Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quantum contribution to domain wall tension from spectral methods

N. Graham1 and H. Weigel2

Phys. Rev. D 112, 045003 – Published 5 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/9v1m-rwjb

Abstract

In field theory, domain walls are constructed by embedding localized field configurations varying in one space dimension, such as the ϕ4 kink, in two or three space dimensions. At the classical level, the kink mass straightforwardly turns into the energy per unit length or area, known as the domain wall tension. The quantum contribution to the tension is more difficult to compute, because the quantum fluctuations about the domain wall in the additional coordinates must be included. We show that spectral methods, making use of scattering data for the interaction of quantum fluctuations with the domain wall background, are an efficient way to compute the leading quantum correction to the domain wall tension. In particular we demonstrate that within this approach it is straightforward to pass from one renormalization scheme to another.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (26)

  1. R. Rajaraman, Solitons and Instantons (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1982).
  2. Ya. B. Zeldovich, I. Yu. Kobzarev, and L. B. Okun, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 67, 3 (1974) [Sov. Phys. JETP 40, 1 (1974)].
  3. T. W. B. Kibble, J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976).
  4. K. Aizu, Phys. Rev. B 2, 754 (1970).
  5. G. F. Nataf, M. Guennou, J. M. Gregg, D. Meier, J. Hlinka, E. K. H. Salje, and J. Kreisel, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 634 (2020).
  6. M. M. Salomaa and G. E. Volovik, Phys. Rev. B 37, 9298 (1988).
  7. D. Tong, arXiv:hep-th/0509216.
  8. A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rep. 121, 263 (1985).
  9. R. F, Dashen, B. Hasslacher, and A. Neveu, Phys. Rev. D 10, 4130 (1974).
  10. A. Rebhan, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, and R. Wimmer, New J. Phys. 4, 31 (2002).
  11. J. Evslin, H. Liu, and B. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 639 (2025).
  12. N. Graham, M. Quandt, and H. Weigel, Spectral Methods in Quantum Field Theory, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 777 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009).
  13. N. Graham and H. Weigel, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37, 2241004 (2022).
  14. N. Graham, R. L. Jaffe, M. Quandt, and H. Weigel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 131601 (2001).
  15. J. S. Faulkner, J. Phys. C 10, 4661 (1977).
  16. N. Graham, R. L. Jaffe, M. Quandt, and H. Weigel, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 293, 240 (2001).
  17. R. D. Puff, Phys. Rev. A 11, 154 (1975).
  18. R. G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles (Springer, New York, 1982).
  19. M. Bordag, J. Phys. A 28, 755 (1995).
  20. S. Jaimungal, G. W. Semenoff, and K. Zarembo, JETP Lett. 69, 509 (1999).
  21. N. Graham, R. L. Jaffe, V. Khemani, M. Quandt, M. Scandurra, and H. Weigel, Nucl. Phys. B645, 49 (2002).
  22. H. J. de Vega, Nucl. Phys. B115, 411 (1976).
  23. G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B153, 365 (1979).
  24. G. H. Derrick, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 5, 1252 (1964).
  25. N. Graham and K. D. Olum, Phys. Rev. D 67, 085014 (2003); 69, 109901 (2004).
  26. J. Evslin and H. Liu, arXiv:2505.21856.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation