.
- I. Papadimitriou, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2007) 075.
- I. Papadimitriou, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2010) 014.
- E. Joung, M.-g. Kim, and Y. Kim, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 092.
Remark that the above procedure breaks the manifest 2D Lorentz symmetry in the intermediate step, but it is also possible to devise an improved procedure which preserve Lorentz symmetry manifestly [8, 50].
- O. Evnin, E. Joung, and K. Mkrtchyan, Phys. Rev. D 109, 066003 (2024).
We used the group decomposition (16) in order to simplify the expressions (17) where we set by the Stueckelberg symmetry. This choice of corresponds to the background metric given by with .
- E. Joung, P. Narayan, and J. Yoon, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 244.