- Letter
- Open Access
Smallness of charm-loop effects in at low : Light-meson distribution-amplitude analysis
Phys. Rev. D 111, L031504 – Published 24 February, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L031504
Abstract
The nonlocal effects originating from the charm quark loops at dilepton invariant masses smaller than the charmonium threshold in are evaluated with light-meson distribution amplitudes. The revised estimates with -meson distribution amplitude within a light cone sum rule approach yielded results about three orders smaller than the original computation. In view of the importance of these nonfactorizable soft gluon effects, both conceptually and phenomenologically, an independent evaluation is necessary. It is found that to twist-4 accuracy, these soft gluon effects vanish when evaluated employing the kaon distribution amplitude. Similar results hold for to the leading twist. This eliminates one of the major sources of potential uncertainty which usually makes it difficult for a clear case of new physics, should the data show deviations from the standard model.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (51)
- C. Bobeth, G. Hiller, and G. Piranishvili, Angular distributions of decays, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2007) 040.
- G. Hiller and M. Schmaltz, and future physics beyond the Standard Model opportunities, Phys. Rev. D 90, 054014 (2014).
- F. Kruger, L. M. Sehgal, N. Sinha, and R. Sinha, Angular distribution and asymmetries in the decays and , Phys. Rev. D 61, 114028 (2000); 63, 019901(E) (2001).
- W. Altmannshofer, P. Ball, A. Bharucha, A. J. Buras, D. M. Straub, and M. Wick, Symmetries and asymmetries of decays in the standard model and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 019.
- U. Egede, T. Hurth, J. Matias, M. Ramon, and W. Reece, New observables in the decay mode , J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2008) 032.
- J. Matias, F. Mescia, M. Ramon, and J. Virto, Complete anatomy of and its angular distribution, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2012) 104.
- S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, M. Ramon, and J. Virto, Implications from clean observables for the binned analysis of at large recoil, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 048.
- C. Bobeth, G. Hiller, and D. van Dyk, The benefits of decays at low recoil, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2010) 098.
- J. Lyon and R. Zwicky, Isospin asymmetries in and in and beyond the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 88, 094004 (2013).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the phase difference between short- and long-distance amplitudes in the decay, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 161 (2017).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality in decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 051803 (2023).
- CMS Collaboration, Test of lepton flavor universality in and decays in proton-proton collisions at , Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 077802 (2024).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of lepton universality parameters in and decays, Phys. Rev. D 108, 032002 (2023).
- M. Smith (LHCb Collaboration), decays at LHCb, in Proceedings of the 58th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories (2024); arXiv:2405.11890.
- G. Hiller and F. Kruger, More model-independent analysis of processes, Phys. Rev. D 69, 074020 (2004).
- M. Bordone, G. Isidori, and A. Pattori, On the standard model predictions for and , Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 440 (2016).
- D. Mishra and N. Mahajan, Impact of soft photons on , Phys. Rev. D 103, 056022 (2021).
- G. Isidori, S. Nabeebaccus, and R. Zwicky, QED corrections in at the double-differential level, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2020) 104.
- G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
- C. Bobeth, M. Misiak, and J. Urban, Photonic penguins at two loops and dependence of , Nucl. Phys. B574, 291 (2000).
- C. Bobeth, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, and U. Haisch, Complete NNLO QCD analysis of and higher order electroweak effects, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2004) 071.
- M. Misiak and M. Steinhauser, Three loop matching of the dipole operators for and , Nucl. Phys. B683, 277 (2004).
- T. Huber, E. Lunghi, M. Misiak, and D. Wyler, Electromagnetic logarithms in , Nucl. Phys. B740, 105 (2006).
- F. Mahmoudi and Y. Monceaux, Overview of theoretical calculations and uncertainties, Symmetry 16, 1006 (2024).
- F. Kruger and L. M. Sehgal, Lepton polarization in the decays and , Phys. Lett. B 380, 199 (1996).
- J. Lyon and R. Zwicky, Resonances gone topsy turvy—the charm of QCD or new physics in ?, arXiv:1406.0566.
- M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, S. Mishima, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, decays at large recoil in the standard model: A theoretical reappraisal, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 116.
- S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, Reassessing the discovery potential of the decays in the large-recoil region: SM challenges and BSM opportunities, Phys. Rev. D 93, 014028 (2016).
- V. G. Chobanova, T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, D. Martinez Santos, and S. Neshatpour, Large hadronic power corrections or new physics in the rare decay ?, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 025.
- C. Bobeth, M. Chrzaszcz, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Long-distance effects in from analyticity, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 451 (2018).
- T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, Implications of the new LHCb angular analysis of : Hadronic effects or new physics?, Phys. Rev. D 102, 055001 (2020).
- M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, Lessons from the angular analyses, Phys. Rev. D 103, 015030 (2021).
- M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, Charming penguins and lepton universality violation in decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 64 (2023).
- M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, Constraints on lepton universality violation from rare decays, Phys. Rev. D 107, 055036 (2023).
- S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, On at small dilepton invariant mass, power corrections, and new physics, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 043.
- U. Egede, S. Nishida, M. Patel, and M.-H. Schune, Electroweak Penguin decays of b-flavored hadrons, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72, 283 (2022).
- G. Isidori, Z. Polonsky, and A. Tinari, An explicit estimate of charm rescattering in , arXiv:2405.17551.
- A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A. A. Pivovarov, and Y. M. Wang, Charm-loop effect in and , J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2010) 089.
- N. Gubernari, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Non-local matrix elements in , J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 088.
- A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, and Y. M. Wang, decay at large hadronic recoil, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2013) 010.
- N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Improved theory predictions and global analysis of exclusive processes, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 133.
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Determination of short- and long-distance contributions in decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 052009 (2024).
- R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Comprehensive analysis of local and nonlocal amplitudes in the decay, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 026.
- A. Khodjamirian, decay in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B605, 558 (2001).
- M. Dimou, J. Lyon, and R. Zwicky, Exclusive chromomagnetism in heavy-to-light FCNCs, Phys. Rev. D 87, 074008 (2013).
- B. Grinstein, M. J. Savage, and M. B. Wise, in the six quark model, Nucl. Phys. B319, 271 (1989).
- M. Misiak, The and decays with next-to-leading logarithmic QCD corrections, Nucl. Phys. B393, 23 (1993); B439, 461(E) (1995).
- A. J. Buras and M. Munz, Effective Hamiltonian for beyond leading logarithms in the NDR and HV schemes, Phys. Rev. D 52, 186 (1995).
- P. Ball and R. Zwicky, New results on decay formfactors from light-cone sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014015 (2005).
- V. M. Belyaev, A. Khodjamirian, and R. Ruckl, QCD calculation of the form-factors, Z. Phys. C 60, 349 (1993).
- P. Ball and R. Zwicky, decay form-factors from light-cone sum rules revisited, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014029 (2005).