Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

New supersymmetry index for the D1-D5 conformal field theories

Marcel R. R. Hughes1 and Masaki Shigemori1,2

Phys. Rev. D 113, 046022 – Published 26 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/b4p5-hkvv

Abstract

We propose a new supersymmetry index for the D1-D5 conformal field theory (CFT) for T4, relevant to the AdS3/CFT2 correspondence. In a novel formulation of symmetric orbifold CFTs based on the Schur-Weyl duality, we show how this index can be naturally described and its protection is argued based on the detailed nature of exactly marginal operators in these theories. This index is a one-parameter generalization of the standard index and gives more fine-grained information about the structure of microstates than previously available. We demonstrate precise matching of the new index between supergravity and CFT below the black-hole threshold, where the standard index—the modified elliptic genus—is trivial. Above the threshold, we uncover a decomposition of black-hole microstates into distinct sectors, invisible to the modified elliptic genus.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (69)

  1. L. J. Dixon, J. A. Harvey, C. Vafa, and E. Witten, Strings on orbifolds. 2, Nucl. Phys. B274, 285 (1986).
  2. L. J. Dixon, D. Friedan, E. J. Martinec, and S. H. Shenker, The conformal field theory of orbifolds, Nucl. Phys. B282, 13 (1987).
  3. O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, Correlation functions for M(N)/S(N) orbifolds, Commun. Math. Phys. 219, 399 (2001).
  4. A. Pakman, L. Rastelli, and S. S. Razamat, Diagrams for symmetric product orbifolds, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2009) 034.
  5. A. Pakman, L. Rastelli, and S. S. Razamat, Extremal correlators and Hurwitz numbers in symmetric product orbifolds, Phys. Rev. D 80, 086009 (2009).
  6. C. A. Keller, Phase transitions in symmetric orbifold CFTs and universality, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2011) 114.
  7. T. Hartman, C. A. Keller, and B. Stoica, Universal spectrum of 2d conformal field theory in the large c limit, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2014) 118.
  8. A. Belin, S. Bintanja, A. Castro, and W. Knop, Symmetric product orbifold universality and the mirage of an emergent spacetime, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 190.
  9. A. Belin, A. Castro, C. A. Keller, and B. Mühlmann, The holographic landscape of symmetric product orbifolds, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 111.
  10. A. Belin, N. Benjamin, A. Castro, S. M. Harrison, and C. A. Keller, N=2 minimal models: A holographic needle in a symmetric orbifold haystack, SciPost Phys. 8, 084 (2020).
  11. N. Benjamin, S. Bintanja, A. Castro, and J. Hollander, The stranger things of symmetric product orbifold CFTs, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 054.
  12. J. M. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  13. J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, AdS(3) black holes and a stringy exclusion principle, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (1998) 005.
  14. J. de Boer, Six-dimensional supergravity on S**3 x AdS(3) and 2-D conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B548, 139 (1999).
  15. S. Deger, A. Kaya, E. Sezgin, and P. Sundell, Spectrum of D=6, N=4b supergravity on AdS in three-dimensions x S**3, Nucl. Phys. B536, 110 (1998).
  16. F. Larsen, The perturbation spectrum of black holes in N=8 supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 536, 258 (1998).
  17. A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B 379, 99 (1996).
  18. E. Witten, Constraints on supersymmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B202, 253 (1982).
  19. J. de Boer, Large N elliptic genus and AdS/CFT correspondence, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (1999) 017.
  20. J. M. Maldacena, G. W. Moore, and A. Strominger, Counting BPS black holes in toroidal type II string theory, arXiv:hep-th/9903163.
  21. C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes, arXiv:2402.10129.
  22. C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, and H. Zhang, Fortuity in the D1-D5 system, arXiv:2501.05448.
  23. E. Gava and K. S. Narain, Proving the PP wave/CFT(2) duality, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2002) 023.
  24. B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, Lifting of level-1 states in the D1D5 CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 028.
  25. B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, Lifting at higher levels in the D1D5 CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 145.
  26. S. Hampton, S. D. Mathur, and I. G. Zadeh, Lifting of D1-D5-P states, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 075.
  27. B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, Lifting of states in 2-dimensional N=4 supersymmetric CFTs, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 155.
  28. N. Benjamin, C. A. Keller, and I. G. Zadeh, Lifting 1/4-BPS states in AdS3×S3×T4, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 089.
  29. B. Guo, M. R. R. Hughes, S. D. Mathur, and M. Mehta, Universal lifting in the D1-D5 CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 148.
  30. M. R. Gaberdiel, F. Lichtner, and B. Nairz, Anomalous dimensions in the symmetric orbifold, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 084.
  31. R. Dijkgraaf, G. W. Moore, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, Elliptic genera of symmetric products and second quantized strings, Commun. Math. Phys. 185, 197 (1997).
  32. O. Aharony and E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and the center of the gauge group, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (1998) 018.
  33. J. R. David, G. Mandal, and S. R. Wadia, Microscopic formulation of black holes in string theory, Phys. Rep. 369, 549 (2002).
  34. S. G. Avery, Using the D1D5 CFT to Understand Black Holes, Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University, 2010.
  35. The SU(2)1×SU(2)2 symmetry coming from the isometries of the T4 target space are broken by states carrying nontrivial momentum and winding on this torus. We will be solely focusing on the BPS states of the CFT, which are contained in the zero momentum and winding sector, and so use these SU(2) to organize our states.

  36. For the mathematical background for this section, such as the Schur-Weyl duality, Schur functions, and Cauchy identities, see Ref. [37] for the purely bosonic case and Refs. [38, 39, 40] for supersymmetric extensions.

  37. W. Fulton and J. Harris, Representation Theory: A First Course (Springer, New York, 1991).
  38. A. Berele and J. Remmel, Hook flag characters and their combinatorics, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 35, 225 (1985).
  39. E. Moens, Supersymmetric Schur functions and Lie superalgebra representations, Ph.D. thesis, Ghent University, 2007.
  40. A. Berele and A. Regev, Hook young diagrams with applications to combinatorics and to representations of lie superalgebras, Adv. Math. 64, 118 (1987).
  41. For other approaches to symmetric orbifold CFTs based on left-right factorization and the Schur-Weyl duality, see, e.g., Ref. [42].

  42. A. Jevicki and J. Yoon, SN orbifolds and string interactions, J. Phys. A 49, 205401 (2016).
  43. Note that swapping fermionic indices yields an extra minus sign.

  44. This simple form is because V˜ does not involve summation over the strand number. If it did, we would also have to project Eq. (2) onto the subspace in which the left and right strand numbers are the same.

  45. I. Macdonald, Schur functions: Theme and variations, Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire 28, 39 (1992), http://eudml.org/doc/119412.
  46. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/b4p5-hkvv for definitions and properties of characters, Schur functions and super Schur functions that we use throughout this paper. This includes Ref. [46.
  47. Generally, if a vector space V contains b bosonic and f fermionic states, Vλ vanishes unless λb+1f (the (b|f)-hook condition) and so λH(b|f). This is because we cannot antisymmetrize more than b bosonic indices and symmetrize more than f fermionic indices in the tensor TI1In.

  48. Namely, this is not the same as refining the MEG by naively inserting a fugacity for su˜(2)2 in the index’s trace, which would not lead to a protected index.

  49. C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, Violation of S-duality in classical Q-cohomology, arXiv:2510.24008.
  50. M. Shigemori, Superstrata, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 52, 51 (2020).
  51. The mixed NS-R sector that we consider here allows both an easy comparison to the supergraviton spectrum as well as preserving the simplicity of the right-moving characters in the R sector that we took advantage of in Sec. 3.

  52. In version 1 of this paper, the proposed REG was based on sectors of contributions from Young diagrams λH(1|1) with a fixed number of rows. While detailed matching with the supergraviton spectrum was also observed in that case, it is not clear how to prove the protection of that index. We have therefore defined the REG in the present version with respect to the weaker selection rules based on su˜(2)2 representations, whose protection at first order in the deformation is straightforward.

  53. A. Schwimmer and N. Seiberg, Comments on the N=2, N=3, N=4 superconformal algebras in two-dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 184, 191 (1987).
  54. We acknowledge the use of the GAP system for computational discrete algebra [55], which we used for the computation of symmetric group characters.

  55. GAP—Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.14.0, The GAP Group https://www.gap-system.org/ (2024) .
  56. J. L. Cardy, Operator Content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories, Nucl. Phys. B270, 186 (1986).
  57. J. M. Maldacena and L. Susskind, D-branes and fat black holes, Nucl. Phys. B475, 679 (1996).
  58. S. R. Das and S. D. Mathur, Comparing decay rates for black holes and D-branes, Nucl. Phys. B478, 561 (1996).
  59. J. C. Breckenridge, R. C. Myers, A. W. Peet, and C. Vafa, D-branes and spinning black holes, Phys. Lett. B 391, 93 (1997).
  60. For recent developments on the bulk computations of supersymmetry indices, see, e.g., Ref. [61].

  61. A. Cabo-Bizet, D. Cassani, D. Martelli, and S. Murthy, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of supersymmetric AdS5 black holes, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 062.
  62. Y. Chen, H. W. Lin, and S. H. Shenker, BPS chaos, SciPost Phys. 18, 072 (2025).
  63. A. Dabholkar, M. Guica, S. Murthy, and S. Nampuri, No entropy enigmas for N=4 dyons, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2010) 007.
  64. I. Bena, B. D. Chowdhury, J. de Boer, S. El-Showk, and M. Shigemori, Moulting black holes, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 094.
  65. F. Denef and G. W. Moore, Split states, entropy enigmas, holes and halos, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2011) 129.
  66. S. Murthy and M. Rangamani, Strings and near-extremal black holes in theories with large N=4 superconformal symmetry, arXiv:2505.14380.
  67. L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel, and W. Li, A holographic dual for string theory on AdS3×S3×S3×S1, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 111.
  68. L. Eberhardt and I. G. Zadeh, N=(3,3) holography on AdS3×(S3×S3×S1)/Z2, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 143.
  69. M. R. R. Hughes and M. Shigemori, Fortuity and supergravity, arXiv:2505.14888.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation