Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Next-to-leading order corrections to radiative pion pair production via dispersion relations

Carlo M. Carloni Calame1,*, Marco Ghilardi2,1,†, Andrea Gurgone3,‡, Guido Montagna2,1,§, Mauro Moretti4,5,∥, Oreste Nicrosini1,¶, Fulvio Piccinini1,6,**, and Francesco P. Ucci2,1,††

  • *Contact author: carlo.carloni.calame@pv.infn.it
  • †Contact author: marco.ghilardi01@universitadipavia.it
  • ‡Contact author: andrea.gurgone@irb.hr
  • §Contact author: guido.montagna@unipv.it
  • ∥Contact author: mauro.moretti@fe.infn.it
  • Contact author: oreste.nicrosini@pv.infn.it
  • **Contact author: fulvio.piccinini@pv.infn.it
  • ††Contact author: francesco.ucci@pv.infn.it

Phys. Rev. D 114, 076022 – Published 21 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/8zd9-sytq

Abstract

We compute the next-to-leading order corrections to the radiative return process e+e−→π+π−γ using a dispersive representation of the pion form factor for the calculation of loop integrals. We compare our results with those of the factorized scalar QED approach, as well as with previous predictions obtained by us in the generalized vector meson dominance model. We show the numerical impact of the structure-dependent corrections on various observables of interest for radiative return experiments at flavor factories. Following recent input from the literature, we include in our calculation also corrections due to neutral pseudoscalar poles, and we provide a first estimate of such contributions. We also investigate additional mechanisms contributing to final-state radiation at center-of-mass energies around the ϕ-meson resonance, such as radiative ϕ decays, presenting numerical results that are relevant for the KLOE experiment. These novel features are implemented in the Monte Carlo event generator babayaga@nlo, which can now be used to evaluate the impact of the modeling of pion-photon interaction in radiative return measurements.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (93)

  1. F. Jegerlehner, The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Springer Tracts Mod. Phys. 274, 1 (2017).
  2. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, and P. Stoffer, Two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 006.
  3. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, g−2 of charged leptons, α(MZ2), and the hyperfine splitting of muonium, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014029 (2020).
  4. M. Benayoun, L. Delbuono, and F. Jegerlehner, BHLS2, a new breaking of the HLS model and its phenomenology, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 81 (2020); 80, 244(E) (2020).
  5. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to α(mZ2), Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 241 (2020); 80, 410(E) (2020).
  6. T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model, Phys. Rep. 887, 1 (2020).
  7. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, T. Teubner, and A. Wright, Muon g-2: Blinding for data-driven hadronic vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev. D 111, L011901 (2025).
  8. R. Aliberti et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model: An update, Phys. Rep. 1143, 1 (2025).
  9. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, T. Teubner, and A. Wright, Muon g−2: correlation-induced uncertainties in precision data combinations, arXiv:2604.25004.
  10. F. V. Ignatov et al. (CMD-3 Collaboration), Measurement of the e+e−→π+π− cross section from threshold to 1.2 GeV with the CMD-3 detector, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112002 (2024).
  11. F. V. Ignatov et al. (CMD-3 Collaboration), Measurement of the pion form factor with CMD-3 detector and its implication to the hadronic contribution to muon (g−2), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 231903 (2024).
  12. M. N. Achasov et al., Update of the e+e−→π+π− cross-section measured by SND detector in the energy region 400  MeV<s<1000  MeV, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 103, 380 (2006).
  13. M. N. Achasov et al. (SND Collaboration), Measurement of the e+e−→π+π− process cross section with the SND detector at the VEPP-2000 collider in the energy region 0.525<s<0.883  GeV, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2020) 113.
  14. R. R. Akhmetshin et al. (CMD-2 Collaboration), Measurement of e+e−→π+π− cross-section with CMD-2 around ρ meson, Phys. Lett. B 527, 161 (2002).
  15. V. M. Aulchenko et al. (CMD-2 Collaboration), Measurement of the pion form-factor in the range 1.04-GeV to 1.38-GeV with the CMD-2 detector, JETP Lett. 82, 743 (2005).
  16. R. R. Akhmetshin et al. (CMD-2 Collaboration), High-statistics measurement of the pion form factor in the rho-meson energy range with the CMD-2 detector, Phys. Lett. B 648, 28 (2007).
  17. D. Bisello et al., The pion electromagnetic form factor in the time-like energy range 1.35≤s≤2.4  GeV, Phys. Lett. B 220, 321 (1989).
  18. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Precise measurement of the e+e−→π+π−(γ) cross section with the initial-state radiation method at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 86, 032013 (2012).
  19. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Measurement of the e+e−→π+π− cross section between 600 and 900 MeV using initial state radiation, Phys. Lett. B 753, 629 (2016); 812, 135982(E) (2021).
  20. A. Aloisio et al. (KLOE Collaboration), Measurement of σ(e+e−→π+π−γ) and extraction of σ(e+e−→π+π−) below 1-GeV with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 606, 12 (2005).
  21. F. Ambrosino et al. (KLOE Collaboration), Measurement of σ(e+e−→π+π−γ(γ)) and the dipion contribution to the muon anomaly with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 670, 285 (2009).
  22. F. Ambrosino et al. (KLOE Collaboration), Measurement of σ(e+e−→π+π−) from threshold to 0.85  GeV2 using initial state radiation with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 700, 102 (2011).
  23. D. Babusci et al. (KLOE Collaboration), Precision measurement of σ(e+e−→π+π−γ)/σ(e+e−→μ+μ−γ) and determination of the π+π− contribution to the muon anomaly with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 720, 336 (2013).
  24. A. Anastasi et al. (KLOE-2 Collaboration), Measurement of the running of the fine structure constant below 1 GeV with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 767, 485 (2017).
  25. A. Anastasi et al. (KLOE-2 Collaboration), Combination of KLOE σ(e+e−→π+π−γ(γ)) measurements and determination of aμπ+π− in the energy range 0.10<s<0.95  GeV2, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2017) 173.
  26. D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 127 ppb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 101802 (2025).
  27. A. Kupich, Recent results from the SND experiment at the VEPP-2000 collider, 14th Edition of the International Workshop on e+e- Collisions from Phi to Psi, Pisa, Italy (2026), slides available online.
  28. Q. Liu, e+e→π+π−(γ) measurement at Belle II, in Talk at the Muon g - 2 Theory Initiative Workshop, Orsay, France (2025), slides available online.
  29. L. Cotrozzi, Updates from the KLOE e+e→π+π−γ analysis, in Talk at the Muon g - 2 Theory Initiative Workshop, Orsay, France (2025), slides available online.
  30. A. Denig, Status of R measurements at low-energy e+e− colliders, in Talk at the Muon g - 2 Theory Initiative Workshop, Orsay, France (2025), slides available online.
  31. Z. Zhang, Review of hadronic vacuum polarization calculations via e+e− measurements, in LP2025 Proceedings (2026), arXiv:2601.11966.
  32. L. Polat, New precise measurement of the e+e−→π+π−(γ) cross section with BABAR, arXiv:2601.16587.
  33. R. Aliberti et al., Radiative corrections and Monte Carlo tools for low-energy hadronic cross sections in e+e− collisions, SciPost Phys. Commun. Rep. 9 (2025).
  34. P. Banerjee, T. Engel, A. Signer, and Y. Ulrich, QED at NNLO with mcmule, SciPost Phys. 9, 027 (2020).
  35. E. Budassi, C. M. Carloni Calame, M. Ghilardi, A. Gurgone, G. Montagna, M. Moretti, O. Nicrosini, F. Piccinini, and F. P. Ucci, Pion pair production in e+e− annihilation at next-to-leading order matched to Parton Shower, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 196.
  36. E. Budassi, C. M. Carloni Calame, M. Ghilardi, A. Gurgone, G. Montagna, M. Moretti, O. Nicrosini, F. Piccinini, and F. P. Ucci, Radiative return at NLOPS accuracy, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2026) 221.
  37. E. Bothmann et al. (Sherpa Collaboration), Event generation with Sherpa 3, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 156.
  38. A. Price and F. Krauss, Toward a fully automated differential NNLOEW generator for lepton colliders, Phys. Rev. D 113, 073008 (2026).
  39. F. Ignatov and R. N. Lee, Charge asymmetry in e+e−→π+π− process, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137283 (2022).
  40. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, J. Monnard, and J. R. de Elvira, Radiative corrections to the forward-backward asymmetry in e+e−→π+π−, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 295; 09 (2024) 177(E).
  41. A. Gurgone, High-precision theoretical predictions for particle physics at the intensity frontier, Ph.D. thesis, Pavia U., 2025.
  42. Y. Fang, S. Kollatzsch, M. Rocco, A. Signer, Y. Ulrich, and M. Zoller, Disperon QED, SciPost Phys. 20, 116 (2026).
  43. G. Colangelo, M. Cottini, M. Hoferichter, and S. Holz, Radiative corrections to τ→ππντ, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 181.
  44. J. Monnard, Radiative corrections for the two-pion contribution to the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g-2, Ph.D. thesis, Bern U., 2021.
  45. F. V. Flores-Baez, G. L. Castro, and G. Toledo, Beyond scalar QED radiative corrections: The ρ±−ρ0 width difference, final state radiation corrections, and their impact on ΔaμHVP,LO[τ], Phys. Rev. D 113, 093002 (2026).
  46. G. Rodrigo, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, M. Guilleaume, and J. H. Kuhn, NLO QED corrections to ISR in e+e− annihilation and the measurement of σ(e+e−→hadrons) using tagged photons, Eur. Phys. J. C 22, 81 (2001).
  47. G. Rodrigo, H. Czyz, J. H. Kuhn, and M. Szopa, Radiative return at NLO and the measurement of the hadronic cross-section in electron positron annihilation, Eur. Phys. J. C 24, 71 (2002).
  48. J. H. Kuhn and G. Rodrigo, The radiative return at small angles: virtual corrections, Eur. Phys. J. C 25, 215 (2002).
  49. H. Czyz, A. Grzelinska, J. H. Kuhn, and G. Rodrigo, The radiative return at ϕ and B factories: Small angle photon emission at next-to-leading order, Eur. Phys. J. C 27, 563 (2003).
  50. H. Czyz, A. Grzelinska, J. H. Kuhn, and G. Rodrigo, The radiative return at ϕ and B factories: FSR at next-to-leading order, Eur. Phys. J. C 33, 333 (2004).
  51. F. Campanario, H. Czyż, J. Gluza, T. Jeliński, G. Rodrigo, S. Tracz, and D. Zhuridov, Standard model radiative corrections in the pion form factor measurements do not explain the aμ anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 100, 076004 (2019).
  52. S. J. Tracz, Radiative corrections to hadrons-photons interactions, Ph.D. thesis, Silesia U., 2018.
  53. P. Petit Rosàs, O. Shekhovtsova, and W. J. Torres Bobadilla, Radiative return meets GVMD, Phys. Lett. B 881, 140864 (2026).
  54. C. M. Carloni Calame, M. Ghilardi, A. Gurgone, G. Montagna, M. Moretti, O. Nicrosini, F. Piccinini, and F. P. Ucci, Structure-dependent radiative corrections to e+e−→π+π−γ in the GVMD approach, Phys. Lett. B 879, 140666 (2026).
  55. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura, and P. Stoffer, Dispersive approach to hadronic light-by-light scattering, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2014) 091.
  56. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura, and P. Stoffer, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: Theoretical foundations, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 074.
  57. For the subprocess γ*γ*→π+π− entering the calculation of e+e−→π+π− and of the Hadronic Light by Light (HLbL) contribution to aμ, FsQED is equivalent to isolate the charged-pion pole [40, 56].

  58. A. B. Arbuzov, V. A. Astakhov, A. V. Fedorov, G. V. Fedotovich, E. A. Kuraev, and N. P. Merenkov, Radiative corrections for pion and kaon production at e+e− colliders of energies below 2-GeV, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (1997) 006.
  59. G. Balossini, C. M. Carloni Calame, G. Montagna, O. Nicrosini, and F. Piccinini, Matching perturbative and parton shower corrections to Bhabha process at flavour factories, Nucl. Phys. B758, 227 (2006).
  60. G. Balossini, C. Bignamini, C. M. C. Calame, G. Montagna, O. Nicrosini, and F. Piccinini, Photon pair production at flavour factories with per mille accuracy, Phys. Lett. B 663, 209 (2008).
  61. After the submission of this work, an independent calculation of structure-dependent corrections to radiative pion-pair production using a dispersive representation of the pion form factor appeared in [62].

  62. Y. Fang, S. Kollatzsch, A. Signer, and M. Zoller, Radiative pion-pair production in disperon QED, arXiv:2609.00912.
  63. M. Hoferichter, Thoughts on rescattering corrections, in Talk at the Workshop on Radiative Corrections and Monte Carlo Simulations at Electron–Positron Colliders, Turin, Italy (2026), slides available online.
  64. M. Hoferichter, Towards mixed initial- and final-state corrections to e+e−→π+π−γ beyond scalar QED (unpublished).
  65. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, feynrules 2.0—a complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  66. T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999).
  67. T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with feynarts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140, 418 (2001).
  68. T. Hahn, Feynman diagram calculations with feynarts, FormCalc, and looptools, Proc. Sci. ACAT2010 (2010) 078 [arXiv:1006.2231].
  69. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, New developments in feyncalc 9.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 207, 432 (2016).
  70. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, feyncalc 9.3: New features and improvements, Comput. Phys. Commun. 256, 107478 (2020).
  71. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, feyncalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?, Comput. Phys. Commun. 306, 109357 (2025).
  72. A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and L. Hofer, collier—A Fortran-library for one-loop integrals, Proc. Sci. LL2014 (2014) 071 [arXiv:1407.0087].
  73. C. M. Carloni Calame, M. Ghilardi, A. Gurgone, G. Montagna, M. Moretti, O. Nicrosini, F. Piccinini, and F. P. Ucci, babayaga@nlo code (2026), available at https://github.com/cm-cc/BabaYagaNLO.
  74. M. Hoferichter, Rescattering corrections to the pion Compton scattering, in Talk at the RadioMonteCarloLow 2 Working Group Meeting, Liverpool, UK (2025), slides available online.
  75. E. Kaziukenas, Dispersive definition of γ*γ*γ→π+π− for muon g−2 applications, in Talk at the RadioMonteCarloLow 2 Working Group Meeting, Liverpool, UK (2025), slides available online.
  76. E. Lymperiadou, Dispersive description of new subprocesses for tensor-meson contribution to muon g−2, 14th edition of the International Workshop on e+e- collisions from Phi to Psi, Pisa, Italy (2026), slides available online.
  77. T. Diakonidis, J. Fleischer, J. Gluza, K. Kajda, T. Riemann, and J. B. Tausk, A complete reduction of one-loop tensor 5 and 6-point integrals, Phys. Rev. D 80, 036003 (2009).
  78. F. Klingl, N. Kaiser, and W. Weise, Effective Lagrangian approach to vector mesons, their structure and decays, Z. Phys. A 356, 193 (1996).
  79. M. Knecht and A. Nyffeler, Hadronic light by light corrections to the muon g-2: The pion pole contribution, Phys. Rev. D 65, 073034 (2002).
  80. M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, and M. Zanke, Radiative resonance couplings in γπ→ππ, Phys. Rev. D 96, 114016 (2017).
  81. M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, B. Kubis, S. Leupold, and S. P. Schneider, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: Pion pole, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 141.
  82. S. Holz, M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, and B. Kubis, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: η and η′ poles, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2024) 147.
  83. M. Hoferichter, J. Ruiz de Elvira, B. Kubis, and U.-G. Meißner, Nucleon resonance parameters from Roy–Steiner equations, Phys. Lett. B 853, 138698 (2024).
  84. N. N. Achasov and V. V. Gubin, Interference in the reaction e+e−→γπ+π− and the final state interaction, Phys. Rev. D 57, 1987 (1998).
  85. S. Dubinsky, A. Korchin, N. Merenkov, G. Pancheri, and O. Shekhovtsova, Final-state radiation in electron-positron annihilation into a pion pair, Eur. Phys. J. C 40, 41 (2005).
  86. H. Czyz, A. Grzelinska, and J. H. Kuhn, Charge asymmetry and radiative phi decays, Phys. Lett. B 611, 116 (2005).
  87. F. Ambrosino et al. (KLOE Collaboration), Study of the decay ϕ→f0(980)γ→π+π−γ with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett. B 634, 148 (2006).
  88. N. N. Achasov and A. V. Kiselev, Properties of the light scalar mesons face the experimental data on the ϕ→π0π0γ decay and the ππ scattering, Phys. Rev. D 73, 054029 (2006); 74, 059902(E) (2006).
  89. G. Isidori, L. Maiani, M. Nicolaci, and S. Pacetti, The e+e−→P1P2γ processes close to the Phi peak: Toward a model-independent analysis, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 049.
  90. G. Pancheri, O. Shekhovtsova, and G. Venanzoni, Final state radiation and a possibility to test a pion-photon interaction model near two-pion threshold, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 106, 470 (2008).
  91. A. Gallegos, J. L. Lucio, G. Moreno, and M. Napsuciale, Charge asymmetries in e+e−→π+π−γ at the phi resonance, Phys. Lett. B 693, 467 (2010).
  92. L. Roca and E. Oset, Asymmetry observables in e+e−→π+π−γ in the phi region within a chiral unitary approach, Phys. Rev. D 81, 014010 (2010).
  93. O. Shekhovtsova, G. Venanzoni, and G. Pancheri, FASTERD: A Monte Carlo event generator for the study of final state radiation in the process e+e−→ππγ at DAΦNE, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1206 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation