Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Ordering multiple soft gluon emissions using SCET with Glauber operators

Jeffrey Forshaw, Jack Holguin, and Aditya Pathak

  • University of Manchester, School of Physics and Astronomy, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom

Phys. Rev. D 104, L091501 – Published 29 November, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L091501

Abstract

In QCD, the amplitude for multiple soft gluon emissions has been shown to exhibit a form of coherence, wherein one-loop corrections are rendered IR finite by the transverse momentum of the real emissions. Using a sequence of soft-collinear effective theories (SCET) with Glauber operators, we present a compact and elegant derivation of this property. Our derivation highlights an important role played by the Lipatov vertex. The EFT approach provides increased physical intuition and, for the first time, a clear road map for how this result can be extended to higher loop orders.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (15)

  1. R. Ángeles Martínez, J. R. Forshaw, and M. H. Seymour, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 212003 (2016).
  2. R. Ángeles-Martínez, J. R. Forshaw, and M. H. Seymour, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 091.
  3. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, and M. E. Luke, Phys. Rev. D 63, 014006 (2000).
  4. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 63, 114020 (2001).
  5. C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 65, 054022 (2002).
  6. C. W. Bauer and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Lett. B 516, 134 (2001).
  7. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, I. Z. Rothstein, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 66, 014017 (2002).
  8. I. Z. Rothstein and I. W. Stewart, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 025.
  9. A. Pathak, arXiv:2108.13440.
  10. A. Bassetto, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Marchesini, Phys. Rep. 100, 201 (1983).
  11. Z. Bern, V. Del Duca, W. B. Kilgore, and C. R. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D 60, 116001 (1999).
  12. S. Catani and M. Grazzini, Nucl. Phys. B591, 435 (2000).
  13. C. Duhr and T. Gehrmann, Phys. Lett. B 727, 452 (2013).
  14. Y. Li and H. X. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 080.
  15. I. Feige and M. D. Schwartz, Phys. Rev. D 90, 105020 (2014).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation