Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Symmetry theories, Wigner’s function, compactification, and holography

Jonathan J. Heckman1,2,*, Max Hübner3,†, and Chitraang Murdia1,‡

  • *Contact author: jheckman@sas.upenn.edu
  • †Contact author: max-elliot.huebner@physics.uu.se
  • ‡Contact author: murdia@sas.upenn.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, 026003 – Published 6 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/8jhb-b4pd

Abstract

The global symmetry data of a D-dimensional absolute quantum field theory (QFT) can sometimes be packaged in terms of a (D+1)-dimensional bulk system obtained by extending along an interval, with a relative QFTD at one end and suitable gapped or free boundary conditions at the other end. The partition function of the QFTD can then be interpreted as a wave function depending on background fields. However, in some cases, it is not possible or simply cumbersome to fix an absolute form of the symmetry data. Additionally, it is also of interest to consider entangled and mixed states of relative QFTs as well as entangled and mixed states of gapped or free boundary conditions. We argue that Wigner’s quasiprobabilistic function on phase space provides a physical interpretation of the symmetry data in all such situations. We illustrate these considerations in the case of string compactifications and holographic systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (76)

  1. D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized global symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 172.
  2. N. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev, Invariants of three manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups, Inventiones Mathematicae 103, 547 (1991).
  3. V. Turaev and O. Viro, State sum invariants of 3-manifolds and quantum 6j-symbols, Topology 31, 865 (1992).
  4. J. W. Barrett and B. W. Westbury, Invariants of piecewise linear three manifolds, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 348, 3997 (1996).
  5. E. Witten, AdS/CFT correspondence and topological field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (1998) 012.
  6. J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, TFT construction of RCFT correlators 1. Partition functions, Nucl. Phys. B646, 353 (2002).
  7. A. K. Jr. and B. Balsam, Turaev-viro invariants as an extended TQFT, arXiv:1004.1533.
  8. A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, Surface operators in 3d topological field theory and 2d rational conformal field theory, arXiv:1012.0911.
  9. A. Y. Kitaev and L. Kong, Models for gapped boundaries and domain walls, Commun. Math. Phys. 313, 351 (2011).
  10. J. Fuchs, C. Schweigert, and A. Valentino, Bicategories for boundary conditions and for surface defects in 3-d TFT, Commun. Math. Phys. 321, 543 (2013).
  11. D. S. Freed and C. Teleman, Relative quantum field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 326, 459 (2014).
  12. J. J. Heckman and L. Tizzano, 6D fractional quantum hall effect, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 120.
  13. D. S. Freed and C. Teleman, Topological dualities in the Ising model, Geom. Topol. 26, 1907 (2022).
  14. D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, Orbifold groupoids, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 132.
  15. F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. Garcia Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Symmetry TFTs from string theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 402, 895 (2023).
  16. D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, Topological symmetry in quantum field theory, arXiv:2209.07471.
  17. J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, Symmetry TFTs for non-invertible defects, Commun. Math. Phys. 404, 1021 (2023).
  18. F. Baume, J. J. Heckman, M. Hübner, E. Torres, A. P. Turner, and X. Yu, SymTrees and multi-sector QFTs, Phys. Rev. D 109, 106013 (2024).
  19. T. D. Brennan and Z. Sun, A SymTFT for continuous symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 100.
  20. J. J. Heckman, M. Hübner, and C. Murdia, On the holographic dual of a topological symmetry operator, Phys. Rev. D 110, 046007 (2024).
  21. R. Argurio, F. Benini, M. Bertolini, G. Galati, and P. Niro, On the symmetry TFT of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 130.
  22. J. J. Heckman and M. Hübner, Celestial topology, symmetry theories, and evidence for a non-SUSY D3-Brane CFT, Fortschr. Phys. 73, 2400270 (2025).
  23. M. Cvetič, R. Donagi, J. J. Heckman, M. Hübner, and E. Torres, Cornering relative symmetry theories, Phys. Rev. D 111, 085026 (2025).
  24. F. Bonetti, M. Del Zotto, and R. Minasian, SymTFTs for Continuous non-Abelian Symmetries, Phys. Lett. B 871, 140010 (2025).
  25. F. Apruzzi, F. Bedogna, and N. Dondi, SymTh for non-finite symmetries, arXiv:2402.14813.
  26. E. Witten, Geometric langlands from six dimensions, arXiv:0905.2720.
  27. Y. Tachikawa, On the 6d origin of discrete additional data of 4d gauge theories, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2014) 020.
  28. M. Del Zotto, J. J. Heckman, D. S. Park, and T. Rudelius, On the defect group of a 6D SCFT, Lett. Math. Phys. 106, 765 (2016).
  29. J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016).
  30. D. Stanford and E. Witten, JT gravity and the ensembles of random matrix theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 24, 1475 (2020).
  31. P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral, arXiv:1903.11115.
  32. V. Balasubramanian, J. J. Heckman, E. Lipeles, and A. P. Turner, Statistical coupling constants from hidden sector entanglement, Phys. Rev. D 103, 066024 (2021).
  33. D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, Transcending the ensemble: Baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 044.
  34. J. J. Heckman, A. P. Turner, and X. Yu, Disorder averaging and its UV (Dis)Contents, Phys. Rev. D 105, 086021 (2022).
  35. J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman, and A. Maloney, Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 069.
  36. J.-M. Schlenker and E. Witten, No ensemble averaging below the black hole threshold, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 143.
  37. F. Benini, C. Copetti, and L. Di Pietro, Factorization and global symmetries in holography, SciPost Phys. 14, 019 (2023).
  38. E. P. Wigner, On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium, Phys. Rev. 40, 749 (1932).
  39. W. K. Wootters, A wigner-function formulation of finite-state quantum mechanics, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 176, 1 (1987).
  40. A. Bouzouina and S. De Bièvre, Equipartition of the eigenfunctions of quantized ergodic maps on the torus, Commun. Math. Phys. 178, 83 (1996).
  41. P. Bianucci, C. Miquel, J. P. Paz, and M. Saraceno, Discrete wigner functions and the phase space representation of quantum computers, Phys. Lett. A 297, 353 (2001).
  42. J. Preskill, Lecture Notes for Physics 229: Quantum Information and Computation (CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2015), https://books.google.se/books?id=MIv8rQEACAAJ.
  43. M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra Appl. 10, 285 (1975).
  44. E. Witten, Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial, Commun. Math. Phys. 121, 351 (1989).
  45. D. Belov and G. W. Moore, Classification of Abelian spin Chern-Simons theories, arXiv:hep-th/0505235.
  46. A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, Topological boundary conditions in Abelian Chern-Simons theory, Nucl. Phys. B845, 393 (2011).
  47. D. Belov and G. W. Moore, Holographic action for the self-dual field, arXiv:hep-th/0605038.
  48. D. M. Belov and G. W. Moore, Type II actions from 11-dimensional Chern-Simons theories, arXiv:hep-th/0611020.
  49. S. Monnier, The global anomaly of the self-dual field in general backgrounds, Ann. Henri Poincare 17, 1003 (2016).
  50. F. Apruzzi, Higher form symmetries TFT in 6d, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 050.
  51. J. J. Heckman and T. Rudelius, Top down approach to 6D SCFTs, J. Phys. A 52, 093001 (2019).
  52. P. C. Argyres, J. J. Heckman, K. Intriligator, and M. Martone, Snowmass white paper on SCFTs, arXiv:2202.07683.
  53. C. Lawrie, X. Yu, and H. Y. Zhang, Intermediate defect groups, polarization pairs, and noninvertible duality defects, Phys. Rev. D 109, 026005 (2024).
  54. J. J. Heckman, C. Lawrie, L. Lin, H. Y. Zhang, and G. Zoccarato, 6D SCFTs, Center-flavor symmetries, and Stiefel-Whitney compactifications, Phys. Rev. D 106, 066003 (2022).
  55. J. J. Heckman, M. Hübner, E. Torres, and H. Y. Zhang, The branes behind generalized symmetry operators, Fortschr. Phys. 71, 2200180 (2023).
  56. F. Bonetti, M. Del Zotto, and R. Minasian, SymTFTs and non-invertible symmetries of 6d (2,0) SCFTs of type D from M-theory, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 156.
  57. R. Ma and A. Turzillo, Symmetry-protected topological phases of mixed states in the doubled space, PRX Quantum 6, 010348 (2025).
  58. R. Hudson, When is the wigner quasi-probability density non-negative?, Rep. Math. Phys. 6, 249 (1974).
  59. D. Gross, Hudson’s theorem for finite-dimensional quantum systems, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 47, 122107 (2006).
  60. C. T. Lee, Measure of the nonclassicality of nonclassical states, Phys. Rev. A 44, R2775 (1991).
  61. A. Y. Kitaev, Fault tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 303, 2 (2003).
  62. S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, Universal quantum computation with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022316 (2005).
  63. M. Hubner, D. R. Morrison, S. Schafer-Nameki, and Y.-N. Wang, Generalized symmetries in F-theory and the topology of elliptic fibrations, SciPost Phys. 13, 030 (2022).
  64. M. Cvetič, J. J. Heckman, M. Hübner, and E. Torres, 0-Form, 1-Form and 2-Group symmetries via cutting and gluing of orbifolds, Phys. Rev. D 106, 106003 (2022).
  65. I. Garcia Etxebarria and S. S. Hosseini, Some aspects of symmetry descent, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 223.
  66. S. Gukov, P.-S. Hsin, and D. Pei, Generalized global symmetries of T[M] theories. I, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 232.
  67. F. Apruzzi, F. Hassler, J. J. Heckman, and I. V. Melnikov, From 6D SCFTs to dynamic GLSMs, Phys. Rev. D 96, 066015 (2017).
  68. M. Cvetič, J. J. Heckman, M. Hübner, and E. Torres, Generalized symmetries, gravity, and the swampland, Phys. Rev. D 109, 026012 (2024).
  69. E. Witten and S.-T. Yau, Connectedness of the boundary in the AdS/CFT correspondence, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3, 1635 (1999).
  70. J. M. Maldacena and L. Maoz, Wormholes in AdS, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2004) 053.
  71. O. Aharony and E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and the center of the gauge group, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (1998) 018.
  72. J. M. Maldacena, G. W. Moore, and N. Seiberg, D-brane charges in five-brane backgrounds, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2001) 005.
  73. J. J. Heckman, M. Hubner, E. Torres, X. Yu, and H. Y. Zhang, Top down approach to topological duality defects, Phys. Rev. D 108, 046015 (2023).
  74. W. Israel, Thermo-field dynamics of black holes, Phys. Lett. 57A, 107 (1976).
  75. J. M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de-Sitter, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2003) 021.
  76. J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes, Fortschr. Phys. 61, 781 (2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation