Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Smallness of charm-loop effects in B→K(*)ℓℓ at low q2: Light-meson distribution-amplitude analysis

Namit Mahajan*

Dayanand Mishra†

  • *Contact author: nmahajan@prl.res.in, mahajannamit@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: dayanand.mishra@tifr.res.in

Phys. Rev. D 111, L031504 – Published 24 February, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L031504

Abstract

The nonlocal effects originating from the charm quark loops at dilepton invariant masses smaller than the charmonium threshold in B→Kℓℓ are evaluated with light-meson distribution amplitudes. The revised estimates with B-meson distribution amplitude within a light cone sum rule approach yielded results about three orders smaller than the original computation. In view of the importance of these nonfactorizable soft gluon effects, both conceptually and phenomenologically, an independent evaluation is necessary. It is found that to twist-4 accuracy, these soft gluon effects vanish when evaluated employing the kaon distribution amplitude. Similar results hold for B→K*ℓℓ to the leading twist. This eliminates one of the major sources of potential uncertainty which usually makes it difficult for a clear case of new physics, should the data show deviations from the standard model.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (51)

  1. C. Bobeth, G. Hiller, and G. Piranishvili, Angular distributions of B¯→K¯ℓ+ℓ− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2007) 040.
  2. G. Hiller and M. Schmaltz, RK and future b→sℓℓ physics beyond the Standard Model opportunities, Phys. Rev. D 90, 054014 (2014).
  3. F. Kruger, L. M. Sehgal, N. Sinha, and R. Sinha, Angular distribution and CP asymmetries in the decays B¯→K−π+e−e+ and B¯→π−π+e−e+, Phys. Rev. D 61, 114028 (2000); 63, 019901(E) (2001).
  4. W. Altmannshofer, P. Ball, A. Bharucha, A. J. Buras, D. M. Straub, and M. Wick, Symmetries and asymmetries of B→K*μ+μ− decays in the standard model and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 019.
  5. U. Egede, T. Hurth, J. Matias, M. Ramon, and W. Reece, New observables in the decay mode B¯d→K¯*0l+l−, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2008) 032.
  6. J. Matias, F. Mescia, M. Ramon, and J. Virto, Complete anatomy of B¯d−>K¯*0(−>Kπ)l+l− and its angular distribution, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2012) 104.
  7. S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, M. Ramon, and J. Virto, Implications from clean observables for the binned analysis of B−>K*μ+μ− at large recoil, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 048.
  8. C. Bobeth, G. Hiller, and D. van Dyk, The benefits of B¯−>K¯*l+l− decays at low recoil, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2010) 098.
  9. J. Lyon and R. Zwicky, Isospin asymmetries in B→(K*,ρ)γ/l+l− and B→Kl+l− in and beyond the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 88, 094004 (2013).
  10. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the phase difference between short- and long-distance amplitudes in the B+→K+μ+μ− decay, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 161 (2017).
  11. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality in b→sℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 051803 (2023).
  12. CMS Collaboration, Test of lepton flavor universality in B±→ K±μ+μ− and B±→ K±e+e− decays in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 077802 (2024).
  13. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of lepton universality parameters in B+→K+ℓ+ℓ− and B0→K*0ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. D 108, 032002 (2023).
  14. M. Smith (LHCb Collaboration), b→sℓℓ decays at LHCb, in Proceedings of the 58th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories (2024); arXiv:2405.11890.
  15. G. Hiller and F. Kruger, More model-independent analysis of b→s processes, Phys. Rev. D 69, 074020 (2004).
  16. M. Bordone, G. Isidori, and A. Pattori, On the standard model predictions for RK and RK*, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 440 (2016).
  17. D. Mishra and N. Mahajan, Impact of soft photons on B→Kℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. D 103, 056022 (2021).
  18. G. Isidori, S. Nabeebaccus, and R. Zwicky, QED corrections in B¯→K¯ℓ+ℓ− at the double-differential level, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 104.
  19. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
  20. C. Bobeth, M. Misiak, and J. Urban, Photonic penguins at two loops and mt dependence of BR[B→Xsl+l−], Nucl. Phys. B574, 291 (2000).
  21. C. Bobeth, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, and U. Haisch, Complete NNLO QCD analysis of B¯→Xsℓ+ℓ− and higher order electroweak effects, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2004) 071.
  22. M. Misiak and M. Steinhauser, Three loop matching of the dipole operators for b→sγ and b→sg, Nucl. Phys. B683, 277 (2004).
  23. T. Huber, E. Lunghi, M. Misiak, and D. Wyler, Electromagnetic logarithms in B¯→Xsl+l−, Nucl. Phys. B740, 105 (2006).
  24. F. Mahmoudi and Y. Monceaux, Overview of B→K(*)ℓℓ theoretical calculations and uncertainties, Symmetry 16, 1006 (2024).
  25. F. Kruger and L. M. Sehgal, Lepton polarization in the decays b→Xsμ+μ− and B→Xsτ+τ−, Phys. Lett. B 380, 199 (1996).
  26. J. Lyon and R. Zwicky, Resonances gone topsy turvy—the charm of QCD or new physics in b→sℓ+ℓ−?, arXiv:1406.0566.
  27. M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, S. Mishima, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, B→K*ℓ+ℓ− decays at large recoil in the standard model: A theoretical reappraisal, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 116.
  28. S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, Reassessing the discovery potential of the B→K*ℓ+ℓ− decays in the large-recoil region: SM challenges and BSM opportunities, Phys. Rev. D 93, 014028 (2016).
  29. V. G. Chobanova, T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, D. Martinez Santos, and S. Neshatpour, Large hadronic power corrections or new physics in the rare decay B→K*μ+μ−?, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 025.
  30. C. Bobeth, M. Chrzaszcz, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Long-distance effects in B→K*ℓℓ from analyticity, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 451 (2018).
  31. T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, Implications of the new LHCb angular analysis of B→K*μ+μ−: Hadronic effects or new physics?, Phys. Rev. D 102, 055001 (2020).
  32. M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, Lessons from the B0,+→K*0,+μ+μ− angular analyses, Phys. Rev. D 103, 015030 (2021).
  33. M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, Charming penguins and lepton universality violation in b→sℓ+ℓ− decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 64 (2023).
  34. M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, Constraints on lepton universality violation from rare B decays, Phys. Rev. D 107, 055036 (2023).
  35. S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, On B→Vℓℓ at small dilepton invariant mass, power corrections, and new physics, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 043.
  36. U. Egede, S. Nishida, M. Patel, and M.-H. Schune, Electroweak Penguin decays of b-flavored hadrons, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72, 283 (2022).
  37. G. Isidori, Z. Polonsky, and A. Tinari, An explicit estimate of charm rescattering in B0→K0ℓ¯ℓ, arXiv:2405.17551.
  38. A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A. A. Pivovarov, and Y. M. Wang, Charm-loop effect in B→K(*)ℓ+ℓ− and B→K*γ, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2010) 089.
  39. N. Gubernari, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Non-local matrix elements in B(s)→{K(*),ϕ}ℓ+ℓ−, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 088.
  40. A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, and Y. M. Wang, B→Kℓ+ℓ− decay at large hadronic recoil, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2013) 010.
  41. N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Improved theory predictions and global analysis of exclusive b→sμ+μ− processes, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 133.
  42. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Determination of short- and long-distance contributions in B0→K*0μ+μ− decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 052009 (2024).
  43. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Comprehensive analysis of local and nonlocal amplitudes in the B0→K*0μ+μ− decay, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 026.
  44. A. Khodjamirian, B→ππ decay in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B605, 558 (2001).
  45. M. Dimou, J. Lyon, and R. Zwicky, Exclusive chromomagnetism in heavy-to-light FCNCs, Phys. Rev. D 87, 074008 (2013).
  46. B. Grinstein, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, B→Xse+e− in the six quark model, Nucl. Phys. B319, 271 (1989).
  47. M. Misiak, The b→se+e− and b→sγ decays with next-to-leading logarithmic QCD corrections, Nucl. Phys. B393, 23 (1993); B439, 461(E) (1995).
  48. A. J. Buras and M. Munz, Effective Hamiltonian for B→Xse+e− beyond leading logarithms in the NDR and HV schemes, Phys. Rev. D 52, 186 (1995).
  49. P. Ball and R. Zwicky, New results on B→π,K,η decay formfactors from light-cone sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014015 (2005).
  50. V. M. Belyaev, A. Khodjamirian, and R. Ruckl, QCD calculation of the B→π,K form-factors, Z. Phys. C 60, 349 (1993).
  51. P. Ball and R. Zwicky, Bd,s→ρ,ω,K*,ϕ decay form-factors from light-cone sum rules revisited, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014029 (2005).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation