Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quark number susceptibilities and conserved charge fluctuations in (2+1)-flavor QCD with Möbius domain wall fermions

Jishnu Goswami1, Yasumichi Aoki2, Hidenori Fukaya3, Shoji Hashimoto4,5, Issaku Kanamori2, Takashi Kaneko4,5, Yoshifumi Nakamura2, David Ward3, Yu Zhang1 et al. (JLQCD Collaboration)

Yu Zhang1 (JLQCD Collaboration)

Phys. Rev. D 114, 074516 – Published 29 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7vkn-kb1l

Abstract

We calculate second- and selected fourth-order conserved-charge fluctuations in (2+1)-flavor QCD using Möbius domain-wall fermions (MDWF) along a line of constant physics. Gauge ensembles were generated for two light-to-strange quark-mass ratios, ml/ms=1/10 and 1/27.4, corresponding to heavier-than-physical and physical pion masses, respectively. For ml/ms=1/10, calculations were carried out on lattices with temporal extents Nτ=12 and 16, enabling an assessment of lattice-spacing effects at heavier pion mass. For ml/ms=1/27.4, calculations were performed at Nτ=12, allowing us to study the light-quark-mass dependence down to the physical point. Several second-order conserved-charge fluctuations show qualitative consistency with the QMHRG2020 hadron resonance gas baseline below the pseudocritical region within present uncertainties. Across the crossover region, these observables rise rapidly and tend toward their Stefan-Boltzmann limits. Selected fourth-order cumulants were also computed at the physical pion mass. Although these observables are statistically more demanding, several channels with controlled uncertainties permit a first comparison with hadron resonance gas calculations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (31)

  1. Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, The order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of particle physics, Nature (London) 443, 675 (2006).
  2. M. A. Stephanov, QCD phase diagram and the critical point, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 153, 139 (2004).
  3. R. Bellwied, S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, J. Noronha-Hostler, P. Parotto, A. Pásztor, C. Ratti, and J.  M. Stafford, Off-diagonal correlators of conserved charges from lattice QCD and how to relate them to experiment, Phys. Rev. D 101, 034506 (2020).
  4. D. Bollweg, J. Goswami, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, C. Schmidt, and P. Scior, Second order cumulants of conserved charge fluctuations revisited: Vanishing chemical potentials, Phys. Rev. D 104, 074512 (2021).
  5. A. Bazavov et al., Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials, Phys. Lett. B 795, 15 (2019).
  6. R. C. Brower, H. Neff, and K. Orginos, The Möbius domain wall fermion algorithm, Comput. Phys. Commun. 220, 1 (2017).
  7. JLQCD Collaboration, Large-scale simulations with chiral symmetry, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2013 (2014) 125 [arXiv:1311.6941].
  8. Y. Aoki, S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, I. Kanamori, T. Kaneko et al., 2+1 flavor fine lattice simulation at finite temperature with domain-wall fermions, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2022) 609 [arXiv:2112.11771].
  9. S. Aoki, Y. Aoki, H. Fukaya, J. Goswami, S. Hashimoto, I. Kanamori et al., Thermodynamics with Möbius domain wall fermions near physical point II, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2022 (2023) 176 [arXiv:2303.05884].
  10. JLQCD Collaboration, Quark number susceptibility and conserved charge fluctuation for (2+1)-flavor QCD with Möbius domain wall fermions, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2024 (2025) 168 [arXiv:2501.03509].
  11. S. Hashimoto, S. Aoki, G. Cossu, H. Fukaya, T. Kaneko, J. Noaki et al., Residual mass in five-dimensional fermion formulations, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2013 (2014) 431.
  12. Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG) Collaboration, FLAG review 2021, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 869 (2022).
  13. JLQCD Collaboration, Form factors of B πℓν and a determination of |Vub| with Möbius domain-wall fermions, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054502 (2022).
  14. J. C. R. Bloch and T. Wettig, Domain-wall and overlap fermions at nonzero quark chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D 76, 114511 (2007).
  15. J. Foley, K. Jimmy Juge, A. O’Cais, M. Peardon, S. M. Ryan, and J.-I. Skullerud, Practical all-to-all propagators for lattice QCD, Comput. Phys. Commun. 172, 145 (2005).
  16. QCDSF Collaboration, Disconnected contributions to D-meson semi-leptonic decay form factors, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2011 (2011) 283 [arXiv:1111.4053].
  17. R. V. Gavai and S. Gupta, The critical end point of QCD, Phys. Rev. D 71, 114014 (2005).
  18. A. Hasenfratz, R. Hoffmann, and S. Schaefer, Reweighting towards the chiral limit, Phys. Rev. D 78, 014515 (2008).
  19. Q. Liu, N. H. Christ, and C. Jung, Light quark mass reweighting, Phys. Rev. D 87, 054503 (2013).
  20. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. Szabo, Fluctuations of conserved charges at finite temperature from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2012) 138.
  21. A. Bazavov et al., The chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition, Phys. Rev. D 85, 054503 (2012).
  22. R. Bellwied, S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. Günther, S. D. Katz, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, The QCD phase diagram from analytic continuation, Phys. Lett. B 751, 559 (2015).
  23. HotQCD Collaboration, Fluctuations and correlations of net baryon number, electric charge, and strangeness: A comparison of lattice QCD results with the hadron resonance gas model, Phys. Rev. D 86, 034509 (2012).
  24. J. Goswami, Y. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, I. Kanamori, T. Kaneko, Y. Nakamura, D. Ward, and Y. Zhang, Dataset for “Quark number susceptibilities and conserved charge fluctuations in (2+1)-flavor QCD with Möbius domain wall fermions” (Bielefeld University, 2026), 10.4119/unibi/3020572.
  25. P. Boyle, A. Yamaguchi, G. Cossu, and A. Portelli, Grid: A next generation data parallel C++ QCD library, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2015 (2016) 023 [arXiv:1512.03487].
  26. P. Boyle, Grid: Data parallel c++ mathematical object library, https://github.com/paboyle/Grid.
  27. S. Ueda, S. Aoki, T. Aoyama, K. Kanaya, H. Matsufuru, S. Motoki, Y. Namekawa, H. Nemura, Y. Taniguchi, and N. Ukita, Development of an object oriented lattice QCD code “bridge++”, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 523, 012046 (2014).
  28. T. Aoyama, I. Kanamori, K. Kanaya, H. Matsufuru, and Y. Namekawa, bridge++ 2.0: Benchmark results on supercomputer Fugaku, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2022 (2023) 284 [arXiv:2303.05883].
  29. Lattice QCD code bridge++, http://bridge.kek.jp/Lattice-code/ (2023).
  30. L. Altenkort, D. A. Clarke, J. Goswami, and H. Sandmeyer, Streamlined data analysis in python, in 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (2023), 8, arXiv:2308.06652.
  31. D. A. Clarke et al., analysistoolbox, https://github.com/LatticeQCD/AnalysisToolbox.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation