Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Consistent chiral limit in the on-shell renormalized quark-meson model with ChPT scaling

Vivek Kumar Tiwari*

  • *Contact author: vivekkrt@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 111, 114014 – Published 17 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7yqv-v754

Abstract

The infrared regularized and the large Nc standard U(3) chiral perturbation theory (ChPT) predicted scaling of the pion, kaon decay constants fπ, fK, and Mη2=mη2+mη′2, has been used in the renormalized 2+1 flavor quark-meson (RQM) model to find a consistent path to the chiral limit as the π and K meson masses approach zero. Using the inputs from the above two prescriptions of the ChPT, the Columbia plots are drawn and compared in the mπ−mK and the light strange quark mass mud−ms planes, free from any ambiguity or heuristic adjustment in the model parameter fixing away from the physical point. The on-shell renormalization of the parameters and consistent treatment of the divergent quark one-loop vacuum fluctuations in the RQM model make the axial UA(1) anomaly significantly stronger, and the light (strange) explicit chiral symmetry breaking strength becomes weaker by a small (relatively large) amount. The first-order chiral transition region in the mπ−mK and μ−mK planes of the Columbia plots generated using the inputs from both versions of the ChPT increases due to the above novel features of the RQM model. Comparing our results (in the presence of the axial UA(1) anomaly) regarding the softening effect of the quark one-loop vacuum fluctuations on the chiral transition, it looks overestimated in a recent functional renormalization group study. The UA(1) symmetry and the SUA(3) chiral symmetry restoration in the chiral limit takes place at the same transition temperature.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (133)

  1. R. D. Pisarski and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 29, 338 (1984).
  2. G. ’t Hooft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 8 (1976).
  3. F. R. Brown, F. P. Butler, H. Chen, N. H. Christ, Z.-h. Dong, W. Schaffer, L. I. Unger, and A. Vaccarino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2491 (1990).
  4. M. Fromm, J. Langelage, S. Lottini, and O. Philipsen, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2012) 042.
  5. H. Saito, S. Ejiri, S. Aoki, K. Kanaya, Y. Nakagawa, H. Ohno, K. Okuno, and T. Umeda, Phys. Rev. D 89, 034507 (2014).
  6. U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, and M. Tissier, Phys. Rev. D 92, 025021 (2015).
  7. C. S. Fischer, J. Luecker, and J. M. Pawlowski, Phys. Rev. D 91, 014024 (2015).
  8. J. Maelger, U. Reinosa, and J. Serreau, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094020 (2018).
  9. S. Borsányi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabó, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2010) 073.
  10. S. Borsanyi, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, A. Jakovac, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2010) 077.
  11. A. Bazavov et al., Phys. Rev. D 85, 054503 (2012).
  12. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, and K. K. Szabo, Phys. Lett. B 730, 99 (2014).
  13. A. Bazavov et al., Phys. Rev. D 90, 094503 (2014).
  14. F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and A. Peikert, Nucl. Phys. B605, 579 (2001).
  15. F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and C. Schmidt, Phys. Lett. B 520, 41 (2001).
  16. F. Karsch, C. R. Allton, S. Ejiri, S. J. Hands, O. Kacz- marek, E. Laermann, and C. Schmidt, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 129, 614 (2004).
  17. P. de Forcrand, S. Kim, and O. Philipsen, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2007 (2007) 178 [arXiv:0711.0262].
  18. L. Varnhorst, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2014 (2015) 193.
  19. X.-Y. Jin, Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, S. Takeda, and A. Ukawa, Phys. Rev. D 91, 014508 (2015).
  20. A. Bazavov, H. T. Ding, P. Hegde, F. Karsch, E. Laer- mann, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, and C. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D 95, 074505 (2017).
  21. X.-Y. Jin, Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, S. Takeda, and A. Ukawa, Phys. Rev. D 96, 034523 (2017).
  22. P. de Forcrand and M. D’Elia, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2016 (2017) 081 [arXiv:1702.00330].
  23. Simon Resch, Fabian Rennecke, and Bernd-Jochen Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 99, 076005 (2019).
  24. L. Dini, P. Hegde, F. Karsch, A. Lahiri, C. Schmidt, and S. Sharma, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034510 (2022).
  25. Y. Zhang, Y. Aoki, S. Hashimoto, I. Kanamori, T. Kaneko, and Y. Nakamura, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2023 (2024) 203 [arXiv:2401.05066].
  26. J. Bernhardt and C.-S. Fischer, Phys. Rev. D 108, 114018 (2023).
  27. S. R. Kousvos and A. Stergiou, SciPost Phys. 15, 075 (2023).
  28. G. Fejos, Phys. Rev. D 105, L071506 (2022).
  29. G. Fejos and T. Hatsuda, Phys. Rev. D 110, 016021 (2024).
  30. A. Lahiri, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2022) 003 [arXiv:2112.08164].
  31. V. Dick, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, S. Mukherjee, and S. Sharma, Phys. Rev. D 91, 094504 (2015).
  32. H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, S. Mukherjee, A. Tomiya, X. D. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 082001 (2021).
  33. O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur, and S. Sharma, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094518 (2021).
  34. A. Bazavov, T. Bhattacharya, M. I. Buchoff, M. Cheng, N. H. Christ, H.-T. Ding et al., Phys. Rev. D 86, 094503 (2012).
  35. T. Bhattacharya, M. I. Buchoff, N. H. Christ, H.-T. Ding, R. Gupta, C. Jung et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 082001 (2014).
  36. O. Kaczmarek, R. Shanker, and S. Sharma, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094051 (2023).
  37. B. B. Brandt, A. Francis, H. B. Meyer, O. Philipsen, D. Robaina, and H. Wittig, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2016) 158.
  38. A. Tomiya, G. Cossu, S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, and J. Noaki, Phys. Rev. D 96, 034509 (2017); 96, 079902(A) (2017).
  39. S. Aoki, Y. Aoki, G. Cossu, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, C. Rohrhofer, and K. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074506 (2021).
  40. S. Aoki, Y. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, C. Rohrhofer, and K. Suzuki, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 023B05 (2022).
  41. R. D. Pisarski and F. Rennecke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 251903 (2024).
  42. Francesco Giaosa, Gyozo Kovacs, Peter Kovacs, R. D. Pisarski, and Fabian Rennecke, Phys. Rev. D 111, 016014 (2025).
  43. H. Meyer-Ortmanns and B. J. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 53, 6586 (1996).
  44. J. T. Lenaghan, D. H. Rischke, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Phys. Rev D 62, 085008 (2000); J. T. Lenaghan and D. H. Rischke, J. Phys. G 26, 431 (2000).
  45. J. T. Lenaghan, Phys. Rev. D 63, 037901 (2001).
  46. D. Roder, J. Ruppert, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 68, 016003 (2003).
  47. A. Jakovac, A. Patkos, Z. Szep, and P. Szepfalusy, Phys. Lett. B 582, 179 (2004).
  48. T. Herpay, A. Patkós, Zs. Szép, and P. Szépfalusy, Phys. Rev. D 71, 125017 (2005).
  49. T. Herpay and Zs. Szép, Phys. Rev. D 74, 025008 (2006).
  50. P. Kovács and Zs. Szép, Phys. Rev. D 75, 025015 (2007).
  51. A. Jakovac and Zs. Szep, Phys. Rev. D 82, 125038 (2010).
  52. G. Marko and Zs. Szep, Phys. Rev. D 82, 065021 (2010).
  53. G. Fejos and A. Patkos, Phys. Rev. D 82, 045011 (2010).
  54. O. Scavenuius, A. Mocsy, I. N. Mishustin, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. C 64, 045202 (2001).
  55. A. Mocsy, I. N. Mishustin, and P. J. Ellis, Phys. Rev. C 70, 015204 (2004).
  56. B.-J. Schaefer and J. Wambach, Nucl. Phys. A757, 479 (2005).
  57. B.-J. Schaefer and J. Wambach, Phys. Rev. D 75, 085015 (2007).
  58. B. J. Schaefer, J. M. Pawlowski, and J. Wambach, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074023 (2007).
  59. E. S. Bowman and J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. C 79, 015202 (2009); J. I. Kapusta and E. S. Bowman, Nucl. Phys. A830, 721C (2009).
  60. B. J. Schaefer and M. Wagner, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62, 381 (2009).
  61. B. J. Schaefer and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014018 (2009).
  62. B. J. Schaefer, M. Wagner, and J. Wambach, arXiv:0909.0289.
  63. B. J. Schaefer, M. Wagner, and J. Wambach, Phys. Rev. D 81, 074013 (2010).
  64. H. Mao, J. Jin, and M. Huang, J. Phys. G 37, 035001 (2010).
  65. U. S. Gupta and V. K. Tiwari, Phys. Rev. D 81, 054019 (2010).
  66. L. Ferroni, V. Koch, and M. B. Pinto, Phys. Rev. C 82, 055205 (2010).
  67. Andreas Zacchi and Jürgen Schaffner-Bielich, Phys. Rev. D 97, 074011 (2018).
  68. Andreas Zacchi and Jürgen Schaffner-Bielich, Phys. Rev. D 100, 123024 (2019).
  69. Pedro Costa, M. C. Ruivo, C. A. de Sousa, and Yu. L. Kalinovsky, AIP Conf. Proc. 775, 173 (2005).
  70. Pedro Costa, M. C. Ruivo, C. A. de Sousa, and Yu. L. Kalinovsky, Phys. Rev. D 71, 116002 (2005).
  71. K. Fukushima, Phys. Rev. D 77, 114028 (2008); 78, 039902(E) (2008).
  72. J. Berges, D.-U. Jungnickel, and C. Wetterich, Phys. Rev. D 59, 034010 (1999).
  73. J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich, Phys. Rep. 363, 223 (2002).
  74. H. Gies and C. Wetterich, Phys. Rev. D 69, 025001 (2004).
  75. J. Braun and H. Gies, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2006) 024.
  76. J. M. Pawlowski, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 322, 2831 (2007).
  77. K. Fukushima, K. Kamikado, and B. Klein, Phys. Rev. D 83, 116005 (2011).
  78. T. K. Herbst, J. M. Pawlowski, and B.-J. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 88, 014007 (2013).
  79. M. Grahl and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 88, 056014 (2013).
  80. M. Mitter and B.-J. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 89, 054027 (2014).
  81. M. Drew and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. C 91, 035802 (2015).
  82. G. Fejos, Phys. Rev. D 92, 036011 (2015).
  83. F. Rennecke, Phys. Rev. D 92, 076012 (2015).
  84. J. Braun, L. Fister, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, Phys. Rev. D 94, 034016 (2016).
  85. G. Fejos and A. Hosaka, Phys. Rev. D 94, 036005 (2016).
  86. Fabian Rennecke and Bernd-Jochen Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 96, 016009 (2017).
  87. M. Drew and W. Weise, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 69 (2017).
  88. R.-A. Tripolt, B.-J. Schaefer, L. von Smekal, and J. Wambach, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034022 (2018).
  89. G. Fejos and A. Hosaka, Phys. Rev. D 98, 036009 (2018).
  90. L. Brandes, N. Kaiser, and W. Weise, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 243 (2021).
  91. G. Fejos and A. Patkos, Phys. Rev. D 105, 096007 (2022).
  92. G. Fejos and A. Patkos, Phys. Rev. D 109, 036035 (2024).
  93. J. R. Pelaez, Phys. Rep. 658, 1 (2016).
  94. V. K. Tiwari, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074002 (2023).
  95. S. K. Rai and V. K. Tiwari, Phys. Rev. D 109, 034025 (2024).
  96. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B250, 465 (1985).
  97. H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. B 374, 163 (1996).
  98. R. Kiaser and H. Leutwyler, Eur. Phys. J. C 17, 623 (2000).
  99. P. Herrera-Siklódy, J. I. Latorre, P. pascual, and J. Taron, Nucl. Phys. B497, 345 (1997).
  100. P. Herrera-Siklódy, J. I. Latorre, P. pascual, and J. Taron, Phys. Lett. B 419, 326 (1998).
  101. R. Escribano, F. S. Ling, and M. H. G. Tytgat, Phys. Rev. D 62, 056004 (2000).
  102. B. Borasoy and S. Wetzel, Phys. Rev. D 63, 074019 (2001).
  103. N. Beisert and B. Borasoy, Eur. Phys. J. A 11, 329 (2001).
  104. N. Beisert and B. Borasoy, Nucl. Phys. A705, 433 (2002).
  105. T. Becher and H. Leutwyler, Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 643 (1999).
  106. V. Skokov, B. Friman, E. Nakano, K. Redlich, and B.-J. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034029 (2010).
  107. R. Khan and L. T. Kyllingstad, AIP Conf. Proc. 1343, 504 (2011).
  108. B.-J. Schaefer and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 85, 034027 (2012).
  109. S. Chatterjee and K. A. Mohan, Phys. Rev. D 85, 074018 (2012).
  110. U. S. Gupta and V. K. Tiwari, Phys. Rev. D 85, 014010 (2012).
  111. V. K. Tiwari, Phys. Rev. D 86, 094032 (2012).
  112. V. K. Tiwari, Phys. Rev. D 88, 074017 (2013).
  113. S. K. Rai and V. K. Tiwari, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 844 (2020).
  114. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Nucl. Phys. B458, 90 (1996).
  115. P. Adhikari, J. O. Andersen, and P. Kneschke, Phys. Rev. D 95, 036017 (2017).
  116. S. Carignano, M. Buballa, and B-J Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 90, 014033 (2014).
  117. S. Carignano, M. Buballa, and W. Elkamhawy, Phys. Rev. D 94, 034023 (2016).
  118. P. Adhikari, J. O. Andersen, and P. Kneschke, Phys. Rev. D 96, 016013 (2017).
  119. P. Adhikari, J. O. Andersen, and P. Kneschke, Phys. Rev. D 98, 074016 (2018).
  120. A. Folkestad and J. O. Andersen, Phys. Rev. D 99, 054006 (2019).
  121. S. K. Rai and V. K. Tiwari, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094010 (2022).
  122. S. K. Rai and V. K. Tiwari, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074014 (2023).
  123. R. Kobes, G. Kunstatter, and A. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2992 (1990); Nucl. Phys. B355, 1 (1991).
  124. A. K. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. D 48, R3967 (1993).
  125. S. Eidelman et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004).
  126. P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2007) 077.
  127. A. Halasz, A. D. Jackson, R. E. Shrock, M. A. Stephanov, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Phys. Rev. D 58, 096007 (1998).
  128. J. M. Pawlowski and F. Rennecke, Phys. Rev. D 90, 076002 (2014).
  129. A. Gomez Nicola, J. Ruiz de Elvira, and R. Torres Andres, Phys. Rev. D 88, 076007 (2013).
  130. A. Gomez Nicola and J. Ruiz de Elvira, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2016) 186.
  131. A. Gomez Nicola and J. Ruiz de Elvira, Phys. Rev. D 97, 074016 (2018).
  132. A. Gomez Nicola and J. Ruiz de Elvira, Phys. Rev. D 98, 014020 (2018).
  133. S. Ferreres-Sole, A. Gomez Nicola, and A. Vioque-Rodriguez, Phys. Rev. D 99, 036018 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation