Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Analyzing the magnitude of two loop corrections to the muon magnetic dipole moment in the mass insertion approximation

Shu-Min Zhao1,2,3,*, Song Gao1,2,3, Xing-Xing Dong1,2,3,4,†, and Ming-Yue Liu1,2,3

  • 1Department of Physics, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
  • 2Hebei Key Laboratory of High-precision Computation and Application of Quantum Field Theory, Baoding, 071002, China
  • 3Hebei Research Center of the Basic Discipline for Computational Physics, Baoding, 071002, China
  • 4Departamento de Fisica and CFTP, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Rovisco Pais 1,1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal

  • *Contact author: zhaosm@mail.nankai.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: dongxx@hbu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 075012 – Published 14 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/7tzg-wk96

Abstract

With the development of muon magnetic dipole moment (MDM) experiments, particularly the high-precision measurements at Fermilab National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), experimental data have become increasingly precise. Up to now, the deviation of muon MDM between the experimental data and the standard model prediction still exists, which may be caused by the new physics contribution. The two loop supersymmetric diagrams can produce important corrections to muon MDM. For many two loop diagrams, we analyze the order of the contribution to select the important two loop diagrams and neglect the tiny one, which is in favor of distinguishing the important two loop diagrams from all the two loop diagrams. In our analysis, we use the mass insertion approximation. There is no rotation matrix during the study and the resulting factors become more intuitive, so the mass insertion method is more suitable for this study of ours.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (31)

  1. T. Aoyama et al., Phys. Rep. 887, 1 (2020).
  2. M. Carena, G. F. Giudice, and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Lett. B 390, 234 (1997).
  3. RBC and UKQCD Collaborations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 022003 (2018); H. Davoudiasl and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 98, 075011 (2018).
  4. K. Hagiwara, A. Keshavarzi, A. D. Martin et al., Nucl. Part. B, Phys. Proc. 287–288, 33 (2017).
  5. A. Czarnecki, W. J. Marciano, and A. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev. D 67, 073006 (2003); 73, 119901(E) (2006); C. Gnendiger, D. Stöckinger, and H. Stöckinger-Kim, 88, 053005 (2013).
  6. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, and P. Stoffer, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 006; M. T. Hansen and A. Patella, 10 (2020) 029.
  7. D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), arXiv:2506.03069.
  8. R. Aliberti, T. Aoyama, E. Balzani et al., arXiv:2505.21476.
  9. CMS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012); ATLAS Collaboration, 716, 1 (2012).
  10. J. Rosiek, Phys. Rev. D 41, 3464(E) (1990).
  11. V. Barger, P. F. Perez, and S. Spinner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 181802 (2009); J. J. Cao, Z. X. Heng, J. M. Yang, Y. Zhang, and J. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 086; P. F. Perez and M. B. Wise, 08 (2011) 068.
  12. S. M. Zhao, T. F. Feng, M. J. Zhang, J.-L. Yang, H.-B. Zhang, and G.-Z. Ning, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 130.
  13. S. Heinemeyer, D. Stockinger, and G. Weiglein, Nucl. Phys. B690, 62 (2004); B699, 103 (2004).
  14. C. Chen and C. Geng, Phys. Lett. B 511, 77 (2001); A. Arhrib and S. Baek, Phys. Rev. D 65, 075002 (2002).
  15. S. M. Zhao, X. X. Dong, L. H. Su, and H.-B. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 823 (2020).
  16. A. Cherchiglia, P. Kneschke, D. Stockinger, and H. Stöckinger-Kim, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2017) 007.
  17. T. F. Feng, L. Sun, and X. Y. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 77, 116008 (2008).
  18. T. F. Feng, L. Sun, and X. Y. Yang, Nucl. Phys. B800, 221 (2008).
  19. T. F. Feng, X. Q. Li, L. Lin, J. Maalampi, and H.-S. Song, Phys. Rev. D 73, 116001 (2006).
  20. S. M. Zhao, L. H. Su, X. X. Dong, T.-T. Wang, and T.-F. Feng, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 101.
  21. H. Fargnoli, C. Gnendiger, S. Pabehr, D. Stöckinger, and H. Stöckinger-Kim, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 070; H. G. Fargnoli, C. Gnendiger, S. Paßehr D. Stöckinger, and H. Stöckinger-Kim, Phys. Lett. B 726, 717 (2013).
  22. P. V. Weitershausen, M. Schafer, H. S. Kim, and D. Stöckinger, Phys. Rev. D 81, 093004 (2010).
  23. D. Stockinger, J. Phys. G 34, R45 (2007).
  24. S. P. Martin and J. D. Wells, Phys. Rev. D 64, 035003 (2001).
  25. M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto, and T. Kitahara, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 075; P. Athron, C. Balázs, D. H. J. Jacob, W. Kotlarski, D. Stöckinger, and H. Stöckinger-Kim, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 080; T. Moroi, Phys. Rev. D 53, 6565 (1996); 56, 4424(E) (1997).
  26. E. Arganda, M. J. Herrero, R. Morales, and A. Szynkman, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2016) 055.
  27. X. X. Dong, S. M. Zhao, J. P. Huo, T.-T. Wang, and T.-F. Feng, Phys. Rev. D 109, 055019 (2024).
  28. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  29. D. J. H. Chung, Phys. Rev. D 97, 125003 (2018).
  30. Y. Takahashi, Nuovo Cimento 6, 371 (1957).
  31. T. F. Feng and X. Y. Yang, Nucl. Phys. B814, 101 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation