- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Holomorphic quasimodular bootstrap

Yiwen Pan* and Chenxi Zeng†

  • *Contact author: panyw5@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: zengchx3@mail2.sysu.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 111, L101903 – Published 19 May, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L101903

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a generalization to the holomorphic modular bootstrap approach featuring flavored modular differential equations arising from null states of the algebra. The approach can be applied to rational and the more general quasilisse chiral algebras that arise in the study of four-dimensional superconformal field theories. The transformation property of the flavored equations reveals hidden and universal effective action of the modular group and spectral flow on the null states. As shown in examples, the equations compute the full ordinary and nonordinary spectra both in the untwisted and the twisted sector.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (63)

  1. S. D. Mathur, S. Mukhi, and A. Sen, Differential equations for correlators and characters in arbitrary rational conformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B312, 15 (1989).
  2. S. D. Mathur, S. Mukhi, and A. Sen, On the classification of rational conformal field theories, Phys. Lett. B 213, 303 (1988).
  3. T. Eguchi and H. Ooguri, Differential equations for conformal characters in moduli space, Phys. Lett. B 203, 44 (1988).
  4. A. R. Chandra and S. Mukhi, Towards a classification of two-character rational conformal field theories, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2019) 153.
  5. S. Mukhi, R. Poddar, and P. Singh, Rational CFT with three characters: The quasi-character approach, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 003.
  6. A. Das and N. B. Umasankar, Two- & three-character solutions to MLDEs and Ramanujan-Eisenstein identities for Fricke groups, arXiv:2211.15369.
  7. A. Das, C. N. Gowdigere, and J. Santara, Classifying three-character RCFTs with Wronskian index equalling 0 or 2, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 195.
  8. A. Das, C. N. Gowdigere, and J. Santara, Wronskian indices and rational conformal field theories, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 294.
  9. J.-B. Bae, Z. Duan, K. Lee, S. Lee, and M. Sarkis, Fermionic rational conformal field theories and modular linear differential equations, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 08B104 (2021).
  10. J.-B. Bae, Z. Duan, K. Lee, S. Lee, and M. Sarkis, Bootstrapping fermionic rational CFTs with three characters, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 089.
  11. Z. Duan, K. Lee, S. Lee, and L. Li, On classification of fermionic rational conformal field theories, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 079.
  12. Z. Duan, K. Lee, and K. Sun, Hecke relations, cosets and the classification of 2d RCFTs, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 202.
  13. C. N. Gowdigere, S. Kala, and J. Santara, Classifying three-character RCFTs with Wronskian index equalling 3 or 4, arXiv:2308.01149.
  14. S. Mukhi and B. C. Rayhaun, Classification of unitary RCFTs with two primaries and central charge less than 25, Commun. Math. Phys. 401, 1899 (2023).
  15. A. Das, C. N. Gowdigere, S. Mukhi, and J. Santara, Modular differential equations with movable poles and admissible RCFT characters, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 143.
  16. X.-G. Wen, A theory of 2+1D bosonic topological orders, Natl. Sci. Rev. 3, 68 (2016).
  17. P. Mathieu and D. Ridout, From percolation to logarithmic conformal field theory, Phys. Lett. B 657, 120 (2007).
  18. M. E. Fisher, Yang-lee edge singularity and ϕ3 field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1610 (1978).
  19. P.-Y. Chang, J.-S. You, X. Wen, and S. Ryu, Entanglement spectrum and entropy in topological non-hermitian systems and nonunitary conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033069 (2020).
  20. C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, Infinite chiral symmetry in four dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 336, 1359 (2015).
  21. D. Gang, H. Kim, and S. Stubbs, Three-dimensional topological field theories and nonunitary minimal models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 131601 (2024).
  22. L. Fredrickson, D. Pei, W. Yan, and K. Ye, Argyres-Douglas theories, chiral algebras and wild Hitchin characters, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2018) 150.
  23. P. Shan, D. Xie, and W. Yan, Mirror symmetry for circle compactified 4D N=2 SCFTs, arXiv:2306.15214.
  24. T. Arakawa and K. Kawasetsu, quasilisse vertex algebras and modular linear differential equations, arXiv:1610.05865.
  25. C. Beem and L. Rastelli, Vertex operator algebras, Higgs branches, and modular differential equations, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2018) 114.
  26. J. Kaidi, M. Martone, L. Rastelli, and M. Weaver, Needles in a haystack. An algorithmic approach to the classification of 4d N=2 SCFTs, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 210.
  27. Y. Zhu, Modular invariance of characters of vertex operator algebras, J. Am. Math. Soc. 9, 237 (1996).
  28. M. R. Gaberdiel and C. A. Keller, Modular differential equations and null vectors, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2008) 079.

  29. In math literature, the space of such states is called C2(V). At the level of the quotient V/C2(V), L2N|0⟩=0 and termed “nilpotent.”

  30. y is a fugacity conjugate to the level k of the associated Kac-Moody subalgebra, which is important for studying modular and spectral-flow property. In practice it is often omitted from writing when not discussing these issues.

  31. G. Mason, M. P. Tuite, and A. Zuevsky, Torus n-point functions for R-graded vertex operator superalgebras and continuous fermion orbifolds, Commun. Math. Phys. 283, 305 (2008).
  32. M. Krauel and G. Mason, Jacobi trace functions in the theory of vertex operator algebras, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 09, 273 (2015).
  33. W. Peelaers (unpublished).
  34. M. Abhishek, S. Grover, D. P. Jatkar, and K. Singh, Finding G2 Higgs branch of 4D rank 1 SCFTs, arXiv:2312.00275.

  35. At the moment we do not have a general proof of the equivalence of the two characterizations, except for the DC series and the su(2)k cases.

  36. D. Ridout, (hat)sl(2)(−1/2): A case study, Nucl. Phys. B814, 485 (2009).
  37. T. Creutzig and D. Ridout, Modular data and Verlinde formulae for fractional level WZW models I, Nucl. Phys. B865, 83 (2012).
  38. C. Cordova, D. Gaiotto, and S.-H. Shao, Surface defects and chiral algebras, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 140.
  39. B. Li, H. Li, and W. Yan, Spectral flow, twisted modules and MLDE of quasilisse vertex algebras, arXiv:2304.09681.
  40. M. P. Tuite, The Virasoro algebra and some exceptional lie and finite groups, SIGMA 3, 008 (2007).
  41. M. P. Tuite and H. D. Van, On exceptional vertex operator (super) algebras, arXiv:1401.5229.
  42. M. Abhishek, S. Grover, D. P. Jatkar, and K. Singh, Looking for the G2 Higgs branch of 4D rank 1 SCFTs, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 026.

  43. In this paper we do not consider the intermediate chiral algebras that are studied in [2, 4, 44, 45].

  44. K. Lee, K. Sun, and H. Wang, On intermediate exceptional series, Lett. Math. Phys. 114, 113 (2024).
  45. K. Kawasetsu, The intermediate vertex subalgebras of the lattice vertex operator algebras, Lett. Math. Phys. 104, 157 (2014).
  46. A. M. Cohen and de R Ronald Man, Computational evidence for Deligne’s conjecture regarding exceptional Lie groups, C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. I 322, 427 (1996).
  47. J. A. Minahan and D. Nemeschansky, An N=2 superconformal fixed point with E(6) global symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B482, 142 (1996).
  48. J. A. Minahan and D. Nemeschansky, Superconformal fixed points with E(n) global symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B489, 24 (1997).
  49. C. Cordova and S.-H. Shao, Schur indices, BPS particles, and Argyres-Douglas theories, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 040,
  50. Y. Pan and Y. Wang, Flavored modular differential equations, Phys. Rev. D 108, 085027 (2023).
  51. O. Perse, Vertex operator algebra analogue of embedding of B4 into F4, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 211, 702 (2007).
  52. J. D. Axtell and K.-H. Lee, Vertex operator algebras associated to type G affine Lie algebras, J. Algebra 337, 195 (2010).
  53. O. Perse, A note on representations of some affine vertex algebras of type D, Glas. Mat. 48, 81 (2013).
  54. T. Arakawa and A. Moreau, Joseph ideals and lisse minimal W-algebras, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 17, 397 (2018).
  55. M. Buican and T. Nishinaka, On the superconformal index of Argyres–Douglas theories, J. Phys. A 49, 015401 (2016).
  56. V. Kac and D. Kazhdan, Structure of representations with highest weight of infinite-dimensional lie algebras, Adv. Math. 34, 97 (1979).
  57. F. Malikov, B. Feigin, and D. Fuks, Singular vectors in verma modules over Kac-Moody algebras, Funct. Anal. Appl. 20, 103 (1986).
  58. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L101903 for explicit an example of (un)twisted flavored MLDE and their solutions, and a brief discussion beyond su^(2)k.
  59. D. Adamovic, A realization of certain modules for the N=4 superconformal algebra and the affine Lie algebra A2(1), Transform. Groups 21, 299 (2016).
  60. K. Lee, K. Sun, and H. Wang, On intermediate Lie algebra E7+1/2, Lett. Math. Phys. 114, 13 (2024).

  61. Here the (E7+12)1 is an intermediate vertex operator algebra.

  62. The precise meaning of this coset at the algebra level remains to be explored.

  63. P. Shan, D. Xie, and W. Yan, Modularity for W-algebras and affine Springer fibres, arXiv:2404.00760.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 111, L101903– Published 19 May, 2025
  • Received 11 November 2024
  • Accepted 7 April 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation